uh my starting point when it comes to the consideration of any issue relating to free speech is my passionate belief that the second most precious thing in life is the right to express yourself freely the most precious thing in life I think is food in your mouth and the third most precious is a roof over your head but a fixture for me in the number two slot is free expression just below the need to sustain life itself that is because I have enjoyed free expression in this country all my professional life and fully expect to
continue to do so personally I suspect highly unlikely to be arrested for whatever laws exist to contain free expression because of the undoubtedly privileged position that is afforded to those of a high public profile so my concerns are less for myself and more for those more vulnerable because of their lower profile like the man arrested in Oxford for calling a police horse gay or the teenager arrested for calling the Church of Scientology a cult or the cafe owner arrested for displaying passages from the Bible on a TV screen when I heard of some of these
more ludicrous offenses and charges I remember that I had been here before in a fictional context I once did a show called not the nine o'clock news some years ago and we did a sketch where Griff Reese Jones played Constable Savage a manifestly racist police officer to whom I as his station Commander is giving a dressing down for arresting a black man on a whole string of ridiculous trumped-up and ludicrous challenges the charges for which Constable Savage arrested Mr Winston cadogo of 55 Mercer Road with these walking on the cracks in the pavement walking in
a loud shirt in a built up area during the hours of darkness and one of my favorites walking around all over the place he was also arrested for urinating in a public convenience and looking at me in a funny way who would have thought that we would end up with a law that would allow life to imitate art so exactly I read somewhere a defender of the status quo claiming that the fact that the gay horse Case was dropped after the arrested man refused to pay the uh to pay the fine and that the Scientology
case was also dropped at some point during the court process was proof that the law was working well ignoring the fact that the only reason these cases were dropped was because of the publicity that they had attracted police sensed that ridicule was just around the corner and withdrew their actions but what about the thousands of other cases that did not enjoy the oxygen of publicity that weren't quite ludicrous enough to attract media attention even for those actions that were withdrawn people were arrested questioned taken to court and then released you know that isn't a law
working properly that is censoriousness of the most intimidating kind guaranteed to have as Lord dear says the chilling effect on free expression and free protest parliament's joint committee on human rights summarized as you may know this whole issue very well by saying while arresting a protester for using threatening or abusive speech May depending on the circumstances be a proportionate response we do not think that language or behavior that is merely insulting should ever be criminalized in this way the clear problem with the outlawing of insult is that too many things can be interpreted as such
criticism is easily construed as unsolved by certain parties ridicule easily construed as insult sarcasm unfavorable comparison merely stating an alternative point of view to the Orthodoxy can be interpreted as insult and because so many things can be interpreted as insulted it's hardly surprising that so many things have been as the examples I talked about earlier show although the law under discussion has been on the statute book for over 25 years it is indicative of a culture that has taken hold of the programs of successive governments that with the reasonable and well-intentioned ambition to contain obnoxious
elements in society has created a society of an extraordinarily authoritarian and controlling nature that is what you might call the new intolerance a new but intense desire to gag uncomfortable voices of descent I am not intolerant so many people so many softly spoken Highly Educated liberal-minded people I'm only intolerant of intolerance and people tend to nod sagely and say well yes wise words wise words and yet if you think about this supposedly inarguable statement for longer than five seconds you realize that all it is advocating is the replacement of one kind of intolerance with another
which to me doesn't represent any kind of progress at all underlying prejudices injustices or resentments are not addressed by arresting people they are addressed by the issues being aired argued and dealt with preferably outside the legal process for me the best way to increase society's resistance to insulting or offensive speech is to allow a lot more of it as with childhood diseases you can better resist those germs to which you have been exposed we need to build our immunity to taking offense so that we can deal with the issues that perfectly Justified criticism can raise
our priority should be to deal with the message not the messenger as President Obama said in an address to the United Nations only a month or so ago laudable efforts to restrict speech can become a tool to silence critics or oppress minorities the strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression it is more speech and that's the essence of my thesis more speech if we want a robust Society we need more robust dialogue and that must include the right to insult or to offend and as even if as Lord dear says you know the freedom
to be inoffensive is no Freedom at all the repeal of this word in this Clause will be only a small step but it will I hope be a critical one in what should be a longer term project to pause and slowly rewind the creeping culture of sensoriousness it is a small Skirmish in the battle in my opinion to deal with what sir Salman Rushdie refers to as the outrage industry self-appointed Arbiters of the public good encouraging media stoked outrage to which the police feel under terrible pressure to react a newspaper Rings up Scotland yards someone
has said something slightly insulting on Twitter about someone who we think a National Treasure what are you going to do about it the police panic and they Scrabble around and then grasp the most inappropriate Lifeline of all Section 5 of the public order act that thing where you can arrest anybody for saying anything that might be construed by anyone else as insulting you know they don't seem to need a real victim they need only to make the Judgment that somebody could have been offended if they had heard or read what has been said the most
ludicrous degree of latitude the storms that surround Twitter and Facebook comment have raised some fascinating issues about Free Speech which we haven't really yet come to terms with firstly that we all have to take responsibility for what we say which is quite a good lesson to learn but secondly we've learned how appallingly prickly and intolerant Society has become of even the mildest adverse comment the law should not be aiding and abetting this new intolerance Free Speech can only suffer if the law prevents us from dealing with its consequences I offer my wholehearted support to the
reform Section 5 campaign thank you very much for more great content like subscribe and hit the notification Bell
