Academia em Debate com Michael Behe

hola es el programa Academy debace down vest a deep red Sparrow na McKenzie em programa promo video que la senza la da da NOSSA universidad alegria het ona a sua casa save escrito en que cosa sta Jono's assistindo agoura oprah Grimalkin tacoma presenza dododo my coby hey Ellie bo Kimiko a professor desa discipline and invest ideally hai na pennsylvania NOS estados unidos usado tirado tambien do kimika if we opted o una invested our defensive on en dos estados unidos toto b-ref eco famoso Peloso livro akasha preta deedar vin publicado cerca di vinci onza tracy continuo

fazendo gun success in tle castillo no goose disparaging mazda Oread avenues de Veloso you wanted fng idea dyckia evidences scientifica suficientes nana teresa para mostrar a presença g un propósito intelligente nasco es que existe en contrary ando por tanto dogmas entrado de avenues mo Dickey a squeezy Stevie Ramakant SI otra vez de muta sois Hondo micah's oka Sione's aleatory Ozzie acidentes toto bahia alegria muy grande y SI belle aqui en o su programa y el gostaria de camisa fazendo a ciggy cheaper Gunther ok a de fatwa iturea design intelligent e equal objetivo della well intelligent

design is just the idea that many parts of nature are better explained as the results of purposeful design rather than undirected unintelligent natural laws it might help if I gave a quick example in the United States we have a mountain called Mount Rushmore and on the Mount Rushmore about 50 years ago a sculptor sculpted the faces of four former presidents of the United States so if you were walking in the woods and you came upon Mount Rushmore if even if you had never heard of it before you would easily recognize that that part of nature

was the result of intelligent design and the reason you can tell that is because you see all the parts of the mountain that are arranged to portray images of of the president's well intelligent design as a science is the idea that we have found things like Mount Rushmore in the cell in life and and also in the universe at large we have learned that cells are controlled by molecular machines that sells the little little bodies they make up your your whole body and this was this was unknown to Darwin and so as as a result

of this new knowledge the intelligent design proposes that we should reconsider our theories of the origin of life and proposes that intelligence was involved so follow anasuya expla casado know so has forced oh yo tambien SI t'es una pregunta para desaparecio team intelligent e quando quando SI oreos demise defensores dudes an intelligent yo SE tu intelligence okeke intelligentsia que significa simplesmente alguma coisa que o quashed okeee aleatory okie dokie a contest for a kazoo well if you go back to a lot latin intelligent means to make a choice and we know that rational beings can

make choices and the way that we detect intelligence is by the external effects of a rational mind for example if you went to another planet and you saw beings there that looked human but they couldn't write they couldn't build anything and they acted like animal you would think that they were not intelligent at least not as intelligent as as we are if you speak to a person you oftentimes judge their intelligence by the language that they use the level of the language or you would judge the intelligence of a person by what they can do

what they can build intelligence it turns out that we have found in nature things that look like they are the results of intelligence things that require choosing among different options things which can perform functions perform jobs that that are very sophisticated and in our experience always do require intelligence mais esas cosas que parece funciona am unicamente son complexes alizon pas de souci d'eau otra vez de procesos notorious uma coisa constr encima de otra y milliron do now to develop a machine by chance is as unlikely in biology as it is in our everyday world when

we see a machine in the hardware store or a lawn mower on somebody's lawn we immediately know that it's not a product of chance because all of the parts are fit together in order to perform the function and the probability the the odds against that coming together by chance is is very very small so small that we've never seen it happen and so the same goes for the machinery in life even simple machines I use I frequently use an example of a mousetrap need many parts in order to function and they have to be fitted

to each other and they all have to be presents or if you take away the the spring of a mousetrap it's broken so those things cannot be developed gradually or accidentally and the same is true of many molecular machines tahrir design intelligent eatin sedo muito a takada I critica de por ser uma teoria hella josa a mesma coisa di creaciones mochas ops own son estos OS cuidas acontecer on por acaso at ravel processes natura es como intelligence' po detras de tudo que acontece natural med CJ Atomos idea do acaso tenemos que abraza aparentemente ikea momenta

poda trace key planner yoyoyo todas proceso complexo y su leva inevitable media / juntas que ellos NOS top o detras de ce process intellij yo maha sposta di muchos y SI dios ultimo dia an intelligent ed fat zero teoria helios pays de création nismo di sua sado sa mccready extensa do feta odds an intelligence y que NOS vamos a boda new prose moblog fee conozco estamos de volta calm program Academy debace over G so breeds an intelligent a volos own condo to my coby hey Bo Kimiko Don veste di Lehigh condo tirado non-vested ah california

auto du Libre Kashyap rated e Darvin he faced grants us a so no brasil considera provoke an opal emeka I aspetto Davalos son los procesos de venustas dis alles unnatural Oh Toby hey muito specialization ki use an intelligent en materia heresy ossa porque mesmo kill design intelligent e vc fala que no designer Esparza obviamente gentrified z kill Xena Nevada adios por ESO tensed oh dear two kills intelligente na verdade material creationist dis facade aqui no fundo estabas Adama biblia simple yong guk code is a zoo well intelligent design is not creationism creationism as a religious

idea intelligent design is a scientific idea and the difference is that intelligent design arises from the study of nature rather than a reading of Scripture and it's its method is to go out and see what exists in nature and try to find the best explanation for it and it has come about because unlike what Darwin expected life even at its fundamental level the cell and the molecules in the cell is extremely complex and and contains true machinery not just that's not just an analogy it's true machinery Darwin expected that the cell would just be a

little glob of jelly a little bit of protoplasm so the idea of design arises naturally from the data because when we see such complex machines whenever we've seen them before they were the result of RIT intelligence and there's no reason not to think that the machines we've discovered in the are the result of intelligence so intelligent design is as might have religious implications but it actually doesn't have any religious premises it just comes from the from the study of nature and actually it's it's not a unique in that there's another theory in physics the big

bang theory about a hundred years ago most physicists thought that the universe was eternal and pretty much unchanging but then evidence was gathered that the universe had a beginning and many people including many scientists were very uncomfortable with this because they thought it pointed to a creation event maybe this was when God created the universe and maybe it was but nonetheless the big bang theory was a scientific theory because it involved just scientific data and reasoning from that data and intelligent design is the same Sarah Sarah quisiste a scientist 'as a tiros wagon or chicos

key defender E&Y dare to design intelligent e e sinto poderia ser usado como prova di q design intelligent nocturia d halitosis well very few atheists would defend intelligent design because I think that they can see that if you need the design of life or the design of the universe then it's going to involve something beyond the universe and since by definition and atheist doesn't think there is something beyond the universe you would either have to give up your atheism or or ignore the data and give up intelligent design there are some agnostics who think that

the current theory Darwin's theory is a poor explanation for how life came about on earth and yes that's that's that's a good point to make to people who say that intelligent design is a religious theory additionally many people say that intelligent design is specifically a Christian idea but intelligent design has been defended and has adherence in many different religions including Judaism and even some Asian religions and so it's it's does not arise from from specifically Christian ideals that it arises from a study of nature Ava dhadke Attiyah davines the devil's own I want a odn

Creasy aqui mesmo scientists keen on some dudes an intelligent esta fazendo criticas amost rondo OS pontos Franco's Desideria a kiss espera prob review my out there are some significant even asset area yes it's interesting that that although many scientists in the mainstream do not like intelligent design one pet most biologists I think recognized that Darwin's theory does not account for what science has discovered in life they did not expect the great complexity in the large amounts of information that is present in the cell and so they're casting about and if you look at books published

in the last ten years by major academic presses authored by leading evolutionary biologists almost all of them proposed additions to or transformations of Darwin's theory and said say bluntly that Darwin's theory can't explain what we have found in life but they propose more unintelligent mechanisms to explain what is in life and have not caught on their their their ideas have not caught on and I think there as as we say in the United States barking up the wrong tree they're looking in the wrong place because the systems we see clearly point to intelligence and it's

only I think for philosophical reasons that many people in voy avoid a conclusion of intelligent design a comunidad científica her out tunisia atado Tod intelligente poovar smooch Evo's yapa kunta poachy uma Turia Kia presento tantas evidencias concrete owes physical da presenza un propósito de muy intelligente peau de tres de fabrica de vida porque que la tan JJ tada critica de he declare azadus prasada s connaissance pintada to michael biehn oprah's mobloc fee conozco sabes de volta calm program Academy debauchee say oh no sumu bloke o programa do esta entrevista no doto my coby famoso bo

Kimiko k publico libre kashyap retahded arvense a gyarados de cádiz a trans casio Nando a goons dos precipice postal ADO's dotty orilla de viniste specialmente o fato de kiatearai aadhavan easter dice que o processo natural ivalo sun sea de otra vez a do a kazoo do do acidente domoto zones aleatory as mu dances ah sida ties Oh Toby hypogaea que la comunidad científica con todo na so many hijita italia design intelligent a man shot a mesma he do Pilates is 0 because they're quasi una Fantasia well I think there are a number of reasons and

it's a complex subject why scientific community doesn't embrace intelligent design when at least i think it's it's clearly indicated and one is a historical reason that is when Darwin first proposed his theory it was opposed by some religious people it was also close by some scientists but some biologists and some religious groups have been at at loggerheads over the theory for for a while a second reason is that science is pretty conservative it doesn't give up a theory very easily if you look at the history of science many theories have gone on when it was

clear they had many many problems before they were replaced by another simply because so many scientists were used to thinking in terms of the old theory another reason is is more more human I think scientists want to be able to explain everything they want their profession to be number one and if if there's design if something outside of nature is responsible for were some things in biology then they might not be able to get an explanation for that and and they'd rather be able to explain everything and I think the final reason is that some

scientists especially some scientists that at the heads of organizations of scientists simply don't want intelligent design to be true they see that it does have extra scientific implications and that many people will think that the designer is God as I myself do and they don't want to that to happen they in fact are atheists and so they will if they are committed to an atheistic worldview then they will simply find some other explanation or no explanation and they will just let the mysteries stay there until they can think up something that satisfactory to them pollution

follow a Antonio quino's PESA vemos no Phenom confronto do sistema que a temple session ADO's delicioso cont penciwate is mo en wisp se diga vision por la doce 10-watt a is mo materialistic que no podia damici hawk explicas oprah vida que sera Asima dhukiye material y por otra vez 8am uma teoria khyati redesign intelligent Academy Chi Cygni possibili dadi ki asha uma inteligencia allen dudududu kia ciencia po di determine a esta por detras de todas las cosas saraki no fundo no es un confleet OD do as L Joyce yes that's certainly true at least for

a lot of scientists and for many who are import in important positions in science and it's important to realize that materialism or atheism is not science it's not a conclusion that was reached because of some experiment in the laboratory or it's a philosophy and so even if you think the results of science give it prestige the assumption that materialism is all there is is is is simply that a an assumption it's a philosophical assumption and it also did not exist until relatively recently in science up until two hundred or fewer years ago almost all scientists

were religious believers Newton Michael Faraday great scientists who who made great advances for science and were thought of it as discovering how God's world worked and yet it seems to be in the 19th century I'm not a historian I don't know why but science came to subtly include this philosophy of materialism that if science couldn't study it it must not exist and that confuses the public and I think it's bad it's very bad for science because it it stops some scientists for some seeing some things that are pretty plain to someone who does not subscribe

to that idea mm-hmm ah whose decision teachers are toz materially stones evolution Easton Ellis dicen que a ciência esta grado amaretti cada vez mais dozed ando Hess pastas para que lo que antes de gente pensava que era dos y ki vai chegar memento ink es ciencia explica todo das coisas que diosito anent Oh me explicas on des necesaria y aqui abajo met ok le zhuzhou y ou argumento da navaja do cim yo creo que vas a philosophy to do so yes it's it's really ironic in that the results of science especially in the last hundred

years or so have been pointing more and more strongly to something outside of nature for an explanation of what we discover in nature it's important to distinguish between how nature works and how nature originated just because a machine like a lawnmower or a mouse trap works and you can write down equations to show it does not mean that those machines did not require design and in the 19th century physicists thought that the universe itself was rather bland that it didn't need any that it was not a special place and the earth was not a special

place and that life probably existed on Mars and Venus and many other places because what was special about the earth and in astronomy and physics the science has shown that in fact the earth is a very special place and is just right for the existence of life similarly in biology Darwin thought that the cell was a little glob of jelly and that would be easy to explain to and we've discovered that and the more and more we discover the more and more complex and elegant we see life to be so I disagree with those scientists

who think that science the progress of science is pointing away from God it's if you look at the results it's it's pointing very strongly towards towards God towards something beyond the universe went obrigado doto my coby he pela sua presenza no program academy in debauchee so c'est des dejas communica kunos come and armagh PA gunto message esto se puede escribir para SE muy academia in debauchee a hoba McKenzie pond to be a hey Noah seremos Preseli has Pandey meet obrigado pela so dencia atay oprah's un programa mayakkam enna solludhu de arimasu who had rotted Dorian

Gray de oscar wilde confucius a home on some ice queen silvia vecchio committee lead forecaster sound barzee am would concede went to hetero male autoset assurance put lives perfume is estas zindagi ki te so hate rato pintado a partir des momento nevada departure Jimmy space EG promesa de Fuca feta Pirelli you hate rato a que pasa in Venice anal Oh pro pro personage objeto Chris Paul yo Oscar Wilde sks krebs homo sri parcero did coochie concepto de belleza a massage ironies no libro respeto juma supposta opposition enter bellezza Intelligencer apropos person charged adieu retrato convalescence

uhlig our do he tratado evidence men tomor pretest Oh rakia so saddaji Britannica do the Saguenay metadata seclusion ave SE resposta is a resposta Lydia no copr perfume you