Misteri del passato | Mauro Biglino

You witnessed the crucifixion, you witnessed him being taken down, you witnessed him being placed in the tomb, then you return a few hours later, you see someone there in the garden and you no longer recognize him. Can something like this happen to you? We must believe, indeed, that Jesus Christ died, was laid there, then rose again.

And now I ask women a question: do you remember that story about when Mary Magdalene goes to heal the body. . .

? Because these women who were with these people, where the "Boanerges" were, the "sons of thunder". .

. I can't imagine they spent three years talking about butterflies. When Mary Magdalene lets down her hair, this could only be done by a Jewish woman for her husband or her brother or her children; in front of anyone else she would have been stoned.

So you've been there for three years, you've witnessed his trial, you've witnessed the flagellation, you've witnessed the crucifixion, you've witnessed him being taken down, you've witnessed him being placed in the tomb, then you return a few hours later, you see someone there in the garden and you no longer recognize him. Could something like that happen to you? Absolutely not.

So something strange happened there, and in the Gospels that we shouldn't believe are true, it says that "he changed shape," but we shouldn't believe those to be true. Just as in the Gospel of Peter, it says that on the night he was buried, a light came from heaven, two of them came down, opened the tomb, two went in, three came out, and the third, who couldn't walk, was carried away. But we shouldn't believe that, right?

Everything else, yes, but not this. Because this is nonsense. But who decides it's nonsense?

Here, the same people who tell us the Virgin will conceive and give birth, etc. , the same people who establish what we should believe to be true and what we shouldn't believe to be true. When Mary becomes pregnant, in the Protoevangelium of James, it says that Joseph was away on one of his work campaigns.

He returns six months later and finds Mary pregnant, and he gets angry and says, "Who did this to me? What am I going to say now to the person who entrusted her to me ? " But he says something wonderful: "But what happened to me was what happened to Adam, who had a companion; someone came along and seduced her.

" What happened to Eve. " And Joseph asks himself this question, but we must not believe it to be true. But who is it that establishes that we must not believe it to be true?

Enough of the fact that in certain desks it is established what we must believe or not believe. We read and then we decide. When the two, John the Baptist and Jesus, who are both born after a Gabriel visited their mothers, both are born after a Gabriel, that is, one who "exercises power on behalf of an El," visited their mothers.

And the Jesuit Jean Danielou, cardinal, French academic, professor of theology, who has conducted a very thorough study on the figure of Gabriel and the Holy Spirit, writes in his books: "The Holy Spirit is the Christian transposition of Gabriel. " And Gabriel in the Bible is defined as "ish," a male individual. So when a Gabriel goes to visit the mother of John the Baptist, she becomes pregnant.

A Gabriel goes to visit Mary and she becomes pregnant. And the two have a mission to accomplish. And when John the Baptist preaches in the Jordan and it is said: "he preaches the conversion of sins" and it is said: "they went to him to confess.

" Confessing is the idea we have. In Greek there is "exomologumenoi. " They went to "shout out loudly" their sins, almost with the intent of boasting about them, because John the Baptist had to create an army of fighters and so he said: "You: I killed three.

Come with us, your sins no longer matter. " Because " only God can forgive sins," say the Jews, certainly not John the Baptist. So: rite of immersion, you enter our group.

"What have you done? I burned down two houses. Come with us.

" They were looking for the fighters, the cutthroats. And he says: "And you scribes and Pharisees, you brood of vipers, if you do not practice the "metanoia" - the change of mentality, that is, if you don't join us, we will kill you. The axe is at your feet.

When the time of battle comes, we will kill you. " And Jesus says: "When the time of judgment comes, what happens to those condemned? They are thrown into Gehenna, Ge'-ben-Hinnon, the Valley of Hinnom, which was a hollow outside the walls of Jerusalem where waste was thrown and the fire burned continuously.

Hell has nothing to do with it: "we will throw the bodies there after killing them. " Perhaps everything needs to be rewritten and retold. When Gabriel says to Mary: "Chaire kecharitoméne," "kecharitoméne," the middle passive participle of the verb "charitóō" which means "to make oneself physically beautiful.

" Rejoice, you who have made yourself beautiful. In chapter 6 of Genesis, it says that the Elohim saw that the females of Adam were desirable. They took as many as they wanted as companions.

They liked females. But that's normal, right? Gabriel says: "Rejoice, you who have made yourself beautiful.

" So, as if to say: we have chosen you. "Chaire kecharitoméne" is in the Gospels. "We have chosen you," I say, so at least we have peace of mind.

And when Jesus experiences the famous transfiguration, do you remember it? The one on Mount Tabor, where a light shines, he changes appearance, etc. Who is it that appears to him?

Moses and Elijah: two undead, two who have gone away with the gods. But is it all a coincidence? Is it possible that it's all a coincidence?

Do you know that no one saw Moses die? At a certain point, Moses decides to go and die. He leaves with his two most faithful followers, Joshua and Eleazar.

He goes to the Valley of Moab, and after that, nothing more is heard of him. Josephus Flavius ​​writes that "when he reached the valley of Moab, a cloud came and took him away. " Now, "cloud" is the term used throughout the Old Testament to identify those flying machines.

But Josephus Fabius says something else that is wonderful. He says: "And Moses was forced to write that he was dead so that no one could say he had gone away with the gods. " And in the Bible, who is it that goes away with the gods?

Enoch, Elijah, and Moses. Doesn't it make more sense to think there's a logical thread? The problem between the Apocrypha and the Canons is that while the Canons can be used, and were used by Irenaeus of Lyons and Athanasius of Alexandria, it would be more difficult to begin to build what we know with the Apocrypha .

. . but from the standpoint of credibility, I place them on the same level as the Canons.

I pretend they are true because I find them coherent. Then again, I don't know if they are true, let's be clear, but I pretend that. .

. Exactly. When the Adamites were expelled, we said earlier, as a preventative measure, to prevent them from having access to the practices of the Tree of Life, which was the place where the technique that allowed for long life was practiced, so much so that the Adamites lived long lives—not Homo sapiens, but that group.

The Adamites lived 800-900 years because they had a large contribution of the Elohim's genetic heritage. Not humanity, mind you, the Adamites. The Bible is clear on this.

So those practices were practiced there—excuse the pun—that we now know, which involves acting on the telomerase of chromosomes, but let's not go into the details. In any case, they were practiced in specific places. Anyone familiar with the Epic of Gilgamesh knows that Gilgamesh at a certain point wants to ask the so-called deities for long life.

Ask for long life. So one says: if I want to ask God for long life , what do I do? I turn to God, I tell him how good I've been, how deserving I am, how.

. . No, no!

Gilgamesh must leave, make a long journey to the place where long life is given. It's not something you get anywhere. To get long life, you have to go there.

If you don't go there, you don't get it. And that "there" is Gan Eden. In that case, it was the biblical Gan Eden, which had more than one Eden.

Homer describes another, the Garden of Alcinous, which is another of their Edens. If you don't go there, you don't get long life. And the Adamites are banished from there.

And lo and behold, we'll probably know this in 15-20 years because the excavations there are taking a very long time. The area corresponds to Göbekli Tepe, we're in southeastern Turkey: it's a very strange site, still largely unexcavated. The only certainty is that those who left covered it up before they left to hide it.

That is, it wasn't covered by nature, it was covered by those who were there and closed it before leaving. And it's right in that area. And it's very interesting to see that Adam and Eve were removed from a place where the techniques of long life were practiced, and Gilgamesh, to obtain long life, had to go to a specific place because otherwise he wouldn't achieve it.

This gives us the idea of ​​the existence of laboratories where certain things were done, and certain things you could only obtain if you went there. Baalbeck in Lebanon is one of the. .

. sometimes people say, "What traces do we still have? " Well, Baalbeck is one of those traces.

Baalbek is a superposition of temples: the most modern is the Roman one dedicated to Jupiter, above the Greek one dedicated to Zeus, above the Neolithic one dedicated to Utu Shamash. Utu Shamash was the deity, so to speak, who drove the sun chariot, and that temple there was built to house Utu Shamash's chariot. One might say, "Well, the chariot.

. . 5,000 BC, what kind of chariot could it have had?

" The problem is that Baalbek has a base made of three monoliths, that is, three individual stones, each weighing 900 tons. Each! Placed perfectly parallel in a mountain valley.

They did it in 5,000 BC. We wouldn't know how to do it; we don't have machines capable of doing it. And one might say, "What the hell kind of chariot was supposed to be placed on top of that?

What kind of pressure was that temple base supposed to withstand? How much weight was that temple supposed to support? " First: the questions.

Second: how did they do it? We don't know. By the way, a fourth stone was discovered about a kilometer away, a quarter of which is still embedded in the earth.

It weighs, it would weigh, 1,200 tons. It's still embedded there, so they were digging it out to bring it out and place it with the others. 1,200 tons.

We don't know how to do it, but they did it, and that's undeniable. Archaeologists say they dragged them with ropes, rolling them on cedar logs. I'd like to put 20,000 archaeologists in the mountains, not on asphalt, in a valley in the mountains!

I'd put 20,000 to 30,000, as many as they want, digging with wooden hammers and copper chisels, excavating four monoliths of about 1,000 tons each, then placing them on cedar logs and bringing them over there and placing them next to each other. Wouldn't it be better to say "we don't know"? Anyway, we're talking about 900 tons in the mountains, so let them invent whatever they want; they should have the good sense to say: "we don't know.

" There are tungsten screws in stones, 3 mm screws. That is, just one screw is enough to unhinge the whole story. Just one screw.

Jim Marrs' book, published by HarperCollins, which is in English: "Our Hidden History. " There's a lot of testimony in there that's never talked about because no one can explain it. We thank our speaker.

. . Thank you.

Thank you, thank you all.