Hey everyone, I’ve been getting a lot of requests lately as to who to debunk next, and several dozen of you have asked me to address the complete insanity that was Terrence Howard’s recent appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast. While I normally avoid lunatics of this caliber, I felt this one was worth addressing for a few reasons, so let’s take a closer look. If you don’t know who Terrence Howard is, he’s an actor.
I’ll be honest, I’ve never seen him act in anything. He was in a really popular TV show that I didn’t watch, and I’ve never seen any of his movies. He might be a great actor, he might suck, I don’t know and I don’t care.
What’s more important is his extracurricular activities as a delusional narcissist who thinks he’s the smartest person in human history. I don’t know exactly when he started showing the world his god complex, but it was way before the Rogan appearance, so let’s go back just a bit. Here he is making a total fool of himself on the red carpet at the Emmys in 2019.
I’ve made some discoveries in my own personal life with the science that Pythagoras was searching for. I’ve been able to open up the flower of life properly and find the real wave conjugations that we’ve been looking for, for 10,000 years. Why would I continue walking on water for tips when I’ve got an entire generation to teach a whole new world.
That’s a big remark! Ok, let’s break this down. The science that Pythagoras was searching for.
Pythagoras was a philosopher and mathematician. The only things he did that could be considered part of the embryonic stages of science were ideas like the harmony of the spheres, where the planets moved according to the frequencies of musical notes, which of course was just baseless conjecture and whimsy, coincidentally Terry’s two favorite things. He says he was able to open up the flower of life properly.
That’s this. The idea of “opening this up” doesn’t mean anything. It’s just 19 overlapping circles.
If you pull them apart, you get 19 circles. Yes it’s nice and pretty looking. Shapes are neat.
Real wave conjugations. Meaningless. Conjugation is something you do to a verb in an inflected language, according to tense, number, and person.
Here is a conjugated Italian verb. In biology the word is used to describe horizontal transfer of genetic material between bacteria. You can’t conjugate a ham sandwich, and you can’t conjugate a wave.
10,000 years is a random number that goes farther back than all of recorded history. He tosses out “walking on water” to foreshadow his blatant messiah complex, and he has absolutely nothing to teach even a small child, let alone an entire generation. “That’s a big remark” says the interviewer, clearly pretty desperate to get out of this ridiculous conversation without directly insulting him.
What do you intend to do? Well let me put it this way. All energy in the universe is expressed in motion, all motion is expressed in waves, all waves are curved, so where does the straight lines come from to make the Platonic solids?
There are no straight lines. So when I took the flower of life and opened it properly, I found all new wave conjugations that expose the in between spaces, it’s the thing that holds us all together. Ok.
I didn’t do too well in trigonometry, what is the… Platonic solids? How is energy “expressed” exactly? By motion?
Whatever he could mean by that, he’s wrong. For example, potential energy is the energy held by an object by virtue of its position in a field, like a gravitational or electromagnetic field. No motion, yet energy.
Matter can be converted to energy. No motion required. No, not all motion is “expressed in waves”.
The motion of a wave is a wave. Periodic motion can be expressed with a wave. Linear motion also exists.
Hence, straight lines exist. What are Platonic solids? That’s these.
Convex regular polyhedra in three-dimensional Euclidian space. Regular polyhedron means that all the sides are the exact same shape, that shape being a particular regular polygon, which means a two-dimensional shape with all the sides and angles being equal. There are five of them, and they were conceived of as hypothetical abstractions, just like everything else in geometry.
And just for fun, if you take a simple cubic lattice structure for an ionic solid, you can get those straight lines he said don’t exist. Again, he did not open any flower of life, he did not conjugate any waves, he doesn’t specify what these spaces are and what they are between, or how they hold anything together. In short, it’s pseudo-spiritual bullshit, and these anchors are justifiably laughing their asses off.
Let’s get one more tidbit. I’m sharing that, on Tuesday when I receive my star, I’m going to be able to prove that gravity is only an effect and not a force. I’m putting something on YouTube where I will build the planet Saturn without gravity, and build the Milky Way galaxy without gravity.
Did you also say you’re getting your star? Yeah. On the walk of fame?
On the walk of fame. Interestingly enough, in the context of general relativity, you can argue that gravity is an effect and not a force, but it does not follow then that gravity isn’t real. And it gets much worse from there.
He is going to “build Saturn” and “build the Milky Way galaxy”, how exactly? Like in a simulation? That needs gravity.
If he built a planet or a galaxy with his hands, I would worship him as the one true god. But something tells me that in reality he’s been watching some Electric Universe frauds on YouTube and now he thinks he’s smarter than Einstein. And we’ve come to find that the universe, they are abandoning the standard model, the ideas of black holes and dark matter, for an electric model of the universe that is in response to the Birkeland current and all these things.
It’s a better version, a better vision of how we should see the universe. That’s how I see it and I think it should be explored. Bingo.
Terry binged some Thunderbolts project videos and is repeating what he heard as though he thought of it. Then this woman tries to change the subject again, and he starts whining about not ever having been nominated for an Emmy. Anyway, this is the magnitude of nutjob we are dealing with, but it gets much worse.
Around that same time Terrence started yapping about his new form of math, which he dubbed, I shit you not, “Terryology”, and which included the startling new revelation that one times one is two. Which prestigious mathematics journal did he select to announce this groundbreaking development? The View.
Let’s take a look. And when I was at Oxford, now this is the point where four bubbles meet equally and oppositely. Can I touch it?
Yes. And it’s where 12 planes meet. This is an undiscovered geometry that I am now making known to the world here on the show.
Isn’t that fantastic? And what was the reception? Well when I was at Oxford, they were so upset, because how can a man that didn’t graduate from one of their prestigious schools come and tell them that the square root of two was a rational number.
And I said I didn’t come to tell you guys this, I just came to prove to you that it’s a rational number, and they were… they didn’t like it. You heard right, Terrence presented his bullshit at Oxford, and the smart people laughed at him. But why would they laugh at poor old Terry?
Do you think the ladies of The View will be a more receptive audience? Well you have to remember our entire world economy is based on one times one equaling one. Yeah, our entire economy is based on one times one equaling one.
Well economics does involve numbers, so it should obey the basic logic surrounding numbers that even children can understand. So what’s the problem? So if you can prove that an action times an action equals a reaction, which science proves, then one times one must equal more than one.
And to have the physical proof of it, that kind of shakes things up a bit. Well you’re a shaker upper. Wow.
If you can prove that an action times an action equals a reaction. Ok, numbers are not actions. They’re numbers.
So that doesn’t mean anything. An action times an action also doesn’t mean anything, because actions are not numbers. Also, no, two actions do not necessarily cause a reaction, no matter what he could possibly mean by “reaction”.
If two forces are acting on an object that are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction, the object won’t move. Two actions, no reaction. Sorry, Terry.
But more importantly than demonstrating how everything he just said is bananas idiotic, let’s review what multiplication is. Multiplication is an elementary arithmetic operation which is essentially repeated addition. One times four literally means the number one four times, and then you add them up.
One plus one plus one plus one equals four. One times three. Write one three times, add them up.
You get three. One times two. One twice.
One plus one is two. One times one means you write one one time. So it’s one.
There’s nothing to add. His revolutionary discovery is just him being dumber than a toddler. And toddlers do like to shake things, so this lady isn’t wrong.
Well you’re a shaker upper. Let’s be clear. There are only two possibilities.
One: Terrence Howard is doing a Joaquin Phoenix style extended piece of performance art, and is therefore profoundly brilliant. Or two: he’s a delusional narcissist incapable of living his life without pretending that he’s the smartest person in human history, or let’s be honest, a god. I’m putting my money on the latter, because I’ve seen this all before.
Pick your favorite flat earther. This is their defense mechanism too. The smallest of minds can’t face a world that doesn’t recognize their self-proclaimed brilliance.
So unleash a word salad, convince yourself it’s science, and hope that nobody challenges you on it. Everything inherently is dielectric because it has matter, and it has a relationship within the medium, the universal background, the absolute frame of reference, the field of energy that is the aether, it receives energy from that. These types of people enact the most impressive mental gymnastics imaginable to maintain their own ego, and the more I encounter it, the less I find it cute or entertaining.
It’s a disease that infects impressionable people and measurably worsens society. It’s not something to simply laugh at, although we are going to laugh quite a bit more before I return to this thread in my conclusion. So as promised, let’s dive into his very recent appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast.
It’s three hours long, so we aren’t going to hit every moment. Rest assured, he was completely insane from top to bottom, but let’s just go through some highlights. My first memory was almost like when you’re dreaming and you’re falling, and you hit the bottom and you wake up, that was my first memory.
But I didn’t wake up here, I was inside my mother’s womb. And I was about, maybe six months inside the womb. He comes out hot in the first 30 seconds claiming that he remembers being in his mother’s womb.
I’ll remove the suspense for you, no he didn’t. That’s physically impossible. Got any proof, Terry?
I remember all of that. You remember coming out? I remember being compressed, I remember being born, I remember being circumsized, I remember the whole nine.
And the proof of it, was when my wife Mira that you just met, when she was six months pregnant with my son, I wanted to prove to her what I was talking about, so I put a light on her stomach every day at six o’clock at night. And I would move that light back and forth and I would put a song on, for a week straight. First thing he wanted to do was see light, he loved lights, from that early stage and I can ask him the square root of two, the square root of five, the square root of that, the square root of pi, and he will run it off.
So his “proof”of him remembering being born is a random anecdote about his wife’s pregnancy, his kid liking light, and a lie about his son being able to do math that Terry himself can’t do. But there’s more. And then when I was about five years old, I had another dream.
And it was this mansion, and he would hand me these shapes, and each shape was different and amazing. And I had access to all the knowledge. The proof of it is the 97 patents that I have now.
The proof of it is the industries that I’ve innovated. Yes, the proof that he has access to all the universe’s knowledge is that he has some patents, something that anybody can get for anything and proves absolutely nothing except that he likes to waste money. He’s never innovated any industry, that’s why he doesn’t actually do anything except ramble like a lunatic on podcasts.
You know, I had the grand unified field equation. I had already put that together at 7, 8, I was working with these things. And then I went through all of the hell that I had to go through.
Yes, he had a grand unified field equation at 7 years old. But he wrote it down once and the dog ate it, and then he forgot what it was. That’s why he didn’t get the Nobel prize for physics.
Also his girlfriend goes to another school, that’s why you don’t know her. But my intention was to rebuild the periodic table, you know build a new periodic table. Because the stuff I had learned in college, you know I went to school for chemical engineering the first year over at Pratt.
And they, at the time I think it was like 108 elements, and I told the teacher, the professor, about the relationship between hydrogen on the spectrometer, and carbon, and silicon, and cobalt, and I was like it’s the same exact color, same tone, just doubled in each octave. And he was like no, each element is the same element and it will always be that element. And I was like you don’t see the relationship.
So I left school. Did you “leave school” or did you flunk out because you kept writing “cobalt is an octave of carbon” on your exams instead of answering the questions? And I was going to spend 40 years rebuilding the periodic table and I found out Walter Russell had already did that, and he did it based upon the natural curvature of everything.
Walter Russell, who was not a chemist, made this in the 1920s and it doesn’t mean anything. The chemical elements display periodicity. You can illustrate that periodicity in rows, or you can make spirals and other shapes.
It’s arbitrary, and listing elements this way doesn’t offer any novel insight into chemistry or any predictive power whatsoever. Terry just likes the shape as much as he likes pretending to understand chemistry better than chemists, or 10th graders for that matter. And when you say rebuild the periodic table, what do you mean specifically?
Well the way the periodic table is laid out, you’ll see hydrogen sitting all the way over there by itself, but they don’t show that hydrogen has the same tone as carbon. What do you mean by tone? Same tone, same key of E.
Same key of E. 40. 5 hertz, the next one would be like 81 hertz, you go to silicone it will double up and would be 162 hertz, you’ll go to cobalt and it’ll be 324 hertz.
It’s, you know, in that base, if you were to take the angles of incidence, or the tones that they create, you know their color, like you can turn color back into sound. Joe wants to know what the hell he’s talking about, and Terry is off to the races rambling about tones. Elements are not tones.
They’re not notes. They’re not keys. They’re not anything related to music whatsoever.
They’re atoms with a particular number of protons in the nucleus. He’s throwing out random terminology and random numbers. Angle of incidence has to do with light, sounds are not colors, and there’s nothing more to say about this unparalleled gibberish.
You’ll see there’s a relationship between hydrogen, carbon, silicone, cobalt, rhodium, they’re all bonded, they’re all sit, as the middle point between two noble gases. So those things don’t really exist, it’s only one substance. No, Terry.
Those elements exist. Hydrogen and carbon and silicon and cobalt and rhodium are different elements. They are not the same thing.
Hydrogen gas is not the same as a hunk of coal which is not the same as a sample of silicon and so forth. They’re just the halfway point of their respective periods, which is irrelevant. Now the problem is, the first thing that we’re able to perceive is hydrogen.
That’s the first visible element. Because before it is too dense for us to perceive it. You understand what I’m saying?
No, hydrogen is the first element because it’s the element with one proton in its nucleus. Elements are defined by the number of protons in the nucleus, and hydrogen has one. That’s the smallest positive integer.
Of course you’re so insane that even something as trivial as one being the smallest positive integer can no longer be taken for granted in your illustrious presence. But as you reach into the next octave, the carbon octave, and they call that a bisexual tone. Because the carbon has two tones to it, it has a negative side and a positive side.
The part where lithium behaves, lithium is contractive. Beryllium is contractive. Boron is contractive.
But the moment you get to carbon, you balance it out. It gets to a perfect balance of plus and minus four. So it’s a double tone.
Carbon is bisexual, you guys! Atoms have sexuality. Elements being “contractive” is also meaningless, everything he is saying is meaningless.
And what they’ve tried to keep from us, if you have, you wanna break water into its component parts of hydrogen and oxygen, all you have to do is introduce beryllium, or the sound of beryllium. And oxygen will violently break away from any other thing, even hydrogen, to bond with that beryllium. Ah yes, the infamous they!
What are they trying to keep from us now? You want to perform electrolysis on water! But how?
Not electricity, heavens no. Use beryllium! But wait, not even beryllium itself, just the sound of beryllium!
What’s that sound again? Yep, that’s what beryllium sounds like. Startling, no?
I’m sorry that I made all the water in your body turn into hydrogen and oxygen gas and you’re dead now. Elements don’t have sounds, but even funnier than that, beryllium is the only alkaline earth metal that does not react with water. Every time he speaks he’s wrong in so many ways simultaneously that it’s almost impressive.
The reason that arsenic kills us is because our DNA has nitrogen and it has phosphorus, and that’s ‘cause nitrogen unwinds into the next octave right after silicone and becomes phosphorus. Our DNA has both of those in there, but it’s going by tone, so the moment arsenic, which sits as a minus three on the next octave, the moment arsenic is introduced, the body thinks that oh, this is my thing that I need, and it tries to wrap itself around the arsenic, but it causes the DNA to unravel. Wow.
Arsenic is harmful because it interferes with biochemical pathways. For example, it enacts allosteric inhibition of pyruvate dehydrogenase, which is an enzyme involved in aerobic respiration. That means it binds to the enzyme, in this case not specifically at the active site, and the interaction changes the shape of the enzyme just enough to render it incapable of carrying out its function.
The cell can’t make ATP, so it enacts apoptosis and dies. There are similar effects on other enzymes involved with signaling, DNA repair, and so forth. Virtually anything that’s harmful to biological systems is harmful because of sophisticated interactions with the cellular machinery, which require knowledge of molecular biology to understand.
No, DNA does not “wrap around arsenic”, nor does it unravel, Terry has no clue what DNA, what it does, or literally anything about molecules in general. But nature doesn’t allow us to unravel that, but now, with the wave conjugations, we can. We couldn’t do that before because we didn’t know the angles of incidence that were necessary to open these things up.
And you couldn’t do that with the Platonic solids because the Platonic solids are averages and approximations. It really is just breathtaking the way he throws together totally unrelated terminology with this much confidence. What does one even do with this?
Wave conjugation. Angle of incidence. Platonic solids.
These don’t go together. It’s like saying you need six hammer the ice cream to monkey of eleven dizzy. Your reaction to these two statements should be the same.
And the Platonic solids are specifically the opposites of averages and approximations. They are hypothetical idealized structures. Reality consists of approximations.
Again, it’s just breathtaking. It’s legitimately challenging to come up with sentences that are as wrong as everything he says. It took me several minutes to write the monkey sentence, because I kept wanting to write things like monkey of fire which accidentally make more sense than I wanted.
He has a gift for gibberish. Because the universe is based off of equanimity, which Einstein left out in his theory of relativity, the balancing side of the gravity, gravity was caused by electric force. Electricity is always seeking a higher pressure condition.
It spins northeast, it’s trying to get to the center of an area, the center of a cone. But the next electric wave is coming, so it gets pushed out, and as it’s pushed out it gets to the vortices. Yeah.
Gravity is not electric, matter specifically disperses from higher to lower pressure, you can’t “spin northeast”, that’s a cardinal direction, center of an area can’t mean center of a cone since areas are two dimensional and a cone is three dimensional, and what is pushed out to what vortices? How does this guy do this? We are only 19 minutes in, and it’s all like this.
That instead of following the natural curvature of these 64 circles overlapping, they averaged the space where they met, and they invented straight lines. Why did they do that? Because they believed that the world is flat.
The irony here is that figures like Pythagoras and Parmenides were the first people in recorded history to propose that the Earth is a sphere, and substantiate it logically. But more importantly, the Platonic solids are just derived from playing with polygons and making polyhedra. And even more importantly than that, none of this geometry has any correlation with any of the bullshit he’s spewing about chemistry and physics.
They’re utterly separate realms. Then we get to the fancy animations. This is hydrogen.
And as I was saying, electricity is always trying to get to the center of that triangle. But it gets pushed out. That’s not hydrogen, it’s not even a triangle, and where is the electricity exactly?
Eight bubbles meet, they gave me the patents to that. I call that the tetryen. Don’t worry guys, he patented the shape!
You can patent shapes now. I know the guy who has the patent on the rhombus, he’s a billionaire. Spheres that’s going around this, but the greater attractor has grabbed the two weaker attractors.
And this looks just like a photon, and guess what, it has 30 poles! Yeah, it looks just like a photon! Massless chargeless photons look like this dumb shape he made up, because he says so!
This is where 12 bubbles meet, and then I put five of them together, and they make these natural starfish, but then when I put ten of them together, they lay themselves out and they predict all distribution of matter within the electric field. Hey, he used the magic word, prediction! What do they predict?
The distribution of matter what? Where? Show us a prediction, Terry.
No? Back to gibberish? One of the first things, but when Walter Russell came out with his book, and he introduced his periodic table, he watched as different people went up and collected Nobel prizes for deuterium, for tritium, for all these things that he had discovered.
And I was like ok, let me wait until the patents are granted before I’ll talk about it. Walter Russell wasn’t a chemist, he was an artist, and he was delusional. That’s why you worship him, Terry.
People aren’t awarded Nobel prizes in chemistry for drawing pretty pictures. Urey got a Nobel for discovering deuterium because that actually matters. You just don’t know what isotopes are, even though you use that word all the time.
Back to Neil Degrasse, when he wrote his response to my paper, and he said if you have any other questions you’re going to have to see somebody else and he wouldn’t take my calls anymore. I was like ok. So I wrote the book based off of those responses, and I reached out to another guy, Dr David Tong.
Very interesting that that would be his take as a public educator, that he wouldn’t want to talk to you anymore. Yeah, Terry sent his ramblings to Neil Degrasse Tyson, since everyone who knows zero things about science assumes that Neil is the president of science, and Neil was gracious enough to explain to him how everything he says is wrong, probably more politely than I would, but Terry the narcissist presses forward, shocked that an intelligent, busy person wouldn’t want to waste his time placating a toddler. Joe seems surprised too, forgetting that educators enjoy educating people, not spending time and energy trying to show an insane person how insane they are.
Why this fixation with Neil? The reason I wanted to talk to him was because of his show the cosmos that he was doing after that incredible guy, you know, Carl Sagan did. The very first episode he had was talking about Giordano Bruno.
And he said that Giordano Bruno was looking for that grand unified field equation. And maybe one day someobody is going to do it. And when they do it it’s going to change the world.
And I’m like dude, I’ve done it! I’ve got it here! Giordano Bruno was not looking for a grand unified field equation.
Quantum physics didn’t exist in the 16th century. The concept of fields didn’t exist in general. The term was coined by Faraday in the 19th century.
This is the problem with science illiterate morons like Terry. They have no respect for science whatsoever. They have no interest in learning basic scientific principles, the history of science, what any scientist did, what scientists are doing now, how to do science, none of it.
They are singularly obsessed with the lofty idea of one brilliant insight that can change the world. It doesn’t matter what it’s called. That’s why he keeps saying grand unified field equation.
Because it doesn’t mean anything to him. It’s a fun phrase, nothing more. That’s what everyone was trying to do since antiquity because he says so, and he’s the one who’s done it, because he says so.
Walter Russell talked about the fact that the sun gave birth to the Earth, that it didn’t coalesce from some field. And the proof of this, do you guys know that the Earth is drifting away from the sun, and all of the planets in every solar system is drifting away from their primary at the same exact rate, like 1. 5 centimeters.
So this is a universal expansion that’s happening with everything moving away. So them saying, and the Webb telescope had proven that those galaxies couldn’t have formed 13, 14 billion years ago. But if you would just add up linearly, how long it would take the Earth to go from the sun to 93 million miles away, it’s 9 trillion… hold on.
Let’s go. This is what I’m talking about. He can’t be bothered to learn literally anything about astronomy.
The expansion of the universe has nothing to do with the dynamics of an individual solar system. The sun did not give birth to the earth, as though our planet emerged from inside of a star. He knows nothing about planetary formation.
And the idea that we have measured this for all other systems? How exactly would that work? We can detect an exoplanet’s orbit increasing by a centimeter how?
But sure, play with your calculator that you already told us shouldn’t be used because it lies about arithmetic. Well, ‘cause I know they’re watching me right now. And they’re mad at me.
Who’s they? The people that want, that… our entire world economy is based off of the politicians and the authorities that give the politicians their (accridation? ).
And those authorities, those universities, their entire curriculum is based off the Platonic solids. And our world economy is based off of 1 times 1 equaling 1. You think they fuck with your phone?
Oh I’m sure of it, because now I couldn’t even, I have to turn it off. Look at the level of paranoia beyond the simple delusions. The shadow government is watching Terry because he debunked the Platonic solids which are the basis of every economics course in every Rockefeller Jesuit institution.
I’m shocked that he’s not a flat earther, because this is exactly how they talk. But don’t worry, he’s an anti-vaxxer, obviously. And Joe is too.
You took a bold stand though, years ago when the governments were trying to poison their citizens. You took a very bold stand that nobody else took. That’s when I was like wow, I appreciate you, ‘cause I lost three or four jobs because I refused to take it.
I refused to. I bet you feel better about it now. Especially when you know all these people that have health problems because of it.
Cancers has increased 300%. All cause mortality, up 40% in some age groups. Pulmonary embolisms almost up like 500%.
Yeah, I wonder what caused that? No, none of those things are true, you heard them on the internet and believed them. But Terry has a little bit of biochemistry knowledge he wants to share.
I can walk you through what the spike protein did to the BRCA1 gene, that’s that gene inside of our DNA that tells us that there’s a damage, there’s damage, almost like the crews that go along the highway, and they immediately put up cones every time there’s a problem. Well the spike protein which is never, no protein has ever been able to enter the nucleus of the cell. Not only does it go to the ribosome and say hey, you know what, I don’t want you to produce whatever protein, like if it was a skin cell, you’re not going to produce keratin anymore.
You’re just going to produce these spike proteins. That spike protein went into the DNA, and it tells the BRCA1 gene, turn off. And that’s the gene that says hey there’s a mutation here, let’s scrap that thing.
And so now the cancers are building up. The spike protein doesn’t do anything to any gene. He doesn’t know what genes are.
Genes don’t “tell us” things. They are instructions for protein assembly. That’s why he goes to his pathetic analogy of something he saw on the highway, because he doesn’t know how transcription and translation work.
There is nothing unique about this spike protein, and he doesn’t know what ribosomes do. They translate any mRNA transcript that binds. Making a spike protein doesn’t render it incapable of producing other proteins.
Spike proteins can’t “go into DNA”, they can’t “tell a gene” anything, they can’t turn of genes, genes don’t detect mutations, the enzymes they code for are what do that, and he doesn’t know what cancer is. This is really pathetic, let’s skip ahead. So is these things that just by doing these calculations you created the exact form of Saturn including the rings?
Just the exact form of it. Just with the calculations. So you change the angles of incidence that these lynch pins, ‘cause remember, each one of these has, these are opposing vortices, so there’s 12 vortices to this, that are opposing so once the angles of incidence change, you change the motion and pressure conditions, you can now change the condition or the crystallization.
So he’s pretending to explain planetary formation without gravity, and without explaining literally anything about what he’s doing. Click a button, the planet is there. What are the dots?
Where did the matter come from, how did it arrange itself? Planetary formation is a process, this just materialized out of thin air. How?
There are no vortices. Nothing is opposing. There is no angle of incidence.
There is no crystallization. He is just listing random buzzwords. Now because we have the angles of incidence, material engineering can now separate the space between carbon and nitrogen, or carbon and boron, and have the same elements of titanium, vanadium, chromium, magnasay, and iron, or nickel, cobalt, nickel, copper, zinc, gallium, or germanium, in those higher octaves.
We can do that between silicone and phosphorus, or silicone and aluminum. So the transparent aluminum now becomes possible, because we can now control the pressure and motion conditions, where we couldn’t do that before, because they were going by Cartesian space at 90 degrees and 45 degrees, straight lines, the Euclidian space that they made up, this orthagonol, or church-like space that they’ve generated, because they wanted to promote that cross. He doesn’t even know the names of the elements.
He’s saying “mangasane” instead of manganese. He says silicone instead of silicon, because he doesn’t know that silicone is a different material. He can’t pronounce orthogonal.
He’s never even heard these words spoken before, and he is doing nothing whatsoever to actually explain anything about what he just showed to Joe. He’s practically speaking tongues and Joe is lapping it up. (speaking in tongues) And as the cherry on top, he pretends that this brilliance was hidden because the Catholic church loves the straight lines from the cross.
Does he not know how much power this symbol still has over normal people even today who would never fall for any of this bullshit? He just knows that churching up the story gives it a Da Vinci code vibe that ensnares gullible people. Can you tell me how a planet is formed under this theory?
So you have a sun, and how does the sun give birth to these planets? The same way we defecate and have gas. Like Jupiter, that red spot on Jupiter, that’s spinning on it, that’s going to become a moon.
It may take a billion or two billion years, that will ultimately become a moon off of Jupiter. Where is it? Right at the equator.
Where do we discharge at? Right at our equator. 90 minutes in Joe finally asks him to actually explain something, and Terry’s response is astounding.
Stars crap out planets the way we take a dump on the toilet. Case closed, everyone! Planets are fecal matter.
And the red spot on Jupiter will be a planet later. Of course this is meaningless, since it’s a storm. It’s a cyclone.
How does a bunch of wind form a planet exactly? And he’s just so objectively wrong about every trivial detail. The red spot is not at the equator, it’s 22 degrees below the equator.
Humans don’t have “equators” to defecate from, and the human anus is not located on the waist. This is such a stunning example of the difference between real science and insane ramblings. Ask this question of an astrophysicist.
You’ll get mountains of data, explanations, equations, predictions, confirmation of those predictions through observation. Ask Terry, and what do you get? The sun takes a crap.
The end. Who falls for this stuff? Everything is just one great being.
We’re all god. That’s what Jesus talking about. That’s what Buddha was talking about.
It’s recognizing the divinity in you. Actually neither of those people said anything like that. Buddha didn’t proclaim to be divine, and in Christian mythology Jesus didn’t say I’m god and so are all of you.
He just said that he was god. That’s kind of why the Romans killed him. Terry is just looking for excuses to call himself god, and he’s as dumb with theology as he is with science.
Here I’ve invented, I’m an oscar nominated actor, that is known all around the world, face recognition, vocal recognition, all around the world, I’ve invented a new form of flight. Tangential flight, the ability to fly around your own center of mass, something they’ve never been able to do, and you don’t hear anything about it. The narcissism is oozing out of every pore of his body and congealing into little origami cranes in front of our eyes.
He’s world famous, kind of, so his imaginary invention must be brilliant! Tangential flight? Tangent to what?
He doesn’t know what a tangent is. And of course his little toddler toy doesn’t actually fly or do anything. He just has cute animations.
Instead of all the props having to turn themselves around to stop and turn the opposite direction… Right, like a helicopter. They just switch the direction. They just, so it’s a collective pitch.
And it changes, and so now instead of going up you’re going down, but now five of them will come together. So I was trying to reach out to Elon Musk, I was trying to reach out to Jeff Bezos, I was trying, ‘cause my main goal was I was building these to clean up the upper atmosphere, all of that debris that’s up there, and ultimately to mine the asteroid belt. You can see immediately that somebody is clicking on a screen to trigger an animation, so it’s anyone’s guess as to why Elon Musk should care about this crappy video game.
Terry is not only smarter than every physicist in history, but he’s better at building spacecrafts than everyone alive, despite never having built anything! The hubris is off the charts. It’s not worth listening to this entire rant, but he genuinely believes that he has invented revolutionary technology, and that he’s being ignored for literally no reason.
And so it’s just going to react, and immediately it converts into a plasma. And so we can project anything into space. All of that has been accomplished.
And it’s ignored. Delusional narcissists always have this precise brand of persecution complex. James Tour, Ben Davidson, they all do the same thing.
All the experts are morons because they ignore my super brilliant revolutionary insights! The whole establishment is against me because they’re afraid of my truth! Honestly, I think we’ve had enough.
I got two hours into the three hour podcast, and there’s just no point in continuing. It’s the epitome of manic hogwash with virtually nothing to even sink your teeth into, and there’s only so many times I can point out that what he’s saying is meaningless. In the end, there’s only one point that needs to be made.
Pretentious tools like Terry can hope to fool as many people as they can by speaking confidently, and using jargon they hope the listener doesn’t understand. But what can they do with it? What can they physically achieve with it?
Terry thinks he’s reinvented physics, but that’s because he never learned any physics in the first place. Take this free body problem, for example. This is something he was supposed to learn in high school.
You use Newton’s laws, plug in some numbers, and you get an answer that correlates with reality. You can predict what will happen when you let go of the block. And guess what?
When you let go of the block, that thing does happen. Terry’s gibberish doesn’t have that power. His ramblings have no utility, no predictive power, no technological application.
It’s a parlor trick. It’s basically hypnotism. But as I mentioned before, it’s not harmless.
This way of thinking is dangerous, and these types of people are often dangerous. Do you want some evidence? Because I was angry.
I was really angry. And I was going to use all of the knowledge I had and I was going to destroy mankind. Oh my god, right out of Marvel.
I was like, yeah, I was about to, but then… Well I’m glad you didn’t. Statements like these are very revealing. It’s not a joke.
He genuinely believes he has this kind of power, and he contemplated exercising it in a violent, destructive way. Do you know who else has had such thoughts, and acted on them? Go and read the manifesto of the Unabomber.
It’s the exact same self-aggrandizing tone, the same superiority complex, the same incessant rambling. This is the psyche of cult leaders and domestic terrorists. I’m not saying that Terrence Howard necessarily would or will blow something up and murder people.
But those who blow things up and murder people tend to think this way. They have this strain of delusional narcissism in them, that enables them to first think they’re better than everyone else, and also that they deserve the right to exercise power over others. Terry is mentally ill.
He should be checked into a mental institution to get treatment for his personality disorder. Cue the onslaught of people saying I have no right to diagnose anyone based on a podcast appearance. Yeah, technically you’re right.
But also, he is a delusional narcissist with a personality disorder that should be committed to a mental institution. Sorry. And if the people in his life really cared about him, they’d have done that a while ago.
Now let’s pivot to Joe. In my video on Tucker Carlson I gave Joe a bit of a pass, but here Joe just fails miserably. And his failure is twofold.
First, Joe desperately needs a better bullshit detector. Anybody who can’t tell that Terrence is completely full of shit within a few sentences has terrible judgement, end of story. You don’t even need to be able to articulate with clarity how he is wrong.
It’s just blatantly apparent in his manner of presenting ideas, the way he vomits esoteric terminology rapid fire, the way he overperforms to give the impression of profundity, it's immediately apparent to any rational person. But the other problem is a more pernicious type of mental defect, which I’ve mentioned many times, and that is the anti-establishment bias. Joe has that in spades.
This is not something, like you’re explanation of these things and your description of the very nature of reality itself is not something that should be take lightly. No. It’s something that like… Thank you for saying that.
It needs to be laid out and it needs to be slowly examined. Because you’ve obviously spent a lot of time working on this. People with this bias can hear any ridiculous story from any unqualified clueless weirdo and they will immediately give it far more credence than it deserves simply because it feeds their desire to see established knowledge arbitrarily overturned.
Joe is psychologically incapable of seeing how stupid this all is because he desperately wants this story to be true. Wow. I wish I could really truly understand exactly what you’re saying.
Because I’m kind of getting it, and you’re doing a great job explaining it, but if you’re right, that really changes everything. Everything. And it accounts for why physics kind of hits a stalling point.
It doesn’t matter that Joe has no clue what he’s saying. Instead of entertaining the idea that he isn’t really saying anything, he just blindly asserts that the emperor has all his clothes on, and that the imaginary garments must be so much better than the drab and outdated clothing that establishment science provides, a field which obviously must be stalling, just because he refuses to lift a finger to learn how vibrant the field really is. It’s contrarianism on steroids, to the point where even the most trivial self-evident facts can be called into question just because of their addiction to perceiving themselves as superior to the masses.
Even something as trivial as one times one equals one. This insistence that the dissenting voice should instantly be taken more seriously than substantiated knowledge is an infantile attitude that is destroying our culture, and I’m tired of everyone looking the other way for fear of making waves or insulting people. Terrence should be mocked to his face on a daily basis.
He may not be evil, or deserve severe punishment, but these are the checks and balances that maintain civic responsibility. If you act like social poison, there should be an antidote. Everyone in his vicinity should be constantly showing him how delusional he is until something registers and he takes it upon himself to change.
Because as insane as he is, his ramblings have an impact. Certain people listen, their minds warp, they choose to further disregard the body of human knowledge, or any concept of expertise, and we all suffer the consequences of the poor choices they make as a result. But what’s the one thing we can say for certain about Terry?
This is what you’ll be remembered for. And your acting will be just a footnote. That about sums it up.
He will be remembered as a pointless lunatic no matter how badly the contrarians want to delude themselves. So that’s it for Terrence Howard. It is genuinely astounding to me that anyone would listen to this guy for more than 30 seconds, and subjecting myself to several hours of his ramblings has probably taken a few months off of my life.
So I hope you got something out of it, I’ll see you next time.
