Padre Hesse #03 - A Nova Religião Conciliar [LEGENDADO]

i have given you an introduction on uh the problems of the conciliar church which i call the counterfeit church since it assumes the name of catholic church but does not have the right to claim to be catholic since it is a new church with a new doctrine and a new liturgy yesterday i gave an introduction to the new liturgy today i'm going to talk about vatican ii that's where it all started well it started in the last century as you will have you will hear hear on the other tapes but uh vatican ii is the

doctrinal basis of a new church and uh there is one general remark that i have to make about the entire vatican council first of all i personally i underline i personally do not believe because i say personally because there's no papal pronouncement on it yet i personally do not believe that vatican ii was an ecumenical council for the simple reason that vatican ii had no intention of defining dogma i have to remind you that all of the ecumenical councils in history without a single exception had the intention of defining dogma and all of them with

one exception did the council of leo never defined dogma because they just never got around to do it but they wanted to third there was never an economical council called in unless there was a crisis of faith like the council of trent was called in after the lutheran reformers messed up the church in the northern countries vatican ii was called in for no other reason but pope john's inspiration so that's no reason to calling in the communicable council maybe i'm wrong with what i say in the sense that uh it is the uh the council

fathers and the pope who formerly declare something to be an economical council but in that case it is certainly at least to say the least a very exceptional economical council it is also exceptional in another regard it is the first council ever to pronounce heresy vatican ii as a whole is unacceptable to a catholic and after the talk you will see why now let's have like either time does not permit me to go through all the details of can do so i will point out the most important errors and heresies first of all i have

to do away with a mistake of interpretation the first document of vatican ii called sacrosanctum concilium is the constitution on the liturgy some people seem to believe that the new rite of mass that paul vi issued in 1969 is against the will of the council it is not the document the first document of the council psychosanctum concilium is formulated in a way that you can do with it whatever you want the very same the very same document you find number 22-2 giving to faculty to the bishops conferences to have the mass set in the vernacular

and the bishops conferences are allowed to decide on how far this may go provided rome's support doesn't say the holy father explicitly has to give permission it only says provided that the the sacred congregation for the divine worship is in agreement that's new too until vatican too nobody was allowed to change anything in the liturgy whatsoever without explicit papal permission and uh sacrosanctum concilium suggests makes a few suggestions uh like uh they want unnecessary repetitions to be canceled this is why nowadays the configure is not said before communion anymore this is why the configure uh

is not repeated by the people in uh by by the altar boys alternating with the priest but the priest says it alone if he ever says it because you have many options to that now uh sacrosanctum concilium says that the latin language must be the language of the liturgy and at the same time it says that parts of the mass can be in a vernacular and then it says if the bishops conference decides so the whole of mass the order of mass the cannon can be in the vernacular so you see it's a a totally

contradictory document and here is a very important thing that you ought to know for all the rest of what i'm going to talk about pious the vi in 1799 condemned the synod of pistoria now that was a a thing that took place in 1786 a few bishops in the area of pistoia in italy came together and demanded some changes in the attitude of the uh of rome uh towards uh certain issues in the church and they wanted uh exactly what vatican to issue they wanted the liberty of religion they wanted uh a certain relaxing of

the discipline and so on pious vi condemned the synod of historia condemned their pronouncements and in his uh bull octoriem fee day he says the purpose of the council is to clarify terms not to come up with ambiguous terms vatican 2 is ambiguous from the first to the last line vatican 2 is contradictory from the first to the last line but i cannot go into the contradictions of vatican ii in this short talk so i will give i will point out the worst heresies and let's start with the dogmatic constitution lumengenitium dogmatic in this context

does not mean it's dogma it means it's a constitutional teaching it doesn't give pastoral advice it is teaching which again is a lie because both john the 23rd and paul vi said this is a pastoral council it is not a dogmatical council but then they came up with two dogmatic constitutions which do not define anything do not bind the catholic to accept it but art of matthew constitution that means constitutions on the doctrine of the church and lumengencium is the constitution on lit on on the holy church lumen gentium is in heresy now you have

to understand that as a catholic you're not allowed to read books that contain heresy because in order to uh in order to make a book illicit as reading for a catholic it is not needed that the whole book is wrong it is so totally sufficient that part of the book is wrong so in the old days when you had a list of books that were prohibited to catholics which was called the index there were books on the index that contained one wrong line there was a very good translation of the bible on the index the

one s translation of the bible into the german german language because it contained two or three little errors for all the rest it was a very good translation but because of two or three little errors the book went on the index didn't get the imprimatur that means uh the agreement of a bishop and was prohibited as reading to catholics now vatican ii should be the first book on the index as far as this century is concerned because now lumengencium one this is something you have to remember remember lumengentium 1 8 15 16. it's easy to

remember 1 8 15 16. lumigentium 1 says the church in a way is in a way the sacrament of salvation concerning all people in the world now first of all the church is not a sacrament we have the seven sacraments the council of trent defined that we have seven sacraments that's a definition a dogmatic definition and you cannot possibly make it plausible to me that vatican too wanted to say yes but in the way containing all these seven sacraments the church is a sacrament of salvation it is not a sacrament and a sign it's not

because the church is a perfect society the church has been defined as a perfect society and not a sign a sacrament is a sign by definition and it certainly doesn't concern all people because those who reject the church are not subject to the church the church is not interested in them unless they convert the church does not judge them the church does not deal with them the church is not they do not make part of the church but vatican 2 says something different in lumen genetium 8 vatican 2 says the church of christ subsists in

the catholic church the word subsists doesn't tell you much in english it says it says a lot in latin sister in latin means something that is lying underneath that means the grass is subsistent to my way of walking but it could also be subsistent to father trinchot's way of walking and not just to mine so when you say that the church of christ subsists of the catholic church that does not exclude the protestant churches vatican ii is too intelligent to to say they're they were too clever to say that the church contains the protestant churches

and the orthodox churches and all these other churches but they said maybe those are churches contained in the catholic church because they said the church of christ subsists in the catholic church for almost 2 000 years the catholic church insisted that the church of jesus christ is the catholic church and it is defined dogma that the church of jesus christ is the catholic church it's identical with the catholic church nothing outside the catholic church is part of the church of christ and nothing of the church of christ is outside the catholic church so the catholic

church and the church of christ are identical the church of christ founded christ founded the catholic church and no other church christ did not just found the latin right we have other rights in the church i mean ways of celebrating ways of worship but we have only one catholic church and uh i have to repeat this now for the third time uh pope eugene iv in 1441 of the council of florence defined as dogma that nobody who is not subject to the roman pontiff can ever be saved he said that those who are schismatics and

heretics cannot be saved even if they for some reason believe they were shedding their blood for christ now when i say they cannot be saved when i say they cannot be saved i mean objectively speaking they cannot be saved there is no objective way that they could be saved subjectively speaking as far as that person is concerned we do not know if god will give them an extraordinary grace after death if they have been honest during their lifetime here but we do not know it the church cannot speak about the dead the church does not

look into the hearts of people he can't the church has to judge according to external circumstances to manifested formalities to formal uh manifestation of the faith and the formal manifestation of the faith is if you're a member of the catholic church and believe everything the church says and if you're subject to the roman pontiff and only if you are in the catholic church you have an objective chance of being saved this is what the dogma means now um in uh i will come back to that later in lumen gentium 8 suddenly the protestant churches make

part of the church of christ they do not make part of the catholic church but they make part of the church of christ because the document says the church of christ subsists in the catholic church excuse me the church is subsist to the catholic church and this comes to the point that cardinal ratzinger abusing saint thomas aquinas in his quotation being asked if the what what that means the church of christ subsists why doesn't the council say the church of christ is the catholic church colonel ratzinger said oh but the word subsist is much stronger

than the verb is and that is an academic lie he was quoting saint thomas but saint thomas talks about god himself when he says subsistence that means subsistence is the most noble form of being only in god because god god is not in every single flower but he subsists to every single flower he subsists to every single being he subsists to everything that is in existence because everything that is you me this house the plants out there this planet the whole universe has its being from god even if man created it it receives the being

from god does the new orleans streetcars are created by man but they receive their being from god because there cannot be anything without god who is being himself i know this is kind of difficult for you but it's so difficult because it's the most simple thing in reality now when the rat singer quotes saint thomas aquinas in the wrong context and this is the method of the council as you will see later you quote somebody but you quote him in the wrong place and that's a form of lying you cannot deny that lumengencium 8 makes

it optional to believe if the catholic church is the only true church or if there can be other churches that have a chance to get you saved no wonder no protestants are converting anymore the same lumension 8 needless to say talks about the fact that even the churches that do not have that are not in union with the roman pontiff receive the holy spirit that's another heresy you can read in the gospel of saint john that the holy spirit is given only to the catholic church at pentecost the holy spirit did not come to the

lutherans to the future lutherans at pentecost the holy spirit did not come to the old religions the old pagan religions the holy spirit came to the catholic church and to nobody else it came to saint peter first of all and the apostles so anybody who is separated from saint peter's successor the pope cannot receive the holy spirit it's ridiculous and when a lutheran pastor baptizes an innocent child and the innocent child dies baptized and goes to heaven this innocent child does not go to heaven because it was baptized by a lutheran pastor but because a

lutheran pastor illicitly administered the catholic sacrament of baptism is that clear now in lumen gentium i do not remember at the moment i do not have the book and lumen jameson 15 something that you should look up yourself for this i recommend from flannery the documents of vatican 2 do not buy the translation of the other guy with the red cover buy the book with the blue book cover because the other guy translates in a in an accommodating way uh lumengencium 6 16 is something that you can entirely judge on your own the muslims together

with us adore one merciful god together with us that's a quotation m i checked it in latin to make sure that this heresy stands firm it stands firm now where's the incarnation where's the trinity the quran the holy book of the muslims cause i'm quoting the quran calls the idea of a holy trinity father son and holy spirit an excremental idea including the quran thank you part and now vatican too tells me that they together with us adore one merciful god now where's the first commandment they have another god they have allah the lonely one

person allah we have father son and holy spirit and the second person of god the son become man and the word became flesh verbum cara facto mister the last gospel at mass uh i've never heard about allah that he would have become verbum that the the allah would have become the meat the flesh i've never heard that allah assumed a human nature and if you tell a muslim that allah was incarnated on earth he will kill you and he is right from his viewpoint of religion the muslims are not as accommodating as the catholics and

god will probably bless many of them for merely that reason now the vatican too tries to tell me that i pray together with the muslims to the one merciful god this is blasphemy it is heresy and it is blasphemy and the same lumen gentium 16 tells me that the jews and i pray to the same god the jews explicitly reject the incarnation the jews explicitly rejected the idea of the blessed trinity and they call it names believe me in their books and how not even i would quote that and now that they can 2 tells

me we are praying to the same god do you realize that a certain german author godhold ibrahim lessing in the 18th century wrote a play called the ring parable the peril the parable of the ring in which he has a representative of the catholic church a representative of the muslims and a representative of the jewish faith agreeing with each other that everything is the same anyway because we pray to the same god god told ephraim blessing was a practicing and open freemason and here we have vatican ii a so-called economical council repeating what god told

abraham the admittedly open freemason said in his play the idea the concept that the muslims and the jews pray into the same god as we do which our present pope repeats over and over again this concept is heresy it implies a lot of other heresies and it is blasphemy and anybody who tells me that we can interpret this in a catholic way is to say the least a little bit not i quote again the muslims together with us adore one merciful god now give me a catholic interpretation of that i don't think that even cnn

could come up with a catholic interpretation on that and they are very good in making up excuses lines and other things oops i hope nobody will sue me and this is uh lumenegencio there's other things in lumigentium that cry out to heaven for being blasphemous stupid and heretical but we have to go on the next document concerned is dinitatis humane and i quoted it already in one of my former speeches but now i have to quote it in the context again number three says and to make it easier for you to understand what i'm saying

i will quote the present pope's interpretation of this line quoted from katie casey tradendo number 32 cuaron oper spiritus christi for the efforts of which the spirit of christ does not deny to bring salvation whom does he talk about he talks about the protestant churches the pope does that means he says for the to the experts of the protestant churches the spirit of christ does not deny salvation now get this is there anybody here who does not understand the distinction between subjective and objective i presume so objective means you are concerned with the the matter

the thing subjective means you're concerned with the person that means with his conscience with his intentions with his view of things the wine i'm drinking here is objectively an excellent wine subjectively you might not like it all the same some other soft drinks around here objectively absolutely bad but you might like them subjectively you understand now uh vatican ii and the present pope talk about the protestant churches and they talk about the efforts of the protestant churches now if you tell me that it would be possible that a protestant who has lived a just life

out of his life who has tried his best to find out the truth who has tried his best to avoid sin will not be sent to help by god i will say i don't know maybe through an extraordinary act of grace from god or an act of of of of authentic contrition he might actually die as a member of the catholic church without knowing but wanting to do so that's possible we cannot exclude it subjectively speaking objectively speaking if anybody says that the efforts of the protestant church and remember what i said about the innocent

child being baptized in a stolen sacrament anybody who says that the efforts of protestant churches can save the soul is a heretic dinitatis humane are vatican too and the present pope says it so the present pope is a heretic we have discussed the question if that makes him seize the pope or not he doesn't he's still the pope he's a bad pope the efforts of the protestant churches cannot save anybody they cannot save anything the efforts of the protestant churches can only bring you down to hell because the efforts of the protestant churches are heretical

efforts objectively speaking i do not condemn the poor pastor and in this regard i should mention to you that in saint thomas church in new york episcopalian i found the best sermon on the devil in a long time not in saint patrick's however christ was never substantially present in the beautiful beautiful beautiful saint thomas church in 52nd street fifth avenue in new york and except for baptism there was no sacrament given there ever you do not receive uh confirmation in saint thomas you cannot go to confession in saint thomas you cannot save your soul in

saint thomas church not objectively speaking you understand when i say not objectively speaking this is very important so this number three is heretical so the whole document is heretical so the whole council is heretical the next thing in day verbum day verbum is the document and it's called a dogmatic constitution day verbum is the document on the interpretation of holy scripture and there with the impermanence of quoting they figures of first vatican toe they redefine the term of tradition now vatican won leadership vatican tour with vatican one vatican ii has the goal to uh quote

vatican one on its own reinterpretation of tradition the first vatican council last century on the pious the night the first vatican council defined dogma defined tradition as everything that has been handed down to us including the uh written tradition that means holy scripture and oral tradition and that means everything the apostles heard to come out of the mouth of our lord jesus christ period that's tradition some things in oral tradition we do not yet fully know that's not a development of tradition tradition is there like uh the apostles knew that our lady was immaculately conceived

it became a dogma only in 1854 the apostles knew that our lady was assumed into heaven with her body it became a dogma only in 1950 that's not a development of tradition this is just finding tradition which is there and defining tradition which is there so i repeat vatican won the first vatican council which was a true council the first vatican council said there is two sources of the faith holy scripture and tradition and tradition the oral tradition is exactly what i was talking about everything received from the words of our lord jesus from the

mouth of our lord jesus christ himself [Music] now mannequin two says there is a growth in tradition that means tradition is developed [Music] under the influence of the faithful study and their religious experiences get this now suddenly we do not need holy scripture anymore suddenly we do not need the popes anymore who interpret holy scripture and what has been handed down to us from one pope to the other suddenly we have the faithful involved with their religious experiences and with their own studies you cannot possibly imagine how much i give on the people's studies and

their religious experiences even if they're clergy and especially when they are clergy so this is the new definition of tradition by the way parenthesis the famous document day verbum of 1988 in which the pope uh fakes to uh want the old mass to be said the pope is a liar because on the year after that he said he doesn't like he doesn't like the fact that so many people are still still still attached to those forms of worship he meant the old mass he said that a year after he issued a crazy day telling the

bishops that they should give white and generous permission for the old mass that goes to show you the honesty of the man in ecclesia day he criticizes archbishop lefevre for his view on tradition the archbishop lefevre i read everything he ever wrote archbishop lefevre was a very unoriginal man as far as doctrine is concerned i have never heard anything out of the mouth of archbishop lefebvre that would he be in any way new to me unless i hadn't studied well my theology before that archbishop lefevre as far as his theological pronouncements are concerned was entirely

unoriginal because he was totally and completely faithful to the doctrine of the church with absolutely no exception whatsoever and he quoted the first vatican council and said tradition is what the apostles heard coming from the mouth of our lord jesus christ and has which has been handed down to us by the popes and then uh the present pope accuses archbishop lefevre of a wrong understanding of tradition quoting day verbum number eight we have to say more about that the experience of the faithful and their personal studies are adding to the growth of tradition thanks but

no thanks next the entire document gaudium it's base that's the document on the church in the modern world was written by the found was written in a sense not directly but indirectly written by the founder of the opal's day the so-called because he isn't the so-called blessed jose marias grivadi balaguer who wanted the church to be a society based on the laity a concept that has been condemned by pious the tenth in his encyclical modernism he wanted the church to conform to the modern world and he wanted a one world government guardian with space in

number 12 utters blasphemy when it says all the religions of this world the non-christian and the christian religion agree with us that all religious efforts and all the efforts of the church are directed towards man but the literal quotation directed towards man sounds familiar to the one who has read about the masons sounds familiar to the one who has read about blasphemy's other that the united nations or at the presidio doesn't it now to say that all the efforts of the church are directed towards man is heresy and blasphemy all the efforts of the church

are directed towards god in reality now the oath mass says so the new mask not sure gaudium with space also postulates as i said before a peaceful government of the whole world on the one body of government this is to say the least naive in 1965 when most of the governments on this in this world were already anti-clerical and against the church it is to to say the least naive i do not believe for a moment that it is naive i believe it's diabolical and i do recommend to you to buy this book on vatican

too and if you write to me i will give you all the numbers concerned doesn't cost me much time at some 40 numbers something like that all through the council you read those numbers then you know exactly why the conciliar church is not the catholic church but the counterfeit church you just read vatican 2 on which they are based another thing about vatican ii i uh there is no need to quote uh the wonderful document on religious liberty please do not call it religious freedom in this country the words freedom and liberty are usually confused

not only by the democrats as usual but also by the republicans unfortunately freedom is a good thing liberty is a bad thing freedom means you have the freedom to do what you have to do liberty means you are at liberty to do what you want and that's not liberty but slavery of sin saint paul says that not i so as long as the statue of liberty is not the statue of freedom and not interested in the old broad new york harbor we talk about the liberty of religion and the liberty of religion is something in

vatican 2 that caused many bishops to stop signing documents because vatican 2 and i always forget the name of the document there are such crazy names and titles what's the one on religious liberty um um now i can't remember it right now i'm sorry i should have brought the book but you can find it easily the one who has the book just check uh in the index and the religious freedom of freedom of religion or liberty of religion whatever they call it liberty of religion has been condemned by the popes gregory the 16th fires the

ninth leo the 13th pirates the 10th pious the 11th fires the twelve you are not free to choose your religion you are bound in conscience to choose the catholic church and to belong to the catholic church and if you don't as the church says it objectively speaking you cannot be saved the church cannot condemn anybody into hell not even judas iscariot there's no pronouncement on him ever so anybody who thinks that he's free to choose the religion might go to hell for it see if i was free to choose my religion in this country i

would join with episcopalians they have nicer churches but they have a better salary i could marry i could still say even if in english a beautiful form of mass in saint thomas church and it's not mess but but who cares uh in saint thomas church they say the evening service with the the veil over the chalice and the birds and the missile is on the epistle side and the altar is facing god and what an altar beautiful one of the most beautiful neo-gothic altars i've ever seen and the priest is nicely dressed and when he

gives a sermon he gives a sermon that reminds you of your duties towards god of your duty to avoid sin he talks about you must save your soul he talks about the glory of the blessed trinity he doesn't talk about nicaragua he doesn't talk about the economically disadvantaged he doesn't talk about the poor people in prison he doesn't talk about all of that and that and that he talks about god and ours our duty to save our souls if i had the freedom of religion i've been an episcopalian for many years already but i do

not have it i am bound in conscience to adore god in the way that god wants me to adore him that means i have to be a catholic even if it cost me my life there is no such thing as liberty of religion forget it forget vatican too let's print the bumper sticker forget vatican [Applause] now one last short comment on our dear present pope i'm going to quote only one encyclical and you will be astonished his first encyclical it's an old tradition the pope's first encyclical is the most important encyclical because in the first

and seconds of the pope says what is going to be his program for his pontificate his first encyclical is called redemptor hominis the redeemer of man mind you not the redeemer of men plural but the redeemer of man of man undefined everybody therefore in this document apart from the fact that the document is truckloads of you know what in his document he never ever uses the term roman catholic or catholic church he speaks about the conscience of the church he talks about the church of the of the new advent i don't know what the new

advent is probably referring to his constant references to the year 2000 in his document number 10 second line he utters the following statement the amazement about the value and dignity of man is called the good news the gospel it is also called christianism i repeat the amazement about the value and the dignity of the human being or man is called the good news or the gospel it is also called christianism christianism in the german translation of this encyclical that i have the translator was so ashamed of this that he left out the word it is

also called christianism he just left it out in the german translation vocator in christianism you just left it out and i checked the i don't remember i haven't memorized it but i checked the the latin original and you always have to interpret church documents according to the latin original not the polish original okay uh because the latin original will be used by future popes not the polish original so the uh the the the latin original is correctly translated the way i do so i repeat this astonishing line the amazement about the value and the dignity

of man is called the the the good news the gospel is also called christianism that's blasphemy that's absolute and total blasphemy saint pius the tenth said the only dignity of man is in his being a catholic that's the only dignity in him the only dignity of man that i have is in my being a catholic and a catholic priest not in my being gregory hesse and in the same encyclical and with this i conclude because i'm sick and tired of it in this same encyclical the pope says with the incarnation of christ man has been

revealed to himself he's only quoting guardium at space number 22. man has been revealed to himself until this pope taught me uh to forget my old faith i had i had always believed that the new testament was you had revealed the son and the holy spirit to us i always thought that the the the message of the new testament was revealing the son the incarnation and the holy spirit so what we have here all together is not only a new church it is a gnostic sect look up in the dictionary the word g-n-o-s-t-i-c look it

up in the dictionary agnostic gnostic it comes from gnosis no enlightenment the word there is no there is no good translation in english for the word gnosis there is only one in not even in italian argentina is in german sometimes in psychology modern psychology even english language the word akintnis is used for that reason because there is no proper term in english it's uh the fact that he realized something but there's no word for the realization but that's i don't think that's good english so that's gnosis agnostic sect i don't have to explain to what

the sect is you know about the jehovah witnesses i like them much more than the the new church because the jehovah witnesses at least tried to mission to to convert other people which personally subjectively speaking is a nice effort now in mother in the modern church they will tell you to join another religion instead so agnostic sect is a sect that believes that man is the superior being and only the recognition of things in our brain is what counts which means you have a purely subjective religion which means you make your own religion and which

means you can do whatever you want it will be fine that'd be nice as gilbert chesterton said if i was not a catholic i would have a harem so uh you can you see how absurd you see the absurdity of things we are living in agnostic sect founded by vatican ii which our dear beloved present pope calls the second pentecost and i cannot say amen to that i disagree with him he's a heretic i reject his teachings i do not reject his papacy i reject what he does in his papacy and i reject what he

says period uh you must not go to the new mass because the new mass is against the will of the church against the will of god it's against divine law it is an illegal right illicit it's not only against divine law it's against eternal law to eternal law is first then divine law as an as his own interpretation of his own eternal law and then positive law natural law and then positive law it's against it's against positive law pronounced by pius v it's against the natural law uh as the tradition of the church and it's

against divine law as the dogma of the council of trent and it's against eternal law therefore you cannot attend the nova's order mass unless you have to for social purposes uh like you did and in this case you do not say amen because amen does not mean all right it's okay amen means yes yes yes you can't say yes to the new mass the new mass does not represent the catholic faith in the 1930s stalin started already to insert kgb agents into western seminaries and in 1974 nato in its annual report not the report you

could buy at the newspaper stand but the report that fortunately i got to see estimated uh 3 000 kgb agents to be found among the catholic hierarchy that means priests and bishops it's very typical martin luther because uh it's not typical cranmer now cranmer committed communion in the hand but he did not allow the communicant to stand archbishop thomas cranmer the founder of the anglican right he insisted on the communicant kneeling because he believed it was symbolic bread that could could contain like a can you know contain christ for those who believe in it luther

insisted fully and totally on the meal this is why the novus order church doesn't have an altar it has a buffet table and now we have the catholic churches with tables including saint peter's basilica now not the papal arthur the papal author can't be changed can't be turned around that's a different thing i would have to give a special lecture on old authors of basilicas in rome there were there was never in the history and after facing the people the altar always went to the east so if the apps of a church had to be

built in the west then the author had to be turned around if a modern priest no matter what language he uses no matter what ritual he uses if a modern priest has the intention to baptize a child into the catholic church for the forgiving of the original sin and if he says so then the baptism is valid as the baptism of a muslim right out in the highway would be valid if i have an accident on the highway and there's a guy with me in the car who is not baptized and the only one passing

by is an a-wrap with a towel head and uh i want somebody i can't move i'm right there in the car and this guy right next to me says father please baptize me i think i'm gonna die i would have to wait until somebody shows up and i would ask this muslim uh to find me the the famous bottle with water back there and baptize the guy next to me the church has said everybody can baptize unless he does not have the intention to do what the church does now when an a-wrap in a tower

head a tower an old tower head says uh you good man i do what you want then he wants to do what the church does he doesn't know what the church does but he wants to do what i want and what i want is what the church does now so he wants to do what the church does this is the old teaching of the church that's not new so uh unless the the forgiving of the original sin is excluded uh it's valid if a new priest says you're hereby received in our community and i congratulate

you and therefore i receive you right here and i've baptized you in an english does not valid baptism because baptism is not a reception into a community baptism but the essential baptism is to get rid of our original sin i sure believe in something that was approved by a miracle that has been seen by 70 000 people and by some other people uh in 15 miles distance from the place where the miracle took place this is the only reason why i believe in fatima because principally i'm against visions against apparitions and against miracles i do

not believe them until they approve as i give you one example this is interesting to know for you saint uh uh saint catherine laboure she was the one with the miraculous marcos medal saint catherine lavery had apparitions from our lady uh i believe they're true for one reason there is one incident in the evening in the late afternoon saying catherine laboure had another operation from our lady our lady was sitting in a chair saying catherine robery knelt with her hands in the lap of our lady imagine and they had a nice conversation and then the

bells rang for vespers now you know nuns are supposed to attend vespers okay the bells rang for vespers and saint catherine of berea got up and said to our lady i'm sorry i have to go and went to vegetables and let our lady sit there so you don't believe me the next day the next day our lady came back and said to saint catherine laboure if you had none not gone to vespers as you are commanded to last night i would not have been allowed to come back that should teach you something no that that's

definitely authentic that is authentic because uh that's the whole point you see most of the apparitions go against the church teaching major career was started by a couple of youngsters who wanted to make a joke and two greedy franciscans found out how you can make money that way franciscans always know how to make money believe me and uh major gauria is not authentic because first of all our lady uh says the rosary there that means our lady says that he'll marry our lady cannot say the hail mary no of course up imagine how can our

ladies say pray for us sinners that would be blessed for me in in bayside our lady quoting quotes says that the unknown sign flying objects the flying saucers are vehicles for the demons according to my theology a demon doesn't need a vehicle and he has no triathlon you