Explaining the Political Triangle

I'm sure we all know the political Compass it's become super famous with loads of teenagers building their entire identities around what quadrant they're in and people like my friends jreg constructing their careers around talking about it a fun fact I want to throw in here is that the political Compass was invented by libertarian Advocates to separate themselves from Fascism and also to portray libertarianism as a political philosophy independent from the right or the left left that's why there is a specific axis for libertarian versus authoritarian rather than the consensus wisdom of the right versus the

left I'm not going to be a redditor and go all autist about what's wrong with the political Compass I think it does the thing it's designed to do pretty well the purpose of language is to communicate a point and thus if a system is able to effectively communicate an intellectual idea even if imperfectly we should keep it around that being said as an anthropologist in historian foremost I find that the political Compass breaks down immediately once you leave industrialized Western societies an issue for example is that everyone in history before the 19th century is shoved

into the authoritarian right-wing Corner the author right corner has loads of people who don't have that much in common whether the Taliban Medieval Europe the lon regime France Fascism and other issues that outside of the West you'll see combinations of often socially conservative and big government which don't make sense with our political Compass where does imperial Japan or the umed copit fit into this people who try to put the Roman Empire on the political Compass are silly to be clear I don't dislike this metric I think the right versus left axis is intensely useful and

in fact the clearest dividing line for the whole world over the last 200 years in thousands of years our time will be remembered as the global battle between the right and the left from the French Revolution through the world wars leading to the Cold War followed by the culture War today that all being said the further you go back into history you see other divides whether between Protestant and Catholic Church versus State Sunni or Shia or the Unix or manderin in Imperial China this is where the political triangle comes in it was invented as an

anthropological tool to model every possible social structure in history every single Society in history fits into this triangle it's a bit deceptive in that it's somewhat similar to the political Compass but with a few important differences the purpose of this video is to explain this [Music] triangle all civilizations must deal with a variety of issues including debt debt is insane and getting rid of debt can be incredibly difficult but with PDS debt you can find the best way to get out of dead PDS debt has customized options for anyone struggling with credit cards personal loans

collections or medical bills if you're making payments every month on your debt and your balances aren't going down this program is for you everyone with $10,000 or more in eligible debt qualifies and there's no minimum credit score required PDS provides a service to match you with debt solution tailor to your financial situation I know a lot of people struggle with debt and so I want PDS debt to help you which is why I'm making this intro and for my viewers PDS debt is offering a free debt analysis it only takes 30 seconds head over to

PDS debt.com whatat ifal TST to get your free debt assessment today so check out PDS debt and get out of debt now a great iron is that the political triangle was made by one of my best friends Kurt dittle Kurt is in my opinion one of the most intelligent public figures and one of the most important philosophers of our time although he and I don't agree on everything my staff has a phrase called the Kurt pill which is meant to symbolize how learning about his ideas has completely changed our vision of the world Kurt has

made a few very Advanced intellectual breakthroughs which in my opinion directly or indirectly will change Chang the course of history Kurt and I have been friends for 2 years and he's been watching walst for the last 8 years he's made five companies worth $100 million and now runs a think tank I've had him check this video out to see if it fits with his understanding of the triangle Kurt's ideas are very Advanced and I don't pretend to understand all of them his theories are public on the propertarian website with all that out of the way

let's get started there are a couple points I want to clear out before we start explaining how each of these Works an important distinction between between this and the normal political compass that I've seen a lot of people get confused over is that the political Compass has two separate axes that being left and right and the other being authoritarian libertarian thus Each corner of the political Compass shares something with at least another Corner this isn't how the triangle works though here there are three polarities with each corner of the triangle being like a magnet which

sucks a certain Society more so in One Direction Over another the edges of the triangle is as Extreme as possible for that one trait the three edges of the triangle are Authority freedom and theocracy given these are the only three ways humans can interact you find that different societies naturally end up recycling these methods in differing ways this is based off the three economic relations those being trade hierarchy or family life is about the consumption or sharing of energy which originally comes from the sun there are three separate ways humans can exchange energy with each

other one is with trade which we assume to the only economic relation in our society but that's kind of obvious in which let's say I want your pizza so I agree to pay you money for the pizza it's consensual then there's hierarchy the government orders you to pay them money alternately a princely patron giving a donation to an artist in exchange for making a painting to glorify his rule thirdly is family families are economically communist you are supposed to share resources in order to help your Offspring partner or kin these other two relations are more

powerful in every other society and thus we rarely think about them the three edges correspond to Fascism liberalism and communism roughly if you want to have a more fine tooth combed answer the societies which respond the most to each Edge are the Vikings zist Russia or maist China Kurt's Real Genius here has been the ability to fully figure out the logical extensions of Darwinism thus he has established social rules for how Society functions based off understanding the incentive structure of how humans would interact if they were animals like we actually are basically taking an Animal

Planet look at human societies through the lens of those who get resources and eat whom not through the story The societies tell about themselves to justify it if you've ever watched a lot of Nature Documentaries which I was personally addicted to as a child you find a very archetypal story of the entrenched old alpha male with his mates he grows old and cruel then the new Young Scrappy guy comes out of the Willer to kill the entrenched Elite and then mates with the females this is literally the plot of The Lion King and you can

push this narrative onto almost all animals whether baboons Lions lobsters or horses in this system the Liberty axis are the young men who don't yet have power and they form alliances of mutual benefit or War bands this is why groups like The Vikings cacs Pirates or feudal Europe were normally capitalist republics meanwhile the established males are the authority axis as you can see from the normal historic pattern of tyranny coming from strong government in exchange for order meanwhile theocracy is the women who mate with whoever the Victor is this final bit will make more sense

once I can explain it Kurt has made the argument that this is the role of religion in human history which I will explain Kurt has crafted this to fit onto moral foundations Theory which for like myself as well John height was a huge influence on his worldview theocracy pulls from the Care Foundation meanwhile Liberty for Freedom or fairness while Authority puls from loyalty Purity and Authority we will explain this to a greater degree later an interesting thing you might notice is that this is somewhat similar to the political Compass except for the removal of lib

left although that's not perfect and that these traits don't perfectly correlate with the political Compass I personally find this Justified since there literally aren't any Li societies ever I don't count some tiny hamlet in Catalonia during the Spanish Civil War which was crushed immediately or devolved into Marxist ocracy the problem is that there is no Vector in which to actually make choices or distribute resources or really govern based off Li principles the fundamental reality is that the idea of forming group consensus and then making choices about that doesn't actually work in the real world it's

just completely impractical that's not how the human condition works and that you either need to organize people by hierarchy or a choosing mechanism like Market or democracy the reality is that when people try to push for libertarian left Wing social Utopias it just results in government authoritarian management as you'll see later the idea of a Libertarian left Utopia is a feature of the authoritarian left propaganda and not a bug one of the most important points of this video is that Kurt and I independently came to the same conclusion for why western civilization was so successful

How the West Was able to colonize the World Unite the planet together usher in the scientific agricultural health or industrial revolutions alongside the Renaissance of reformation is due to the West having a balanced social structure the issue most societies fall into is that they have a single ruling class who Co-op the society for their benefit exploiting them this happened with the bureaucracy in China the priests in India the slave owners in Rome or the alliance of the Warriors and priests in Islam the society then stops progressing what happened in the west was that a balance

of power between the church nobility merchants and monarchy that none of them could take over over and destroy the system the West had institutions which balanced against these three axes or church State and capitalism due to the West being able to activate all three axes it was able to adapt to every situation the West created a position in which it effectively hacked the Trinity and was able to hit exponential advancement as a civilization as we get started I will try to explain each of these axes through the era of history in which it affected the

given Society the most part one Authority the year is 00 and were in Russia zaris Russia is one of the most absolutist states in the world the Emperor or Zar has total Authority as Russia doesn't have property rights in every single part of the society is an extension of The Emperor's Authority the majority of Russia's population are surfs serfdom in Russia is much more comparable to African-American slavery than to West European serfdom which a lot of you are probably more familiar with the Russian surfs had basically no rights and could be beaten raped sold off

and often killed by their landlords there's a story of an especially cruel Noble woman where some of her surfs accidentally made eye contact with her and then she sent them off to Siberia as convicts a fate nearly as bad as death even among the nobility they would refer to themselves as slaves to the Zar the Russian nobility upon Penning their letters to the emperor would refer themselves as your humble slave Russia was a society which the entire social structure was based off absolute loyalty to your social Superior the Surfs served their Lords and the Lords

served the bizarre in Russian Society sacrificing your whole life to your Superior was seen as normal the Russian military would draft peasants for their whole lives in order to be more Humane shortened it to 25 years the nobility in turn also had to either serve in the military or the government Russia is the most extreme example of the process of loyalty in of itself if you folks want to know more watch the video I made about Russian civilization however this is a thread you see all over history examples of other societies in which unquestioning loyalty

to the ruler were dominant social organizing principles or the Inca Empire which was one of the most authoritarian societies ever Persia the ottoman Turks the Roman Empire and basically every society which has an Emperor as we'll see later China is the society which built itself from the ground up based off these foundations an important distinction is that the difference between this form of authoritarianism and the other Theocratic feminine form we'll discuss later is that there is no ideological justification really for example in communist societies they're founded upon unquestioning loyalty to the state but it's since

the state is fulfilling some philosophic or holy goal its loyalty to the concept where in zarus Russia its loyalty to your social superiors for being social superiors a recent historic example of this is fascism in fascism the goal of unity inside the group is seen as a moral good in of itself if you read musolini he actually invented the word totalitarian and used it as a positive in that the goal was for the state to take over every single aspect of a person's life in Nazi Germany or imperial Japan on top of this goal was

to completely submerge the individual into the tribe the idea is that it's not loyalty to tribe for the ideology the tribe has but loyalty to the tribe because it's your tribe what this means is this is a pretty cynical and practical worldview it aims at dominance as its ultimate aim this is what Kurt has correlated it with the established masculine Authority effectively we are already in power and would like to keep it that way this isn't something our society likes in that of the three axes this is the one which has been most demonized in

our current Society however like the other axis this one does have benefits in that order is necessary and can be positive if used correctly in yian archetypes there is the division between Mother Earth and father culture father culture creates stability under which creat ity and human civilization emerges but in itself devolves into corruption tyranny or being too restrictive the advantage of this system is the ability to operate on scale if the people in a group submit themselves to the group identity it allows greater cooperation among larger groups of people John height talks about how humans

evolved to be individuals sometimes but we have a switch built into us which allows us to turn into Hive creatures like ants or bees due to this there are conditions in which we are are willing to sacrifice ourselves as individuals for the group at these times the individuals act out things that are in the strategy for the total group this switch is the authority axis in the emotional system I've developed this axis corresponds very closely to shame and disgust with shame being prevalent in Asian and non-western civilizations and disgust with conservative societies as I said

before this also fits with John Height's measurement where this access pulls from Authority loyalty and Purity effectively this system exists to maintain standards for group Behavior people often like Authority since they feel insecure in themselves as individuals and most of the population actually craves Authority also the average person isn't that smart or driven so they actually do do better by following the hive mind this is not politically correct to say but this is even more true for women in Eric Hoffer's great book on totalitarianism he calls it a freedom from Freedom the massive social changes

implicit to the Industrial Revolution caused Mass Social chaos which then resulted in people craving Authority thus resulting in Monsters like Hitler Stalin or mauo you can pretty closely correlate how closely people follow this AIS based off how militarily threatened that area is I've talked before about how you can correlate authoritarianism based off the borders of the former Mongol Empire this is since these were societies that were in proximity to the nomadic tribes who were were the most deadly military opponents of the premodern world just the Mongols killed nearly 100 million people during the Middle Ages

when the total world's population was 500 million thus societies evolve to sacrifice the individual in exchange for the group to fight off the bloodthirsty Nomad Invaders and if you want to look at Russia our previous example Russia became so autocratic partly based off the Mongol system of governance and also to fight off the Mongols you can even see this on the European continent which the countries which created democracy or capitalism were Islands or Coastal societies like Britain the Netherlands Athens or Rome the countes stuck in the middle of the map like France Germany or Russia

became absolutist States Poland's Lithuania is an example of an attempt to create a republic on the North European plane and it was crushed by the authoritarian Austria Prussia and Russia this is since in high pressure situations authoritarianism is the best social structure this is why the military is based off author AR and unquestioning Leadership the same is true for companies whenever I run clubs or my own personal business I realized you have to create clear hierarchical structures since it's the only way to get things done you see this is why most Societies in history were

autocratic monarchies since by making an unfair system in which you pick the leader automatically it lessens friction and allows leadership to move as smoothly as possible that being said the other side of this Duality is that since the authoritarian system creat stability it's also not creative this is even more true in the societies like Russia or China where they don't have that many alternate institutions to the state like a church capitalism or Warrior nobility the rapid changes implicit to the Industrial Revolution have made the system less popular Visa theocracy or Freedom you can see this

over Russian history in which Russia was constantly being outcompeted by countries like Germany or America whose more fluid social structures allowed them to advance much faster the Authority based social structure always ends up with Zerg like military tactics using hordes of cannon fodder driven by unquestioning hierarchies a great example of the implicit flaws built into the system was that in the Soviet Union they had rules where you had to unquestioningly follow your Superior in the military and so you hear stories about Soviet units being told to walk directly into a river and they did it

still drowning because they knew if they didn't follow the orders exactly right they were dead men anyway so might as well just go into a river because there's at least some chance of survival China is the society which has founded most so off this axis although it has evolved to have other axes Peter turchin has said that China as a nation has stayed unified so much over its long history due to neighboring the Mongol Nomads who were a great enough threat to create a reason for the Chinese to keep working together if you look at

China as Francis fukayama likes to say it's a strong state with a weak culture over Chinese history most of the great fortunes were created by passing a test which then allowed you to enter the government bureaucracy and then milking that power position for your fortunes China never evolved a strong church that could push back against the government the government strangled China's development whether through preventing the Chinese from fully using the Technologies they discovered like Gunpowder the compass the printing press or the steam engine this is a very common theme historically in that capitalism is very

rare given the incentive for government is to exploit their own populations often times with the government working with the mob the book why Nations fail covers this very well in which Rome China Islam India or the European Union had Elites which purposely degw their societies pushing them into poverty through regulation China was on the verge of Industrial Revolution during the sun Dynasty a thousand years ago but the bureaucracy regulated the factories out of Effectiveness the bureaucracy strangled the military's development so that China kept on being conquered by Nomads who they outnumbered 100 to one China's

ships sailed as far as Kenya and possibly America yet the bureaucracy had no need for a colonial Empire in each case the halves were scared of anything new since they were already on top watch my video on Chinese civilization if you want to know more part two Freedom it's the year a000 ad in Iceland Iceland is a society without a government it was established by Vikings fleeing the unification of of Norway into a single monarchy the political structure of Iceland was that everyone met up once a year in the valley of thing valier they would

vote directly on various issues icelands didn't have a political leader government or bureaucracy when someone broke the law the electorate would declare them an outlaw and would say their neighbors could kill them and take their property without repercussions another very similar Society was Ireland at the same time Ireland was a society filled with various Clans and tribal groups there's a saying in Irish that every man is king of his own land Ireland's never had a centralized government and any political growth was immediately torn down by intractable tribal Warfare that being said the Irish were the

freest people in Europe with both of these systems the benefits and negatives are pretty obvious the Irish and icelanders both had the reputation for being insane Warriors when the English colonized America with Jamestown a lot of the guys who did so were Veterans of the conquest of Ireland and they would write the natives are hard to fight but at least they're not the Irish the English tried to have Irish entered servants or used them as slaves in the colonization of the new world they stopped trying since the Irish had a nasty habit of slitting their

Master's throats in their sleep my father's side of the family is Irish and my dad told me dozens of times growing up it is better to spend a day on your feet than a life on your belly honor is the most important thing in life or we're only barely civilized the Irish were known for fighting with Incredible fanaticism in which the English l literally needed to kill a third of Ireland's population alongside wiping out its entire ruling class to get the Irish to submit then the Irish kept on launching revolts constructing their entire identity around

resisting when Ireland got independence in order to take back the north the Irish created the bloodiest and most successful terrorist movement in history I've read a bunch of Icelandic sagas reading them it's obvious how courageous and tough the Vikings were there are so many incredibly heroic and chadly content among the characters I think we all know though that the Vikings raided and invaded so many places sailing all the way from America to Central Asia the plots of the sagas are mostly about intractable Warfare between Clans with the absence of a centralized government the way to

mediate social issues is that if someone transgressed against you often even in silly ways like insulting your sister it then started intractable tribal Warfare once someone killed your brother you kill theirs and then a few years later half of your Clans are dead a major issue with the system is twof full and that as we can see it doesn't have a way to mediate conflict and thus there isn't Unity you can see this with both Ireland and Iceland being so torn apart by internal conflicts as to be colonized by external Powers which were England and

Denmark respectively there's a reason the authoritarians win Wars this means that as a society comes more civilized and urban the freedom access gradually gets worn out that makes sense given this system is the rising or chaotic masculine our society has a very incorrect view of freedom in that we see it as egalitarian and peaceful the reality is that freedom is inherently aristocratic and warlike if you look at democracies they only come from Warrior peoples whether the Vikings English Romans Greeks or iroy the Democracy stems from the war band in that someone's place in the war

band determines their right to vote since fundamentally force and power are the same this is why medieval parliaments the nobility who were the warrior classes were those who could vote all all of these societies have a strong sense of Honor in my emotional scheme this value corresponds very heavily to Pride and secondarily guilt the thing is that when the war band is mobilized the results are absolutely incredible this axis in competition is by far the most advanced the war band provides the structures for why the ancient Greeks modern Europeans Romans Mongols are so many other

Nomads were so militarily dominant this is why so many of the Great States in history have been militaristic republics whether Britain Rome America or Athens this system allows flexibility and naturally pushes manly Vigor again the system is very strong but also degenerates quickly given it's not organized as Authority the thing with this system is that once the war band is mobilized it can Crush all opponents however keeping the Warriors working together consensually is pretty difficult and thus it allows a good chance that the system deteriorates over time and thus The Authority based structure which is

more stable crushes it the natural cycle of history is that a marshall Warrior Nation based off a war band forms a society then as it has to organize it becomes more based around Authority then a new Barbarian People based off another War band conquers the area once the older one grows weaker and degenerate it's very much like in a nature documentary you see the baboons on the grassland where the old male grows weak only be taken down by a new younger one coming out of the desert this system is also so militarily effective that it

creates an incentive to use it to predate upon other populations you naturally see this with the nomads of the Eurasian step killing millions of people and raping and pillaging this results in situations where the nomads themselves don't produce much while they steal from other civilizations a friend of mine once said the most passive people in the world were the Indians and the most predatory were the Afghans he said that this was by Design given IND was predated by the Afghans thus encouraging each kind of behavior through the other this system which internalizes competition is also

capitalism Western Europe became capitalist while other societies did not given the merchant classes in Europe started out as pirates thus the centralized government couldn't control them and they could demand their own privileges due to being so well-armed capitalism is such a successful social system given it allows permanent structured competition which forces the best play to out compete the rest one of the interesting historic threads that no one covers is that the modern startup structure stems from Pirate organizations in which you have a crew either for the startup or the pirate ship and they go on

a venture together and then they share the spoils the modern company was originally a pirate and then a trading Expedition a very similar Dynamic on the negative side of this is the Atlantic slave trade I know this pisses a lot of Libertarians off but the natural logic of the market without other institutions to balance it out is slavery if you don't have laws against it landlords will enslave their tenants and the strong will enslave the weak the Europeans or Muslims Ed their Superior military ability to turn Africans into a commodity Europe was able to fully

evolve capitalism since it had a church in government to balance out the rapacious young masculine if you're in a system where the only metric is based off transaction that it's obvious that you should turn people into a commodity to trade if you put this access in charge of society you will have the best results even if it needs to be balanced by the other two axes this is why the society's built off this are the wealthiest most technologically advanced just nicest Societies in the world that being capitalist republics after that societies which are socially built

off capitalism may be authoritarian which was Western Europe for most of his history this is since this structure allows competition and Improvement the reason the West was so successful is that its social structure allowed creativity and self-improvement if you operate off this structure a legal code is necessary since you need the law as a way to arbitrate between differing self-interests inside the warband you need a system of rules to arbitrate while in the authoritarian system you just submit to your superior's whims one of the top points Kurt makes is that rule of law is one

of the most important variables driving the West success you can almost perfectly correlate a society's rule of law with its net worth today part three theocracy the year is 19 55 and we're in maest China from the outside this system may seem like the zarus Russia we spoke about before in the video the government runs literally everything while there is no private property or interests independent from the state that being said you notice something interesting the more you look in zaris Russia everyone submits to Authority itself in maist China everyone is obsessed with an idea

in China everyone is pushing towards Utopia when the state tells people to do things they don't do so because the authority tells them to do so but supposedly to reach heaven on Earth China at this point was going through the greatest self-inflicted atrocity in history over 30 million people died due to a famine called the Great Leap Forward and 40 million people died in total with Ma's other atrocities maidong the Communist dictator of China had the aim of making China an industrialized modern country within 5 years this involved forcing the Chinese to make steel the

problem is that what actually result in was people not farming thus causing famine on top of this China had none of the tools or infrastructure to actually industrialize or even make steel thus they ended up making lots of useless slag iron with no real use for it a huge driver of the famine was the attempt to use modern socialist agriculture the problem here is that socialist agriculture was complete pseudo science and just didn't work this leads to one of the most toxic elements of this access that being the false promise in this system you mobilize

people with the concept of something better what we're seeing with maest China was an evil religion trying to mobilize people around Faith unlike other religions the heaven it offered was of this Earth not of the spiritual it's interesting and ironic that I call maist China theocracy the great irony here is that maist China was the most militantly anti-religious state in history in that they persecuted the religious and tore down their temples that being said they were also the most Theocratic State ever in history as well in that their whole society in every aspect of every

waking moment of someone's life was unified and driven around a shared holy project maest China is the society in the whole history of the world which was driven the most by an idea in yian Psychology the feminine is inspirational men push themselves hard in order to get laid in yian principles the feminine is being and masculine is doing if you want to look at nature the women of the pack are very important but they end up meeting with whichever group of men takes over the weight of child rearing pulls women out of the Darwinism fortable

child's birth and our incredibly long childhoods due to their physical weak Ness women wield power through relationships sex and verbal ability women do a thing called GSR or gossiping shaming and rallying this is using relational Warfare in order to attain their goals women who use these kinds of tactics do better sexually and reproductively than women who don't and thus they evolved this ability women evolved more advanced verbal and empathic abilities than men in order to navigate or manipulate interpersonal relationships better than men this is since women are physically weak speaker and don't work in packs

like men do thus they made up for it sexually and socially due to this women's two great strengths became social skills and sexual access we can see this very clearly today and that if you criticize modern women for anything the immediate attack on you is to call you an incel even if that's ridiculously untrue since the aim is to discredit you through your lack of social status or sex it's remarkable how common it is today once you know how to look for it and how many different ways it happens but our Society takes these verbal

attacks completely seriously GSR is a form of social piracy in toxic femininity toxic femininity in general involves crabs in the bucket thinking Envy social shaming hysteria Conformity bias the abdication of responsibility magical thinking removal of context and Distortion it's effectively the manipulation of words to serve a social end my friend HTH is a great example of this from one of his videos talking about how a woman can use the threat of ruining someone's reputation to get a promotion at work is the equivalent of a man using physical Force to bully someone into a promotion this

system is hardest to explain in our society since an aspect of GSR is the obfuscation of trying to understand it through social shaming you can see through Freedom or authority those are Concepts we have very easy terms and ideas out in our society but we don't have a word for GSR or any of this stuff because their society is so enthralled to it they not allowed to talk about it if you were to imagine toxic femininity personified into an ideology it would push for equality at the expense of Merit use distorted language to push for

its aims would hate greatness Advocate responsibility to the government it would be obsessed with care the avoidance of suffering and would treat everyone in the population as children being worried about their safety and regulating them it would motivate people with the false promise of Utopia this is the ideological equivalent of women Leading Men on sexually doesn't this sound a lot like communism or left ISM women have historically not really been in danger of dying in war this is since the conquerors would just marry the women of the defeated tribe in fact the women nearly had

an incentive to have their side lose a war since the Victor would be stronger and thus have better genetics to pass on and would be protect them better this would in turn establish an incentive structure to create a social system built mostly around emotional stabilization or ego protection it would not actually be about solving problems but making the people in the group feel as good as possible the societies themselves would be dysfunctional but they would have the most beautiful myths to justify them we can see this parallel in leftism today and if you're even more

controversially traditional world religions where they don't make a barrier between what they want to be true and what the actual reality of the world is and if you disagree with what are their faith-based arguments for what they want to be then they'll destroy your reputation and so it's a worldview based around what feels good not what the reality is this is a topic which I know will be controversial but at the same time I have covered it in a few previous videos both the feminine and Authority are collectivists so merging the individual into the group

this makes sense in that almost all Societies in history are collectivist in which people lived in Clans with ar ranged marriages set religions social tabos and traditions the individual doesn't matter in these societies Europe is basically the historical exception for being individualist this being so far we focused on the negative aspects of of the feminine but not the positive which there are without the feminine the masculine loses purpose women balance men out stabilizing them men do their deeds but then the women are always there creating the Next Generation and keeping the Society Running as I've

said before the masculine is the doing and The Feminine is the being in some ways being is more important to happiness in life than doing since we're always stuck inside ourselves and we're always stuck inside our own minds and bodies I know loads of successful people but they're often miserable since they aren't comfortable inside their own skin the feminine aims at emotional and inner stability thus the feminine in its healthy form tries to increase mindfulness mindfulness is the inner calmness in difficult situations to be mindful of the battle around you but still to keep your

cool all the major world religions and many philosophies like stoicism are all about mindfulness they all want you to sink your mind in with God so you can feel Inner Peace by surrendering to the state of being you can feel in calm at all times the degree to which a society builds itself around emotional stabilization determines how feminine it is in a theocracy the society is run by appealing to the emotional demands of the people in the society at the expense of dealing with the outside world examples of this over history besides communism are the

Catholic Church Islam the theocracies of Mesopotamia or India in each case the elites are those who train the populace on how to be the best religion is improving your conduct as an individual and people's moral value is hopefully assessed by their internal character I am personally more in favor of this system than Kurt is one of the largest differences we have between us is that I am more pro- religion than Kurt is I say this and people need this psychological stabilization to not go crazy removing it results in ironically our society in which we're committing

suicide as a civilization while we have the worst mental health in history which I have said will ultimately kill our society unless it's stopped I think you really need to establish a duality you need to have this feminine side in the society no matter which other masculine side it's balanced with this is why every major Society in history is religious and for most societies religion was the most important thing in someone's life the question is whether or not the religion is healthy the relationship between men and women in a society determines how that culture deals

with chaos the great Asian civilizations of India China or Islam fossilize once they repressed women too much starting around a00 ad our current society which has no rules for the feminine is spiraling into madness now Europe was able to establish a very successful and adventurous Society through giving women the highest amount of social authority of any major civilization which forced men to have to do more to impress them at the same time men were able to hold women accountable socially a great irony is that the societies Which pull from this access the most are the

most misogynistic the Middle East is a civilization founded off theocracy in that in modern Islam the legal code government philosophy and Clan structure are all founded off religion this isn't true for the Middle East going back to the ancient Babylonians Jews or Egyptians India is similar also being a society run by the priests ironically these societies both gave women basically no rights it reminds me of the old joke that goes women understand other women and women hate each other the feminine can be positive as I keep saying and is something I think young men today

often forget so I want to keep reminding you folks of it an example of this is organized religions which use social shaming aesthetic and the promise of something better to guide people towards pro-social and positive ways of life religions train people from birth to be humble kind grateful wise courageous among other things Christianity used the feminine skills for Good by telling people to love each other the feminine is based off love in that women evolves to love their children thus Christianity was able to get on the negatives in female Behavior by tapping into something that

they evolved to do anyway or being more pro-social for everyone around them Christianity also has the best protections against GSR and envy I think this is part of the reason why Christian societies are those which treated women the best since it effectively tamed the worst aspects of female nature the Communist pro-social AIS evolved for the family and thus it results in generally trying to reach an extension of a Brotherhood of family across an entire nation or an entire world the problem is that the harmony inside a family can't scale across a group that large this

means that when this system tries to apply itself on a large scale or more so than it just evolved for on the family basis the results are terrible this is why theocracies often fail while also theocrats are normally pretty delusional the aim for this axis is what's good not what's true they often aim for what they want to be true not what is a very important detail here is that we view the economics of family as unimportant because in the west families largely aren't that important but keep in mind almost all humans in history lived

in Clans where you live and work with people who are your relatives your parents arrange your marriage you work at your cousin's store and all of your life is your family so for most people in most of History the most important economics were the economics of family of all these ACC is this is the one which is most broken today we are seeing a pandemic of toxic femininity the West is committing civilizational suicide due to its own guilt thus killing itself for emotional stability due to the Industrial Revolution removing men's Advantage with physical labor this

aess is at the strongest Point ever in history as opposed to the other two this is why the government today is all about creating policies that look good on paper ass swaging people's guilt whether or not they're actually useful or effective our populations have terribly poor mental health we need to fix this ACC AIS now if we want our society to survive unless we can't partial through this system and take responsibility for our own mindfulness we're doomed