there the the times the United States has been kind of pushy in international Affairs um which may resonate with a number of members of the audience um and I think we should uh in general leave other countries to their own business basically America should mind its own business you know um rather than push for regime change all over the place we do need to um delete entire agent as opposed to leave part of them behind because if you leave part of them behind it's easy it's kind of like if leaving a weed if you don't
get remove the roots of the weed then it's easy for the weed to grow back but if you remove the roots of the weed it doesn't stop weeds from ever growing back but it makes it harder so so we have to really delete entire agencies many of them gby has um very very powerful reasoning capabilities um so uh in the tests that we've done thus far grock 3 is outperforming anything that's been released that we're aware of um so that's that's a that's a good sign um yeah it's uh in fact at times I think
grock 3 is kind of scary smart you're like wow this thing's smart it's kind of scary gr 3 is scary it's like wow this thing's you know it comes up with solutions that you didn't even think were like you wouldn't even anticipate you know not obvious Solutions um so grock 3 was trained with the most amount of compute and I think very efficiently trained um also notably grock 3 was trained on on a lot of synthetic data so um and and and then it goes back and forth through the data and tries to achieve logical
consistency so so when if if it's got data that is uh wrong it it'll it'll actually reflect upon that and remove the data that is that is wrong that does not Concord with reality so it's it's based reasoning is very good in fact the even without fine-tuning Rock 3 the base model is better than grock 2 so with so we're really in the final stages of polishing Gro 3 probably it gets released in a in about a week or two so pretty soon um I don't want to be Hasty in the release because a lot
of the the final polish uh is necessary for a great user experience so um some ways you can think of it like a house you know that last 5% where you do the finish the the drywall and and do the painting and the trimming even though it's not much work it transforms the the house yeah um so it's that just want to make sure that that last 5% is done really well um and uh that's a week maybe two weeks um I think it'll be very good and I think this might be we think it'll
be better than anything else and then maybe this might be the last time that any AI is better than Gro I think the evidence is there in that open AI has gotten this far while having at least a sort of dual profit nonprofit role what they're trying to do now is completely delete the nonprofit and and and and uh that seems a really going too far you know um the I I I provided all of the funding for opening ey in the beginning for the first almost $50 million for nothing for as a nonprofit um
and it was meant to be open source and so you know I think this is analogous to like if you pay a b if you fund a nonprofit to preserve the Amazon rainforest but then they but instead they turn into a lumber company and chop down the trees and sell them for wood you like wait a second that's the exact opposite of what I paid what I donated the money for um so open is meant to be open source nonprofit and now it is closed they changed the name to closed for maximum profit AI closed
for voracious profit I mean they're like whoa are they after money next level so why does this change need to occur
