wellone welcome to this talk it's nearly Tuesday the 8th of uh October now I want to bring you an article now that brings a lot of sense to the chaos that we've seen over the past few years and really does make sense of quite a lot of what we've come across in regards to the covid vaccines it explains quite a few things really I know it's time to move on from this but these vaccines are still being used in my country the people are still getting notifications to go for vaccination and of course there's an
awful lot of uh consequences from the vaccines that have been given and as well as that there's plans for new mRNA vaccine so this is really still quite relevant now was this research published in the United States no was it published in the United Kingdom no Canada New Zealand Australia no it was published in Poland so this is from the Polish annals of medicine um strange we can't manage to publish any uh of these more revealing articles in our sophisticated modern Western countries but good on our polish cousins for the publication now this is the
publication itself here changing views towards messenger ribonucleic acid based covid vaccines in the scientific literature now this is written basically by um an academic who's an economist but works in a health department so it really is quite revealing and I'll let me give you the uh essence of what it's about first of all and you can decide if you want to watch so um changing views it's talking about the evolution of views towards the covid vaccines how useful they are and the level of risk and basically initially there was no risks and knowledged at all
and then there was more and more risks acknowledged as time went on is the bottom line but we'll see why that is and uh the reasons aren't good now uh before the global covid-19 pandemic mRNA vaccines had never had never been administered to the public before never outside of a single clinical trial that was not completed at the time and uh the article admits that it is a complete mystery as to why mRNA vaccines were chosen and pursued with warp speed around the world let me know what you think in the comments I couldn't possibly
comment further it's outside the rumit of this article right so the aim of this article is to raise awareness that that medical science can be biased due to Social and economic influences so this is really quite important and makes a lot of sense of because it's saying this is not a pure scientific matter there's other things have influenced the science now of course that's ludicrous because science is independent and objective but the way people report science most certainly is not so let's be careful to differentiate between science and the proper scientific method which of course
is great and what our lot of our Western Civilization is predicated on and the way science can be or let's use a strong word subjugated potentially to vested interests moving on um so social and economic influences especially during high stress epochs in history um now whether this stress was real or artificially generated or hyped up of course we could debate for a long time but the whole point is if you've got your scientific principles and you've got established epistemologies ways of thinking ways of examining knowledge then surely the time that that's most important is when
the pressure is on you know if you if you're trained to be a soldier you train and train and train and train then when the pressure's on when someone's actually trying to put a bullet into you that then you you react according to your training same in high stress situations I've been in we we learn Cardiac Arrest procedures like parrots you go through it time and time again on the dummy then when it happens in the real event your training just kicks in and you do it this is the antithesis of what happened during these
uh this vaccine uh history shall we say um we need to keep to well Tred principles when the pressure is on not go 180° off past scientists should be uh conscious of always being objective we should always be objective of course and skeptical regardless of what is happening in The Wider world now I've given you some references here I'm not going to put them all in but they are in the uh in the paper which is well referenced now uh the way this study was done um it was uh a literature survey performed examining reports
of uh severe Adverse Events in articles published between 2020 and 2024 and initially they looked at well over 4,000 articles and they found this Evolution to gaining uh uh tendency to admit the uh the risks of the the vaccine and the reduced eff giv of the vaccine as time went on and we'll see why and the as I say it's not it's not good uh so results and discussion from 20 to 2024 the literature has gone this is just the summary has gone from claiming there are absolutely no serious Adverse Events of messenger ribonucleic acid
vaccines uh in 2020 2020 2021 so 2020 2021 not it's all ticko no problem at all these things are absolutely brilliant but gting on to 2023 2024 to acknowledging a significant number of various sever severe and suspected Adverse Events and again I've given you uh literature if you want to check it out in more detail for yourself I've checked these references and they do actually check out now um con initial conclusions the early scientific literature was biased as not to report significant uh serious or suspected Adverse Events so early decision- making was based on biased
reports of the science and of course if you've been following me for any period of time you'll know that my views have changed dramatically initially we followed the guidelines and initially we followed the science as published in papers because we've been brought up to believe that these scientific papers were were sacran it now appears that they W and that really really really has rattled a lot of people's fundamental beliefs in the way science is processed which is a Pity because the science itself as we say is an objective striving to understand the empirical nature of
the world uh and if it's been subjugated that is a bad uh thing not the science it's the way human beings have reported it for reasons um that we're starting to see now right oh here we are in fact due to social and political concerns so not science according to these this this author so social and political concerns based on this analysis of over 4,000 pieces an overwhelming corporate greed corporate greed the overwhelmed objective science now this is a pretty strong statement from this article overwhelming corporate greed let me know what you think in the
comments I'm just reporting what this article says only in the last year have scientists been able to publish articles that acknowledge the high number of suspected in serious Adverse Events linked to mr& based vaccines this should act as a warning as a warning that science should be completely objective when evaluating health risks completely objective not subjugated to social political concerns with overwhelming corporate greed no no no no no no don't want these this is not science this is something else something else this is science objectivity is science should be completely objective when evaluating health risks
but can often be influenced by social and economic consider considerations so um that's the main essence of this um I'm going to give you some more detail in a minute but uh here's the article here it's it's freely available um you can click and get the PDF uh free uh it is completely intelligible because it's not written by a doctor it's written by a well PhD academic obviously um but it's um not written by a medic not written by a scientist written by someone who understands the economics of health and it is completely uh intelligible
you can read it for yourself in oh 20 minutes half an hour half an hour really to get the most of it right let's look at bit little more detail International competition between the United States Russia and China power blocks United States Russia China what the author saying it is this is an extension of international power Prestige politics who can put the first man into orbit who can put the first man on the moon who's going to put the first woman on the moon pretty soon probably who can get to Mars first who can vaccinate
the world first international power plays all three countries and power groups uh complain their vaccine was most effective and safest my vaccine's better than yours no it's just childish isn't it absolutely asinine really and yet that's the conclusion of this author and to tell you what it doesn't half ring true mine's better than yours it's like children in a playground really young men bragging in a pub you know it's just it's at that level it's pathetic and yet it appears to be the case for unknown reasons the United States chose to invest heavily into mRNA
vacc based vaccines why did the United States choose to massively invest I can't remember what operation W speed now was Mega books billions wasn't it in into M based vaccines was it because there was no alternative no of course it wasn't because there was no Alternatives as the article says as opposed to other types of vaccines with stronger research supporting the underlying technology we're not new to vaccinations and we're doing it since Edward jeno inoculated James fips with cowpox to protect him against small pox this is not new there's an established technology here of of
creating antigenic vaccines with adjuncts massive amounts of literature on that okay there's big gaps in the literature as regards the way that specific vaccines are used and implemented but this is an established technology let's just forget all that rip that up Chu that over your shoulder let's go for Something Completely new why why would you do that do hope it's not economic considerations so these were Alternatives there were Alternatives but they weren't used scrub the Alternatives due to competition between the world's three superpowers no country wanted to admit there was any problem with their nation's
vaccination program obviously there can be no problems in the Glorious USFA or the United Kingdom of course not certainly no problems in China and obviously no problems in Russia it's as pathetic as the propaganda that comes out of North Korea and this is our countries we're talking about disappointing would perhaps the least that we could say disappointed would be the gentlest word I can think of at the moment unfortunately these toxic policies entered the scientific literature enforce so they went from government thinking power block thinking into the science scientific literature influenced by corporate interests according
to this article read it yourself draw your own conclusions now uh three time periods in the 2020 to 2024 2020 um 2020 to the end of 2021 scientific literature claimed there were absolutely no serious Adverse Events whatsoever now this is what were going on at the time this is what decision making was predicated on at the time we now know it's wrong and yet this was the basis on which I decided to get vaccinated and just to demonstrate that you won't be able to read this in detail but um you can see it there so
this is a summary of literature regarding early covid vaccines and here we have various items of literature here one per line um uh no serious Adverse Events reported whatsoever very positive about the vaccine there for example December 2020 serious Adverse Events or suspected Adverse Events rates the same as the placebo group uh poac etal 2020 very positive results written by fiser very positive results written by fiser in those examples now um these are available in the article of course this this is where I've got one from so this early stage everything's fine safe as eating
your morning egg some of it was written by vested interest of course but never mind now next time period January to August 2022 scientific literature claimed there were some serious Adverse Events but they were very rare and we got this time and time again despite the very rare despite the very rare despite the very rare we've got this time and time again the MRNA vaccines were a miracle drug and here's the literature that reflects this uh just examples they've taken of course uh that reflects uh this thinking at the time um rate of serious adverse
reactions are minuscule very positive overall gatal 2022 rate of serious Adverse Events are rare so that was that time period there now September 2022 to April 2024 characterized by being highly skeptical of the M based vaccines so basically the evidence of the risks became incontrovertible and that was eventually reflected in the literature three vaccines for me later than I would have preferred and here we see here so a summary of the literature regarding late covid vaccines a very high rate of uh observed versus expected ratios of serious Adverse Events for example there uh madna has
higher rates of SES than viral Vector admits uh SES are a problem although they although they work for madna high numbers of Sever's adverse reactions especially with fisa or sometimes that stands for serious sometimes suspected so SES especially with fisa so we see this great increase in skepticism so for example this paper here covid vaccines covid vaccines and Adverse Events of special interest uh a Multinational Global vaccine Data Network cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals significant observed compared to expected OE observed compared to expected ratios were found for gong Barry syndrome cereal Venus sinus
thrombosis acute disseminated en sephy militis inflammation in the brain myocarditis and pericarditis and trust me I've looked after many patients with all of these conditions and you do not want any of them you really don't right conclusions from this paper um a drastic shift in the medical literature occurred concering mRNA vaccines between 2020 and 2024 so there's been a dramatic shift in the way these have been reported for these reasons that we've seen the early literature seem to have been heavily biased in favor of promoting experimental vaccine without any previous completed human clinical trials for
both monetary and political purposes according to this author read the article and you see what you think don't tell you what to think just reporting what's been said here monetary and political purposes this is the antithesis of good science even as reported essayes became too numerous to to dismiss in 2022 the literature at the time simply plays down esses as extremely rare often while saying there was immense benefit as well of course even though they were blat recently obvious obvious conflicts of interest conflicts of interest such as vaccine producers publishing manuscripts promoting their own vaccine
you couldn't make this up you know Jon's videos are really good honestly JN says so give me a break it's just uh yeah vaccine producers publishing manuscripts promoting their own vaccines the saying in English is a stinking crish come here buy buy stinking fish off my stall of course you can think of many other examples yourself I am sure so vaccine manufacturers publishing manuscripts promoting their own vaccines but the Articles were published in very prestigious journals what were in fact I would say the world's most prestigious journals in my view are no longer the world's
most prestigious journals it wasn't until late 2022 that the first criticisms of mRNA vaccines began to appear and as time goes by more articles are becoming more vocal about completely banning all mRNA vaccines until they can be thoroughly tested for safety concerns duh obviously we want a monitor on these vaccines until we know one heck of a lot more than we do now or until there's complete open well we probably know enough it's just that there's lack of transparency and openness people need to stop hiding the data let our statos at this data let the
truth be revealed which is what we're waiting for the DraStic shift in attitudes towards vaccines only about 3 years show shows shows serious vulnerability serious vulnerability in Western Medical Research and I would add Chinese and Russian as well all three power blocks us Western UK European Chinese and uh Russian have serious vulnerabilities for the reasons uh enumerated in this article so do read for yourself very comprehensible it does kind of make sense of quite a few things doesn't it and it explains as well what why why My Views have changed as the evidence has become
available My Views have changed dramatically and this is what science is follow the evidence wherever it leads and it's been uncomfortable but I'd rather rather be uncomfortable in the land of Truth than living in luxury in the city of delusion we'll leave it there for now thank you for watching
