Tatiana: Greetings, dear friends! We are sincerely happy to welcome you again. Today we will have a conversation with the esteemed Igor Mikhailovich Danilov.
Igor Mikhailovich: Hello. Igor Mikhailovich, thank you very much for the previous video, it is extremely insightful and inspiring. Those prospects which open up for every person in the Creative Society are truly inspiring, as well as the fact that we can easily reach the level of development of other civilizations, the more advanced civilizations.
During the last conversation you said that, in fact, we already have fantastic technologies in this world; it's just that today they do not serve for the benefit of people, but exactly the opposite. In the previous video you said, "Imagine what can happen even in 10 years if we become one united civilization, if restrictions in science and all secrecy are removed, if science works on improving the lives of each of us instead of us dominating and killing each other. " Frankly speaking, it is even quite difficult for the consciousness of some people to imagine what the world may be like in the next decade if we succeed in becoming one united civilization.
And you know, Igor Mikhailovich, the consciousness of some people very often calls what we describe and discuss in our videos about the future, as well as what we voice at the forums regarding the future in the Creative Society, as “something fantastical and fictional”. On the one hand, consciousness really wants those miracles, but on the other hand, it doubts whether such things are possible or not, especially in such mundane matters associated with getting rid of diseases and prolonging life. It seems to be some kind of science fiction that people can exist for fifteen hundred years.
It is especially difficult for consciousness to believe in this because if we compare those scientific discoveries and that amount of progress which we now observe in the consumerist format, when many scientists seemingly want to find a recipe for longevity, a recipe for eternal youth and eternal life, and they’ve been working on it for so many centuries and millennia, but people do not see any results. While here it is said that in the Creative Society, even during the next decade, it is possible to ensure that every person, even a currently living person, will be able to feel those results for himself. First of all, I didn't say "during the next decade", I said it differently.
If we voted for the Creative Society already today, and if today we gained opportunities to actually work on this technology, on what directly relates to the health capsule, as our volunteers call it at the forum, then I say: it will be available in 3 years Tatiana: Wow. and it will contain all the innovations and preferences in 5 years. While in 3 years it will be a perfectly workable device.
Does it seem fictional? Tatiana: It seems fictional. You see, when we do not know something, it seems to us that it is fiction, when we are not knowledgeable in some subject… You know, it’s like making money on bitcoin — for me it is fiction, but people really make money.
You see? Tatiana: Right. While some people don’t know it exists.
Those who remember, there was such a company as MMM, and someone earned a lot of money on it. You see? It also seemed to be fiction.
But those who were in the know and were aware of what it was managed to make money. The same applies to the matters associated with prolongation of life beyond the species limit. I’ll put it as follows, friends: as of today, there are already a lot of doors to this room, really a lot.
If we take information from publicly available sources, today there are information technologies making it possible to prolong human life; there are various chemical means, medications that prolong human life, and today there are already, let’s say, various stimulants. But there is also what we are talking about. I mean, we are talking about that technology which is no longer fiction.
I cannot tell you more about it, but it’s not fiction. And if there is technology, what does this mean? It means you can do whatever you want with it.
Right? Tatiana: Yes, exactly. That's the answer.
If we look at present-day developments shown in open sources, that which relates to prolonging human life, this is already spoken about openly, that’s really so. People who work in this field describe results that allow the rejuvenation of individual organs as well as the whole body. This is no longer science fiction either.
This is something that is done in laboratories, yes, on animals, not on humans. But let me tell you that there is no major difference, friends. It takes merely one step, and everything falls into place.
Everything is very simple. I understand that when you’re not in the know, this seems unrealistic. However, I can tell you based on my personal experience that this is quite possible.
At one time we… It so happened that I was looking for opportunities to accelerate regeneration of tissues that were believed to be incapable of regeneration at all. Well, here’s a simple example: quite recently, a few decades ago, it was believed that the degenerative-dystrophic process that occurs, in particular, in intervertebral discs doesn’t have reversible development. In my life, I have managed to prove through my works that regeneration is not only possible, but it is natural, moreover up to and including restitution, meaning, complete restoration of an almost non-existent disc to its absolutely normal state.
That’s what I've been doing for most of my life, so to say. And when I was looking for available methods and developing relevant techniques, I naturally resorted to a search of various ways to speed up regeneration. I’ll give you a simple example.
Before moving to Kyiv, I withdrew from the experiment a group of mice that had lived 3 times longer than they were supposed to. They were brought into the experiment at the age of 70, if we recalculate it into human age. Naturally, their reproductive functions were already failing; the mice were old and already preparing to depart from this world.
Treating them with just one medication, I managed not only to bring back their youth, so to say, but also to prolong their existence, as it turns out, 3 times. Tatiana: Cool. And they were withdrawn from the experiment only due to my relocation.
They showed no signs of aging, none. These are well-known facts, and many people saw that because my friends helped me with the preparation of these medications. Is that a fact?
It’s a fact. There is nothing supernatural here. Once again, why did we come to this, and why was I dealing with it?
I sought an explanation as to why during a rupture of a fibrous ring, the content of an intervertebral disc, specifically what the nucleus pulposus consists of, triggers an autoimmune response. I was intrigued by the question of how one's own tissue can elicit an immune system response against itself. I mean, that is incorrect.
This shouldn't happen. However, it has been found that this should happen, and it serves as a defense mechanism which the body intentionally creates. It turns out that an intervertebral disc, both in humans and in animals, is like a galaxy within a galaxy, or a universe within a universe.
This is a very intriguing fact. We studied this subject very carefully, seriously and profoundly. Since there are such reactions, we came up with an idea, "What if we use this tissue as a kind of irritant that would not allow cells to mix on the wound surface, meaning, to form a natural scar, a natural healing process?
Could that contribute to the regeneration process? " We began to study this process. Friends from a laboratory helped us, so to say, we had to clean the content of a nucleus pulposus from cells up to the matrix, and we had to clean the matrix as well.
Well, I'm getting ahead of myself, that's not the topic of our conversation. But what's my point? The artificially made holes of up to two centimeters in diameter in the ear of a rabbit healed over a period of 30+ days with the help of this medication, with hair regrowth and without a trace.
Is this possible? It is possible. But I was interested in what would happen if, instead of injecting it on the surface of a wound, we would use a purified medication, this is an endogenous medication which is taken from the nucleus pulposus by puncture and grown artificially in the laboratory, that is, it was increased in size.
It's not difficult. So if we just inject it like an intravenous drug, how will the body react? Of course, we tried it on mice.
Who else would we use? The medication prolonged life, and it had to be injected every three months. The mice came back to life.
I mean, the old mice that were about to die… The control group died very quickly, whereas these mice got a second lease on life after three months, they started to reproduce and lived like that for three lifetimes, that is, basically, more than 10 years. When we had to withdraw them from the experiment because we had to move, and there was no longer anyone to take care of that laboratory… By the way, it was for this very experiment that we created a cell laboratory with our friends, and I thank them very much. It was necessary for other things: for burns and… never mind.
But we did our best to get this laboratory because before we had to go to the neighboring region, it was expensive and problematic to negotiate with people, they couldn’t always agree to. So we took care of that as well. And the result was tremendous.
This is a very simple thing — a purified matrix of the nucleus pulposus. Look how it behaves. Why?
Because it contains something that actually changes the way the cells in our bodies work. And most importantly, it affects the extracellular substance in our body in a very positive way. These are microdoses, but the result is tremendous.
Another example. Again, my friend and I had an idea. He is a psychotherapist, a psychiatrist, an honorable and respected person, and we had a lot of discussions about different issues concerning human health, and not only the mental state of a human, but also the physiological state.
And one of the issues we considered was, what would happen if we could trick the brain… while the brain is a very complex structure that basically controls the entire chemistry of our body. It is really true. And as far as we know, I’ll digress a little bit, friends, the human body is capable of producing anything.
It is so, indeed. Again, if we take any cell in our body, it’s a very complex mechanism. In fact, it’s a mass of different factories that work autonomously and reproduce their own kind.
What influences the correct functioning of a cell is, first of all, the nutrition and the information that comes from the extracellular substance. That’s the whole phenomenon of this process. If there is some kind of failure, mainly in the information, if there is some kind of toxicity, I don't know, some pathogens get in or something else, yes, it causes a failure.
But this factory is capable of self-repair and self-regulation when there is correct information. The main problems start when the information coming in is changed or distorted. That's the whole phenomenon.
And there is a lot of evidence for this, really a lot. So where's the whole secret? In a cell?
After all, it can divide endlessly. This idea regarding telomerase and so on is garbage. Telomerase grows when the right information is embedded, which is already recorded.
This is called informational management of longevity, and the telomerase can work, and it has worked. There are also various chemical methods to stimulate the prolongation of our lives. These are also simple elementary things.
But what idea came to us? He and I thought: if we can trick the brain… and actually the brain can do anything. I'll give you a trite example.
In the history of medical science it has been found that the human body can produce large amounts of mercury. There are medical examples in history, excuse me, when the human body produced 100 grams or more of mercury over a period of several days. Just think, that's mercury.
In the same way our body is capable of producing crystals that are as dense as a diamond. So our bodies make all this stuff. These are historical facts.
Our body is capable of self-regeneration: organs that have been ablated are regenerated. Moreover, ablated limbs, I mean after amputation, trauma or something else, are restored under certain conditions, and first and foremost, under the dominant information, images. And these facts are recorded in the history of medicine.
It is called spontaneous regeneration, so to speak. But what does spontaneous mean? Who is behind this spontaneous process?
So we came to the conclusion that if we could trick the brain and make it work properly, we could reverse aging. An animal was brought into the experiment — let’s say a dog, it's unimportant. It was old, let's say, it was about to leave this mortal world, it was quite old, let's say.
It's clear that it had no reproductive functions any longer, it wasn't reproducing, it was a very old animal indeed. What did I do? All I did was implant electrodes and supply electrical stimulation in a certain area of her spinal cord, and a "miracle" happened.
Just look, a simple trick forced her brain to perceive that she had a well-functioning reproductive system. The animal came back to life in a matter of months. Moreover, the animal lived almost four years after that and brought offspring several times.
However, there arose problems. Let’s say, it is possible that in her case the electrodes or the frequency of the impulse were selected incorrectly. Current is current, you know, and the motor neurons were somewhat destroyed in her spinal cord.
So naturally, she developed laxity in her hind limbs and associated problems. We had to take her out of the experiment. But if instead of an electrode, I mean, instead of electricity, an optical waveguide was used, for example, that is, an ordinary optical waveguide and a laser.
In other words, photon excitation which at the moment of our aging would display to our brain the activeness and youthfulness of the reproductive system. How would our brain respond? Is that interesting?
It is interesting. However, between this experiment and reality there was the alcoholism of reputed people. I mean, those people with whom we wanted to conduct this experiment had everything: laser equipment, optical waveguides, and a surgical department — they had everything but sobriety.
Thus alcoholism kills Nobel Prize winners. Tatiana: Yes, indeed. Well, not me, I don't drink alcohol, and I don't need a Nobel Prize due to certain reasons.
But they could have won it, you see? Does such a thing happen? It does happen.
These are simple things that we merely developed and tested while doing something completely different; we were just playing and experimenting. Additionally, there are other existing methods. What does that suggest?
It suggests that there are capabilities, that our body is easily controllable, and this is really so. This shows the dominance of this very information; this is really amazing, indeed. IM: Absolutely.
Information, or more correctly, the image — the dominant image; it is paramount. Let me give you a simple example. What is an image?
Let's use athletes as an example. Why? I was engaged in sports, so, naturally, there was a need to come up with some discoveries to reach the objectives, to apply all the scientific achievements and, at the same time, develop new ones.
So, here is a simple example. Many times, there was a need to move an athlete from one weight category to another. This is natural in sports, but there were problems.
Some people could easily gain and lose weight and so on; I mean, they flexibly lost and gained these 7 to 8 kilos. However, there were people who had a hard time gaining weight, or they had very tight deadlines to do it. While there were people who were almost incapable of gaining or, on the contrary, losing weight; and this was also a problem.
That’s where my companion experimenter and I, relying on our previous experiments, which are not related to our topic, they are quite interesting, but not for today… So, this experiment was precisely related to working with images. What did we do? An athlete was brought into a certain state, let's say, hypnotic immersion; the operator, who was our well-respected psychotherapist, gave him a dominant image, he created it in him.
To put it simply, for everyone, the athlete remained in a state of wakefulness, that is, he didn't change in any way prior to the beginning of this session, during and after it, for everyone around him. Whereas in actual fact, the work of his brain changed: the right program was embedded into it, which created his own image in an athlete — it was like a step into the future. And in that future, the person increased his weight by 8 kilograms.
Moreover, this weight increased correctly, not by fat tissue, but. . .
Tatiana: Muscular… . . .
of course, by an increase in the mass of certain muscle groups. Why certain muscle groups? An athlete engages certain muscle groups in order to achieve speed and reaction, depending on what kind of sport he is practicing, to ensure that his body works properly during competitions.
Therefore, a correctly embedded dominant image made a person feel 8 kilograms heavier owing to an increase of muscles that were well-trained and capable of good speed; the muscles he needed. And that was it — the person was brought out of that state, and in a short period of time, with the same diet regime, he gained the necessary weight with an increase in the mass of that very muscle group. Just look, that was merely the dominant image.
But what did we notice, friends? I'm going to digress a little bit, this might be of interest to someone. It's just that I’ve started talking about it now, and this point came to my mind.
This is really interesting, although we did not solve this issue; we postponed it for later, and the “later” never came. Whoever is interested, who knows what these techniques of embedding this image are and how to use them correctly, try to solve this issue if you wish. I say it again, we didn't come to solve it, we had a lot of ideas.
Well, let's go through everything in order. When a person receives a dominant image, his body weight changes. So back then, my friend brought electronic scales with 120 kilos weighing capacity to our gym.
Moreover, those weren’t just regular scales, but laboratory ones showing even hundredths of a gram. And that's what is interesting: people who are susceptible… Well, there are 3 types of people. There are neutral people, they are very few, just a handful of them.
I mean, it doesn't matter whether you embed an image or not — a person has a stable image of his own, and he doesn't let anyone into this domination. There are people who receive an image easily, it takes root, and they achieve a tremendous result. Whereas there are, sort of, antagonistic people who, on the contrary, have a negative result; despite a proper embedding of an image, they still have a negative result.
And this is extremely interesting. In what way? We took an ordinary person, I mean, a normal healthy person with a normal psyche, everything was fine, and this dominant image was embedded into his head while he was standing on the scales: his weight changed from 2 to almost 30 grams.
How did the image embedded into a person's head create a change? Yes, we had an idea of gas exchange in the body. But imagine, let's take on average, even 20 grams.
Okay? Did he gain 20 grams by breathing in? T: Where did this weight come from?
Right. Where did it come from? But when a person was brought out of this state… I mean, he entered this state, the image took root, he came out of this state, or to be more correct, he was brought into this state, then brought out of it, but his weight went back to what it was down to a gram.
For instance, a person had 70 kilos and 2 grams of weight. This image was instilled into him, and while he was in this state, let's say, his future weight was 70 kilos 27 grams. Where did 25 grams appear from?
But when he was brought out of this state, 25 grams disappeared, but the image remained. Can we say that the image disappeared too? No, the image cannot contain this information.
It can have neither mass nor volume or anything else; it has no physical manifestations and no physical parameters. Although, again, it exists, it really exists — it’s a material thing, well, that’s not today's topic. So where does weight disappear?
There are other people. With neutral ones — it’s clear, nothing changes in them, and it is even impossible to instill this image into them. Meanwhile, there are people who produce a negative result.
And those with a negative result, instead of gaining weight, were losing it. Again, somewhere between 2 and 20 grams, up to 30 in some of them. As far as I remember, there were several people over the entire history, who lost a little more than 20 grams, never mind.
But why does weight disappear? And why is it immediately restored? Hence what?
Gas exchange again? Or? .
. Well, it’s an interesting paradox, but it remained unexplored, we didn’t delve into it. Moreover, we did not take any tests and did not examine how blood or anything else changed in response to the image specifically in the case of athletes.
Although images affect blood, they affect hormones and everything else. There was a whole series of properly conducted experiments with many examined people and good results — it was done, it was studied. Yet, those were not athletes, but a completely different group of people.
While in this case, there was a loss and gaining of weight. Thus, we came to the conclusion that there is placebo and nocebo. To put it simply, as we understood it, there are people, again, based on a certain psychological testing, they are normal and positive people who are doing just fine; they easily receive this image, and within a short period of time they actually gain or, on the contrary, lose the necessary weight, without any deviations, and such people are the prevailing majority.
Neutral people do not have any reaction. They have their own dominant image. And there are people who produce a negative result.
So, the most interesting thing is placebo and nocebo, so to speak. How do they differ? Just to make it clear, any normal person who is capable of self-control and self-analysis, who is capable of spiritual development and so on, meaning, he is positively minded, he can easily create anything in his imagination, independently at that.
For instance, you and I are talking and… or the way our friends can talk or watch and listen to us now, they can easily create in their heads, you know, like on a second screen, let’s say, an image of an elephant. Let it be a pink elephant. It's amusing, isn’t it?
Tatiana: Super. Yes. With a golden bracelet on its proboscis — no problem.
And this elephant can run around as long as a person wants. He can easily and freely retain this image. It’s impossible to retain a static picture for a long time, it has to move, but your elephant can run around all day, as long as you want.
So, those people who are neutral are unable to create anything at all. They have a dominant image and do not generate anything else at all. T: They are not interested.
IM: As for those with a negative result, they have bugs in their image, meaning, glitches. They cannot keep it in the same color or paint it at all. They cannot put a bracelet on the elephant; they try to hang it on its proboscis, but it appears on its tail — well, like that.
Images are blurred and distorted, and they can no longer dominate. Then this image, since it is altered by consciousness, already works against the person himself. Meaning, the other way around.
Hence nocebo appears, that is, we get a negative result. It is also interesting that those who couldn’t create an image of that very elephant in their heads, when an image of their correct state with gained weight was instilled into them, they received a negative result, and the scales showed that a person didn’t gain weight in grams, but lost it. Later on, they didn’t gain weight either, but oftentimes, on the contrary, lost it.
In other words, everything was the other way around. And again, everything depends on the proper perception of an image. Yet, is it possible to get rid of such glitches?
It is possible. Of course, it is. With a certain approach and proper work with such a person it takes about three months on average, although in some cases we had to work with a person for even more than a year for him to get rid of the dominance of consciousness.
Why? Because this very individual as Personality was unable to dominate his own consciousness; it was consciousness that dominated him. This is what we talk about often and a lot.
Why does such a situation arise? Because a person faced something in childhood or something else, we have a lot of videos on this subject, we won’t delve into that… Generally speaking, consciousness dominates a human as Personality, it imposes its images, and they are clear, they can linger; there are dominant ones and so on. In the same way, neutral people have a dominant image, and such a person is completely devoid of any imagination.
But it can all be developed. For neutral people it is super easy, while for those who have such a negative result, it is more difficult; they should be worked with. However, using that very autogenic training, those very meditative practices and various psychological techniques, a person can come to the point that he begins to dominate his consciousness and returns to normal life.
Is this interesting? T: Yes, it’s extremely interesting. It’s interesting, of course.
And what is placebo? We just mentioned placebo and nocebo. Right?
But if we look in general, it is said that "this is unexplored" and so on. That is… While some people… Tatiana: “It is pseudoscientific. ” “Pseudoscientific”, yes.
But who says that, pardon me, "placebo or nocebo is pseudoscientific"? Those are exactly liars. As a rule, it is either those who work for someone who do not want people to know about it, or, excuse me, those who are like some fellows that have sheer plagiarism instead of scientific works and just hate everyone, especially successful people.
Like there is one man familiar to all of us, friends, I won’t name him, now he is already… T: Famous. IM: He doesn’t promote himself, but we’re promoting him all over the world, and he is very famous, such an ardent fighter against pseudoscience. He attaches a label of pseudoscientists, excuse me, to Nobel Prize winners.
What can we say if he calls even Natalia Bekhtereva, Zhores Alferov, and many other honored people. . .
Tatiana: "Pseudoscientists" . . .
"pseudoscientists", yes. Such things happen in our society, you know, when his own image is dominant in a person, let’s just say, he doesn’t tolerate others and thus defames them. But most of the time, let's be honest, it happens so that people don't know how placebo works.
I'll tell you even more: miracles do not and cannot exist in the world. There has never been a single miracle. Any miracle is a physical manifestation of something.
There is our misunderstanding and our ignorance, while everything else is in its proper place. For example, that very placebo. It cannot be a pseudoscience because practically all pharma drugs, pills, medicines and whatnot, are tested in comparison with placebo.
In this case, a doctor doesn't even know where a drug is and where a placebo is. It is tested according to them. If a result is better in comparison to placebo, then the drug really works.
But people do not understand this very point of embedding an image. What is also taken into account is the inaccuracy in comparing placebo and drugs; and in this determination of the real therapeutic effects of a drug much depends on the doctor himself. Meaning, the doctor who prescribes and dispenses these drugs.
And a lot is also staked on this, that everything depends on the doctor. I'll give you a simple example, I'll digress a little bit. There were two groups of rabbits.
They were given diets that were high in, so to say, no-good cholesterol, you know, bad cholesterol. The first group was just given food with this bad cholesterol in huge amounts. While the second group was given the same food, but at the same time they were played with, they were stroked before they were fed; when they ate, they were also played with and stroked.
And here's the paradox: after all, a play and the fact that they were stroked could not in any way affect the organism's perception of the food. It would seem so, right? So in the first group, of course, the bad cholesterol was many times higher than all the permissible norms because of such nutrition, that's clear.
But why was the cholesterol normal in the second group, when people were just playing with rabbits and stroking them? A good question. Right?
T: There was mutual influence. IM: Of course. Tatiana: Yes, exactly.
So this dominant image, which is what placebo actually is, affects everything: it affects our hormonal system, it affects everything in general, it affects our whole life. You know, there are people who get up in the morning, and they are already, excuse me, as if they have shit themselves, and they stink all day long. They have, you know, such a worried look on their faces, they don't like everything, everything hurts in their bodies.
But what actually hurts? "I don't know, my finger hurts. " And that's it, their whole life is reduced to that finger.
At a time when there are people who have no arms or legs, or a lot of diseases that God forbid, they are bedridden, however, they wake up happy, full of energy, and they do a lot of good. Do you see the difference? When a person lives for himself, then, excuse me, even if his finger hurts, it’s a tragedy for him; the whole world has narrowed to this, it has disappeared, the whole world has dissolved, only his finger has remained.
He doesn't care about anyone or anything. And even if he cares about someone else, it is through himself: "How do you feel about me? " or "How is it…", I don't know, "How is the sun shining on me?
" You see? "It is shining wrong, not at the right angle. " And the person is unhappy all the time.
But why does this happen? Again, because he has a dominant image. And this dominant image, which this person himself created in his childhood by attaching this image of suffering to himself, the image of selfishness, again, selfishness due to certain reasons.
And a person tries to get out of it. That is, it seems to him… In childhood, he gives himself a mindset, he had a bad life, a family of alcoholics — whatever, there were problems in his childhood, kids at school teased him, and the person thinks, "I'll grow up and change everything, and then I'll have a good life. " And that's it, the person goes around stinking, excuse me, all his life, until he's very old, until he dies.
Why? Because it seems to him that everything will get better later on. It will never get better as long as that image dominates a person.
That's nothing else but nocebo. Far and wide this leads to a variety of different diseases. And it doesn't matter what illness you have, my friend, what matters is how you react to it and your attitude towards it.
If we think about an illness all the time… This is a simple example that millions of doctors know. It's true. If you think about an illness all the time, if you are preoccupied with it — you will be sick, you will never get well.
It really takes a miracle for a person to get well. Again, a dominant image with reference to some medicine or, excuse me, surgery or something should be instilled in that person. In other words, it is the art of a doctor.
He should somehow make the person change his mind, make him believe that he can recover, give him at least some hope, and take him out of that state. Then the person will recover. But if a person is preoccupied with his disease so much, he thinks only about it, all his strength, all his Vril power flows into it, can he recover?
No, of course not. Yet, if a person wakes up in the morning, and no matter how bad he feels, he smiles and is happy that he woke up and can smile, if he sees his relatives and friends, he smiles and is happy that they are there. Yes, sometimes they are annoying, it's normal, it is life; they can cause a slight surge of adrenalin or testosterone in his blood, so to say.
That's normal, we're all hormonal machines. But then he immediately calms down and treats his relatives with love. If you have a dominant image of respect and love for other people, please, note the difference — for other people, then life becomes beautiful.
That's why I've always said and will continue to say that if a person lives for himself, if he has an engrained dominant image of himself as the center of the Universe, then he is a corpse, and it doesn’t matter how long his body will exist, he has already killed himself. But if a person lives like a loving being who loves the whole world and all people, no matter even if they are bad and cause him a lot of trouble, he realizes that this is the consumerist format, and people have become like this due to certain reasons, but if you change the conditions, people will also change. And he tries to change these conditions and does everything that depends on him, excuse me, this person lives a full life, then already during his lifetime, he earns Life Eternal for himself.
Look how great and simple everything is. Again, what is everything based upon? Upon images.
If a person makes Life Eternal the dominant image in his life and main goal of his existence, tell me, can such a person fail to gain Life? He cannot because changes will occur in everything: his character will change, everything will change, and his attitude to people will change, too. He will really become a much better person.
Everything is very simple. Images rule the world. And there's an art of manipulating those images.
This is really what we are living in. We have touched upon those fellows called the Keepers. Right?
Well, it's not us who called them that, they've been called the Keepers for a long time. So, in their circle, the creation of images is elevated to the pinnacle of art, both for specific individuals and… Remember I told you about a person who was building a house, and how the foreman forced him to change the architectural plan? This is precisely the imposition of images, performed easily, simply, and even through other people.
That's why they were called the Architects of this world, because they could change the future of the whole humanity with just one word. Everything is very simple. In the same way, we too can change our lives completely with one word or one image.
Let's take a little bit broader look at placebo and nocebo. Let's begin with the example of Anatoly Kashpirovsky, if people remember him. Okay?
Again, the man would sit, looking smart, give certain commands, and remain mysteriously silent most of the time. Thus, he gave us an opportunity to create the image we needed. Well, he was giving us little hints: the stitches will dissolve, the disease will go away, and so on and so forth, trivial suggestions.
Did he possess any power? We are the ones who possess the power. We created an image for ourselves and thus recovered.
However, there were those, as we have already analyzed on the example of athletes, who couldn’t create a placebo image, and so an opposite image arose in them, that is, nocebo, and those people had a negative result. At first, this was hidden, especially when these sessions were broadcast on TV. It is clear that a negative result, while the suggestion was broadcast to such a large audience, would undermine the authority of that very author, Kashpirovsky, and placebo effect would decrease, that's why nocebo was covered up.
But in just the same way, this is being covered up in all religions. After all, there are no miracles coming from God. There are no healing saints who have 27 legs, 3 bodies, and no one knows how many fingers, I don't remember, there are already hundreds of them, right.
After all, what exists is a lie and deception, yet it is based on our faith. So the question is: what is faith? And here is the answer: faith means a dominant image.
Whereas knowledge means practice, experience, and exploration. So, as you see, a dominant image can be easily changed. That’s why we say that faith is good, but not enough.
Knowledge is better. Then a person can maintain the right image as well. That is why those Keepers, by substituting the primordial Knowledge which was brought here by the prophets, and by creating religions, actually introduced this magic.
Well, it is false magic. Although any magic is false. You have to understand that.
Why shouldn’t we practice it? Because we spend our energy and our life on achieving something that we don't really need. That's why it's a lie.
But for this very reason religions are filled with magic, because we, as humans, want exactly what we don't really need in life. We seek dominance or something else, some kind of health… while actually, waking up in the morning and whining, you see, about how sick we are, instead of enjoying life, smiling, and maintaining the right image. Thus we fuel a disease that doctors cannot cure in us, it is natural if our image is way more powerful than the doctor's image.
Isn’t that so? Instead, we go into a religion and, pardon me, kiss the 27th foot of some saint because we were told that if we kiss it, we'll be cured, and that's it — we are cured. Why?
Because we believe in this piece of somebody’s corpse which belongs to hell knows whom; priests dug out a hobo somewhere, whose body didn’t rot, and presented it to us as something holy. After all, it’s true. And if we have believed in that, we become cured.
However, the priests meticulously conceal the category of people who had negative results or no results at all. And do you know what their argument is? "The person didn't pray enough" or "was too sinful" T: "His faith is weak".
Well, "Faith is weak", right, "You have weak faith. " You see, it's easy to justify, and it's easy to twist everything. Whereas in actual fact, those are simple and clear things.
It's very simple, and it has all been studied a long time ago. And those who manipulate our lives are perfectly aware of that. That is why, all of us who are striving for life, for a good life, we are preoccupied with creating a good life for ourselves and our families, and that's all, because each and everyone of us has been divided.
Yet, we have forgotten about each other. We have forgotten that we, people, are all one big family, and all of us are related and very close indeed. And if we took care of each and everyone, but at the same time everyone took care of us, imagine what kind of world we would be living in.
Then such simple things, the things we discussed today, would be available and known to everyone. And we would be able to use these benefits of civilization in our daily lives; things that have long been hidden from us, substituted and used against us. Well, everything is in our hands and depends on our choice.
To what extent we are able to become human beings, to what extent we are able to heed the truth and change the dominant image in our heads from an egoist to a Human being with a capital H. Do people really want to live in the kind of world we have now, where we are enemies to each other, in fact? After all, this is so.
We are manipulated, we are pitted against each other, we are forced to fight; they do to us what they want, they make us believe in things we do not accept. But then this image becomes our dominant natural image: first neutral, then natural, and later on dominant. Isn't that so?
Are we really so stupid that we do not understand elementary things? Again, those who do this engage in it not because they want to, but because someone easily forced them to do it, while they are merely pawns, excuse me, on the chessboard of that someone. You see how simply the world is arranged, and how, in fact, God embedded in us beautiful mechanisms that we can use, even in regard to prolonging that very life, our lives, far beyond the species limit.
We were talking about 1,500 years. That's a trivial calculation; in fact, this term can be increased even more. Whereas if we use a different technology, that’s where science fiction begins — we can exist in our own bodies for millions of years.
However, it’s a different level; it is, pardon me, not the first level of development of civilization. It implies different energies; everything is different. But at least what we already have, excuse me, lying openly on the table, and we just have to reach out our hand to take it — how stupid we will be if we don't do that.
Isn't that so? Indeed, if we can live well, beautifully, peacefully, happily, in good health, stay young, exist for a very long time, and do a tremendous amount of good for all humanity while enjoying life, and we don't do it, then who are we after that? A simple question.
Everyone chooses their own path. But preferably, we should choose our path together. Thank you.
Tatiana: Thank you very much. Thank you, friends. Peace be with you, and God's Love.
