Foreign [Music] this is James Lindsey you're listening to the new discourses podcast and the time has come for us to start talking directly about the 17 sustainable development goals of the United Nations agenda 2030. 17 goals to transform our world know this is often billed as a conspiracy theory and you can go to the search Engine of your choice and type in United Nations agenda 2030 or United Nations sustainable development goals and you will find that it's all over their website it's all over everything this is not a conspiracy theory it's all over the place
I just went to Philadelphia for the moms for Liberty National Summit that has got so much press and lo and behold there by the baggage claim in the airport are all the 17 sustainable development goals and all of this all These posters and and displays set up to promote them I ran into them at Chicago O'Hare Airport one time uh not that long ago these things are out and about they're on a mural in this on the side of a building in the city of Houston they're kind of all over the place he says go
to the website it's not a conspiracy theory or if it is it's the most open conspiracy and that is an illusion for sure on purpose it is the most open conspiracy in the history of The world so what are these 17 sustainable development goals I'm going to do a little bit of a series here because I'm going to actually go through the entire document published in 2015 which is 41 pages long no way I'm going to do this in one episode um I want to go through this entire document that is 41 pages long it
was published in 2015 announcing the agenda 2030 agenda for sustainable development from the United Nations before I start Though I want to talk about something familiar I want to frame this in a particular way that makes clear what's going on so I'm going to read to you from the selected works of the CCP dictator Mao Zedong Chairman Mao where he gave a speech in 1957 I did an entire podcast here on the new discourses podcast going through this speech which is on the correct handling of contradictions among the people so I encourage you to go
check that podcast Out to search for the ones on the new discourses platforms where I mentioned Mao I think I used the Statue of Liberty with red smoke and communist symbol symbology all around it for the cover if I remember right so here's what mouse said and this is what I want to frame this as okay so the Democratic method this is Mao in 1957 this Democratic method of resolving contradictions among the people was Epitomized in 1942 in the formula Unity criticism Unity to elaborate that means starting from the desire for Unity resolving contradictions through
criticism or struggle and arriving at a Unity on a new basis now I've done a lot of talking about this whole idea and I can talk about this off the cuff quite a lot with this I contend is what the 17 sustainable development goals in agenda 2030 is all about We're going to create the desire for Unity in a new world we're going to criticize and struggle contradictions against that vision for Unity and then we'll arrive at a Unity on a new basis that will be called a sustainable and inclusive future see we just want
to have a sustainable inclusive future where everyone feels like they belong that's a desire for Unity but we have these contradictions that we have to resolve there are people who are racist That's in the way of that there are transphobes there are homophobes that's on the social side of things but there are also people who want to drive their trucks or their cars they're people who like to get Goods that are shipped on container shipping there are people who like to take commercial flights all of that causes emissions it's near the Fourth of July here
in the United States so there are people who like to shoot fireworks to celebrate holidays that Creates emissions there are farms they create emissions there are cows that we have to sacrifice to Gaia because they create emissions and so those prevent the environmental aspects from coming to fruit so we're going to criticize those things and struggle those things say that there are all kinds of problematic so that we can arrive at a Unity a new Unity on a new basis as Mal put it and that will be the sustainable and inclusive future outlined by the
17 Sustainable development goals of United of uh agenda 2030. what Mao does I'm just going to read half of a paragraph here some of it's a little bit contextual to him but he says in our experience this is the correct method of resolving contradictions among the people in 1942 we used it to resolve contradictions inside the Communist Party namely the contradictions between the dogmatists and the great majority of the membership and between dogmatism and Marxism the quote left dogmatists have resorted to the method of Ruthless struggle and merciless blows in inner party struggle it was
the wrong method in criticizing quote left dogmatism we did not use this old method but adopted a new one that is one of starting from the desire for Unity distinguishing between right and wrong through criticism or struggle and arriving at a new Unity on a new basis this was the method used in the Rectification movement of 1942 within a few years by the time the Chinese Communist Party held its seventh National Congress in 1945. unity was achieved throughout the party as anticipated and consequently the people's Revolution triumphed here the essential thing is to start from
the desire for Unity for without this desire for Unity the struggle once begun is certain to throw things into confusion and get out of hand Wouldn't this be the same as ruthless struggle and merciless blows and what party Unity would there be left it was precisely this experience that led us to the formula Unity criticism Unity or in other words learn from past mistakes to avoid future ones and cure the sickness to save the patient so that's how Mal frames this idea and what you can hear is that he used it he Applied it on
his own party to achieve party Unity so that they would have the strength to be able to overcome it that was in 1945 they launched a revolution in 1946 and they achieved power in 1949 and began the CCP dictatorship that remains to this day so this is the formula that Mouse's transforms everything you say we're going to have Unity but we can only have it on some new basis that we don't have yet and here are all you problematic people We're going to criticize you and we're going to engage in struggle sessions which is a
form of psychological torture I've done a couple podcasts on struggle sessions you should listen to them on Surviving a modern struggle session for example uh is is particularly deep into that it is a form of psychological torture in which you try to get your you you you produce psychological pressure for people to conform to the new basis not just in the individual but in their Social circle around them so that their friends also pressure them to adopt the new basis and it is psychologically very difficult because you don't have to stand up to your enemies
which is one thing you also end up having to stand up to your friends who are saying just be reasonable this will all go away once we get the shots this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated just get it we can have peace and unity again and that my friends is exactly what they did to us And this is exactly where it came from and it can be in identity politics from race to sex to gender to sexuality to every other thing it can be an environmentalism it can be in medical things and they have
deployed this on us over and over and over again in wave after wave after destructive wave and the goal of all of it is to point to the sustainable development goals we talk a lot about Dei we realize that Dei diversity equity and inclusion is Actually just the implementation of the s in ESG environmental social and governance but what those point at is the sustainable development goals the name of the monster that we have to fight to save the West is the sustainable development goals of the United Nations agenda 2030 which are 17 goals to
transform our world why 17 because 17 is a magic number in cult numerology 17 represents the spiral of theodorus from the Pythagorean cult way Way back before Plato and Socrates in the Greeks and these this cult and it was a cult Pythagoras where we remember him for his his theorem which is relevant to the spiral turns out to have been a total cult that believed in all this magic has to do with uh numbers and lots of things we could talk about with that but we won't the spiral theodorus is if you go say from
a point out a distance of one then up a distance of one and you create the Pythagorean Triangle that has a length square root of two your horizontal line the hypotenuse has a length of square root of two the horizontal line has a length of one which is the square root of one the hypotenuse has a length square root of two now if you go off of that and create a right triangle at 45 degrees and you drop the hypotenuse down to the Center Point again what you get is a new triangle that has by
the Pythagorean theorem a hypotenuse of the square root Of three and if you do that again another right triangle you get one with the square root of four and if you do it again with the square root of five and if you do it again with the square root of 6 and what you actually end up drawing this way is What's called the spiral of theodorus you could draw this yourself if you wanted to it's not that hard it takes a little bit of patience getting the 90 degree angles right will be tricky But what
you have is these segments that are one unit long over and over and over again and when you get to the number 17 the 17th of these triangles where the hypotenuse is the square root of 17 you will see that you are almost around the circle but not quite but if you went to 18 you would overlap with the inner with the first triangle on the inner ring in other words you've completed one turn of a spiral well remember when I talked about How the dialectic is a spiral through history well here we are they
believe that 17 represents a spiral through dialectical change it's one turn of dialectical transformation it's not likely to be a coincidence that there are 17 goals to transform our world now they've issued a number of targets that we should hit and again I'm not a big believer in coincidences with these freaks because they love symbolism and so How many targets are there well some of you heard my interview with Jordan Peterson and he said oh yeah I helped write those and originally you think 17 is bad they're originally like 170 of them well he's talking
about the targets not the goals and there were not 170 of them which would be 10 each which is a number that would kind of make sense there are 169 of them there's one short of 170 but magic numbers being what they are 169 is 13 squared 13 is the magical number from Persian mythology from zoroastrian religion and so on of Mithra who is the uh God that has the power to move the wheel of law through the sky and you guys can look up the zoroastrian wheel of law if you want to and see
what it looks like what it's talking about is the Big Dipper and the way that they point at the North Star at the points of the Four Seasons so you can imagine you know four big Dippers set off 90 degrees At each other pointing down to a center point so A Center Point up and then kind of off to the side and there's four of them you can maybe guess what the shape is and that is that shape and that is where that shape comes from and that whole thing is yes Mithra and so 13
is the magic number of Mithra it's mithra's number for a variety of reasons and it represents power the power to move the universe as a matter of fact and here it is squared in the 169 targets but now You hear why we're gonna have to break this up into multiple podcasts there are 17 goals that's a lot of them to transform our world and there are 169 targets so to go through all of that one podcast would be Preposterous and impossible unless you want to be here for days which we do know is kind of
my brand but nevertheless so what I want to do there's a long Preamble of 59 paragraphs leading up to the statement of the 17 sustainable Development goals of the United Nations agenda 2030 the sdgs and then there is a long discussion of all 169 targets following that statement of the 17 goals I'm going to start by reading to you the 17 goals in full then I'm going to read to you the Preamble and we will come back and start to dissect the 17 goals themselves afterwards now before I get into the 17 goals it turns
out that they are divided into a number of categories in a number Of different ways which makes it very complicated for example there are some diagrams out there that talk about what's called the sustainable development goal or sdg pyramid and on the bottom it has goals that are oriented toward people and it looks like if I'm counting very quickly there are 10 that are oriented toward people there are five that are oriented toward ecology that are on a higher level there are two that are oriented toward Spiritual creating kind of a pyramid of ten five
two gives you 17 and the spiritual ones are the last two 16 and 17. um I'm not going to go into what they are quite yet just to point that these things exist there's another one that's uh also a sustainable development goal pyramid that breaks them up differently there are four very big ones at the base that are considered the biosphere so actually we have to get the world right If we're going to get anything else right above that are eight for society four for the economy and one that is the binder the spiritual one
on their very top which is number 17. so the biosphere goals have to do with the environment things like life on land life Under the Sea clean water climate action Society or societal goals gender equality is one zero hunger is one quality education for all is one there are lots of these the economy is built On top of that so if you get the biosphere right you get the all that right then you can move up and you can get Society right then you can move up and you can get the economy right and then
you can get goal number 17 is kind of the magic one that is on the very top and the most spiritual one it is Partnerships for all the goals so there are different ways that these are organized I'm not going to obsess about this for the moment we might come back To it in time I think we'll organize subsequent podcast according to this particular pyramid as a matter of fact and then there are a couple of bids there are two different bids for a secret 18th sustainable development goal sometimes called sdg plus one proving that
the 17 is really important because this is the first step into the new turn of the dialectical spiral to transform history and it's next thing the revolution of the Spiral is Perpetual you all it doesn't stop it is Perpetual change so there will be more and those are what are sometimes referred to one of the bids for that I should say is is space going into space and conquering space under these same kinds of principles the other is what are called the inner development goals in other words now you're going to transform not the world
around you but who you are inside and their symbol takes the symbol uh the the the the Wheel of goals I don't know if you've seen this eye of Sauron I've stuck it on a ton of things for the 17 sustainable dominant holes and it turns it into very obviously by adding some relief tapered relief on the inside and outside of the wheel it turns it into what very much obviously looks like a snake eating its own tail which is not that big of a surprise those are called the inner development goals um I wouldn't
pay that much attention to Them not quite sure how official they are but they are somehow official because I just saw a document recently from the EU adopting its commitment to the sustainable development goals and paragraph number 50 on that document explicitly mentions moving into the inner development goals later or sdg plus one so they're they're going to move into another domain of brainwashing on the back end of these now speaking of Brainwashing I've already done some podcasts about the the Nea goes sustainable is the title of it where I point out that education at
the K-12 level and then the whole series called The Strange death of the University where I read through a UNESCO document instead of a National Education Association Foundation document but this UNESCO document says that higher education at all levels has to become committed by very soon I would assume 2025 is the magic year for that to their mission statements every level achieving the sustainable development goals of United Nations agenda 2030 this is not a conspiracy theory this is a UNESCO initiative President Biden put us back into the UNESCO program I just saw on Twitter major
players congratulating us for getting back into UNESCO and how important UNESCO is of course UNESCO not only generates these pushes these 17 sustainable development goals into Education so that the purpose of education is brainwashing to understand and live in accordance with and Achieve these goals but also um so that uh these goals are brought into every facet of our lives so UNESCO was the push behind that he's it's also the push behind comprehensive sexuality education which I just recently exposed more fully and other people are exposing but I did A podcast groomer schools five on
comprehensive sexuality education guess where that comes from yeah that's right UNESCO it created there in 2003. so basically all these bad things are coming from UNESCO not a big surprise um but they are the arm of the United Nations UNESCO stands for United Nations educational scientific and cultural organization that is pushing the sustainable development goal agenda onto our children through our schools Relentlessly higher education is to be completely transformed in line with these goals by presumably a year or so from now at every level of higher education and the K-12 was already geared to start
adopting curriculum to teach these goals as early as kindergarten and Pre-K to children so what are these sustainable development goals now you're going to hear these are very aspirational what is this I should say new Unity on a New basis that we're supposed to Aspire to in words of Mao we are supposed to Aspire to a new Unity to achieve and live by these goals and everybody who doesn't will be criticized of course we saw that in one of the previous podcast talking about social emotional learning that one of the points of social emotional learning
is to overcome in children the cognitive dissonance anxiety and stress that comes with turning their education into the Sustainable development goal agenda that was another UNESCO document that was very explicitly uh the point it was called um it was called SEL it's social emotional learning for sdgs this is very serious the goal is to teach all children to be programmed with it that's what cloud Schwab tells us if you remember from the great narrative for a better future he tells us in that that book that where he has three primary Goals one is to use
the top-down power of the public-private Partnerships to force ESG in accordance with the sustainable development goals into the corporate world into the institutional world into the the non-profit world the second is to use education to transform the youth to only live according to that basis to demand employers not just employees employers to demand that the employers get in alignment with this agenda to demand that as customers that They're the people who produce their goods and services also are in alignment with this in other words to create bottom-up pressure and then the third one is the
Inside Out pressure to rewrite the social contract that it what it means to be a true good citizen or in their language a global citizen is to Accord yourself with the sustainable development goals with a whole new set of social agreements now in the book that was education for sustainable Development or something like this I think it's something like that is I I've talked about this in the past also they openly say that they're not that concerned what are the rights of a global citizen well first of all they say that global citizenship education I
think that's what it's called as global citizenship education the global citizenship education is designed to create Global Citizens but a global citizen is somebody who lives in Accordance with the sustainable development goals of the United Nations agenda 2030. this is extraordinarily straightforward what they're doing this is the indoctrination program as I said in a podcast two years ago sustainability is the tyranny of the 21st century this is the program to achieve it okay and what uh what they said there is that they said well we're going to aim for global Citizenship through global citizenship education
so what are the rights of a global Citizen and they answer a paragraph later they don't immediately they answer a paragraph letter and say well as far as the rights of a global citizen go we're not actually that interested in rights of global citizenship or more interested in responsibilities and duties in other words you're a slave to this program which will be enforced through social Credit and the fact that it's ubiquitous and there'll be no getting around it by the way the woke probably will get crushed by this too but we'll be living under permanent
tyranny with no Freedom we'll have social Credit Systems like in China just like Mao got rid of the overly zealous quote left because they were ruthless blows and whatever else and they were too left where he wouldn't even call them the true left and he had them uh Liquidated in some cases literally um the same problem will happen to the woke because this is meant to be a sustainable regime for them that's what sustainability really means not just a sustainable economy or a sustainable capitalism but in fact a sustainable regime that can't be deposed so
they don't need destabilizers like woke people right and that that's going to be how they do this they're going to implement A strong social credit system in alignment with the sustainable development goals which they get to arbitrarily decide how those are understood and enforced and they can be enforced pretty ruthlessly so this is the future that we're staring at and these are meant to be achieved by 2030 which is not that far away so they're going to have the pedal to the metal in fact they do have the pedal to the metal to try to
get them all right There's even more tangents I thought of when I'm going to try to suppress them so I can get to the point here what are the 17 sustainable development goals and like I said these are a little ambitious um which is to say they're fake which is to say that they're excuses for tyranny how do I know that they're fake well I don't even have to get biblical to say why number one is wrong but let's just read number one and see if you think this is realistic by 2030 goal one end
Poverty in all its forms everywhere goal two and hunger achieve food security and improve nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture okay so I said I don't have to get biblical because Jesus said that the poor and the hungry will always be with you well here we have in goals one and two that that's not going to be the case we're going to end poverty in all its forms everywhere that's not going to be realistic so it's going to be a excuse For grabbing tons of power to redistribute wealth according to their designs what it's going to
be is another excuse to impoverish all of the world except for the technocratic elite the stakeholders who are going to run this show for us as a kind of oligarchy technocratic oligarchy of experts who know how to run everything he knows how well they ran things like fully illegally and totally criminally through covet yeah like that but for everything Not just Public Health then end Hunger let's look at this one a little more closely I'm not going to dwell on these because I want to read this little 59 paragraph Preamble and hunger achieve food security
that sounds good I don't think we're going to end Hunger but achieve food security and improve nutrition okay those sound pretty those are things worth working on certainly reducing poverty certainly worth trying to do something about But then there's a contradiction immediately achieve food security and promote sustainable agriculture but we see what that looks like it means no nitrogen fertilizers and things like that it means people are going to starve but you can't have a you can't have food security and sustainable agriculture at least not under the present population something's not right there somehow they're
going to cut back on squash back on Lots of agriculture to make it sustainable agriculture but somehow achieve food security across all eight plus billion people on the planet something's not going to work something is going to give those are inherently in contradiction with one another you can't have what they call sustainable agriculture and end Hunger and Achieve food security that's just Not going to happen they're going to try to feed us synthetic foods and things but something is going to have to give that's fake that's not a good sign that's goal number two in
fact when we look at the Nea program that's the one they start teaching in kindergarten through manipulative techniques like trying to get kids to imagine what it's like to be hungry imagine how much they have to do to you know Help The Starving Children around the world massive wealth redistribution is coming off of both of those which will collapse economies and Destroy people's lives and kill many people meanwhile promoting sustainable agriculture it sounds very much like something like what Mao was talking about in that same speech as he prepared in 1957 to launch the Great
Leap Forward not the great reset that's our time that was meant what was a great reset for by the way to bring us to Agenda 2030. the sustainable development goals is going to be the new model we're going to reset to a sustainable model right so that's it and so um Mal was talking about the same thing we have to get food production and steal production up to massive levels to prove that we're a modern industrial nation 55 plus million people died murdered and starved because it was an absolute failure to have what he considered
what we would call in our our day sustainable Agriculture in other words centrally planned ideologically driven agricultural programs to end Hunger and Achieve food security and improve nutrition all over the world you can bet with all you have that this will kill billions of people if they commit to it in Earnest even as good as it sounds goal three ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages now I've covered in the past that sounds wonderful we do want healthy Lives look how good they're doing with their health care and the medical license
that tells you what's really going on I did a podcast specifically about the word all for all well-being for all first of all we're not talking about health we're talking about well-being which is mostly a subjective replacement of Health but for all what woke people mean by the words for all means there are some for whom this Doesn't apply who are oppressed and so we have to Jimmy the system to make sure it works for them no matter how much it breaks along the way in other words it's massive redistribution so ensure healthy lives and
promote well-being for all at all ages is a very concerning statement even if it were something possible how do you ensure healthy lives under the auspices of Liberty you do not people who are free are free to make some bad choices they're free to make mistakes They are free to eat the incorrect foods that make them unhealthy they are free to hurt themselves trying to do things how do you have Liberty and ensure healthy lives you don't and we saw what healthy lives look like we're not going to go outside we're not going to have
vitamin D we're not going to take care of our bodies we're not going to exercise we're going to stay home hide from a virus and take shots and to destroy our social and emotional lives In the process so I don't really trust these idiots to ensure healthy lives for us and they're not very good at promoting well-being but well-being is for all so you know it's a redistribution of well-being which means it's Equity of well-being and Equity equalizes downwards so we'll all have equal well-being that's just less well like Herbert Marcus said we all have
to adapt if we want a sustainable economy to less to having less to a lower Standard of living and I would contend Herbert Marcus's model from one-dimensional man particularly chapters two and nine of that book as I covered in yet another podcast lay out exactly that argument so that's what we have with Goal three that looks bad goal four ensure inclusive uh oh and Equitable uh oh now listen to the cheek on this listen to the next word goal for ensure inclusive and Equitable Quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all there's a lot
that we could unpack and should and need to unpack and on this there are some scary targets within goal number four we're not doing that right now but inclusive and Equitable education and quality education are not compatible as it turns out their definitions of inclusive and Equitable cannot produce quality and we have exposed that repeatedly I don't have to Go into it again but inclusive means it it's just like for all if you have anybody complaining that it's not on the new standard well that's not inclusive so the person creating the situation that's not according
to the the news the new basis is going to have to be criticized and struggled which means it's actually the person's not going to learn that person is going to get bullied and brainwashed that's what inclusive education is Equitable Education that means like what they do to get Equity then like not grading people getting rid of grades you know getting rid of standardized tests it just drags everything down it's the idea that everybody's going to get roughly the same because that's what Equity means Equitable quality education is an oxymoron Equitable means adjusting shares so citizens
are made equal so adjusting educational share so that citizens are maybe will guess what That's going to amount to dragging everything down to the lowest common denominator and worse which because it's a race to the bottom that's what it is and so the lowest common denominator will get lower and to promote lifelong learning opportunities for all there's that for all again so key in on that of course that means massive redistribution every time you see what people say for all that means They're going to redistribute to who they think are the deserving victims of Oppression
when Klaus Schwab says we're rewriting the social contract what does he say we're doing we're going to move it from an economy of caring and share or sorry an economy of production and consumption to an economy of caring and sharing in other words redistribution so when you hear for all that's what it means but lifelong learning sounds good right we all want to be lifelong Learners that's a huge woke talking point because what it really means is lifelong brainwash victims they've got to keep indoctrinating us from the moment we're conceived in the womb they even
talk about before birth until the moment we die we are constantly learning to be a part of their stupid cult that's going to kill people this is the death cult by the way we already heard proof that it's going to be a death cult it's not hard to see that but ensure Inclusive and Equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all is goal number four so sustainable development goal four is the education nightmare that we're dealing with with our kids it's the justification for all of it goal five get ready for this one
achieve gender equality and Empower all women and girls now normally you wouldn't blink too much about this except you'd roll your eyes At this point about gender equality you got to think a little globally there are some places where that's not working out so good but then we come to that phrase all women and girls right so you're thinking oh you know like the ones in Saudi Arabia right that's not just Western women and girls but what about trans women trans women are women all women and girls oh crap right and so you really have
to Pay attention to the way that these people talk achieve gender equality and Empower all women and girls is goal five what about the men well that's to be expected it's just taken for granted this is the way the Communists always think whoever's in the Bourgeois category about anything this is the justification for the for all thing the Bourgeois category is taken care of by default it cannot suffer it cannot be oppressed by definition so you don't Have to worry about it you don't have to pay attention to it it's automatically good so you have
to go to the class that they consider oppressed and patronize them and Elevate them so goal five is an enshrinement of that across what should be sex but it's going to be not sex sex isn't mentioned at all gender is gender equality and Empower all women and girls well trans women are women so there you go there is goal five goal six ensure availability and Sustainable management of water and sanitation for all well that sounds you thinking again of Africa or somewhere in you know Indonesia things are not going good they don't have clean water
you're thinking that's important yep that's true and that's the good thing Sarah communism always marries truth to a lie start getting that in your head let me say it again communism always marries truth to a lie more broadly dialectical leftism marries truth to a lie it always Marries something true yes there are people in the world who do not have clean water and water security and sanitation to a lie because what is this actually going to be what is sustainable management of water and sanitation mean and for who for all yet again for all so
all of your environmental justice initiatives dealing with water allocation and use boom they're all in under goal six doesn't sound as good anymore does it Climate change or climate Justice models to talk about water and sanitation and water availability and management oh this is an excuse for them to manage the water under their ideological programs you can see a lot of the things they do with the water to mismanage water say in the state of California which is already pointed very strongly in this direction it's an excuse to control the water and control the people
who need access to the water because it has to be Sustainable which means it's going to be tyrannical and not going to work for most people but it has to be Equitable for all it doesn't say Equitable here it says sustainable management ensure availability is going to be Equity equal access right is that they lie and say Equity means in sustainable management that's tyranny is what that is that's starvation is in this case people are not having water because we have to make sure that it's Available for all so they create justifications well sorry Las
Vegas you know largely too many white people there can't redirect water to you in the middle of the desert because somebody Downstream needs it instead for all means for all so if you don't have enough water to function in your city that's too bad you'll have to fix that we'll come up with a solution for the crisis that they've manufactured that's what they're talking about sounds okay Isn't okay is not good tyrannical control and using um the claim of vulnerable people and marginalized groups and so on to use to Tennessee environmental justice and climate Justice
and all this nonsense to do tyrannical control over your water access goal seven ensure access to Affordable reliable sustainable and modern energy for all There's the for all again so just we already covered that what's going to mean is that means brownouts because affordable okay that'd be great reliable sustainable energy is an oxymoron reliable sustainable energies and oxymoron if they wanted actual sustainable I don't know what they mean do we do know what they mean by sustainable sustainable means they have to say well emissions are not sustainable that's bad So we have to cut emissions
for whatever magical reasons because it disrupts their plans nuclear energy isn't sustainable but if we want a reliable energy we're going to be using fossil fuels and we're going to be using nuclear and we're going to be using a lot of both because that's what reliable modern energy looks like and it does reach more and more and more people so it comes as close as possible to reaching for all in the way that you Think it would mean but for all means justifying redistribution so it means in this case brownouts reliable sustainable modern energy is
a lie because their definition of sustainable means wind and solar you remember the episode I did about the the UK fires document absolute zero in the western holiday tomorrow is what I called that they want to put us in massive energy debt massive energy uh scarcity and they'll use that To control us so they're going to ensure access for all so it justifies not having enough and having to re manipulative and controlling redistribution schemes reliable sustainable and affordable modern energy does not exist outside of fossil fuels and nuclear energy it does not exist so on
their trajectory under their definition of sustainable this is not possible goal eight promote sustained inclusive And sustainable economic growth full and productive employment and decent work for all so full and productive employment and decent work for all what how do you think that's going to work how do you think that's going to work for all means redistribution every single time so decent work that's subjective they're going to decide what's decent and who gets to have decent jobs and who doesn't get to have decent jobs I'll tell you How this works having been to China the
people that they that are loyal enough and that are smart enough get to have decent jobs and everybody else is uh the the Chinese term for this in Mandarin is Kuli means bitter work bitter worker k-u-l-i and pinion sounds like a racial slur that got adapted from it and those people do not have decent work or productive employment frankly although they work themselves to the Bone 28 days on one day off 12-hour days paid barely Enough to eat um It's a Wonderful Life really and that this is supposed to promote sustained inclusive and sustainable economic
growth so goal eight is sustainable capitalism it is the model that I've learned about in podcast after podcast essay after essay when I say that sustainability is a tyranny of the future when I talk about the um the dialectic between socialism and capitalism initiated by marcusa and Realize through Deng Xiaoping and coming into the modern era under the ESG tyranny that's what that means what it means is like when Larry Fink says that markets like totalitarian governments it means they get absolute control to make sure that the uh the economic model continues to grow according
to their dictates under perfectly programmable economic and political units called you through the algorithms through the social emotional Learning through the brainwashing through whatever else through nudge Theory all these different psychological manipulation tools through ESG compliance and social credit well your social if the economy isn't growing in a sustained and sustainable way well you're going to have to nudge you to buy more or buy less and your social credit score will depend on doing the right thing oh no such and such Corporation it's a darling of the government isn't Doing so well and maybe it's
because I make a crap product but everybody needs to go buy it or they lose social credit score right you see how that kind of would work inclusive well they always say the economy isn't inclusive enough well in other words it's not communist so that that's what that means so goal eight there you go goal nine build resilient infrastructure promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and Foster Innovation So again with inclusive and sustainable those words appear in virtually all the goals inclusive and sustainable inclusive and sustainable that's the new basis the new Unity on a new
basis everything's going to be geared toward whatever they call inclusive and sustainable which they will Define through their social credit mechanisms however they need to resilient infrastructure that's the big thing off of covet oh look at the Infrastructure shock we had our supply chains got shut down everything got disrupted it wasn't resilient in other words we need Global cooperation headed up through our organization conveniently enough United Nations needs to be a central Planning Commission to make sure that our infrastructure is built to be resilient on their terms by the way the r word resilient is
a big word for them it's a big danger red flag word pay attention When you see it so build resilient infrastructure that sounds like they get to be in control of all uh all building um all infrastructure layouts and you know why did our supply chains collapse oh yeah because they made us close everything isn't it it's because they broke it isn't it isn't it they broke it and they said oh no it's a broken what do we do I know give us more power hate these people so now We have to have building resilient
infrastructure as one of their goals that they're going to control so we can have we can have inclusive and sustainable industrialization which means not enough of it it's going to look like a crap uh it means what it looks like is crazy Rich Asians is what it looks like it looks like a handful of hand-picked loyal people being allowed to promote themselves to Crazy Rich status That's sustainable and inclusive industrialization goal 10 this one's communism guys it's just communism it's just communism let me say it again sustainable development goal 10 is communism I should just
say goalten communism not even read the words let me say it again Bolton is communism sustainable development goal number 10 is communism how do I know that well let's read it For real gold 10 reduce inequality within and among countries so I misspoke goal 10 is global communism reduce inequality within and among countries well how are you going to do that Claus Schwab how are you going to do that Bill Gates on your private jets and your super Yachts how are you going to do that I know communism massive redistribution within and among countries goal
11 make cities and human Settlements inclusive isn't that word just pissing you off at this point make cities and human settlements inclusive safe for other that word resilient there it is again and sustainable in other words smart cities in other words smart cities what's a not sustainable settlement according to them well Farms rural uh you know towns things like that those aren't sustainable are they inclusive oh no no No population's not big enough they're going to have to be mega cities that we're all herded into those are inclusive and sustainable ways of life apparently not
farming not sustainable independent Farmers not sustainable big giant corporate Farms owned by Bill Gates with all those Farmland sustainable and they have to be safe do our cities that their control right now seem safe no they are not safe they are absolutely not safe they're also not Very inclusive to be honest with you and I'm not completely sure that they're all that resilient but are they safe no they're not safe safe means safe for the agenda it doesn't mean safe for you it means safe for the agenda and the people pushing it so when moms
for Liberty go say to Philadelphia and has a perfectly peaceful and wonderful and fun and lovely conference what did they scream what did these flown in and bust in and paid protesters outside scream at us While we were there you're not safe you're not safe it's not safe to have you here safe means safe for the regime and its programs and that's what it means it means nothing else what did they scream at us what did they say on social media afterwards citing their stupid fake astroturfed protest as the as the justification Philadelphia didn't want
you here you were not welcome in Philadelphia I walked around the city myself I talked dozens of People everybody was a happy to see me be perfectly friendly see when they heard about the Monster Liberty largely on side kind of excited that it was happening sort of disgusted by the protesters I didn't have a single interaction where somebody was like against it the city loved us we loved the city the city was totally inclusive to us and safe as far as it goes given they have a Soros D.A and we didn't go out at night
because of crime Which is a big problem in Philadelphia but they staged an AstroTurf protest and said Philadelphia doesn't welcome you you are not welcome here Philadelphia showed no you were from Seattle and you were from Portland and you were from California and Minnesota and all kinds of fake places and a few of you were from Pennsylvania some of you came down from New York fake fake fake fake to say this city isn't inclusive and safe with you here that's what they wanted to say That's the message they tried to Gin up out of literally
the ground totally in opposition to every possible feature of reality in order to shut moms for Liberty in their their Summit down so make cities and human settlements inclusive safe resilient and sustainable for the regime and its operatives only is what that means goal 12. ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns that's where we come back to Papa Klaus We are going to rewrites the social contract and uh we will move from the the economy of our production and our consumption into a new economy of sharing and caring people have a new Unity on a new
basis for a minute you probably thought you're actually listening to clouds there because I was nailing that at first ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns we're going to move away from an economy of production and Consumption because that would be sustainable many sustainable capitalism AKA productive socialism gonna move away from production and consumption into sharing and caring communism in other words on their terms the stakeholders who run the sdgs in the western commune will tell us what sharing and carrying looks like what consumption and production patterns count as sustainable and which ones are not sustainable
you know like in the UK Fires document where it says eating beef and lamb not sustainable not going to do it eating anything that has to be shipped by anything other than light rail not sustainable container shipping not sustainable airplanes not sustainable so it has to be flown in not sustainable if it has to come from overseas on a container ship not sustainable heavy rail not sustainable so if it had to come from far away not sustainable People are going to starve London cannot feed itself London cannot feed itself think about these things that's what
this is about goal number 12. goal number 13. now remember what I said about 13 being the magic number of Mithra and power remember what I said about that magic number's magic number of power is goal 13. so it's the one of the power to move the universe through its direction through the wheel of law through the direction it's supposed to Move okay it's the only one with an asterisk by it by the way goal thirteen can you guess what it is can you guess what it is where is the locus of all of their
power to move everything goal 13. take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts star acknowledging that the United Nations framework convention on climate change is the primary International Intergovernmental forum for negotiating Global Response to climate change in other words goal 13 is empower the United Nations and its subsidiaries to be a tyrannical Global government entity that will be able to control everything on the excuse of combating climate change and its impacts and that action has to be urgent between now and 2030 this is their power goal isn't that something isn't that Something and
once again it's the only one with an asterisk take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts where the asterisk reads acknowledging that the United Nations framework convention on climate change is the primary International intergovernmental forum for negotiating the global response to climate change so goal 13 is use climate change as an excuse to hand over all the power to the United Nations and that's exactly what they're talking about doing I was just sent an article this morning by the from the Federalist talking about how in September 2024 which is in line with achieving
these agendas by 2030 the United Nations is supposed to set up a program by which it can declare crisis shocks over all 193 member nations the Biden Administration is helping this be implemented so the United Nations can declare a state of Emergency or a crisis a state of Crisis or a crisis shock state that can override any national laws it can we can declare state of emergency in other countries that totally obliterates National sovereignty and hands that power over to the United Nations which has these agendas to use climate change as an excuse to do
whatever it wants or pandemics or whatever else they could say in 24 September 24 declare that There's a crisis shock plaguing the United States and then we have to suspend elections in November the timing is very curious this is a really freaking concerning agenda that they're pushing this is a really really concerning issue climate change is one of the things they think is or they don't think they say is a crisis so they can justify stealing power whenever they need to goal 13 mithra's number take urgent Action to combat climate change and its impacts through
handing over National sovereignty to the United Nations that's the star goal 14. conserve and sustainably use the oceans seas and Marine Resources for sustainable development so there's a lot again here I'm not actually going to get to read this whole Preamble in this episode I'll read the beginning part of it I guess there's a lot of concerning Things and a lot of boring things in that maybe this will just do the 17 and I'll come back to the Preamble later okay conserve and sustainably use the oceans seas and Marine Resources for sustainable development what do
you think that means that means they get to have decision-making control over how those things are used what the oceans seas and Marine Resources they get to make all the decisions as in the stakeholder Council Of experts who knows what the implications of that would be tremendous of course but most importantly is how it's worded the last three words let me read it again and I want you to pay attention to the way the last three words appear conserve and sustainably use the ocean seas and Marine Resources for what purpose so we're going to do
stuff with Marine Resources for sustainable development in other Words we're going to repurpose all of the oceans the Seas and Marine Resources to achieve sustainable development so we've got to be careful about what we put on the ocean and the diesel and all this no container shipping maybe we have to worry about pollution from say offshore oil rigs well we can't have any of those we've got to worry about nuclear contamination from the fukuyama reactor in Japan so what are we going to do well we can't have any more nuclear Reactors because we've got to
have sustainable development for the oceans all these things are just excuses for power oh the ocean we've gotta we've got we the experts need all the power in order to do this yet again well when you see life Under the Sea you think well that's not that big of a deal yeah we want to conserve life Under the Sea that's a good environmental goal no it's an excuse for them to seize massive amounts Of power over everything in the world goal 15 is similar that's life on land is the little slogan for it goal 15
protect restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems sustainably managed forests combat desertification and Halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss in other words every single possible environmental initiative that they can use to crowd people out like Farmers developers industrialists Industries themselves on the basis of that we have to guard ecosystems or whatever forests land degradation biodiversity which these things will be very very vague we know that many of their initiatives about like spotted owls and other things we all care about to some degree or actually ruses that they use to Elbow out
farmers and ranchers and other things in various areas and take over their land Expect that on a global scale under goal 15 and all of it will be just like with the oceans just like with all the other holes put under sustainable use which means what is sustainable use mean it means the stakeholders at Davos and at the United Nations get to decide what the hell happens it means you don't get to decide what happens on land that you live on or near it means Geneva gets to decide what happens on land you live on
or near it means you don't get to decide What happens with waterways Geneva gets to decide it means you don't get to decide what happens with food Geneva gets set aside did you elect anybody to go to Geneva no you're a stupid deplorable you would have to be struggled you're not allowed to do that you don't want Unity on a new basis this is what I'm saying Land and Water Resources seem like they're not that big of a deal turns out they're a very big deal Goal 16. now remember these were the ones that got
categorized as spiritual goal 16 promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development provide access to justice for all and build effective accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels oh there's a lot going on there that's not actually spiritual that is institutional that is institutionalize all of this that is not nationalized it is in global institutionalized Luckily there's conveniently a national International institution called the United Nations that could head all this stuff up so peaceful and inclusive societies well there's your inclusive right so they're what are you going to do with your borders well you're going
to have an inclusive Society what are you going to do with anything you want to agitate for call it racist or transphobic because it's not inclusive enough same tactics call everything you Want to control raise systems who you control it call everything you want to control transphobic until you control it critically denounce everything you want to control until you control it and then you'll have Unity on a new basis Unity criticism Unity just like Mao said promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development oh there's that again so we're not going to promote peaceful and
inclusive Societies in and of themselves they have a purpose they Have a Talos there's a there's a meaning to peaceful and inclusive societies they exist to achieve sustainable development so in other words all of our societies are going to have to be retooled to be engines of achieving the sustainable development of gender oh perfect tyranny what else does it say provide access to justice for all Mercy do we have to do this again isn't that what we just went through didn't we understand that justice has been Replaced by social justice and that social justice is
not Justice at all where it wouldn't need the modifier social justice is about group rights which necessarily means running over and abrogating individual rights right Justice for All was black lives matter it was no justice no peace which we slowly figured out wasn't a statement or an ask it was a threat there will be no peace until you give us what we call Justice it is the excuse to do more and More of that trans rights are human rights that falls under this provide access to justice for all for all so the most marginalized communities
that scream that they can't possibly have Justice and you'll notice no matter what you give them no matter how many demands you meet they don't have Justice yet because Justice is a code word that means communism fully realized communism what did uh Marx call it it is uh communism as the uh Transcendence of private property is human self-estrangement that was in the economic philosophic manuscripts that's what Justice Means that's when we have Justice who said so while Mark said so who else said so Stalin said so and who else said so Mao says so so
this is what we're actually looking for access to justice for all means more woke tyranny climate Justice Health Equity Health Justice we could go to social justice racial Justice trans Justice and it goes On and on and build effective accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels hmm what does that sound like that's a dictatorship baby effective at what sustainable development accountable to whom the stakeholder Council the Soviet and inclusive according to people who are in on the new Unity on a new basis that's what that's about and it will be at all levels individual family
local state federal Regional and international global build effective and accountable inclusive institutions at all levels build out the commissars not the commissar the the common turn build out the international Communist party if we take this as communism effective accountable to whom the stakeholder is effective and Implement into sustainable developmentals and inclusive of the people who are already unified on the new basis at all levels Now goal 17 is the one that's unambiguously considered spiritual strengthen the means of implementation and Revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development doesn't that sound good and that's not like what
you want to be involved in related to spiritual it is also partnership for the goals is the short phrasing of it it is five circles arranged overlapping one another in a circle whereas Hegel put a circle of Circles with the different domains I don't know why there are five I'm sure it's some freaking magic number somebody can look into that goal 17 strengthen the means of implementation and Revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development in other words make sure everybody's on board with the with the Tyranny and strengthen all of the means of implementation social
emotional learning brainwashing and under education for all making sure Everybody's on board social Credit Systems strengthen the means of implementation open-endedly so that we can have sustainable development for everybody like I said there is an 18th uh there's an 18th goal which is sdg plus one which is um I don't have the actual graphic in front of me but it the little placard is that it is a um sorry I lost my place I'm looking for my document again It is a image of a little person with arrows pointing into their head and it's bringing
the goals internally into the mind and those are Under The Branding of the inner development goals so this is the United Nations agenda 2030 this is from I just read through the 17 goals so far in this episode I'm going to read a little bit of the Preamble this is the official United Nations document it's got the United Nations letterhead at the top the first Thing it says in giant bold letters is Transforming Our World then it has the wheel of Doom the 17 little colored placards in a circle and then says the 2030 agenda
for sustainable development Transforming Our World the 2030 agenda for sustainable development of the United Nations you can see it as sustainable development.un.org and like I said there's quite a lot of paragraphs here Um in terms of what it's all about um I'll read the preamble Transforming Our World to 2030 agenda for sustainable development Preamble this agenda Capital so proper noun this agenda is a plan of action for people planet and prosperity it also seeks to strengthen Universal peace in larger freedom huh listen to that Universal peace in larger Freedom see if I can find this
Where uh or um Mao talks about that um he says within the ranks of the people democracy is correlative with centralism and freedom with discipline this is Mao Zedong in 1957. they are the two opposites of a single entity contradictory as well as United and we should not one-sidedly emphasize one to the exclusion of the other within the ranks of the people We cannot do without Freedom nor can we do without discipline we cannot do without democracy nor can we do without centralism this Unity of democracy and centralism of freedom and discipline constitutes our Democratic
centralism under this system the people enjoy broad democracy and freedom but at the same time they have to keep within the bounds of socialist discipline all this is well understood by the masses That's Mal that's Mao right and so now we come back to the sustainable development goals it seeks to strengthen Universal peace and larger freedom we recognize they say that eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions including extreme poverty is the greatest Global challenge in an indispensable requirement for sustainable development it's frankly in my opinion indispensable because it's a Massive justification for Relentless
and tyrannical wealth redistribution it doesn't address the causes of poverty at all it just seeks to end poverty within seven years all over the entire planet now we all know the best way to end poverty does not universally end poverty because people are pretty varied but it is to actually provide them with liberty and allow them to pursue their dreams and allow them to pursue their uh their Own Prosperity by securing property rights which this instead would take from them all countries and all stakeholders acting in collaborative partnership will implement this plan hear that so
all countries are going to implement this but all stakeholders acting in collaborative partnership will infant discipline who are the stakeholders well that's a funny tricky word they'll tell You that you are a stakeholder because you hold a stake in the outcome but you're not a stakeholder Because unless you're included in their inclusive and sustainable program unless you're an expert in sustainability and inclusion unless you're one of them one of the gnostics you are too dumb to advocate for your own interests you will vote against your own interests you will act against your own interests you
will act in short term uh gain for yourself Not paying attention to sustainability you will act for yourself and not be inclusive so you're a stakeholder but the people that they call stakeholders are Representatives who have the bigger picture they are the inner circle of this cult that's who the stakeholders are nobody else not the inner School meaning the adapts not the initiates in the outer school only the Inner Circle basically only the People who went to the island are going to act in collaborative partnership in other words oligarchy to implement this plan we're resolved
to free the human race from the tyranny of poverty sounds like Karl Marx and want and sorry tyranny of poverty and want sounds like Karl Marx we are resolved to free the human race from the tyranny of poverty and want and to heal and secure our planet well that's exactly what Mark said this His program was about those two things we are determined to take the bold and transformative steps which are urgently needed to shift the world onto a sustainable and resilient path that you get to Define sustainable and resilient transformative is their magic it's
their Alchemy we're not going to have the world as it is we're going to transform it into its idealization into what is not we're going to incorporate elements of what is not into what is which turns Out to always end in calamity why because we have an urgent need to shift the world onto a sustainable and resilient path in other words under their control as we embark on this Collective Journey we pledge that no one will be left behind Collective journey and which no one will be left behind Okay Karl Marx the 17 sustainable development
goals and 169 targets which we are announcing today demonstrate this scale and Ambition of this new Universal agenda so it's a new Universal agenda did you vote for it you didn't did you give did you sign up for it with your consent you didn't is it going to massively impact your life oh yeah did you agree to it at any point you didn't they decided they were going to do it and you have to go along with it you have no representation in this whatsoever in other words it is tyranny it is tyranny they seek
to build on the Millennium Development goals and complete what they did not achieve see they tried this before with eight goals we don't have to get into that didn't work so they expanded the 17 goals they seek to realize the human rights of all oh really human rights not individual rights anymore ladies and gentlemen human rights of all human rights is one of those things we're gonna have to come back to that at Some point the universe Universal Declaration of Human Rights from the the United Nations you read through them you can tell there's something
off it's hard to tell what it is it's a really tricky little document because it sounds great but it's talking about human rights it never talks about individual rights it never ever ever talks about individual rights we only have rights in light of us being human so what if we saw it as Mark saw humans Humans are actually a collective under what's called what really should be described as being species being we are individuals who live for the species in other words we're a dialectical synthesis of individual and Collective if we see human rights that
way and we read it that way it's something different or they seek to realize the collective species being rights of all hmm that's different because if it's Human rights of all they get to trample on individual rights of individuals in order to achieve so-called human rights of all it doesn't mean rights that are inalienable to you because you are human which is what it sounds like I guess it could mean that if you wanted it to and then you would advocate for the wrong thing and become a useful idiot for them but it means something
different they seek to realize the human rights of All even the least of these no one will be left behind No Child Left Behind for uh w a George W bush no people left behind from sustainable development goals they seek to realize the human rights of all and to achieve gender equality not sex and the empowerment of all women and girls they took a special point to mention sdg5 right there without naming that they did so they are integrated and indivisible and Balanced the three dimensions of sustainable development the economic social and environmental they didn't
mentioned the spiritual one the goals and targets will stimulate action over the next 15 years in areas of critical importance for Humanity and the planet remember this was published in 2015 that was about eight years ago they've got seven years left so doing the math we're about halfway through this 15-year project Let's pause and reflect how's it going how's it going is it going good it's not going good everything they do makes everything they touch worse it's not going well it's utterly destructive it's ruining people's lives we've got seven more years of this unless we
make them stop people we are determined to end poverty and hunger in all their forms and dimensions and to ensure that all human beings can Fulfill their potential indignity and equality and in a healthy environment those are the people-based goals don't those sound great planet we are determined to protect the planet from degradation including through sustainable consumption and production sustainably managing its national natural resources and taking urgent action on climate change so that it can support the needs of the present and future Generations in other words They get to control everything they get to control
everything we're going to redistribute everything and they get to control everything that's people and planet Prosperity we are determined to ensure that all human beings can enjoy prosperous and fulfilling lives and the economic social and technological progress occurs in harmony with nature that's a strange one um at the end there But we're going I want to go back to people to ensure that all human beings can fulfill their potential indignity and equality in a healthy environment um what is their potential what is human potential is it to actually live out our individual lives at the
highest level of prosperity that we can with one another in communities that are voluntary at their basis and we have our rights protected by our Government and you know we consent to that and we keep them in check or is it to do as Mark said and to achieve the positive Transcendence of private properties human self-estrangement naturalism equals humanism and humanism that equals naturalism is that what it is is it to realize that we are actually social man a species being that lives for one another and whose inorganic body is the Earth Nature as Marx
put it is that what it is because that's what it sounds like it is peace we are determined to Foster peaceful just and inclusive societies alarm Bells peaceful probably fine maybe fine we'll see how that works just uh oh we know they're not good at that word inclusive we already know what that means so this is not a good scientist thing is a huge red flag we're determined to Foster peaceful just and inclusive societies Which are free from fear and violence well you're gonna be free from fear and violence that's pretty big good luck with
that there can be no sustainable development without peace and no peace without sustainable development oh look it's exactly the thing no justice no peace no sustainable development no peace you hear that hear that world it's a threat there can be no sustainable development without peace And no peace without sustainable development there will be no peace without sustainable development do you understand same threat no justice no peace and you mentioned it earlier no justice no peace was not them saying that we can't have peace without Justice it was saying until you give us what we want
there will be no peace same thing here if you don't give us what we call sustainable development Which is complete control which looks very Marxist in a lot of ways there will be no peace they will agitate they will as cholesterol put it prepare foreign they'll make people hate each other make us fight with each other instead of with them because there will be no peace without sustainable development and if we don't go along well maybe they need to unify by starting a war or two or threatening a nuclear war or World War III partnership
we are determined to mobilize the means required to implement this agenda through a revitalized global partnership for sustainable development oh a global partnership a global government is how you're going to manage that partnership based on a spirit of strengthened global solidarity focused in particular on the needs of the poorest and the most vulnerable we Know how they manipulate that and with the participation of all countries all stakeholders and all people what we already talked about first of all all countries are going to participate like they don't really have a choice did you vote for this
no but you got to participate anyway because your country said so all stakeholders we already talked about stakeholders you're not one they say you're one so that you feel good and included but you're not One because you're not of the Gnostic elect that gets to be in the stakeholder Council so you don't really get to make any decisions your betters will make those decisions for you and all people well there's a lot of things we could say about that we already heard that they're going to prioritize so-called the most vulnerable but we also know for
example in the same document I'm reading from Mal that some people aren't People Mal's very clear about that right from the very beginning some people are not people they're enemies they are not people that's very different you see he says to understand these two types of contradictions correctly we must first be clear on what is meant by quote the people in what is meant by quote the enemy the concept of the people varies in content In different countries and in different periods in history in a given country take our own country for example during the
war of resistance against Japan all those classes strata and social groups opposing Japanese aggression came within the category of the people while the Japanese imperialists their Chinese collaborators and pro-japanese elements were all enemies of the people during the war of Liberation the U.S imperialists and Their running dogs the bureaucrat capitalists the landlords and the guomingtong reactionaries who represented these two classes were the enemies of the people while the other classes strata and social groups which oppose them all came within the category of the people at the present stage the period of building socialism the classes
strata and social groups which favor support and work for the cause of socialist construction all come within The category of the people while the social forces and groups which resist the Socialist Revolution and are hostile to or sabotage so sabotage socialist construction are all enemies of the people so does that what the people mean is that we have to ask because the parallels are too damn close so let's reread that with sustainable development agenda in place of the at the present stage the period of building a sustainable and inclusive future the Classes strata and social
groups which favor support and work for the cause of sustainable development all come within the category of the people while the social forces and groups which resist sustainable development agendas and are hostile to or sabotage the sustainable development goals are all enemies of the people is that what they mean we have to ask unfortunately we have to ask because this is going to be implemented with a is focused in particular on the needs of The poorest and most vulnerable and with the participation of all countries all stakeholders and all people so the people who willingly
participate are people and everybody else's enemies is that a thing it feels like that's a thing eight years into this little project and we see history repeating itself at Great risk to billions of people and everybody actually around the world they go on to finish the Preamble with the Interlinkages and integrated nature of the sustainable development goals are of crucial importance and ensuring the purpose of the new agenda is realized sorry ensuring that the purpose of the new agenda is realized let me read that sentence again because intersectionality has entered the chat the interlinkages and
integrated nature of the sustainable development goals are of crucial importance in ensuring that the purpose Of the new agenda is realized if we realize our Ambitions across the full extent of the agenda sorry I added another word if we realize our Ambitions across the full extent of the agenda the lives of all will be profoundly improved and our world will be transformed for the better so that's how they begin this thing they now do a 59 paragraph declaration which I won't cover and then they cover the uh 169 goals which I will cover in future
Episodes um it does not end there there's then a means of implementation and Global partnership um and some other sections to this thing that go on follow-up and review they're going to make sure that they stare at all this stuff so we end up with a grand total of 91 paragraphs the last of which is we Reaffirm our unwavering commitment to achieving this agenda and utilizing it to the full to transform our world for the better by 2030. so we've got a few minutes to wrap this up since I don't want to go through the
17 sustainable development goals right now um how are they going to implement this paragraph 60 means of implementation in the global partnership we reaffirm our strong commitment to the full Implementation of this new agenda we recognize that we will not be able to achieve our ambitious goals and targets without a revitalized and enhanced Global partnership and comparably ambitious means of implementation the revitalized global partnership will facilitate an intensive global engagement in support of implementation of all the goals and targets bringing together government Civil Society the private sector the United Nations system And other actors in
mobilizing all available resources so through Global governance that we didn't vote for that's how paragraph 61 the agenda's goals and targets deal with the means required to realize our Collective Ambitions which you didn't vote for you didn't sign up for them their Collective Ambitions for all of the collective they've decided to speak for because they're the Gnostic elect the stakeholders the Soviet of our New 21st century world the means of implementation targets under each sustainable development goal and goal 17 which are referred to above are key to realizing our agenda and are of equal importance
with the other goals and targets we shall Accord them equal priority in our implementation efforts and in the global indicator framework for monitoring our progress 62 this agenda including the sustainable Development goals can be met within the framework of a revitalized global partnership for sustainable development supported by the concrete policies and actions outlined in the Adidas Ababa action agenda which is I don't know if I said that right Addis Ababa sorry um the Addis Ababa action agenda which is an integral part of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development that is the Baba action agenda supports
compliments and helps to contextualize the 2030s Agenda's means of implementation targets it relates to domestic public resources domestic and international private businesses and finance International Development cooperation international trade as an engine for development debt and debt sustainability addressing systemic issues in science technology and Innovation and capacity building and data monitoring and follow-up that's a lot of Realms that they want to have control over 63 cohesive nationally owned sustainable development strategies supported by integrated National financing Frameworks will be at the heart of our efforts well there's your ESG program right there isn't it we iterate that
sorry we reiterate that each country has primary responsibility for its own economic and social development and that the role of national policies and development strategies cannot be overemphasized we will respect each country's policy space And Leadership to implement policies for poverty eradication and sustainable development while remaining consistent with relevant International rules and commitments in other words they're going to hide a lot in other places like the ESG movement to leverage people into achieving sustainable development goals for them at the same time National development efforts need to be supported by an Enabling International economic environment to
see there's your ESG economy that they've created to do this including coherent and mutually supporting World Trade monetary and financial systems and strengthened and enhanced global economic governance hello Central Bank digital currencies international monetary fund scams processes to develop and facilitate the availability of appropriate knowledge and Technologies globally as well as Capacity building are also critical we commit to pursuing policy coherence and enabling an environment for sustainable development at all levels and by All actors into reinvigorating the global partnership for sustainable development so they're going to make sure all the countries all 193 member states
are in line walking in lockstep as it were 64 we support the implementation of relevant strategies and programs of action including the Istanbul Declaration and program of action the SIDS accelerated modalities of action Samoa pathway and the Vienna program of action for landlocked developing countries for the decade 2014 through 2024 and reaffirmed the importance of supporting the African Union's agenda 2063 and the program of the new partnership for Africa's development all of which are integral to the new agenda we've recognize the major challenge to the achievement of durable peace and Sustainable developments in countries in
conflict and post-conflict situations 65. we recognize that middle-income countries still face significant challenges to achieve sustainable development in order to ensure that achievements made to date are sustained efforts to address ongoing challenges should be strengthened through the exchange of experiences improved coordination and better in focused support of the United Nations Development system the international financial institutions Regional organizations and other stakeholders 66 we underscore that for all countries public policies and the mobilization and effective use of domestic Resources underscored by the principle of national ownership are Central to our common pursuit of sustainable development and that
something including achieving the sustainable development goals we recognize that domestic resources are First and foremost generated by economic growth supported by an enabling environment at all levels 67. Private Business activity investment and Innovation are major drivers of productivity inclusive economic growth and job creation so the private sector has to push the the inclusion program we acknowledge the diversity of the private sector ranging from micro Enterprises to cooperatives to multinationals we call upon all Businesses to apply their creativity and Innovation to solving sustainable development challenges that's your new business environment ladies and gentlemen ESG will make
it so we will Foster a dynamic and well-functioning business sector while protecting labor rights and environmental health standards in accordance with relevant International standards and agreements and other ongoing initiatives in this regard such As the guiding principles on business and human rights and the labor standards of the international labor union the conventions on the rights of the child which by the way was written by a now convicted pedophile which is creepy as hell and key multilateral environmental agreements for parties to those agreements 66 international trade is an engine for inclusive economic growth and poverty reduction
and contributes to the Promotion of sustainable development we will continue to promote a universal rules-based open transparent predictable inclusive non-discriminatory and Equitable multilateral trading system under the World Trade Organization as well as meaningful trade liberalization this is a giant wealth redistribution scam for the planet from the rich West everywhere else we call upon all members of the World Trade Organization to redouble their efforts to promptly conclude the negotiations on the Doha development agenda we attach great importance to providing trade related capacity building for developing countries including African countries least developed countries landlocked developing countries small
island developing states and middle-income countries including for the promotion of regional economic integration and interconnectivity I have to not lie to you A lot of these are not that interesting but it's I guess should be covered 69. nice we recognize the need to assist developing countries in attaining long-term debt sustainability through coordinated policies aimed at fostering debt financing debt relief debt restructuring and sound debt management as appropriate you have these banks are doing great things for these developing Countries this is IMF slavery is what this is the international monetary fund is screwing these countries to
keep control over them many countries remain vulnerable to debt crises and some are in the midst of crises including a number of least developed countries small island developing States and some developed countries we reiterate that debtors and creditors must work together to prevent and resolve unsustainable debt Situations maintaining sustainable debt levels is the responsibility of the borrowing countries however we acknowledge that lenders also have a responsibility to lend in a way that is not undermine a country's debt sustainability well I'm going to read that as iron law Vogue projection straight at the international monetary fund
we will support the maintenance of debt sustainability of those countries that have received debt relief and Achieve sustainable debt levels 70 we hereby launch a technology facilitation mechanism which was established by the Addis Ababa action agenda in order to support the sustainable development goals the technology facilitation mechanism will be based on a multi-stakeholder collaboration between member states civil society and the private sector scientific Community United Nations entities and other stakeholders and will Be composed of a United Nations interagency task team on science technology and Innovation for the sustainable development goals a collect sorry a collaborative
multi-stakeholder Forum on science technology and Innovation for the sustainable development goals and an online platform what that means is the experts are going to determine how the technology facilitation all works and as bullet points the United Nations Inter-agency task team on science technology and Innovation for the sustainable development goals will promote coordination coherence and cooperation within the United Nations system on science technology and Innovation related matters enhancing Synergy and efficiency in particular to enhance capacity building initiatives the task team will draw on existing resources and will work with 10 representatives from Civil Society the Private
sector and the scientific Community there's your stakeholders there's 10 of them 10 10 10 10. wonder who they are probably not Joe Blow to prepare the meetings of multi of the multi-stakeholder Forum on science technology and Innovation for sustained sustainable development goals as well as in the development in operationalization of the online platform including preparing proposals for the modalities of the Forum and the online platform the 10 Representatives will be appointed by the Secretary General for periods of two years guess what that means nobody voted for them that's what it means the task team will
will be open to the participation of all United Nations agencies funds and programs and the functional commissions of the economic and social Council and it will initially be composed of the entities they currently integrate the informal working group on technology facilitation namely The department of economic and social Affairs of the Secretariat the United Nations environment program the United Nations Industrial Development organization the United Nations educational scientific cultural organization that's UNESCO which is ruining education around the world and the United Nations conference on trade and development the international telecommunication Union the world intellectual property organization and
The world bank just to really get there the online platform will be used to establish a comprehensive mapping of and serve as a Gateway for information on existing science technology and Innovative Innovation initiatives mechanisms and programs within and Beyond the United Nations we really got to get rid of the United Nations is killing me the online platform will facilitate access to information knowledge and Experience as well as best practices and Lessons Learned on science technology and Innovation facilitation this is killing me boring uh I'm just going to skip this is crap um The multi-stakeholder Forum
on science technology and Innovation for the sustainable development goals will be convened once a year for a period of two days to discuss science technology and Innovation cooperation around thematic areas for the implementation of The sustainable development goals congregating all relevant stakeholders to actively contribute in their area of exploitation or there's 10 of them um and on and on this goes 71 I'm skipping the rest of this it's painful we reiterate that this agenda and the sustainable development goals and targets including the means of implementation are Universal indivisible and interlinked And uh the rest of
the document which I'm also going to skip at the moment is about follow-up how they're going to make sure we implement this I didn't find anything that stood out in that that I thought wow everybody needs to hear this so let me just read through the 17 sustainable development goals to ruin our world one last time and then we will call this episode to a close and we will go through the Declaration in the next Episode and then we will go with the 59 paragraph declaration you got heard how much fun that is we'll start
tearing apart all 17 goals I'm going to do a whole series so we do the whole thing um go through all 17 and we'll do them according to these organizational structure that they've given us and I'll try to get enough information to work in sdg 18 or sdg plus one as well so once again I'm not going to Editorialize too much the sustainable development goals to ruin our world by the year 2030. goal one and poverty in all its forms everywhere which is not possible so it's a justification for massive redistribution and power grabbing goal
2 and hunger achieve food security and improve nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture which is not only inherently contradictory but not possible and thus a justification for Seizing control of the means of food production and redistribution or distribution and tyranny and starvation goal 3 ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages I don't trust them to ensure a healthy life I don't think they know what it means well-being is too ambiguous it's too subjective the for all indicates redistribution not good goal four ensure inclusive and Equitable quality education and promote lifelong Learning opportunities
for all that's brainwashing goal five achieve gender equality and Empower with all women and girls just remember trans women are women when you take that one seriously goal six ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all in other words they're going to try to control the water environmental justice and so on goal 7 ensure access to Affordable Reliable sustainable and modern energy for all in other words we have he who controls the food controls the people we have he controls the energy controls the region we're quoting Kissinger here there's two of them
the other one's the money he who controls the money controls the world that's what Kissinger said so we've got at least the food wrapped up in sdg2 and we've got the energy wrapped up in sdg7 this is means for absolute totalitarian control we Also see that it's self-contradictory there's no such thing as reliable sustainable modern energy for all which is a redistribution scam goal eight promotes sustained inclusive and sustainable economic growth full and productive employment and decent work for all contradictory goal nine build resilient infrastructure promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and Foster innovation In other
words seize the means of production comrade goal 10 reduce inequality within and among countries that is global communism goal 11 makes cities and human settlements inclusive safe resilient and sustainable in other words sees the means of control of production of where people live goal 12 ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns again sees the Means of production transition from an economy of production and consumption to one of caring and sharing goal 13 star power mithra's number move the world with that uh funny propeller-shaped thing that the Big Dipper represents the one that the Adolf liked take
urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts so that's hand all power to the United Nations if you remember what the asterisk said because it says acknowledging that the United Nations framework convention on climate change is the primary International intergovernmental forum for negotiating the global response to climate change so in other words hand over your National sovereignty to the United Nations on the justification of fighting climate change fixing the weather goal 14 conserve and sustainably use the Ocean seas and Marine Resources for sustainable development in other words seize control of the means of using
our ocean seas and Marine Resources so that they can further the agenda of the United Nations in other words appropriate them to their regime goal 15 similar but for land protect restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystem sustainably managed forests combat desertification and Halt and reverse land degradation and halt Biodiversity loss so that means destroy Farmers more or less in addition to the other ones that touch on that goal 16 promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development to provide access to justice for all and build effective accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
in other words build out the common turn and the dictatorship of the sustainable and inclusive people goal 17 strengthen the means of Implementation and Revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development which I reiterate it is this network of Partnerships among all of the members for the goals so this is the 17 sustainable development goals of United Nations agenda 2030. sustainability is the tyranny of the 21st century that is so that is this is the structure of our tyranny we heard the unambiguous parallels to the program that Mao was putting in place in China In the
lead up to the Great Leap Forward which crushed China starved tens of millions of people or LED to their murders and utterly ruined the entire place and they called it the Great Leap Forward just like we're calling this initiative to get this on track the great reset and so this is a very very concerning development the goal is to replace shareholder capitalism with stakeholder capitalism which is a council driven a Governing Council driven or soviet-driven that's what that word means governing Council um technocracy of redistributing and controlling the means of production and resource distribution just
like what you would expect and from a from a tyrannical technocratic regime like Communists and so uh what we're what we're facing is not just a new Global a bid for a new Global Soviet but one that has this Agenda of sustainability and inclusion that gives it power like we've never really seen before with tools equipping them they're equipped with tools I should say uh like social Credit Systems that will be able to bend people to their will in a way that nothing in history has ever been able to do as we can already see
in China and so um this stakeholder capitalism with the new economic system of what they it says you Know sustainable uh development or whatever what they call this a circular economy a snake eating its own tail people eating their own whatever you want to say that it is um that's the objective this of course will just degrade the law of entropy will apply to it and it will be suffering in poverty and destruction and death for all except for the technocratic elite who sets themselves on top of this thing for as long as Social Credit
Systems can keep human beings crushed under their boot if you want a vision of the future imagine a human sorry imagine a boot stamping down on a human face forever 1984 George Orwell warned us that's what this looks like so the big Target in the world we talk about targets what do we go after what do we try to do there are a lot of things we have to go after we've got to Take on the American Library Association we get taken out of the teachers unions we're going to take on a lot of these
things we got to take on a lot of things the Bar Association of Medical Association so we got to deal with these those are small things the big picture targets we have social emotional learning and education that's meant to turn into a brainwashing program to facilitate this and we know that's their goal they've written about it I've Exposed it myself other people have exposed it to so we have to take on social emotional learning in the schools because if they get the kids it doesn't matter if we stop them and everything else they have the
Next Generation so they have the future if they don't get the kids it doesn't really matter what they do to us because the kids aren't going to go along with it and it's going to break them so we must protect our kids from this which means keeping them Out of their horrific system we must stop social emotional learning that's a Target another big Target is what all of this is being facilitated through corporations and through municipalities and through institutions and through hospitals into non-profits and through startups is the ESG economy so what you do is
you get the young people worked up to become an employee base that will cause every problem in the universe for Their CEOs for their their management their Management's afraid of them they get struggled at work because they have a bunch of Communists working for them that's a problem so they have a bottom-up pressure and then they have a top down pressure telling them they have to do this meanwhile they're rewriting the social contract to be in accordance with achieve these 17 tyrannical development goals and so this is the vision of the program for our future
we Are eight years out from its statement eight years into its implementation of its 17 goals and 169 targets I don't think it's going nearly as well as they had hoped they're very ambitious in fact they're ridiculous but it's not going as well as they hope people are waking up it's time to wake up to this it's time to wake up to agenda 2030 and to realize that it is the bid for Global tyranny this is I said that yeah SEL social emotional learning and ESG Environmental social governance scoring are the two of the big
targets the Crown Jewel Target is a sustainable development agenda the sustainable development goals themselves undermining these is absolutely critical resisting the implementation of these targets and goals and mechanisms is absolutely critical that we do we must break this agenda because this agenda will break Humanity if we don't that's quite the introduction we'll try To do a series and start tearing these apart Brick by Brick uh in coming podcasts thanks for listening [Music] [Applause] [Music]