Mr. Beat is a Liberal Lunatic Pretending To Be Unbiased

Mr beat a YouTuber a teacher an educator a person you'd ideally trust to give you an unbiased Centrist tldr perspective of reality that you know comparatively less about yourself think of veritasium Visos or Simon Whistler and the tens of channels that he owns but in politics and Mr be has for whatever reason acquired a reputation of a political n Persona which posts exclusively educational content on YouTube but much like Adam something he is full of [ __ ] surprise forgot the spoilers is Mr beat really that unbiased and fair As He makes himself out to

be or is he another liberal lunatic not worthy of your attention let's explore this question on the example of one particular video that I especially dislike lik the video is titled the great replacement Theory explained and as you would expect if you're familiar with how leftism operates it will not deal with documenting a statistical decline of the white population in historically white countries explaining the reasons for it it will instead first go into Mis defining it as something else entirely and then explaining why it's not happening before saying that it's a good thing that it

does finishing off with a discussion on how how Society ought to handle those people who are not particularly fond of this demographic transformation now I originally planned to respond to it after it was first uploaded but unfortunately I was either too busy or too lazy nevertheless I did promise to Mr beat and my followers that I will respond and so it is better late than ever even after 2 years he's watched at least one of my videos before at least he claims to have watched it and so I do expect some back and forth after

I publish mine but I still obviously don't expect him to change his mind on anything this is mostly for the audience because in my personal engagement with him he seems to be very close-minded and conspiratorial as an example I remember one of my followers were saying to him that the AI can accurately predict one's race and he was like hm but who has created the AI That's Right racist white people for the purposes of detecting race while all of the experts agree race isn't even real to begin with and so obviously DNA can detect race

and so if the DNA can predict race then surely the AI can't either all of that is utterly false of course but as Joseph gobl once said when one lies one should lie big and stick to it I even fell for it and I'm supposed to be smart enjoy the video the the great replacement Theory says that too much immigration of nonwhite folks to countries that are mostly made up of white folks is bad well yes and no the great replacement doesn't necessarily refer to immigration of non-whites per se but to the decrease of the

Native white population relative to the increase of the non-white population who are thus replacing the native white population or in even simpler terms great replacement is the alleged replacement of Whites by nonwhites now it doesn't necessarily has to have a negative connotation for a lot of non-whites and many white liberals openly hail it as a positive development let's see some examples and the wave still continues it's not going to stop nor should we want it to stop folks like me who were Caucasian of European descent for the first time in 2017 will be an absolute

minority in the United States of America that's not a bad thing that's a that's a source of our strength the white British population has decreased by 600,000 while the minority population has increased by 1.2 million so yes lad we're winning I mean I remember being in England first time in the 80s and it was very different yeah very different how so well first of all London was like all white yeah y it was you know so so can we just celebrate that victory that we made a place more diverse and not you know you never

get a pat on the back the people who like achieve I feel like in that area there's only like there's more to do of course there's more to do but can we just get a little two generations three generations okay that's progress I I'm not a bad person to like clap for progress in other words it only becomes a problem for people like Mr beat when it is invoked by the people who aren't happy with this demographic transformation in other words you can praise it or even be neutral about it but the moment you are

unhappy about it suddenly it doesn't exist and it's a good thing that it does powerful people are trying to prevent whites from having kids often the conspiracy is blamed on you guessed it Jewish people its Origins can be explained using conspiratorial language or academic language or bypassed entirely in favor of Simply focusing on a current description of reality without necessarily dwelling much into its origins The Great replacement could be defined as a Perpetual demographic decrease of the Native white populations relative to non-whites who are increasingly finding themselves in historically white countries much like for instance

the mcale migration of nonwhites and Germanic into late stage Roman Empire before its collapse this theory is manipulative because it equates normal patterns of immigration with murder is trying to put a big equal sign between the new Salvadoran or Syrian who lives down the street and a mental image of a concentration camp here Mr beat is committing what is known as the equivocation fallacy in which he originally defines the great replacement as the replacement of Whites by non-whites but then goes a had into debunking its more ridiculous variant that he himself has just invented so

no the great replacement wasn't necessarily planted in a secret room for the purposes of hurting whites that's a strowman clearly most likely it happened organically as a result of Shifting Elite preferences at the top compounded by a silent consent at the bottom which originally was not even supposed to result in mcale Immigration according to a highly partisan Jewish liberal School ER Basia monk the reasons for this demographic transformation differ from place to place in Germany and Switzerland it was mostly driven by the need of unskilled labor that would fuel those Count's economic miracles in the

1950s and 60s in France and the United Kingdom much of it was a consequence of the imposition and later dissolution of brutal empires in Denmark and Sweden generous Asylum laws played a significant role but despite despite the important differences all these countries share a key commonality their transformation is owed to the unforeseen and unintended consequences of policies that had objectively unrelated to the ultimate outcome none of these countries intentionally chose to turn themselves into diverse democracies and so none of them ever developed a coherent plan on how to deal with the key challenges they would

face as a result now if you look at the 1965 Immigration Act only 10 years later did it really began having an effect let me quote you a passage from the same shly book I quoted earlier who for whatever reason calls it the great experiment when referring to the 1965 Immigration Act president lynon B Johnson insisted that this is not a revolutionary bill it does not affect the lives of millions it will not reshape the structure of our daily lives so the experiment is more of a result of mistaken assumptions about the long-term impact of

public policy reforms than a testament to a principal commitment to the benefits of diversity at least originally neither woodro Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt nor Lyndon Johnson and Ronald Reagan took a conscious decision to set up the great experiment but now that it's done moral values have shifted to uphold this Dynamic making it permanent though as you'd imagine most people are still against it of course you must keep in mind that this is a functionalist interpretation of the origins for there is no clear consensus on the logic behind this process but it did became implemented in

every single Western Country underpinned by the logic of liberalization and management anyways thanks for coming to my crash course history now once that we have defined the great replacement the second time the video could have simply ended right there but Mr Beast has decided to make an even grander assertion that he couldn't back up which is that's right you guessed it again it's not happening only are those who preach about the great replacement Theory manipulating us but as it turns out the entire theory is bull crap it's uh literally not backed by evidence at all

it's uh like literally not backed by evidence like at all um Chief we didn't come here to replace you you okay what you're protesting against doesn't even exist and now back to the video in which Mr Beast presents with six arguments or perhaps should I say assertions as to why the great replacement is not happening and why it's a hacking great thing that it does for the sake of Saving Time the claims are presented in front of your screen now the nature of these claims is that they come in a sequence in a manner in

which every subsequent premise contradicts the previous while also assuming that you have not accepted the preceding series of arguments which is presumably why you need to hear another one not a particularly great way to convince people but most so ate it anyways so it's not like Mr beat failed in his mission at any rate I'll be going through dismantling these six arguments in order even though they pretty much dismantle each other when they are grouped together in a sequence claim number one there are more whites than ever before well they must be doing a pretty

poor job eh since they're more white folks now than ever before you might be thinking well duh Mr beat first of all even if we go by absolute numbers the white birth rate isn't high enough to sustain the overall white population in the world for instance over the last 10 years the white population of the United States has decreased by 20 million in the UK the white British population has decreased by a million but of course this doesn't matter as much as the relative number of natives to foreigners let's look at isra as an example

the Christian population there is growing it was 40,000 in 1950 and almost 200,000 now you could say they're thriving except for the fact that at its founding the Christian population of Israel has amounted to around 10% of the total and now it's less than 2% of the total in other words as the overall percentage of the population their numbers and influence has fallen by a Waring 80% whites in the west will simply face the same same future so now in a fantastic scenario in which by some miracle the UK's wide population grows to a 60

million or even 65 million the fact of the matter is that it will also house an entire country of Pakistan and thus it will turn into a Pakistani state claim number two you aren't actually being replaced because race is a social construct there are more white folks now than ever before you might be thinking well duh Mr beat but whites represent a smaller percentage of the proportion of the world well who counts as white isn't based on genetics or even demographics it's based on politics in the United States for example Irish Americans Italian Americans and

polish Americans weren't considered white until the early 1900s Greek Americans weren't white until just a few decades ago some Arab Americans used to be considered white but by the end of the 19 hundreds were no longer considered white in other words well actually you're getting replaced by you you see this Indian man and this Haitian right here they're actually white just like you are problem solved bucko he invokes nov's ghost by which the historic discrimination against polish Jewish Italian and Irish Whites by anglosaxon Protestants became equated into the Discrimination of non-whites by whites because according

to all igna of discrimination goes only one way from whites to non-whites and thus whoever happens to be on the receiving end of the Discrimination is automatically non white well if polls or the Irish or whoever else weren't white to begin with why were they allowed into the country in the first place how come they received citizenship given that the United States Congress First Act was to limit naturalization to any free white persons how come they want subject to slavery Jim Crow and zoning laws but at the end of the day white Anglo sax and

Protestants are about a fraction of the white demographics in America and the globe if you go to France Brazil or Russia the same racial reality will remain but without the Wasps even though race isn't a biological reality if race isn't biological then why can't a black family give birth to an Asian child and how come can I send my DNA to a genetic ancestor company and see my results now I actually brought this same question to him on Twitter and he said that it's not possible so whoever send their DNA to An ancestry testing company

sorry guys but it's just not possible why isn't it possible it's just not why not you stupid bastard for whatever reason in our mainstream conception race is imagined to be equated to skin pigmentation by the way you should watch this older video Bea of mine but the truth is that over 80% of the gene is expressed in the brain If race was truly about skin color then we surely would consider Northern Asians white and dravidian Indians black yet we don't why well for the same reason the greater Swiss mountain dog and rotw aren't considered the

same dog breeds yes they look kind of alike and they have the same fur texture but other underlying differences that stem from genetic ancestry make them different subspecies Kimu particularly was afraid of Muslim immigration arguing they often had a much higher birth rate than whites even though around 40% of Muslims identify as you know white here we are again confusing biology with identity I suppose for a person who believes that biological sex plays no role in gender this argument looks convincing but at the end of the day with the exception of bosnians albanians and some

converts to Islam those brown people who identify as white identify so on census only because there is no Middle Eastern and Northern African category Dillingham do do I look white to you congresswoman I I think that uh uh if you tell me what you identify with and I I think I would respect that sure so Dr director are you aware that people like me who are Arab Middle Eastern North African have to indicate that they're white on the US Census furthermore if one can identify as white despite not being white biologically can one also identify

as another race while being born inside the body of the assigned race of course we will never get the answer to that question not only that immigration is simply currently not high enough nor will it likely ever be to make it so that skin color values or culture will completely change in one country claim now number three the people who are replacing you are not coming in sufficient numbers to replace you in such a way that it would be immediately noticed well the easiest proof of the falsity of this statement is by referring to official

immigration statistics if you take any Western Country and start counting from the year 1960 you would see a clear demographic transformation in which by year 2060 all the anglosphere nations without exception will become majority non wide furthermore according to present Dynamics this shift will occur much faster than previously anticipated for instance Canada with a population of less than 40 million people has received 1.3 million people in the year 2022 as a result pushing house prices up which I guess would be noticeable enough for Mr beat same thing is in the UK by the way and

of course the source of these migrants are in 75 to 80% of the cases happens to be from outside of the western world so not only will they drive up the house prices and ruin your social services but they'll also change the cultural landscape of your country sure there will be demographic changes and there already has been but there is no evidence that these recent demographic changes have dramatically changed the dominant culture and values of any one country we often just see cultural assimilation oh cultural assimilation is the process in which which a minority culture

gets absorbed into the dominant culture of a society claim number four the people replacing you don't possess a culture so they will assimilate to yours it assumes that immigrants don't possess a culture or it is not strong enough and therefore they'll just end up like Bland white people well then please explained to me why haven't black successfully assimilated into the dominant culture of society after hundreds of years or better explain to me why Jews have created such strong cultural pressures that much of our society has in many ways adapted to a culture significantly shaped by

them you see immigrants aren't a blank slate they come with their own internal baggages that will manifest themselves in their nation of destination in his book the cultural transplant Garett Jones estimates that approximately half of the cultural attitudes of Second Generation and subsequent immigrants are carried over from their Homeland to manifest in their new country of residence however while these reflect cultural attitudes biological predispositions are far more significant causing an average immigrant to nearly mirror the characteristics of their Homeland assertions number five and six the culture of the people replacing you is almost always beneficial

to you and culture is constantly changing and weol always been Multicultural anyways not that that matters as these immigrants already share American values that's why they're coming here and the different cultures they bring are almost always beneficial to American society are almost always beneficial to American society almost also most immigrants and especially their children assimilates peacefully into the existing culture which by the way is constantly changing anyway and has always has been Multicultural i l the last two arguments together because in argument six he eventually gives up throws in the towel and says yeah immigrants

will come to replace you and that's a good thing okay we knew that from the start now if we apply this logic to other worldly scenarios then clearly you could argue that Native Americans and Arabs and Palestine have objectively benefited from White colonization given that their replacement was done by people who were w more techno-economically and socially ahead of them but at the same time he recorded this little video complaining about the cultural genocide of Native Americans by whites trying to assimilate them into their society so how come one group takes over another and orders

it to confirm to its cultural assumptions a form of a cultural genocide in one place and an enriching experience in another native people in all known historic cases get oppressed by those who come to replace them the Japanese in hoko the Manus in China the Vikings or more recently for instance the Lan population was almost made into a minority in their historic Homeland and culturally speaking they were pretty much almost crucified but if we go back to the argument number one and look at the graph the ethnic latian population grew by 100,000 since the times

of the Soviet occupation so I suppose there was no instance of replacement because after all the Latvian population grew until lvia got its independence after which it began to fall that is to say they should have been annexed by Russia again to experience a new wave of cultural enrichment by the way that's an actual argument in certain Pro Soviet circles but I digress the point is that minorities can take over majority countries and make them run for them we already know the examples of South Africa but consider the example of China and Malaysia who despite

representing just 22% of the population virtually run the entire economy and government and as you would expect this causes a lot of tensions and not just in Malaysia but pretty much everywhere where there are Chinese in Asia let's assume that the replacing force is generally better than you as in the case with Asian immigrants into the west or ashkanazi Jews in the historic lands of Palestine now Israeli Arab clearly experience Better Health Care education standard of living and property rights than they would experience without the Jews settling in but can you really say the same

with regards to their culture and a sense of nationhood can you really say that they aren't being terrorized by the majority population let alone can you say that the Palestinian diaspora which is now living outside of Israel proper and Palestine benefited from Jewish migration into Israel certainly not but in our particular circumstance most of the people coming over can't even get their life together let alone take an entire country these aren't ashkanazi Jews or Northeast Asians they're generally less productive than natives or the average population and what they'll bring is more social tension a collapse

of trust and of the welfare system which will set us back to a more authoritarian past to quote a [ __ ] Li political Phil philosopher yasham the history of countries from India to Indonesia shows that diversity significantly increases the danger violent conflict the citizens of the world's most celebrated democracies have prided themselves on their ethnic Purity from Athens to Rome and from Venice to Geneva premodern attempts at self-government were restricted to an ethnic in group meanwhile the most celebrated examples of diverse societies were with very few exceptions Empires or monarchies from Baghdad in the

9th century to Vienna in the 19th century episodes in which a great variety of different groups live together peacefully and influence one another's cultures came at times when the people had little say over their Collective fate assimilates peacefully into the existing culture which by the way is constantly changing anyway and has always been Multicultural now that Mr beat has admitted that culture does change when you mix elements from different cultures together du before weirdly claiming that our society has always been Multicultural which I mean is not even true especially in the context in which Multicultural

is equated to multi-racial for I don't think around 100% ethnically white countries with a strong patriarchal tilt could be considered as Multicultural but okay another L I guess let's move on by the way I'm not that smart I just pretend to be smart on YouTube in the next section of the video he starts by deliberately mispronouncing Lauren Southern's name and labeling her a white supremacist and desperate attempt at suppressing her ideas from being further proliferated before linking concerns about your own demographic Integrity with terrorism 2017 video by oh what was her name Northern Warren Northern

yeah I think that was it well the video has since been taken down but still back in 2017 it did very well and just Warren casually bringing up the theory like it ain't no thing was surprising Congress Steve king of Iowa endorsed the theory the scariest thing about this being so mainstream is that it has led to violence there isn't an argument to be had here I'm simply pointing out what a slimy person Mr bit is he then proceeds to dissect white nationalists which I'll also Skip and instead debunk Mr beats debing of white nationalist

talking points or L there off biology is Destiny it's manipulative because when we hear biology we think oh it's science so it has to be legit right this one says that culture is genetically determined and that genetic features predetermine cultural traits for example they might say that all the problems in the African-American community and in all of Africa are rooted in and inferior genetics or culture in other words they say that black people inherently are less intelligent or more likely to be violent it's bull crap it's been disproven by Decades of scholarly research it's been

disproven for example many outcomes from measures of intelligence to violence are driven by socioeconomic status and income inequality there is absolutely no evidence that biology is the driving fact Now where's the study because I could pull out a bunch saying that poverty has no casual relation to crime and why would it since the richest black people commit more crime than the poorest Asians for example African-Americans perform similarly to other Americans when given access to the same opportunities okay this is just straight up false and he won't even show the study so I don't even know

how to work with this talking point number two We are brave to speak the truth and then armies are cowards I'm skipping this too by the way diversity is conflict it's manipulative because the vast majority of us fear conflict and this one says that diversity automatically causes conflict it often relies on cherry-picking evidence and studies to back up its claims it's bull crap I mean it's the most predictive variable for conflict both within and between nations not even yasham disagrees with this this is basically a common accepted fact for anyone outside of the radical liberal

bubble it's bull crap there is plenty of research that actually shows that diversity enriches societies even in the ways the haters claim to care about for example diverse groups of problem solvers often outperform groups of high performers on really tough problems and that makes sense because tough problems need New Perspectives it's how we got autom aut itic elevator doors basketball and the iPhone correct but it deals with a diversity of skill not diversity of race with their own innate biological predispositions abilities cultures and group affinities being placed together in the room like Are you seriously

trying to tell me that a team of programmers working on a video game each specializing in diverse tasks using multiple working strategies is the same thing as placing the entirety of Congo in your neighborhood that's right that thing you're watching this video on right now wouldn't exist without diversity yeah obviously now show me some Black and Filipino invention so we could better understand the benefits of diversity well thankfully there's data on patents and as it turns out black inventor patent rate is 6 per million while the average National rate is 235 patents per million pretty

tough but again it's not racism whites aren't at the top here Asians are and perhaps Asians should share their privileges with blacks so people like Mr beat won't get offended they argue that it's natural for humans to act in the interest of their own race even at the expense of others outside of their group it's bull crap remember powerful people created the whole idea of race in order to divide us and to justify their place at the top of social hierarchy what seriously are we now going to deny tribalism I'm sorry but even non-genetic social

identity Theory would disagree with you he then goes on to talk about mysterious powerful people who supposedly have invented the idea of race in order to divide Society but this is sort of our Point why else would the elites transform a homogeneous society defined by One race of people into a multi-racial society with low trust in which people would not form into unions clubs and engage in other Collective based bargaining also I'm not necessarily claiming that powerful people want to divide people by race but they certainly wouldn't be able to do so if they weren't

already divided by race so why continue further fracturing our society so that it could be further divided by powerful people this is entirely self- deting on your part Mr beat also how exactly are whites being exploited well that's pretty easy pull that [ __ ] up Jamie I CL open believe this is manipulative because it points to a vague threat to make you feel scared yet doesn't provide good evidence of specific exploitation of whites besides our trust and social safety nets collapsing as a result of diversity we provide nonwhites or brown people with a ready

infrastructure that their ancestors haven't built in addition to large sums of welfare that they disproportionately receive and not give back but this this is sort of an economical argument the reality of the situation is that things are way worse at this symbolic and institutional levels for they are encouraged to self-organize at our expense and Bully us for more benefits like Dei or other systemically racist preferences in which they acquire positions not because of Merit but because of their race while we are denied to act in the same way I'm not even speaking of the amount

of emotional trauma through which whites go through every today as a result of people like Mr beat because before replacement migration nobody thought about race microaggressions and similar stuff people just live their normal lives but now whites are forced to walk on eggshells every day and now doubt that this is what we would choose to go through if we were given a choice the final section of the video contains the great replacement red flags on which I'll just end the video because it already assumes you agree with him anyways so thanks for watching stay tuned

for more And subscribe to my substack by the way but anyone including me and you can fall for great replacement Theory messaging since they use manipulative tactics to make false claims sound plausible and if we're not careful and critical we can be manipulated and and heck we could even be radicalized by this stuff