IS JESUS GOD? UNDERSTANDING THE TRINITY PART 1

Is Jesus God? The question I have been flooded with recently is now able to be dealt with. Now, I must say that this is something that I have been anxious to get to over the past month or two. It has been quite a struggle for me not dealing with this, as many times as people have been asking me. Let me explain: as I was creating this series about testing Christianity, I knew I was going to ruffle some feathers. I'm speaking against the largest religion in the world; I knew it was going to come. But

what happened is that as Satan saw where I was going, he started moving people in their flesh to provoke me to move according to his terms. All of a sudden, people were making videos about me, not believing Jesus is God, and calling me a heretic and whatnot. Now, if you watch my videos, I do not ever say things for no reason, and if I say something, I try to explain my reasoning. Whether you agree with me or mostly disagree, if you are being fair, you know I go to great lengths to try to explain myself

and my reasonings of why. But what was happening is that Satan was trying to push me on the defense to play on his turf. Everyone was trying to get me to answer this question: Is Jesus God? Depending on if I said yes or no would determine if I was a heretic or not. Now, to me, it really exposed Satan's hand and what he has done. I will explain this: for a question like this, I cannot understand how someone could give a simple yes or no answer, and then if you disagree, you believe that they are

a heretic without understanding anything else further. I could not understand how people could engage like this. Then I realized that this question was actually all about indoctrination. Now, before I explain what I mean by indoctrination, I would like to use this as a testimony, and if you will allow me to just vent, please bear with me. You see, throughout all of this, there were many times that I was provoked. Other times, they were funny to me. Here's my thing: the truth is the truth. If you believe you are in the truth, you don't need to

use my name to bring attention to it. If you're in the truth, Yahweh will make sure that your truth is heard, so just teach it. But many people right now feel that in order to get attention, they need to put my name in the title of their videos. It's craziness in a sad world—people just looking for attention. Wait, I got off track. Sorry, my point is that there were times I was provoked, and I wanted to explain myself. I even, one time, made a quick video to present my case and asked for patience. I watched

it with my wife, and then Yah told me to again follow Him and not put out that video. The devil wanted me to come on his turf and speak from defense, and I knew that if I did that, I was going to be walking into a trap. So, I trusted in Yah, and I let Him guide me on how the information was supposed to be presented because it's a very big topic. I ignored the critics and those pressuring me, and He gave me a roadmap of how I should break it all down, which is what

you have been watching in the series since about part seven, I would say. As a part of my testimony, I want to say to everyone: let Yahweh fight your battles and let Him lead you. Just because the enemy is provoking you does not mean you always have to respond and fight. Yes, war against him in the spirit, but most of all, trust in Yahweh, and He will prepare a table before you in the presence of your enemies. Now, listen, I have no expectation that everyone will agree with me. I know that there are people who

are extremely set on disagreeing with me regardless of what I say. I want you to know that this topic is something that needs to be dealt with in depth for anyone who thinks that this question, "Is Jesus God?"—and listen, I only use Jesus here because it's most people under the influence of Heniz that are pressing me the most on this question for the most part. If you think that this question should be answered with a simple yes or no and it's just as simple as that, it is my humble opinion that you do not have

enough respect for the Scriptures. I promise you at the end of this video, whether you agree or disagree with that last statement, I will have explained my reason for saying that. So let me say this first: this, like other important topics, will be broken up into a series of videos. In this video, I will explain my overall view, and then in the next part, I'm going to explain my overall reasoning, and then I'm going to provide the evidence and the receipts of why I hold my view. You can disagree with me, but after I give

the receipts, if you're not dealing with the receipts, then you're just looking to disagree. And if you believe that it makes me a heretic after all the evidence I presented, then so be it. I'm not here to confirm your indoctrinated thoughts; I'm here to give you truth that's not edited. It's very obvious that most people have not actually come across any of this information, so as I explain this, I think it's important to take you through my thought process. Let me start here: there is a part in the movie *The Matrix* where Morpheus is explaining

the Matrix. For copyright reasons, I can't use it in the dialogue. He says, "The Matrix is a system; that system is our enemy. When you're inside, you see all different types of people—the very minds that we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system, and that makes them our enemy." Now, here it is: you have to understand, most people are not ready to be unplugged, and many of them are so ignored—so hopelessly dependent on the system—that they will fight to protect it. People are so attached to

the system, and because they are not ready to be unplugged, they decide that they're going to be our enemy, and they'll do anything to protect the lie that they're comfortable with. Okay, maybe you're confused, like, "Why did you start here? This is about the Trinity." Yes, it is. What is said here is the overall problem in regards to this topic. Let me explain: most people are like programs; they regurgitate thoughts and beliefs that they have just been programmed to believe. Because they have heard it in one way for so long, they accept it as fact,

and anyone that disagrees with that is just basically a heretic to them. Most people have heard this word but don't actually focus on the actual definition of it: the word indoctrination. What does it mean? Indoctrination is the process of teaching a person or group to accept a set of beliefs uncritically—uncritically meaning with a lack of criticism or consideration of whether something is right or wrong. So, indoctrination is the process of teaching a person or group to accept a set of beliefs with a lack of criticism or consideration of whether something is right or wrong. Let

me give you an example of this. Let's say you ask a child today who is taught in the public education system to describe the Earth or describe climate change. What do you think their responses would be? Well, here are some examples: "What did you draw there?" "I drew different planets, and I drew where we live." "And what is that?" "Where do we live? Um, I kind of forgot." "The Earth is a healthy environment for plants and animals. You should never throw garbage on the Earth because maybe people see it, and they say, 'Who did that?'

I don't like people throwing garbage at the Earth because if we have a dirty planet, how will our food be good? They'll be like those power plants that really smoke into the air, and they pollute the air. If you throw garbage, then the trees will not stay alive; they'll stay dirty. And if they stay dirty, then we won't have oxygen. If you could say one big thing to everybody in the world, I'd tell them to stop lying and plant trees and use electric cars instead of fuel, and we need to work as a community. Do

not stop helping the Earth because the Earth needs help to make the things that we need to survive." You see, these are young children, and they don't have a clue about the actual truth about this world. They are just children that grow up in a time where their parents and grandparents have been programmed to believe in climate change and that we live on a globe. Now that it has gotten to them, it's just an accepted fact. Now, this is not an argument about the shape of the Earth; that's not where I'm going. I'm not going

there, so please don't get distracted. You can believe what you want to believe, but here's the real truth: unless you yourself have gone out in a rocket and have seen outer space, your description of the planet and what it looks like can only be based on indoctrination. It's based on what people have told you. You have been trained to see it in a certain way, and it has not been questioned or challenged. A lot of it is very subtle, too, like placing globes in our classrooms, solar system projects done in science class, and putting the

globe in our cartoons from when we were kids. Apple Maps, as you zoom out, shows the globe. Major movies about space like *Star Wars*—a lot of things presented to you make you believe that you're living on a spinning ball that revolves around the Sun. It has been presented to the world pretty much unchallenged by the overall majority. And here's the thing: if you even challenge it, you are immediately labeled a quack, a crazy person, a conspiracy theorist—lots of labels just for you questioning it. I mean, a lot of you are probably provoked right now by

me just questioning it. But again, I don't care what you believe; this video is not about that. But I’m asking, is it not fair to label this thought about living on a spinning ball revolving around the Sun as indoctrination? If it is a thought that people are taught and they are supposed to believe without any kind of challenge, it is, by definition, an example of indoctrination. Now listen: here's a point to understand. That does not mean that what you are being programmed to believe is right or wrong. Being indoctrinated does not always mean you're being

programmed with a lie. Like, I indoctrinate my children about Yahweh. I want them to know Him and serve Him and never question it. I want them to serve Him—period. No questions asked. But here's the thing about truth: when questions are asked, people are able to give answers. So it's not... About the fact that it's right or wrong: because if my children were to get older and then they would start to question, I would not dismiss their questions but explain why I believe and serve Yahweh. I would answer their questions, but with others. If you question

their indoctrinated thoughts or what they want you to believe, they get defensive; they get angry, and many just completely reject you. That is what the case is with the doctrine of the Trinity. So many people are ready to reject everything I have to say because I don't align with what they think. But nobody's ever asking me, "Why do I believe this?" It's because they're not trying to deal with the challenge; they just want me to align with what they are indoctrinated to believe. You see, for me, I grew up as a Christian. I don't know

if the doctrine of the Trinity was ever broken down to me or taught. I don't know if it had ever really been taught to me, but I know that it is what I was supposed to believe, and so I believed it. As a matter of fact, much of my videos, when I first started, I believed in the Trinity. It's ironic because that man who made a video about me used a video I did at least six years ago about the Jesus of the Bible versus the Jesus of Islam. He said I was being deceptive about

the Trinity subject. Notice what he's put on the screen: this is truthful. However, there's something else that's missing. He says he is the son of Elohim. I don't have a problem with that. The Son of God, he is the Word that became flesh. I have a problem with that. He is the Father; he is in the Father, and the Father is in him. "Hmm, what do you mean by that?" This is where I say he becomes a bit deceptive because what you notice that is missing—matter of fact, it's a glaring omission—is that Jesus is God.

But it was so odd to me, because I believed in the Trinity at that time that the video was made. So whatever he was talking about showed an extreme lack of discernment. He was just making content looking to sow strife. Anyways, the point that I'm making is that this doctrine about the Trinity is pretty much unchallenged. Basically, the view is that if you do disagree, you're automatically a heretic, and the Christian community will do whatever they can to tear you down. So, I want you to think about it: with people reacting in this sort of

way, how many people that actually may disagree are really willing to go up against this and deal with the backlash? Satan has this topic in such a stranglehold that you can't even present your case without people attempting to chop you down. So even though there is a lot of confusion on this subject, the truth is that not everyone is fully indoctrinated to believe in the Trinity, but it just seems safer to stay away from it. It's one thing to deal with, like, a personal church congregation, but dealing with it on social media where everyone just

jumps in and makes comments is just strife. It's very difficult—it's a way of suppressing the truth. Because if the truth is so valid, it should be easily challenged, and clarity given. If what people are saying is true, it should be able to be scrutinized and dealt with. We should not be bullied to stay away from certain topics. If their doctrine is truth, it must be able to stand up to be challenged. If it cannot be, there is a lie baked in somewhere that the devil does not want to be seen—simple as that. Throughout all this,

Satan exposed his hand. I've seen the problem, and I know what Satan did. Before I was able to reveal him and expose him, he got on the offense and got those tied to him to try to come get me on his turf and speak from his angle and his point of view. But it didn't work—praise Yahweh, the Most High. I mean, ask yourself: why is this subject so one-sided? In a world that our Messiah said would hate him, if the Trinity truly was biblically true, wouldn't there be a lot more people making videos speaking against

the Trinity instead of for it? I mean, just do a YouTube search: "Is the Trinity biblical?" and there are far more people speaking for the Trinity than against it. So for any unbeliever, this should really make you ask why Satan should be against the truth. So, let's discuss the Trinity. To get this conversation started, we will go to the catechisms of the Catholic Church because they clearly break down their doctrine of the Trinity. We'll go to Catechism 234. It says, "The mystery of the Most Holy Trinity is the central mystery of Christian faith and life.

It is the mystery of God in himself; it is therefore the source of all the other mysteries of faith, the light that enlightens them. It is the most fundamental and essential teaching in the hierarchy of the truths of faith. The whole history of salvation is identical with the history of the way and the means by which the one true God—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit—reveals himself to men and reconciles and unites with himself those who turn away from sin." Okay, so they say a lot right here, but let's hold that point right here. I've heard that

me not believing in the Trinity is now a salvation issue. This man said this, that you do understand. Some things we're not saved by: what we know. We're saved by who we know. But if what we know about who we know is distorted—if you understand what I'm saying—then you cannot be saved. In other words, if you think that Jesus is just some prophet, some good person, and then you don't even fully believe what He has come to do, it is impossible for you to be saved. And so, while He is speaking about being deceptive and

how we portray certain things, He Himself is actually being deceptive. No scripture, just using a philosophical concept, but this is what He thinks. All of a sudden, this is what is being brought out. For me, because I read these catechisms, I know where their indoctrination starts from. Now, I have not heard this doctrine in the scriptures at all about this being a salvation issue, and no one can give you this scripturally. But because of the philosophical approach to scripture that they take, this is what is believed. But let's just hold that point and get back

to the catechism. The main point that needs to be reviewed is what the catechism starts with about the Trinity. What did it say? The mystery of the Most Holy Trinity is the central mystery of Christian faith and life; it is the mystery of God in Himself. So be clear here: by their own admission, they believe that this is a mystery. The doctrine of the Trinity was a mystery. Now, what's a mystery? Something that is difficult or impossible to understand or explain. So this doctrine of the Trinity is something that is difficult or impossible to understand.

But because the Roman Catholic Church has figured it out, I'm supposed to believe it. And if I don't believe it, I lost my salvation. Okay, got it. Now, let's deal with this. Now you may say, "Well, you're not a Roman Catholic, and you still believe it." In Part 15 of the Testing Christianity series, I went down the line of the history of how Christianity was brought to you. I showed where we are today as a leaf on a branch and how this branch goes all the way to the trunk, which is Roman Catholicism. This doctrine

of the Trinity did not start based on the Protestant Church; it has been passed down through history. There was a point in history that this doctrine was created and then generally accepted and then built upon. I'm going to show you in the next parts. But okay, let's be clear that by their own admission, this doctrine was a mystery. Let's keep reading the catechism. Catechism 235 states: This paragraph expounds briefly on how the mystery of the Blessed Trinity was revealed; how the Church has articulated the doctrine of the faith regarding this mystery; and how, by the

divine missions of the Son and the Holy Spirit, God the Father fulfills the plan of His loving goodness of creation, redemption, and sanctification. So this next paragraph in Catechism 236 will explain all that is said in 235. Catechism 236: The Fathers of the Church distinguish between theology (theologia) and economy (oeconomia). Theology refers to the mystery of God's inmost life within the Blessed Trinity; economy refers to all the works by which God reveals Himself and communicates His life. Through the oeconomia, the theologia is revealed to us. What they're saying here is that through the economy, the

theology is revealed to us. But conversely, the theologia illuminates the whole oeconomia, stating that conversely, the theology illuminates the whole economy. God's works reveal who He is in Himself; the mystery of His inmost being enlightens our understanding of all His works. So it is analogously among human persons. "Analogously" means in a similar way or showing a likeness that allows for comparison. So they are saying that through God's works, He is similar to a human person. A person discloses Himself in His actions, and the better we know a person, the better we understand His actions. Okay,

they really say a lot in these things. Let's just establish the fact that it's clear that the Fathers of the Church created this doctrine. And though so many people keep saying that you are not influenced by the early Church Fathers, by your believing in this doctrine of the Trinity, it is very clear evidence that you are influenced by these early Church Fathers. It's from them where we get the three persons doctrine, because there is nowhere that you ever find our Father describing Himself as a person. In fact, He says quite the opposite: "God is not

a man that He should ever lie, nor a son of man that He should ever repent. Has He said, and will He not do? Or has He spoken, and will He not make it good?" (Numbers 23:19). You have to understand Greek philosophy and what these people are doing: they're making doctrines because they're philosophizing the word and just making these doctrines. But okay, let's just finish with this catechism. Catechism 237: The Trinity is a mystery of faith in the strict sense, one of the mysteries that are hidden in God, which can never be known unless they

are revealed by God. To be sure, God has left traces of His trinitarian being in His work of creation and in His revelation throughout the Old Testament. But His inmost being as holy Trinity is a mystery that is inaccessible to reason alone or to even Israel's faith before the Incarnation of God's Son and the sending of the Holy Spirit. So again, it's more about this doctrine being a mystery. Now let me take you a few steps back here. Through all of the lessons in the Testing Christianity series since Part Seven, I have been trying to

explain what Christianity is: it is Greek philosophy. Mixed in with the Hebrew Scriptures, I have proven this over and over. I want you to understand that this topic of the Trinity has to do with the Greek philosophical mindset that you treat the Scriptures with, and with the way that you come to understand our Father and our Messiah. As I have been saying, Christians are disciples of Hellenization, and they do not know it. So let me show you what theology is. Christians are completely influenced by this. But what is it? Do you think theology started from

our Father? Do you think theology has anything to do with Yahusha or anything that the apostles themselves created or studied in order to be a pastor in these Christian churches? There are often qualifications to qualify as a pastor. Let's say a person typically needs to have strong personal faith, a deep understanding of the Bible, the ability to teach and lead others, a reputation for good character, and often formal theological education, usually including a seminary degree, which equips them with the knowledge and skills to effectively minister to a congregation. Now, obviously, not all pastors have a

formal theological education, but a strong majority do. I have not attended a church where the senior pastor has not had some form of theological training from a seminary or divinity school or class. They are all influenced by this. But again, back to the question: What is theology? You see, Greek philosophy had a significant impact on the development of theology, including the word theology itself, while also influencing the theological concepts and frameworks that emerged in Christianity. The term theology comes from the Greek word "theos," meaning God, and "logos," meaning reason. Theology means the study or understanding

of God or the gods. You see, theology existed before Yahusha and before the Christian church was ever built. The work of Plato and Aristotle, the two prominent Greek philosophers—the prophets of the Greeks—laid the groundwork for many theological concepts. For example, Plato's philosophy of the distinction between the physical world and the world of Forms, or Ideas, influenced the Christian understanding of the relationship between the material and spiritual realms. Augustine, whom I often refer to as a saint, is known as the Doctor of the Church. He is most known for blending Greek philosophy into Christianity, which makes

Christians view the Word in the Greek philosophical manner that they do. Most people are influenced by Augustine, and they don't even know it. Augustine was heavily influenced by Plato. He was influenced by Plato's ideas of the immaterial nature of God and the idea that God permeates the universe. Augustine adopted Plato's ideas that the soul is immaterial and separate from the body and exists in a higher realm. Augustine's thoughts are often described as a unique form of Christian Platonism or Augustinianism. He adjusted Plato's ideas to fit the Christian perspective. He taught that theology is the study

of the nature of God and religious belief. Theology is the study of the nature of God and religious belief, and this again is the major problem with Christianity. When you talk to many Christians, they'll start using words like, "Well, the nature of God shows His essence." This is Greek philosophy; they just don't recognize that they're influenced by it. And because the whole Christian world is attached to it, they think it's just normal talk. It's not biblical. Let me explain. You see, in every video in the "Testing Christianity" series, I end with the same statements. Remember,

Christianity is a religion that, on the surface, seems biblical, but when you dig deep into the doctrines, it is not a doctrine of service to our Father, but a doctrine of abusing grace, editing covenants, rejecting the way our Father actually chose to reach humanity, and making it only about the way Christians want to receive Him. It lacks the love, obedience, and reverence for our Father that He deserves. In the end, it does not prepare those who follow it to be ready for what our Father plans to do in the last days. From all that, I

want you to hone in on the fact that it lacks the love, obedience, and reverence for our Father that He deserves. Understand this: the study of theology is exactly an example of the problem I mentioned. The study of theology is exactly what the problem of Christianity is. You see, for me in this ministry, my goal is a simple one—it's not that deep. I want to spread love, obedience, and reverence for our Father. I want people to love Yahweh, not just with their mouths, but in their hearts. And He told us what people who love Him

would do: they keep His commandments and are obedient to Him. I do not teach a faith, nor do I believe in a faith, that we need to know the nature of Yahweh. I personally do not believe that we need to know everything or quantify everything about Him. I believe pure reverence for Him is doing what He says and being happy while doing it. That's literally my main thought about my relationship with Yahweh. I don't need to go through all these questions and rationalize Him, or understand Him in this deep way. He has never commanded His

children in this way. That is not the way of Yasharel. If you read the Scriptures from the beginning, all He desired was that His people served Him, put their trust in Him, and were obedient to how He directed them. He never told them to learn about His essence, understand His nature, and comprehend Him in all these great ways. He doesn't talk like that. It wasn't until the Gentile converts who were introduced to... The faith of the Yahud Deen started to believe in the scriptures, and they began to add their ways of philosophy to understanding our

Father. They created a whole new way of looking at our Father because they never knew Him. They began philosophizing Him, developing concepts about Him, trying to solve mysteries He never told them to solve. There was a lack of love, obedience, and reverence that they had towards Him from the beginning of their learning about Him, and this attitude is what has been spread through Christianity. This is why people can argue about the celebration of pagan holidays or say it doesn't matter because God knows our hearts. This is why they can reject His commandments and make a

new day, calling it the Lord’s Day. This faith of Christianity is not about service to Yahweh but about what Yahweh can do for them; it is a completely selfish faith. So, okay, maybe you're asking, "Well, what does this have to do with the doctrine of the Trinity? He's going all over the place." Well, the point I am making is that this thought process, which lacks love, obedience, and reverence, applied in Christianity is about knowing Him in a way that He has not told us to. But because of the philosophies of men, people have just come

to accept these ways of thinking as being normal and acceptable. If 95% or higher of the Christian churches teach this way of thought and come to Him in these terms, who's going to tear it down and say, "Stop it?" If someone does come to speak against it, will the people actually listen? Well, I'm going to say it clearly: Do not treat my Father like this. The truth is that the Yahud Deen did not treat our Father in the scripture like this, and that's why, from the beginning of Christianity, it was agreed upon to remove all

their influence from their churches. It’s also why they don't want us to have total recall. Now they want us to conform to their nonsense, and they want to fight me because I'm ready to tear it all down like King Yosa Yahu, known as King Josiah, in 2 Kings chapter 23. That's my mission: to restore true worship back to Yahweh. In order to do that, we have to cut down the falsehoods. We do not philosophize Yahweh; we do not treat Him like that. We read His word and believe what it says. We don't treat His word

like some puzzle that we jump to scriptures and say, "Well, this says this, so that means that," and "This must mean that, so this verse must mean this," like we're solving some type of riddle or puzzle, or like the Roman Church clearly says, "mystery." I will revisit all this, but if you ever hear people explain the Trinity, this is exactly how they treat the word. What is the Trinity? There are a few doctrines of Christianity that are more misunderstood than the Trinity. So, in 60 seconds, here’s what the Trinity is and what the Trinity isn't.

The Trinity is the belief that there is one God who subsists as three distinct, co-equal, co-eternal persons—one eternal being who is three separate divine persons. Or, simply put, God is one what and three who. Even though you won't find the word "Trinity" in the Bible, the doctrine emerges when you bring together three essential elements. First, there’s only one God. Second, the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are distinct persons. And third, each person is fully God. Now, you may disagree with one or more of those elements; fair enough, but that's the view. The Trinity is not

that three beings are one being or that three persons are one person. Certainly, this is a mystery, and that shouldn't surprise us—we're talking about God, after all. The Trinity is beyond reason, but it isn't against reason. What you just heard was philosophy, logic, and reason. Philosophy, but I will prove this more in the next parts. It’s like a puzzle piece, and they’re trying to see what this really is and how deep it really goes. Do you understand His essence and all the other nonsense? So let me deal with this now, and thank you for bearing

with me as I explain all of that. Yes, if you have not figured it out by now, yes, I absolutely reject the doctrine of the Trinity. If you're so arrogant as to feel that this disqualifies me without understanding why, then so be it. And listen, if anyone makes a video or tries to discredit me without dealing with my reasonings of why, please know that they’re just being used by Satan, period. They’re just trying to discredit me without any understanding. It’s one thing to disagree, but if you disagree, do so with what I'm actually saying. Just

don't say it’s not true; explain clearly why. I want to show you something, and I prayed about whether I should show this or not. I had someone reach out to me and ask me questions from his email. He seemed sincere; he wanted to understand my view after a video was made about me. He asked me, "Do you still believe Jesus (S.L.A.I.A) is not God? Please elaborate." So I said to him, "I have no problem with you conversing, but is this a sincere inquiry to understand my beliefs or just a way to make content for your

YouTube channel?" He told me he was not trying to tear anyone down; he just wanted to know my beliefs. And being that I'm not running or hiding, I answered him with some points. I thought he was going to respond and engage and give feedback, but his response was just more questions. When I showed my wife, she said it seems like he's... Interviewing you, but it didn't matter to me. I answered him in detail. After all, I wrote this. His response was, "Thanks, Ron. I will be doing a video in regards to your answers and will

try and go about it in as respectful a way as possible. Blessings." That was it. I was shocked at how he could be so deceptive, like a serpent. I told him he's moving like a serpent. I was genuinely trying to communicate, and he just wanted to make a video. Look how he treated my answers, like with the question, "Do you still believe Jesus (Yahusha) is not God?" I would have rather been wrong about all this, but some of his answers were shocking and needed to be addressed. The questions aren't for the purpose of division; they're

to find out if there is a reason for division. Even Jesus said that he came to bring division in Luke 12. If someone is teaching false doctrine, then there is a reason to divide. Anyhow, he replied, saying that his overall problem is with Christianity as a whole, that it was grounded in Greek philosophy and that the Trinity is a doctrine of men, completely centered around Neoplatonism. Well, I and many others would disagree, and I'll share a past video at the end that shows from Scripture why the concept of the Trinity is biblical. He did not

address all that I said; he just used some excerpts and then said he disagreed. I generally do not like bringing people out, but because he moved like such a serpent, I want to share this video from Revealing Truth and use him as an example of how people truly are. I think it's important that everyone understands what's going on behind the scenes in this YouTube stuff. People don't seek to understand or discuss; simply because he disagreed, he wants to make a video. I said to him, "The fact that you call me a false teacher and have

had the opportunity to engage with me, but yet have not provided any feedback or any views, says more than you ever would know. If I'm a false teacher and you have had the opportunity to engage with me before you decide to expose me, wouldn't the better thing for you to do be to engage with me and have dialogue if you truly knew what you were talking about?" His response was, "Ron, you've had your channel up and have been given your views for much longer than me. I don't believe I could change your point of view.

I can only pray God does." He didn't even try, but he thought to make a YouTube video about me. This is what people are doing; they are trying to make content, but not to edify or teach you. So listen, whether you disagree with me or not, you know I engage in the comments and I try to answer your questions. This is not about indoctrination; challenge is always okay. If I have not responded to your email, and if you asked me this question, it's because I'm men like this. I was waiting to explain myself through the

video because people are deceptive right now. So, with all that said, let me answer the question because this was not clickbait: yes, I absolutely reject the doctrine of the Trinity, like I said, and the reason why is what I actually told this man if he would have just read my response. My problem with the Trinity is my overall problem with Christianity as a whole. Christianity is a faith that is said to be grounded in the faith of the Hebrews, but in fact, it is a faith only inspired by the faith of the Hebrews; it's grounded

in Greek philosophy. The doctrine of the Trinity is not a thought or concept that originated from the Hebrew Apostles; it is a thought that has originated from the Greek philosophical minds of the Pagan converts. Origen, who is the main contributor to the doctrine of the Trinity in its beginning stages, was heavily inspired by the Greek philosopher Plato, and the doctrine of the Trinity is completely centered around Neoplatonism. You can look up Neoplatonism and Christianity to research this for yourself. Though I will read these philosophers in the writings of the early church fathers in the next

parts, the writings from Origen on first principles are the main contributors to the beginning concepts of this doctrine, and it correlates to the Platonic philosophy of the relation of one to the many. You see, these things are hidden from the mainstream and not taught unless you study them. But once you do, it's all right there. The reason I reject the Trinity is that the Trinity doctrine is completely a doctrine of men. It is only accepted today because it was agreed upon doctrine by the early church fathers, but it was not based upon the foundation of

the Scriptures; in fact, it is a complete rejection of what Paul warns in Colossians 2:8. People don't talk about this, and therefore they argue about this subject without trying to understand what it is a person actually believes. That's how Satan wanted me on his turf; they wanted me to philosophize the Scriptures without me actually explaining the reason why. I praise Yahweh that I did not fall for the bait. I believe that anyone who looks into the correlation of Greek philosophy and Christianity will be absolutely shocked. I have taught on all this in detail and have

provided sources and receipts, and I still have more to give. People have decided to judge me without hearing me, and in the end, they only speak about themselves. This understanding goes very deep, but I do not want to overwhelm. I am not... Tied to Greek philosophy, I reject this way of thinking in its completeness. So that is my overall reasoning behind the doctrine of the Trinity. Like this man says, well, I and many others would disagree; there are many that disagree and say that's wrong. But it truly baffles me because I don't understand how they

could ever speak something like that. It absolutely shows that they have not researched this at all. So anyone that says that the Trinity doctrine is not something created by the church fathers and that it is not rooted in Greek philosophy clearly does not know what they're talking about. I want you to think about how easily people can discredit something and say it's not true while the information proving them wrong is in abundance. So I'm going to cover all that evidence next. Rule of thumb: if someone speaks against me because I don't believe in the Trinity,

ask them if they reject that the doctrine was created by the early church fathers and that Greek philosophy was applied to the doctrine of the Trinity. After you see all the evidence I provide, you can clearly see who is living in lies. You can't just ignore and reject facts and say that they don't exist so you can live in the world and the realm that you want to be in; it does not work that way. I'm going to provide all the evidence of this in the next part. Now, the last part to this is dealing

with the question: Is Yahusha Elohim? Is Jesus God? Well, here's the next point I always try to clarify: God is a title. Satan is described as the god of this world in 2 Corinthians 4:4. We are even referenced as gods. God is a title, so when asking this question to me, it needs to be specific. If you're asking me if I believe Yahusha is the Most High, the answer is no because Yahweh is the Most High. Yahusha is Yahweh's salvation; that's what his name means. Yes, Yahusha was there from the beginning, but he is not

Yahweh. I pray to Yahweh in the name of Yah. I cannot come to the Father without coming to him through the Son. Let’s be clear: if there were scripture that properly spelled out this doctrine and said this is the case, then this is what I would believe unequivocally. But being that the scriptures do not spell this out, it is something that I cannot attest to. I would need direct words from Yahusha or Yahweh to explain this and make me understand it. John chapter 1 does not break it down sufficiently for me to say that Yahusha

is Yahweh. This doctrine is only based upon indoctrination that has been passed down for centuries, and just because this is what they agreed upon, it does not mean that I must tie myself to this. Again, I don't practice Greek philosophy, and this question that people are asking is tied to the mindset of the Greeks who philosophized everything and never had a true relationship with our Father. This doctrine and the way that people think were not determined until the church fathers, whom I unequivocally reject, made this doctrine. For me, it's very simple: I believe what the

scriptures say. "For Elohim so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in him shall not perish but have everlasting life." That's John 3:16. This was always the standard: if Yahusha said God sent himself, then this is very much what I believe; but it does not say that. Let's be clear that Yahusha had the chance to make this clear when he asked Peter who he was. I believe what Peter testified to Yahusha in Matthew 16. It says he said to them, "But who do you say that I am?" Simon Peter

answered and said, "You are the Messiah, the Son of the living Elohim." Yahusha answered and said to him, "Blessed are you, Simon bar Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my Father who is in heaven." (Matthew 16:15-17). Yahusha did not say to Peter, "No, Peter, I am Yahweh Elohim, the Most High." He confirmed he is the Son of Elohim. I am strictly applying what he has said, and people telling me I am a heretic because I just believe what the word says should really reexamine themselves. This doctrine did not come

about until the second and third century, and the fact is that you're just influenced and indoctrinated by it. That has nothing to do with me. I know this is where many of you start throwing scriptures out and say, "Well, what about this?" and "What about that?" not recognizing that your behavior is a pure example of philosophy. Now let me also just say this: does that mean that I believe that Yahusha is just an angel, or he's just a man, or a mere prophet? Absolutely not. This is my overall point that I'm trying to make. Listen,

I do not know exactly what he is or how it all works. I know he's not an angel, and he is not a mere man, but I know Yahweh is one, because that is what scriptures state: "Hear, O Yasharel: Yahweh our Elohim, Yahweh is one. You shall love Yahweh your Elohim with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your strength." (Deuteronomy 6:4-5). This was the premise of Yash from the beginning of why they are monotheistic and different from all the other nations. You all believe he is three, which is an absolute contradiction

to the basis of understanding Yasharel was given. And maybe people say, "Well, no, I believe it's like..." This, and you're talking about moralism and all this other nonsense. No matter what, whenever people start with their disagreements, they go into another philosophical way of explaining it. Just listen to what people are saying, and then look at the Scriptures. I know that, for there are three that bear witness in heaven: the Father, the Word, and the Holy Spirit; and these three are one (1 John 5:7). I know that Yahusha said, "My Father who has given them to

me is greater than all, and no one is able to snatch them out of my Father’s hand. I and my Father are one" (John 10:29-30). But am I to take that and now say that Yahusha is Yahweh? Absolutely not! I have way too much reverence for our Father to rationalize Him in this way. Logic and reasoning is the way of the Greeks, not the Hebrews. I do not apply my opinions or my thoughts to the Scriptures; I just apply what it says. My overall take, and what I have been trying to communicate, is that we

don't know the complexities of the relationship between the Father and the Son. He has not given us enough direct answers to know, and therefore, being that I have respect and honor for Him, I do not use His word as a puzzle piece and try to use my intellect, reason, and logic to create an understanding. This is what the Greeks did, not Yasharel. This rationale is a way of the Greeks, which I abhor. I have respect for His word. If He clearly spelled it out and explained the relationship between Him and Yahusha, I would hold it.

But all the Scriptures say He is the Son of Elohim, and that's what I hold on to. I don't deny that; I never have. But for Christians, all of a sudden, this is not good enough. I don't know when it became unacceptable to hold to Yahusha being the Son of God. I understand if people were calling me a heretic for denying that, but people making me a heretic because I reject the doctrines of the Trinity? That's a mistake on their part, and it's only defense to hold their indoctrination. So for me, should I know, and

could I actually understand, the complexities of their relationship of Father and Son in Heaven? Absolutely not, nor do I feel I'm supposed to. I am not Greek; I don't need to know everything. I just know what I'm to believe and what I'm supposed to live through. I follow His word. I know there can only be one Most High, and Yahusha Himself prayed to His Father and spoke only about seeing Him and doing His Father's will. I also know there is a reason for the doctrine of the Trinity, and that is to completely remove worship of

Yahweh, which is what the majority do with this Trinity doctrine. I will get to that. I desire people to have respect for the word and not to add doctrines or their concepts. Being that I know how this mindset was created, I reject it even more. Treating the word like a puzzle with reason and logic shows off Father no respect when it comes to honoring Him. If He wants us to know something, He will very clearly tell us and not have us piece verses together to make doctrines. This is not how He worked with Yasharel; that

is how the other nations that never knew Him treated Him. Christians just accept it. After I knew Yahweh personally, I left that disrespect behind and focused on what He said, period. And I'm fine with what I don't know. That's my belief. For the life of me, I cannot understand how people who say they love Him couldn't understand that the doctrine of the Trinity is a very complex one and it needs to be dealt with. Perhaps you disagree with me still, and you believe He is the Most High. Okay, that's fair. I personally don't believe we

were ever to know this. You will not see this being discussed or debated by the apostles at all; they never thought about this or started this debate. This was started by pagan converts who were inspired by Greek philosophers, and everyone that says that that's not true is lying to you. I'm going to prove it. So it's okay that you disagree with me right now. Now, I believe that by the end of this, those with ears to hear will have proper understanding, and there will be more proper reverence and respect for Yah, the way He desires

and, more importantly, He deserves. And being that I believe that this is what's going to happen at the end, I want to thank all who are making videos about me, helping bring attention to what I had to say on the subject and making sure I had an audience that desired to hear what I had to say because now they're hearing it. So thank you. In the next video, we are going to discuss how this doctrine came to be, and I'm going to 100% prove it is a doctrine of men created by the early church fathers,

rooted in Greek philosophy. From this, you will have to go back and review everyone that says that was not true. I thank you for your patience with me as I unpack this difficult subject. In the end, worship our Father in spirit and in truth, as He desires, and be ready for Him because His kingdom is soon at hand. Be blessed! Hallelujah! Praise Yah! Okay, thanks again for watching. If this has blessed you, please make sure to like it and share this video with others. If you haven't done so already, please make sure you subscribe to

this channel. Yah willing, I upload every... Friday, also don’t forget to follow this ministry on Facebook and Instagram, as well as on my website, truthunedited.com. If for any reason you don’t see this ministry on YouTube any longer, you will find me on my website. I really would like to give a special thank you and shout-out to those who have donated and contributed to this ministry. I’m so thankful for the love of our Father, and I thank you for your obedience to His call on your heart. You have helped me get through this challenge, and I’m

very thankful for your support in getting this message out. I’m always humbled by your generosity, and I’m very thankful for you. You know who you are. Thanks again! Okay, thanks again for watching, everyone. Be blessed! I love you all.