Deadboy (Chris) vs Zeni (femto) | Crossverse

I'll take uh I'll take Griffith. Fento. I'll take Fento. Say I'll take Griffith. [ __ ] what the [ __ ] Let's see what character I want to pick. What character I want to pick? What character I want to choose? Hey, choose that [ __ ] Luffy. Gang. I'm not a weird ass [ __ ] so I'll just use Luffy. Cross. Use Goku. Luffy. Imagination 25. Where that whack ass argument, bro. That [ __ ] ain't going to get you nowhere. That [ __ ] is going to get me everywhere. I can't announce, dumbass. I

don't got perm. Does this thing [ __ ] But um what is this [ __ ] talking about? Clearly, you're [ __ ] I'm telling you to tell somebody up perms to announce it, dumb ass. You're just too I don't know what that guy be aiming at. Can we even send scans right now? Yeah, we can. You just got to you just got to click on it. Like you just got to click on the file. It's going to show who made this [ __ ] ass tier list. It is [ __ ] bro. It is

[ __ ] Tier list. Some [ __ ] made a tier list and had [ __ ] no. [ __ ] has ask yourself in tier four and Apollo in tier three. Delete this [ __ ] I think it's about rhetoric though. Oh, Rhetoric. Apollo still has worse rhetoric than everybody um below him. I'm Paul Jamaican. But Hey, uh button [ __ ] his classy ass turn right. Shut up, [ __ ] Hell, you got to be muted, bro. How about that? Damn. Uh, by the way, I'm I'mma begin. Is that cool with you? All

right. You said what? I'mma I'mma begin. I'mma send the scan as far. And my position is my character doesn't lose. And you don't even know you don't even know what character I have, bro. You can tell me once I give the argument Or once whenever you want to pick the character. How are you? I'll probably choose since you're choosing [ __ ] Griffith and you're just using an argument that was popularized like eight years ago. I'll just use like Chris Ron, bro. Be honest. All right, [ __ ] man. All right. Um, my character's abstract.

Wait, what is that supposed to mean? He isn't physical. He doesn't hold the physical form. He doesn't occupy space. So he doesn't hold it. Oh, I mean this Yeah. basic like universal level universal level [ __ ] Yeah. He could be like spirit he could be spiritual in nature. What is that going to get him? Yeah. So if he can't be interacted with and he can't lose. That's not that's No, that's not the argument. The argument is that he just can't be interacted with. The argument is that he isn't material. So he's spiritual. We obviously

know in fiction that spiritual beings can Interact with other spiritual beings. cuz we obviously know in fiction there's other people that have the same property as this. So unless you give me some distinction to why his abstract is different on a fundamental level, I think it's just baseline [ __ ] spirits. We we can't interact with spirits. No. No, we can't. That's the point. We can't exactly. So it's fine. You just be like the point is that if he's non-physical, then he can't go Through change. He's non-physical, therefore he can't go through change. If he

can't go through change, then he, you know, he can't win or lose. Why can't why can't non-physical things go through change in fiction? Yeah, because we see it happen all the time. Yeah. No, it'd be a contradiction if I got you. It'd be a contradiction if the basis of the reasoning or logic would be our reality, but that's obviously not the basis. I mean, by Definition, since you we you can't pick and pick and choose which words you want to use. By definition, if you interacting, moving or doing an action that causes harm or afflicts

another person, by definition, that is change. We visually see Griffith do this. So, you're talking about contradict. Yeah, we see FTO do this. We do. Yeah. Fem Okay. Griffith is Famto's like physical form. Famto is the non-physical god hand while Griffith is Just the human version on Earth that's moving around. So yeah. Yeah. So when we see FTO, so we see FTO, we see him take over. Are you trying to say takes over Griff's body? Cuz I don't think that's true. No, no, no. I'm saying that whenever we see Fento, it's either a non-physical thing

like ideas, he's either an emotion, which is also non-physical. It's just that every time there's a consistency consistency. Yeah. Okay. Just send the scan. Yes, just send the scan. Yeah, go. That's what you do. Send the scan cuz it's just now it's getting a little too incoherent. By the way, you want me to prove that, you know, he whenever you see him, he isn't physical, right? Yeah. Which which wouldn't matter to me. I mean, we have characters in fiction like that all the time. This just avatars down. What is like that's just you're naming regular

[ __ ] that's not That tough, bro. Like regular [ __ ] in DC got that [ __ ] Superman's true form isn't [ __ ] physical. So like that doesn't matter to me. But you can go get send me the scan if you talking about sending in scans. Yeah, the idea. All right. Where's the server again? Um all right. Uh check us. So yeah, the first one he's an idea. Second one. Why [ __ ] be duck? Oh, cuz these [ __ ] ain't evil. And then the next one is Idea. So what is

he? So the idea of evil. So what does that post mean? Like like what is what does that first scan prove? Yeah. So whenever we whenever we talk about phento um like the conclusion, all right, hold on. How do I say it? So look, let me let me just say this in a way that like I can like make it simple. But basically, every time you see FTO within the verse, he's denoting himself as the idea of evil. his cords in the middle of the ocean of negative Thoughts. Um the ocean was brought into this

world from within. Okay. So within the context of the verse um these negative feelings until evil and he's just negative things. He's just like the idea of negative things. Yeah. He's just the he's the idea of negative thing. Where where does it say that at? Yeah. I can Okay. The first the first it doesn't say that the idea of evil right there. That's the first scan. But but but these scans that You're saying, I'm saying the first scan that you send does not like, you know, prove or substantiate the claim that you're trying to make.

Like it just says the idea is this is God. Like I I really I don't understand the correlation. Maybe let me read the scan out loud. The droplets of idea idea from to eternity they are splashes some other word. Yeah. So what you're talking about is just not like with the so far. So I'm going to send a new scam. No, it's just it's just A consistency whenever Okay, look, there's also this scam just calls him the idea of evil. Like, dude, there's just a consistency every time we see Yeah, I sent it, bro. So,

I dwell or I dwell deep in your heart. I'm a part of you. You're actually blah blah blah blah blah. You are a part of your consciousness, a part of me. Which scan? All like all the all four scans I sent just you know like make it consistent. Obviously, not consistent. Yeah, it's a consistent thing because nonical who was out here solid. Yeah. So, just because you say it's consistent doesn't really make a consistency, bro. Like, you're just saying it. But I'm going go read the scans, though. I'm going to go read I'm going to

go read the scans. I'm Hey, hold on. I'm going to read the scan, bro. Ocean of feelings. What's this? So, I don't Who's saying what's this? Uh, Griffith. Okay. What's this? An ocean of feelings. All humans have deep in their souls. So feelings okay a common consciousness that transcends individuality which is true is is feelings feelings by nature transcend individuality makes sense baseline [ __ ] doesn't get you nowhere collective consciousness as a species it's dark side is the swelling ocean I was born from the from these swells as in ego of This world so

he's being he's basically being born he's being born of consciousness of emotions. Yeah. He's being born from the negative emotions. If that's kind of I mean that's that's not what it says though. I mean I like based off what I seen is just the person that's talking to Griffith has been born from a collective conscious from a collective conscious and he's been born from the swells. So that's fine. So this person's This person this portion is born from the collective conscious of emotions. So like the person has like is emotionally abstract. It doesn't really is

that what you're trying to do? No, no, no, no. The point is that whenever they refer to Griffith, okay, I am in this cancer brother, but whenever they refer to Griffith, he's just referred to in some non-physical context. And then I mean that's not true though. You just said I haven't provided any you haven't you haven't provided anything that goes against the the evidence of it. I wait I have though cuz based off what you just told me. I said who is this? You said that's Griffith. Griffith says what? Then the other person that he's

talking to so happily is saying I was born from that. So that wouldn't make sense that you say every time we see Griffith on screen he's being called abstract because that's just not what's Being shown on every skin. There's so why did you just say Griffith? Yeah. Whenever Okay. I meant Griffith's true form fto. That's my fault then. Okay. Yeah, man. Make the argument more cohesible for us to understand. So, are you saying that every time every time that FTO is on the street, he's an abstract idea. Yeah, they they talk. Um there's also evidence.

So, they say um but his opponent is transcend transcendental entity beyond physical Reasoning. reasoning is just logic. Logic is just the language that we use to describe it's that's not No, I hate when [ __ ] I hate when [ __ ] just do that. It means it means physical reasoning. It means physical reasoning that means nomogical things. It doesn't matter. So things that are physically it's it literally I hate when [ __ ] do that. The literal context behind what said is physical reasoning. The reasoning behind it would be physical Reasoning. That would be

nomological things by definition. I literally like what you're saying. Can we just stop hopping? Hold on. We're hopping point. point to point. Well, what happened point to point? Let's focus on one. I don't mean to cut you off, but we're like still on the same point. I don't like I don't know why you talk about all beyond reasoning. Like, we're not even on that [ __ ] yet, Brody. Let's just talk about the same thing that you're trying To prove. So, what are you trying to prove? Are you that Fento is an abstract being and

his abstractness is due to him being tied to emotions? No, I'm saying that Fento is just literally the idea of evil. He's just this non-physical thing based off of what? Yeah, based off of the evidence I sent, we can infer that. Like, what are you talking about? So, you're saying so, so first at first, at first you're saying The scan says it. Now, you're saying we're making an inference. So, now we're since we're just making since now we're just making inferences. I'll just make an inference off the scan. Inferences are subjective. That's why I wanted

I'll shut up. Even though I'm not cutting you off, I'll go ahead just talk, bro. His direct statement saying that he's beyond physical reasoning. reason just defined as um the action of something in a logical way. Um, so then Yeah, if they're saying physical reasoning, they're just saying that we cannot describe this thing virtue of reasoning that we can Bro, I don't I'm not I'm not responding to I'm not a separate point. I'm not responding to a separate point, bro. I'm not responding to a separate point. Can we just Can we just handle the first

point? This is the main point. This is the main point, bro. The main point the main your main point was based off these four scans. The Claim that he Hold on. Wait, wait, wait, wait a minute. The claim that he's beyond physical reasoning is a different claim different than what you're so I'll talk about the first claim that you're talking about, but you're not going to shotgun me then add on two other scans which is saying completely different. So we could talk about the same scans that I'm still trying to get an idea of first.

So from these first four scans that we're right now, Zinny, can we are you saying that FTO is an abstract being because he is tied to this collective consciousness? It says as a ego of this world. I was born from these as eagle of the world. Do you know ego is right? Yes, bro. Yes, I do. Okay. So is that is that what you're saying is is I feel like you're just complicating. You're making it more complicated for yourself. Okay. Yeah. You know what? Yeah, he he's abstract. He's abstract. Yeah, that's Literally he's abstract. He's

abstract based off emotions. And the reason why he's abstract is because based off of the emotions. Not really based off of the emotions, but bas. Yeah. No, I'm using the scans to show how whenever they talk about Fento, they talk about him in a non-physical way. Like saying his ideas, he's But I understand. Okay. So, I understand in which way they're talking about him Being non-physical, but the problem is we need to have the context for why he's non-physical because a lot of people are non-physical for a multitude of different reasons. You have people that

are non-physical because there are shadows. And we have non people that are non-physical because there are ideas and concepts. But the specific way that he's non-physical is explained because it's tied to emotion, ego, which makes So yes, he can be an abstract idea of ego And he could just be like the living abomin. I can agree to that. That doesn't Yeah, that's fine. I don't care. That Okay. Okay. So, just to make this clear, bro, he is he non physicist or no? Do you agree to that? You said, "Is he non-physical?" He can be an

abstract. He could be an abstract being. Like, he doesn't have to have like a like a physical form in space. That's Yeah, that's my whole argument. All right. Sure. We can move on to your Argument. Um, yeah. So, you're just arguing that your character is just non-physical. Yeah. And you agree. You're saying? Yeah. Yeah. It's fine. So, yeah. Yeah. That's all he's arguing for being non-physical. Um, I'll just explain Chris Hon real quick. So Chris Rion basically just he has a trait which is called enhance emotion. Just act before potentiality become actuality and vice versa.

I'll send it in um let me go let Me go take a screenshot of the scan. Yo, you good, bro? Yeah, you don't have to move around like that, bro. [ __ ] what are you talking about? Let me go go get the scan. No. So right here, Chrison just acts before potentiality can become actuality. And right here, Chris Chris and has a logic barrier where he's able to break the logic barrier on our target by basically I'll go. Hold on. Let me go get this [ __ ] I can basically bypass any rule that's

set about your character. Boom. And then also just have the absolute foresight which I can advance all events beforehand. Ignoring possibility, nothing. So basically like you're cooked either way. I'm going to lie to you. You're cooked either way, bro. So here you go. Basically the argument is this Creon has a trait. He could just move so before the potentiality something become actual. So before there is even a potential doing anything or having any sort of effect I can just attack you and I could also just bypass the rules that set your character and you just

establish the rule or a trick that your character has which would be that he's a non-physical being. So we could just move on. We could literally move on from this. Uh yeah. So I I'll bring up two Points. Um yeah. So the first point is well why is this statement true? Because statements are analytically distinct from evidence. Statements are evidence by definition. And then um the second point is how would this help you know uh your character interact with a non-physical thing that isn't spatial and isn't temporal. You said why is the statement true? Because

the way I I'll just I'll just send it to you. So this is the sub I Hate when I love when [ __ ] do this [ __ ] [ __ ] want to debate me and using tier five arguments. So right here, the reason why this statement is true is because this is from the Sugverse wiki. This wiki is how we actually get the ver like the ability of these characters and it's canon to the verse. I even send you the creator of the YouTube the YouTube of the creator linking I even sent you

the video where he links this as some type of justification in the bottom. So The author uses this as justification where he could just place abilities of his character. So that's what makes it true. Okay? Wait wait wait wait a minute wait a minute wait I'm not done. Let me go send the scans. So right here this right here would be scan. So you know how other verses have like you know papers or scans. This would be this versus scans. This is what they use to to detail how strong a character is. Go look at

the YouTube channel. Go look at the blink bottom below and they're going to link to the same thing. And if you go look on the [ __ ] it's notable techniques. If you go on the actual website itself says everything that's used on this website is accepted by the author and it can be used. So yes, this is why it makes it true. And you said um by the way statements can be true. You don't like I don't know like what you I don't know what type of logic who had you have like A logic

you know [ __ ] class or whatever but statements can be true. I don't know why you would just even say that stupid [ __ ] You can a lot of times make statement. You can you can make statements without evidence and you know it's true. Like [ __ ] a prime number being seven. Like it's like I don't need to prove that. Like it's literally there's certain things that are actually that don't need evidence. Like it's actually [ __ ] You said something Really stupid to be honest with you. If I was you, I'd

make a different argument. And then you said why does this prove that he can interact with beings that are non-physical is because I actually gave the reasoning. It's like right then and there. It literally says quote unquote it can bypass any rules that are established by or connected to said character. A rule be something the character has to it like a certain trait That you kick away which would be character's physical state which obviously bypass and then even so even if even if even if I'm wrong another notable technique of Chris Rayon I'll just go

send it because I just know this [ __ ] that's why I chose this character he's he's going to rap right here Chris Ron could just shift the state of being of said character or beyond the vanishing point. So, it just doesn't matter, bro. I can just shift like [ __ ] bro. But we can move on, bro. Like, it explains everything. All right. Um, why can't the why can't all the abilities just be limited to that versus that? Like, there that verse you said, why can't they I'm not done. I'm not I'm not I'm

not done. I'm not done. But look, let me actually I'll just attack most of the things. So, but first, I said why is the statement true? I'm not saying that statements cannot be true. And also I Said that statements cannot be evidence. All right. Um and then the second point is that well why can't you said why not? They're analyzing but you randomly said that statements aren't evidence. Yeah I know I said they before we continue like does anybody in here think actually know Z? What? No I wasn't even Why can't why can't this be?

Hold on. So why can't in this instance basement be used as a evidence based off the prior context I Gave you? Cuz based off that cuz based off Wait, stop cutting me off. Based off context, yes, this would be evidence literally. Yeah, based off the context I provided you. It would be evidence. No, that that' just be a special pleading fallacy. Wouldn't be at all. I hate when [ __ ] just started [ __ ] start naming random [ __ ] just start naming random fallacies. Special pleading that you just name special like [ __

] just start Naming random [ __ ] No, you don't. You said you hold on. Based off of your you your lack knowledge, you said that this is a statement and it just can't be evidence. Based off the context I gave you, it quite literally is considered evidence. I said the author uses this as justification for justification for us to understand it the techniques of certain people. That's why he links down to it and if you even if you go to the page of it, everything that's used here Is canon. It could be used. So

what are we talking about? right there is evidence. Look, okay, look, look, look, look. The reason why it'd be a special pleing fallacy is a special pleing fallacy is just a um where a person claims an exception to a general or universal principle. Like what is universal principle here? Yeah. By definition, since these two things are different, by definition, statements cannot be ever. It's not. But it's not It's not different. But it's not different. It's not different at all. Can I just get Hold on. It's not I'm not done. Hold on. I'll I'll continue speaking.

Like what? Oh, go ahead. authentic speaking. Look uh so I said by definition they are distinct. So these two things are distinct. So when you're saying that why can't this one okay look what do you mean they're distinct? Why why why are you questioning how are they distinct? I'm asking you what is a Distinction by definition. By definition you know what that is that's circular reason that's circular reasoning dumb ass. What is again again? Why is it this statement evidence? And why can't a statement be evidence? You know why is this why is this? Are

you [ __ ] stupid? No. No. Why is this No. Why is this statement not evident? By definition. By definition. I'm not done. I'm not done. I'm not done. I'm not. Yeah. You said definition. What Definition? I'm asking you what's the definition. Okay. So, whenever we say statement, we just mean um you know something. Yeah. No, I'm talking about Oxford. So, so yeah. So, whenever use we don't use we. Let's look at the word statement though. Okay. So, statement is just a you know a true or false declarative thing. So if you declare something that's

true. Yes, that's that's not what a statement is, you dumbass. A statement Is just a [ __ ] definitive or clear expression. You just you're just chatting. Yo, but yeah. Okay, we can use two different definitions. And again, that's No. What definition are I'm asking where you getting your definition from? Cuz even the way that you said it, you blundered it. So it didn't make sense. How are you getting your definition? Cuz it just sound like you just be true or false. Like the words the way you said, you didn't even Believe in it. So

I think we could take Sure. Sure. We can take your definition. And I don't even care. So you said a definitive clear expression of something in its future writing, right? Mhm. Okay. So an evidence is just something that is distinct from the proposition or statement that gives it credence. Why Why is that what evidence means? Cuz that's not what evidence means by definition. Yeah, that's what I No, no, no. You can go. You're just wrong. You're just wrong. That's not what evidence mean. Okay, that's fine. Yeah, definition. You can't question. Look, look, you can't question

the definition that I'm using because I can question the I can question the definition cuz it's fundamentally wrong. Yes, it's not. Hey, wait. We're debating, right? We're debating, right? What is the debate definition? What is a debate def of evidence? Cuz you don't know how to debate. I could literally tell I can Tell based on the argument. I can tell based on the arguments you're giving me. We're debating. Hey, don't get mad at me. If you try to get mad at me, it's only going to be worse for you. Your ranks are going to get

lower. Your rent your rent is going to get lower. your going to get low. What is the what is the debate of evidence? What is the debate definition of evidence? Like what is a debate? Just want to cover the empiricism like what his view On empiricism is. Dead boy, don't you want to like, you know, ask that? Yo, what is he any dead boy? What is the debate? He's a random [ __ ] bro. The most the Hold on. The most easiest The most easiest way The most easiest way for me to explain what evidence

is to you. I know I had to give it down to you cuz you're a PE brain. It's proof. It's literally just proof. That's all it is. So, so let me let me let me hold on. Let me let me ask you a question. Do you not Think statements can be proof? So, let me ask you a question. Let me ask you a question. No, no, no, no. I'm I'm done. Hold on. Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, hold on. I'm not done. I'm not done. So, if I say So, so evidence is we need to

prove what I'm trying to argue. So, if I say Yeah. That [ __ ] thinks he's gay. What's my proof behind that? I'm going to show you a video. [ __ ] stating he's gay, which is a statement. You stupid ass [ __ ] So statements can be Proof. You stupid [ __ ] You don't You don't even know like Wait. So, can a statement not be verification? Can Can someone not verify something with a statement? Can Wait, can wait. I'll answer your question. Can someone not verify something with a statement? Verification with a statement.

You haven't You haven't Let me finish. But look, that isn't even my claim. I'm not even committed to that regardless. You're not. But I'm telling you, but I'm Showing you the absurdity. I'm showing you the absurdity of your argument. I'm reducing it. Prove Okay. Okay. Also, prove I'm reducing it to wait. It's absurd. I'm telling you it's absurd. Okay. Look. Prove that your the abilities aren't just like set to this specific verse. Prove that. Go ahead. You said prove that the abilities aren't just set to That's not my burden to prove. What is a What

is your reasoning? Hold. Hold on. What is your reasoning For you to say that? I don't have like in the because because possibly whenever they talk about traits within the verse they could be referencing something different that isn't why hey hey I don't I don't agree to this possibility argument because this is a possibility claim possibility claims for it to be justified or taken to a debate needs to have some type of basis to support it to why it's even being thought about otherwise it just Becomes hey stop hey don't cut me off practice what

you preach you see [ __ ] do that when they know [ __ ] do that don't do that buddy don't don't do Don't do that, buddy. [ __ ] do that when I know they're losing. [ __ ] do that when I know they're losing. So, let's This [ __ ] wants to try and don't know how to actually debate. Let's look up possibility claims. So, a possibility claim. Oh my lord. You're just saying something possibly can be the case. However, in debating, which we're doing, possibility is at its lowest level of proof because

there's possibility, probability, and there's certainty. So in order for your possibility to go true or even matter in the terms of this debate, you need to actually give me a basis behind why your possibility can even be possible. But what you don't have is a basis. So what you have nothing. So what how isable based off what evidence that you're giving that It's giving it more likely that what you're saying is true. Cuz if you're just saying it's possible, it doesn't help your point. Show me where in a debate. Show me in a debate. Well,

possibility claims win you in a debate. Show me. Show me a formal debate where it went with you. It's an evil interpretation. Yo. Okay. No, it's not at all. No, it's not at all. No, it's not at all. No, it's not at all. Yo, dumb ass. Dumb ass. Dumb ass. Dumb ass. Hey, I want you to do that. Yeah, keep going. You're going to keep losing. You know what? Equal interpretation. Based off what? Do you even know what an equal interpret? What is equal interpretation debating? What is equal interpretation debating? Yes, we're just interpreting. What

is the equal interpretation in debating? What is equal interpretation? We are interpreting the same thing in two different ways. That's an equal interpretation. That's not true. I Foundationally I foundationally have more evidence than you foundationally. No, because you're Yes, I do. I have Yes, I do. I have the state. Hold on. Yes, I do. I have the statement. I have the state. Wait, wait, wait. Wait, hold on. I have a Wait. I have a statement. Wait, wait a minute. Wait a minute. I have a statement. That's not an equal interpretation, bro. Wait. That's not Wait,

hold on. That's not Bro, just chill. Just Chill. Wait. Wait. Chill. Wait. Hold on. Just chill. As I was saying, I have foundationally I have foundationally more. I have found Bro, bro, stop. But just stop. Just chill. Just chill. Just chill. Just chill. Slow down. Slow down. Just chill. Why you getting so mad, bro? Wait. Wait. Hold on. Why you not confident? I'm not done. I'm not I wasn't done talking though. It's not your turn to talk yet. It's not your turn to talk yet. It's not your turn to Talk yet. It's not your turn

to talk yet. Bro, stop trying to beat me with the debate, bro. I hate when [ __ ] do this [ __ ] but just debate me, bro. I don't give a [ __ ] about my noodles with the debate. I don't I don't know about the debate. Let me say what I have to say. Let me say what I have to say, bro. So, that's not what the equal interpretation is, buddy. That's not what That's not what e That's not what an equal interpretation is, buddy. by Debating at all. I'll just I'll just show

you what it is by sending you the definition of what it means by a debate because you obviously know how to debate. It's probably the same level you've been at for all these years. So, because you don't have foundationally understanding of what debating is. What you just gave was a possibility claim that does not make it an eagle interpretation. I have a statement that I'm arguing about. You Didn't. Now, what you initially tried to do was go at the validity of my source. You couldn't do that. So, you try to argue equal interpretation. You're dumb.

An equal interpretation is where we're both arguing from the same scan and you're interpreting the scan differently. What you're doing is that you're getting a possibility claim because you do not actually have any arguments or substance to actually beat me with cuz you can't beat me with Substance. You can't take an argument and beat me cuz you're not fundamentally a better debater than me at all. You suck. You're not a good debater. You suck. So that's why Yo, bro, you done? Are you done? I know. Yeah, you said I'm still talking, right? You say I'm

talking, right? You say I'm talking, right? [ __ ] [ __ ] Yo, dead boy, you done? I'm [ __ ] [ __ ] but you just said it's an equal interpretation. [ __ ] stupid. Look, shut your stupid ass up. I am [ __ ] [ __ ] but you said it's an equal interpretation. I'm a dumb ass here. But no, it's not by definition. No, it's not. Look it up. Look it up. Look up what equal interpretation means. No, no, no, no. Look what Look what it means. Let's look it up. Let's look

it up. Let's look it up. Let's look it up. We had to literally go, "Hey, hey, hey, hey, shut up, [ __ ] Let me send a debate. Let me Send a speech and debate." Hey, send debate glossy to this [ __ ] Let me send a speech and debate glossery to this dumbass [ __ ] Go read this [ __ ] you stupid [ __ ] Go read that [ __ ] cuz you don't know how to debate. Go read that [ __ ] [ __ ] Go read that [ __ ] [ __

] Go read Go read a debate glossery, [ __ ] Maybe go get some maybe go gets a lot of debate cuz you don't know what an equal interpretation is. That's not what an equal interpretation is at all. An Equal interpretation is when we have one scan on one set of proof and we're having two different interpretations on this one set of proof. That's what that's what equal interpretation could be used. No, no, no, no, no, no. That's not what Hold on. Hold on. That's not what you did. Hold on. That's not what you did.

What you gave What you gave is a possibility that has no basis. Which in debating in debating if you wait hold on Hold on when debating if you foundationally do not have wait stop bro stop foundationally found stop just stop you look trash let me just calm down cuz you just look trash you look trash as I was saying bro what you need to go do is finish debate school you need to go back to debate school and finish that you need to go finish that you need to go finish debate school cuz you're not

good at that you're debating. Holy [ __ ] You're so [ __ ] stupid. A lot of [ __ ] do. You can go to debate. You can look. You can even go You can take philosophy in your You can take philosophy in your class. You can take interpretation and equal interpretation. What's your definition? What's your definition? What's your definition? What's your definition, S? Yeah. When you take a scanner, we interpret it in two different ways. I'm interpreting this kind of No, no, no, no. That's like This [ __ ] is stupid. This [ __

] is dumb. Look at this [ __ ] Look at that [ __ ] What? Repeat yourself. Repeat yourself. Repeat yourself. Repeat yourself again. Repeat yourself again. Repeat yourself. Hey, repeat yourself with that [ __ ] Every time it's an equal interpretation, you dumb [ __ ] You sound You sound dumb. You sound dumb, bro. No. No. An equal interpret equal interpretation is if I'm coming to a certain interpretation about a scan Based off the certain variables. That's without adding nothing else. You're a [ __ ] [ __ ] You're hold on. You're adding Hold

on. You're adding extra variables by adding a [ __ ] possibility that is not have any basis in reality which leads to a possibility. Wait, stop cutting me off. Stop cutting me off. Stop cutting me off. Stop cutting me off. Stop cutting me off. Stop cutting me off. What's a possibility? What's a possibility claim? A possibility claim. Foundation. Why can't that be limited to the verse? Look, why can't the abilities what you're doing now? We're doing circular reasoning. So you tie back to the same point to try to argue that again. Come on now, [

__ ] That's the That's the Bro. Bro, that's the first point. That's the first point. That's the first point you said and you tried to tie it back. You dumb. Make a good Make a good point and argue with Me. Make a good point and argue with me. Show me. Show me some Show me some debate skill. Show me some debate skill and debate with substance. Cuz you sound stupid, [ __ ] Make show me some debate skill right now. Hey, show me some Show me some debate. Show me some debate skill right now. Show

me some debate skill right now. Pause up. Pause up and we can debate. I We don't even got to yell each other. We wait a minute. Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait a minute. Wait a Minute. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. We can actually debate. We can calm down. We can have an argument. We can We can calm down and we can have an argument because you sound stupid. What is an equal? What is And where are you getting your definition from an eagle interpretation? cuz it's just too wrong.

Okay. Can you give the argument as to why these ability? Stop doing that [ __ ] I ask you a question. Look, I'm No, no, no. I've Already answered that. I don't care to answer it again. Your answer was wrong. I just explained my answer was wrong. You So, you don't care. You don't care about me explaining why you're So, you don't care about me having substance in a debate. But you don't care about me adding the substance for why you saying it's wrong. So, you just Thank you for the concession. That's a concession. That's

irrelevant for you saying that you don't know what equal interpretation Is. That's irrelevant. That's irrelevant. You know quotation is look look like what [ __ ] where you got Hey, these [ __ ] didn't even go to debate elementary on my mama. Go to debate 3K. Go learn some [ __ ] debating [ __ ] You trash [ __ ] You don't even you don't even you haven't been to debate 3K trying to talk to me. [ __ ] you're a rookie and brown shirt with 2K generic on trying to debate me. [ __ ]

you better know who the [ __ ] you talking to. Whack [ __ ] You suck. You suck. You literally suck. Yeah, you really suck. Like I really thought this [ __ ] would come in here give me a good argument. Give me some good substance use argument for 8 years and you didn't even use it right. Come on now [ __ ] Answer my question first. You dumbly do [ __ ] You suck. You give me argue this [ __ ] first. Argue this [ __ ] first. You said quote unquote can you ask

why only be Hold on. You Said why can't these only be in reference to the verse? That is a possibility claim by definition because when you're not giving a alternative, you're not giving a alternative expert interpretation to what's going on in the scan. You're talking about the meta of the scan and the validity of it being in a crossro setting which outright makes it a different and equal interpretation. What you're doing is giving an alternative interpretation based of a Possibility. But however, in a debate, possibility claims do not prove anything. They do not prove anything.

They leave you at zero because you have no which in the bank the person who has the better and the better substance wins. What you have is a why can't that just shows you that you're a [ __ ] cuz you can't argue nothing. Everything I argue I give proof substance and is blind. A why can't win you nothing. I'm asking you why does a possibility win a Debate? Why does it win a point? And what form of debating does it do? It doesn't win you in court. It doesn't win in politics. It doesn't win

nowhere. What form of debating does a possibility claim go through? Where does it go through? Oh my lord. Where does it go through? You sound the ass right now. Instead of screaming, look, instead of screaming, right, can you go ahead and prove why these abilities wouldn't just Be limited to this verse? That's the original thing I've asked you. Look, look. Yo, by the way, Zenny, no. Bailey. Bailey. And Zinny. And Zinny. What was my response to that? You dumb [ __ ] What was my response to that? Yo, hey, I'm going show you. Hey, let's

go back to debate school, [ __ ] Let's go to prek. I'm about to open the door for you. I'm about to open the door. Open the door for you. Let's go to debate. Let's go to debate school. Walk into my class and sit down. What was my response to that? Tracking oneonone. Was there what was a direct response to me saying that? Yo, you haven't given one. That's what I'm asking you. Not given one. I haven't given a direct response to that. I I advise you. I advise you. You better ask every [ __

] down the VC what I said or you better go back in the recording and go through because you just started the first class of debating. You just Started the first class of debating, which is tracking 101. I gave a direct argument to why does it matter, [ __ ] So, like come on, bro. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Look, you haven't given an response to that. Let's conclude. You haven't proven anything. Let's conclude. I haven't proven what? You haven't proven that these abilities aren't limited to the verse. So, let's conclude. Okay. So, how before you said

that, how did you get to that conclusion? What did you say Before? Hey, you know what's crazy? Let me break it down. I'm going to show you how good my tracking is. Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey. I'm going show you I'm going to show you how good my tracking is. Hey, wait. I'm not running nothing. You're You're actually a level You're level five. You're a level five. You're not nothing to me. But anyways, I'm not done. I'm not done. I'm not done. So, hey, I'm going to show you why I

passed debate school. Let's go To tracking 101. I'm I'mma catch him up in the lie. Hey, I'mma catch him up in the lie. So, earlier he didn't make the he said it could just be possible and it only is in reference to his verse. That's directly what it said. So, now you tried to switch it to prove that it's not. So, which one are you going to go with? Are you going to go with your Are you going to go with your [ __ ] equal interpretation or are you going to go with the burden?

Yeah. Can you go Ahead and prove the thing I've asked? So, now you're going with a Now you're going with the burden. So, are you dropping the equal interpretation point? Those two can't coexist, you dumb [ __ ] Those two can't coexist. Your your equal interpretation point. You saying possibly cannot coexist with you saying me to prove something. Are you So, are you making it affirmative? So, are you affirming that I can't prove this thing or are you saying it's possible? Which One is it? I'm saying can you go ahead and prove this to be

the case? Can you prove why it would work? So, so, so now you're dro So, are you dropping evil interpretation point? Yes or no? Sure, bro. Sure. I'll drop that. So, so you dumb [ __ ] So, this is what I did. I got a [ __ ] to drop his main point. So he had to switch that [ __ ] You sound dumb. So now, so now, so now, now what you want me to do? No, no, no. Now what you want me to do? Now, now about to go To debate class number level

two. Let me turn my fan on. Dumb little [ __ ] Nigga's a tiger level threat. Let me turn my fan on real quick. Let me tell hey. So So hey, go ahead, ask your question. Go ahead, ask your question. Yeah. Okay. So can you prove that this would work within a crossbow setting? Can I prove what I'm working across for a city limited? Because I I'll just I'll just give you I'll just give you reasoning based off how the ability is Dictated. It doesn't have a certain limitation. It's not cutting me. Don't cut me

off. Don't cut me off. Don't cut me off. Don't cut me. I didn't even finish. I didn't even finish. I didn't even know what I'm about to say. Look at you. Look at Look at you. Look at you. Look at you, bro. Bro, bro, I'm Hey, I ain't going to lie to you, bro. is right now. You don't even know what I'm about to say. You don't even know I'm being a rat. This is so Ironic. I'm being Hey, hey, hey. I'm being a rat, but you're asking me to tell me why this would work

in a Why would work across? Why wouldn't shut the [ __ ] up? There's different levels and there's different levels of me of us debating. This [ __ ] says I'm ratting, but the [ __ ] response that you have to come up with prove that it works in a cross setting. Shut your stupid ass up, [ __ ] The [ __ ] wrong with you? So the reason why So the reason why Hey. Hey. The reason why I think this ability would work in a crossroad setting is Stop cutting me off, bro. Stop cutting

me off. Stop cutting I'm giving you reasoning. That's what I'm talking about. I'm trying to give you reasoning. I'm trying to give you reasoning. I'm trying to give you reasoning. And when I'm trying to give you reasoning, you're withholding that. Yes. What I'm trying to do is cuz you know the level you know the levels of us. You You won't let me Say it. You won't let me say it. So in a debate, right, you're asking why can this work? in a cross verse setting based off what I'm reading the induction behind it. I'm not

seeing anything unless you can give me some type of reason for you to believe why any of these abilities would have some type of inverse mechanic where it's specifically indexed to the verse that's indexed. We have the reasoning to why we can say so. So in Bleach we can say oh yeah the spiritual questioning can't work crossverse because it only directly works on people who have spiritual pressure. That's why we can say that but based off any of the scans I sent you. You cannot come to that conclusion to even make that argument. So what

that does it ties back to the original thing. It ties back to the fact that you cannot argue without with substance. You're trying to go with these certain Possibility. So what you can do is learn how to bake some nuts pants up and cuz you cannot do that. Okay, look look look. Shut up, [ __ ] I'm not Okay. Look, look. Shut up, [ __ ] Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, shut up. Hey, shut up, [ __ ] Hey, shut up, [ __ ] So, what I'm doing? So, hey, shut up, [ __ ]

So, what Hold on. Basically, basically, I know. Hold on. I'm not done. I'm not done. I'm not done. I'm not done. So, Basically what I'm basically basically what I'm doing is the oldest I'm using the oldest debate to direct it in the book. I do not think your argument has foundationally any substance will fall back on. My argument foundationally does. So based off of that, I'm I'm winning substance based off of that. Literally the way you're because in the debate, you would have to have some type of you would have to have you said you

just hang assumptions. You have to have Some type of basis behind your skepticism. So what is your basis behind this? You have nothing. You have none. [ __ ] When they say characters possibility, you're going to get beat on that too. You dog [ __ ] [ __ ] You're dog [ __ ] When he says characters, that's just limited to his knowledge. He's only He can only say that about things that he knows. Like if he doesn't know this thing then he cannot make the claim that this would work on him. So because femto

Does not who does that respond to? Who does that respond to generally zinny? Zinny who does that respond to Zinny who does that respond to exist within the verse. So they wouldn't be able to say that their thing work. Hey Zinny what does that respond Zinny? Who does that respond to? Yeah. So Zinny all of a sudden so that's what I'm going to do. I'm going just beat you using I'm going just beat you using coherent. Hey I'm going just beat you using coherency and Reasoning. Hold on. I'm going just beat you using coherency and

reasoning again. Most of the time hold on hold on. Usually in crossverse debates, the character that someone's debating with not know they're in the [ __ ] fiction and does not know they're the [ __ ] verse and they don't know about other verses usually. Are you going to disagree with that? Are you going to say that Goku knows that Naruto and [ __ ] Superman exists? Are you going to say That knows that Batman exists? Mostly the [ __ ] not. That's why we have Cros debating cuz it's hypothetical. So, I would agree with

you. There's certain abilities and hacks that are correctly indexed to a verse because it has mechanic to where it can only work within the verse. However, we're debating cross verse for a reason because obviously based off the indexes that we have, right? Based on the indexes that we have, we have no reason To say that it's only working in our verse. What you did is you're trying to get me to prove something that has no basis behind it. I cannot prove a negative. There's no re there's no basis for me to try to prove or

disprove anything. If you would have actually gave me some type of reasoning. So yeah, I don't think this gonna work. Proy prove this work within the verse because of that third. You didn't do all that. You hold on. Hold on. All you All you Did No. No. You didn't give any reason. You done a debate. All you did was give Hold on. All you did All you did was give an empty claim. You give an empty claim. You give an empty claim. You give all that [ __ ] Check the VC. Check the VC chat.

Check the VC chat. I'm giving Whoa. Talk the VC chat. Attack the VC chat. No. What do you think? What about it? I I've given I've given Wait. What about Yeah. So, Hey, appropriate appropriate that substance in formulation of your argument. Try to and try to and try to Hey, hey, wait, wait, wait, wait. Look, look, look, look, look. That's just an argument from ignorance as well because you just said you didn't prove X means that X isn't the case. You're just saying that because at all No, I didn't. I know. I didn't do No.

Zinny. Zinny. Zinny. That's not what I did. Zinny. Zinny. That's not what I did. Zinny, that's not what I did. Zinny, that's not what I did. Zinny. Zinny. That's not Let me talk. Let me talk. That's it. That's not what I said. Zinn, that's not what I said. Zinn, that's not what I said. That's not what I said. Zinn is not. That's not what I said. That's Z. That's not what I said. I said foundationally in debating if you're giving empty possibilities and you're not giving a behind the empty stop cutting me off, Bro. What's

wrong with you? Wait, what's wrong? That's what I'm talking about. [ __ ] do this [ __ ] because they're losing. [ __ ] do this [ __ ] cuz they're losing. That's not an argument from ignorance by definition. Like again, you don't you're you're talking about [ __ ] you don't even know what possibilities are. You don't know about logic. So you try to talk about argument from that. But let's look at argument from ignorance. Let's let's look it up. I'll Just beat you down on everything. argue for so listen listen hold on so

listen listen listen this is argument for ignorance argument for ignorance is a logical fallacy the claim because it has been proven false or false because it has been proven that's not what I said I said it lacks the foundation for you toize about it you dumb [ __ ] that's two different things you dumb ass I never said I never said this or true I never said that you dumb [ __ ] like I said Come back to debate school I'm about to open the doors Sit your ass down. I'm about to give you an

apple. Lunch time in 10 minutes. What I said is your argument lacks the credibility for it to go through and it lacks the cred for it to be skepticized. Skepticism needs to have a basis otherwise it becomes an empty claim and empty skepticism which any judge or person listening with a brain will not accept and do not accept people who have no backing basis behind What they're saying. So no, this is not an argument from ignorance. I'm not talking about the certain claims. I'm saying the possibility claims has no backing to make it more probable.

You dumb [ __ ] So what are you having against that? But what do you what do you have against that? Just said I didn't give motivation for why this ability is indexed to a certain verse. Therefore, it's not that's dead ass just an argument from ignorance. That's not What I said. I literally gave you like I literally made said this. That's not what I said. I just zinny even said this, bro. Oh my zen. Zinny, even Zinny, even even if Zinny, bro, verbatim said this. Zinny, even Zinny, Zinny, even if I somehow initially Hold

on, Zinny. Even if I somehow initially said that, we can multiple Hold on. I multiple times. Zinny, stop. Zi, stop. Multinnie, Zinny, multiple times, multiple times Throughout this conversation, I directly recclarified. So, if I did say that, Grace is razor. So, what are you going to say now? Bro, bro, that Okay, look. Look. Give the justification. Give the justification, bro. Look at this [ __ ] So, does that that that's what ended off? Are you sure? Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey. Are you sure? Are you sure you want to end it off on that? Are

you sure? I'm asking you. You've never given any sort of Justification as to why. Do Do you know why? Do you know Zinny? Do you know why? Zinny, Zinny, I actually did, but Zinn Zinn, I did give justification. It's tracking issue 101 again. I gave five different levels of justification just because you are Oh, [ __ ] because you're a pe brand and you do not have the ability to respond to them. Don't do that. But I but I've already did that multiple times. The thing that you were holding So Hold up, Denny. Zinny. The

Thing that you were holding back on so far was, "Oh yeah, he said this. He said this." Now the regress's razor cuz I clarified that [ __ ] So what was your tying back point? Cuz you didn't respond to what I said at all. Okay, I'll just steal on this. But look, even if you do say that your character can do this, all right, my character cannot go through change. So, for you to take away this trait from my character, he would have one point. He'd have to go from Look, Look, he'd have to go

from one uh part in in time to another party. So, he's going to have to have this trait and then lose the trade. That's literally just So, you're saying So, you're saying even So, you're saying even if you still man, my abilities. Yeah. Even if I grant this, look, even if I grant Let's go to conclusions right now. Let's go to conclusions right now. Right now. Go to conclusions right now. Right now. Go to conclusions right now. My Character can't go through conclusions right now. Go to conclusions right now. Let's go to conclusions right now.

Yeah. After after I say this, we go to conclusions. No, let's go to conclusions right now. Okay. After I say this. After I say this. Look, my character cannot go through change. So for you to take away this trait from my character, he would have to go from one point in time to another point in time. Basically, he's going to have this trait then lose this Trait. But my character is not temporal at all. Therefore, that cannot happen to my character. So yeah, we can conclude now. Yeah. Um, you can give your conclusion, bro. You

suck. Okay. So yeah, uh you never I just need um one thing. I think Deborah already responded to the thing that you just said earlier. He he kind of just references towards like physical change and that boy said like properties of your characters can still go through Change. He's never responded to that. Oh, I did. You know, he knows crazy, you know. Hey hey hey, am I interp let me let me ask you a question. Hey, Broly. Factor fiction. Brley Broly factor fiction. Did I not just say I'm not Shut up, [ __ ] Hey,

bro. They didn't not just say he can steal my abilities, right? They did not say he can still make my abilities. Guess what? Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey, hey. Look at this. Hey, man. Hold on. Hold on. Stop, bro. Stop that [ __ ] bro. Stop that [ __ ] Stop, bro. Cuz you lost badly. Hey, it's Broly. I'm about to react to something. Hey, bro. I'm about to react to something. He said that this can go through. Read that scan out loud for me. Read the scan out loud for me, bro. Where is that

word? Yeah, it's the logic barrier scan. Can you Can you read it? Can you read the logic barrier scan around for me? Bailey, Bailey, look. Wait, wait, brother. Can you read the brother? Can you read the logic barrier scan out loud for me? I'm not done talking to you. In what chat? Rand scan chat. Logic barrier scan that I sent the one I just reacted to. Yo. Yo, Bailey. Yo, Bailey, I have a question. Um, so when I say chill, chill chill, bro. So, read that scan out loud where it says logic Bear. Can you

read that out loud for me? Um, where it says notable techniques? No, it says logic bear. Chris B. I'll just read it. says logic barrier. Chris Fage is able to break the logic barrier around his target affecting to bypass any rules that's established by a character. And what his dumb ass said is he can still man all my abilities. It's on record. No, I said you're so stupid. You're so stupid. I said all and I said so you can still me all my abilities. I Said you can still me all my abilities. I said you

can still me all my abilities. I literally said that.