There's a big there's a big difference between how you learn European history in school with names and places and people and events and the vague archaeological record North America this begins to change it now we have names we have Nations we have events we have Heroes this is the beginning of this welcome my name is Nathaniel Jensen this is the Lost history of North America I'm The research biologist with Answers in Genesis I've been doing research on the pre-columbit Americas and the history of peoples around the globe for the last several years and I've got
some spectacular new insights into the pre-columbian world if you've followed the research that I've been doing what I'm about to show you has not been presented in public before and I think it'll blow you away I want to make a special invitation to any Native Americans who are watching or first nations in Canada or indigenous peoples if you're even watching with subtitles in Latin America what you're about to see I think will be an extremely valuable contribution to understanding the history of the world before the Americas and I've got a special invitation for you at
the end of this talk especially if you're part of the alject language family groups for example the cree or the Ojibwe or the Chippewa or if you're part of the suun kataban language family groups lakota's Dakotas and such there's there's a special thing I want to say to you at the end so without further Ado let's launch into the Lost history of North America if you grew up like I did you learn next to nothing about the pre-clement histories of history of the North America what happened who was here what were they doing where did
they go all these Sorts of questions basic questions that typical history classes answer for other regions of the globe have been left blank I I grew up knowing knowing nothing about it I knew who was here when Europeans arrived but that was it if you've spent any time trying to study the answers that have been offered to these questions you've probably discovered that those are major Gap in our knowledge and this Gap is what prohibits us from being able to say more you might say what Gap I'm going to show you the Gap once I
show you the Gap I think you'll say aha now I know what you're talking about I see this is this is the major hurdle we have to overcome if we want to solve this mystery and to show you this Gap I want to start with something familiar we're going to walk through the history of America beginning with European arrival as so many of us have been taught We'll walk forward in time to get our bearings and then walk backwards in time as we try to walk backwards then the Gap will appear for many of us
myself included the history of North America begins with Columbus's arrival in what's now the Caribbean in 1492 his many voyages typically my history history classes my own would then jump forward to if we're talking about the history of the United States the first thing get Thanksgiving The pilgrims fast forward even more to 1776 the war for independence of the 13 colonies and at this point is typically when history books will cover who was here beginning with tribes on the East Coast because these were the peoples that the Europeans encountered as the colonies gained their independence
so you talk about the Massachusetts and the Narragansett and the Iroquois the the the the alliance of the Confederacy the Mohawk and the Seneca the powaton and so on and what's I think I can retrospectively now look back and say ah this is this is what was so valuable is we could put not only Nation names down on paper but we could put their locations on a map and this begins to give us history we could also put names to faces and talk about John Ridge of Cherokee and Sequoia if you go further south this
is sort of the Northeast if you go to the southeast section of what's now the United States You can talk about the Chickasaw and the Choctaw and the Cherokee in the creek in the Seminole and the in the Trail of Tears As you move further west which is where U.S history moves as the Louisiana Purchase happens and such you can talk about the Plains Indians and their way of life and their culture and their Lifestyles even further west the Southwest the Navajo the Hopi and so on so this is just to give us our bearings
Hopefully this is fairly familiar to you it's familiar to me what if we work backwards in time now and try to understand the answers that have been given before Europeans arrived what do you find if you go looking let's say in textbooks and such what you find is not names of people that go with pictures you find academic terms with archaeological sites here is a mound in Moundsville West Virginia that will be labeled from the Dana era well what does that mean who built it what nations does this connect to closer to home for me
home right now is in Northern Kentucky near Ohio The Serpent Mound is not too far for me this is quite a significant structure well who built that who does that connect to Cahokia was the greatest city north of The Rio Grande before European arrival and this is quite a massive amount these people build who are these people why do we just have academic terms this is a artist's rendition of what that great City may have looked like if you look at the literature that's out there you try to go before the Colombian era you don't
get very many Clues you get academic Clues but to say oh the Lakota's built this the choctaws built that good luck trying to find answers in the academic literature you get these sorts of terms Mississippian late Woodland and the dates I've given here are not the full boundaries of what's considered I've just given representative years within those periods so now what that there's there's our Gap you've got archaeological sites with somewhat boring academic terms that Don't connect for us to anything it seems in the pre-columbian era the post-contact era you've got lots of familiar names
and places and people and Nations but trying to connect this to that is the major problem that's what's inhibiting our ability to understand what transpired in the pre-clement world and today I want to tell you about our steps to bridge that Gap now before we get there Though the question of course arises why is there this Gap why can't we connect the lakota's to this particular archaeological site or the Delaware the London Lenape to this particular archaeological site let me give you one example the answer in a sense is because we know what happened in
the early centuries the early decades in the post-contact era and what we know from that period is enough to say wow it's really tough to Make connections so let's use again just one example talking about the Lakota Sioux if you've heard of them as you study their history you're probably thinking of them as a Plains Indian tribe in that what's now the modern Dakotas North and South Dakota area have they always been there try to get my slide to advance here sorry here we go it would be a mistake to think they've Always been there
and we know that because in the post contact era we know that the santissue pushed them out of Minnesota so to back up a second the lakotas were not always in the Plains area they came out of Minnesota because of pressure from the north the santissu were in the Lake Superior area and they were pushed pushed further south in Minnesota because the ojibwes north of them north of Lake Superior were pushing on them so The Ojibwe is sort of a domino sequence events here the ojibwes were pushing on the santissu but then pushing the Lakota
Sioux who pushed them out to the planes so if there's that much movement since the 1600s what can we say about archaeological sites where would you go looking for the archaeological record the pre-columbian archaeological record of the Lakota soup and let me add one more element to this Discussion that throws another wrench in our attempts to understand and connect post-columbian history to pre-columbian history it's Clues from language so briefly using perhaps a more familiar example I'm speaking to you in English and English is part of a larger language family family just being a term for
a grouping of languages that seemed to have a common ancestor and if that strikes you as odd I can tell you that Because I'm a German speaker and have been in Germany multiple times and heard Dutch being spoken heard Norwegian being spoken these are other languages classified as the Germanic subgroup English is as well I can tell you that there's very clear and obvious similarities among some of these languages if I listen very closely to Norwegian to Dutch I can almost understand it it's still unintelligible to me but I Can almost understand it because there's
enough similarities there or to make another point I play soccer with a group of Guatemalans on Sunday nights I'm trying to learn Spanish there's a lot of similarities between English and Spanish there's a lot of similar words that make it straightforward for an English speaker to to learn Spanish they also speak Mayan languages and I got a book on Lion language vocabulary and Such and it is night and day from English it makes learning Spanish seem like Child's Play so just an example of how there's relationships among languages that we can recognize as coming from
a common ancestor applied back now to the question of American History I mentioned the lakota's out here this is the this is their grouping right here around the time of contact I'll have better Maps uh we're working on These right now to show you in the future but I'm using this one for now The Dakotas are right here in the in the Minnesota area you'll notice that there's other language languages being spoken out here near the East Coast this is a map of the suun kataban language family you can compare these languages Lakota Dakota and
so on catawban to one another and quantify the amount of differences among them and the most Divergent Different languages that the catawbans over here so given the likely possibility that all of these languages came from a common ancestor Lakota as well where would you put the original homelands for this group if they came from a common ancestor that came from a common population where would that population lived the shortest distance between two points Between the most Divergent the less Divergent would put you around about right here part of the reason I put you right put
this circle right here near the Ohio River Valley is because the Osage themselves say we came from this region so not only have the lakota's come from Minnesota originally having been pushed out of Minnesota by the decoders and themselves having been pushed out pushed South by the ojibwes It's not just that they arrived here late in history from the Minnesota but they may have originally been further to the east and south down here again just one example to illustrate that there's this major Gap between the post-contact period and the pre-columbian period it's very difficult to
connect one to the other and this is a major reason why the history of the pre-climate America's remains obscure This is the first point I wanted to make set up the problem to solve in a sense now the whole reason I'm talking to you of course is because I want to show you that we've begun to close this Gap what I'm going to show you in the next few minutes is work that's already been accomplished before 2022 which is when I published my book traced and and talked about a lot of what I'm about to
show you now That's not the last point I'm going to make in a few minutes I'm going to show you how we've actually closed the Gap in a spectacular way so stay with me let me set up for you how how far we've gotten before March of 2022 and what's happened in the last calendar year that's so spectacularly wonderful the main one of the main tools I've been using to interrogate history around the globe And also investigate history in the Americas among Native Americans before Columbus is a particular piece of DNA that is inherited only
among males the reasons I'm focusing on this are technical in nature I won't cover them now for sake of time but it just so happens to allow us to go way back in history connect people groups back to Sons of Noah to be able to look at history in a generation by generation manner it's it's it just has all sorts Of aspects to its biology and inheritance that allow us to make some powerful inferences about human history so the male inherited DNA is only a fraction of the total only about one percent of a male's
total DNA it is passed on imperfectly from generation to generation mistakes are made and these mistakes then act like a clock so if you compare my DNA to my three boys DNA you're going to find Differences between us among us if you compare my DNA to my dads you'll find differences and on average there's about three mistakes three differences that occur every generation so that you can compare mine to my sons you'll find on average three differences you compare my DNA my Y chromosome to my dads you'll find three differences you compare my boys to
my dad's their grandfather you should find about six differences so you can compare any two men Count the number of differences and this will give you a estimate an estimate of how many generations ago they last shared a common ancestor so if you're following what I'm saying you can compare the Y chromosomes from men around the globe and reconstructive family tree this is the powerful tool then by which we can investigate human history and the history of North American for Columbus there's lots of things you can infer so This this screen right here shows you
an example a representative example of the global human Y chromosome based family tree this is from 600 men from around the globe from the Americas you have Native Americans in this tree you have Europeans North African sub-Saharan Africans middle easterners Central Asians South Asians East Asians Pacific Islanders and so on good representative example these letters and these colors are given To highlight specific structures in the tree sections in the tree these labels come from the mainstream literature there's a there's a general rule of thumb the deepest branches are given semi-arbitrary letters of the alphabet that's
why it goes from F G H I J to T and then L and then o and then n then S K and M and so on semi-arbitrary but you can see here that n and yellow here is fairly deep time just to clarify moves From top to bottom in the screen so the present is near the tips of these branches ancient history goes back in time this yellow branch has a very deep connection to the blue branches over here o now let me go over to this part because this is where the business end
of our discussion happens as it relates to the history of North America you can see here there's Q in the pinkish color it has a fairly deep connection to this Section of the tree known as r r further subdivides so you've got in the lighter tan R2 and then over here in lavender and dark tan r1a r1a for the subdivides into excuse me and this is R2 this is R1 then Lavender is r1a dark tan is r1b and on and on the naming convention goes letter number letter number letter number letter number that's just the
method for the nomenclature rules for navigating this tree you don't have to remember all that that's just to Explain what you're looking at right now now this family tree I don't have time to justify all this can give you information on changes in population size it can detail for you migration events and of course especially relevant to our discussion genealogical relationships again I don't have time to to explain or or defend each of these claims there's just a lot you can learn from a family tree and Just to stop and summarize because we've covered a
lot of ground this is a family tree based on DNA male inherited DNA that DNA changes every generation it acts in a sense like a clock it can tell you genealogical relationships and the timing of those genealogical relationships allows you to reconstruct a family tree and there's lots that you can learn from a family tree I want to draw your attention to this branch that I've already referred to Q Because this is where you find the vast majority of Native Americans or let me stop for a second and say if you look at Latin America
the vast majority of Latin American men do not have a native Y chromosome they have either European or an African Y chromosome Heritage because of the history of European colonialism and the Ugly history of the transatlantic slave trade so if we exclude those from our discussion and just focus on Native History those that are not obviously European not obviously African the vast majority of what remains is this Branch Q and again I'm going to summarize because this is something stuff I've covered elsewhere in a book and videos and I'll point you towards those resources in
a moment the American side of this family tree so so what I've just done here is I've isolated out this branch and I've Rotated it 90 degrees so now time moves from left to right instead of top to bottom if you zoom in you can probably read some of these names Pima Indians Mayans characteris from Brazil those are some of the the populations that were sampled for this particular study and you can see this whole section right here of Native Americans breaks away separates from Mongolian pothran and macaroni are Pakistani Groups Russian naxi and honor
in China Hazara in Afghanistan these are Eurasian peoples so the Eurasian section of Q separates from the American section of Q which applies a migration event around the 300s to 600s A.D that's when to make a long story short one of the populations in the Americas arrived 300 to 600 A.D there's really interesting history here Why it happened it correlates the time of of major movements in Central Asia when the Huns came into Europe and overthrew the Roman Empire when the shanbai were overthrowing and infiltrating China at the fall of the Han Dynasty and so
on but this is all stuff I've covered elsewhere and don't have time to review instead I want to draw your attention to another section of the tree in the Americas that'll be especially important here in a few Minutes once we bridge the gap it's this other Branch known as C this is also found in Central Asia among other places you can find it in Pacific as well in past videos and in writing I've talked about this Branch arriving in the Americas a little bit later around a thousand A.D that was a rough estimate based on
the data that was available at that time I can tell you now that we have more data that we can probably revise that and make it more precise to About the 900s A.D that's still several centuries after haplogroup q and if we back up a second I can cover something I forgot to mention just a few minutes ago the size of these circles represents the relative abundance so you can see these circles right here are not quite as large as the circles for this Branch haplal group is just the term for branch Q so about
90 of navajos this this circle right here belong to haplogroup Q Whereas just a fraction of them you can see it's a tiny Circle right here belong to this haple group or Branch C and again this is we can we can revise this now to the 900s this is all information I've put in print in this book traced came out in March of 2022 Trace demon DNA's big surprise and I've talked about in previous video series which I'll I'll point you to those links in a moment so just to summarize then I covered a Lot
of ground fairly quickly again because this has been covered elsewhere and this sets up how we're going to begin to bridge this Gap what this Y chromosome research implies is multiple siblings of the Americas you'll notice I didn't talk about BC era branches who gave rise to the Mayans to the olmecs that's because we don't have those branches yet that's something we're still looking for Again we have the potential to identify movements Rises and falls in population sizes migrations so I talked about major migrations from one continent to another if you're thinking about this and
drawing this logic out in theory we should be able to identify movements within a continent movements of the lakotas from Minnesota or perhaps from the Ohio River Valley and so on This has the potential to begin to close the gap between archeology pre-columbian archeology and post contact geography and Nations now at that time March 2022 I did not have sufficient data to identify specific branches of the tree or sub-branches of the tree with specific Nations but that's that's where we were One other line of evidence that we were exploring and that I published on and
talked about a year ago was the indigenous history of at least one of these nations the Delaware this map shows you the alject language family the Delaware Nation the Delaware language belongs to the algae language family and this map will become relevant more relevant here in a moment but for our purposes right now where we were a year ago was the following the Red record or the walam Olam was recognized as the Delaware nation's indigenous history for many years due to a thesis that was written about 1995 claiming that this record was a forgery the
Delaware nation has now disowned it I have showed in times past that there was a tremendous amount of history recorded in this record that matches exactly what we see in the Y chromosome the male Inherited DNA tree long story short I find it difficult to believe that this so-called forgery could have anticipated genetic discoveries 150 years later so to give you the back story this was recognized or collected I should say by Europeans in the early 1800s it's since been claimed that this guy from Kentucky who collected the record actually forged it and made it
up and wasn't actually The Delaware Nations history so this is early 1800s and I'm telling you and I've said in in print and in videos before that this history and this record matches point for point the history that we see in the in the Y chromosome the male inherited DNA based on the tree so how could some guy in the early 1800s have invented out of whole cloth in in indigenous history in Indian history that just so happened to match genetic Discovery's a century and a half two centuries later I don't think that's just an
accident I think what the real story is this is a real record from the Delaware Nation from the londonape that tells their history and just to summarize again because I've gone in more detail elsewhere but just for our purposes give you a brief taste of it this record describes something that sounds like a creation event that that matches Genesis 1. at the beginning the Sea was everywhere covered the Earth sounds like Genesis 1 2 the great spirit moved and so on bringing forth the sky the Earth sounds like a creation event there's also a flood
that I'm emitting here that they describe it sounds like a global floods with some survivors they seem to describe an ice age After the flood their home was icy their home was snowy talking about the London Lenape in the old land the winter land they described then after being in this Icy land what appears to be a crossing of probably the Bering Strait by the dark fish sea the gaping policies settled the White Eagle Clan the white wolf Clan they crossed Aquaman is if you read on in the in the in the text seems to
describe the Americas they describe how many people crossed ten thousand or ten times a thousand they crossed so ten thousand people they arrive and this is where it gets very detailed once they arrive in North America they describe a series of about 95-96 sachems here they say White Eagle had been the path maker let me advance this slide here the next Sachem and that that's the main turn that's used over and over again the next station was history man written records he began next station was shriveled man next station was drought this is the pattern
you see going forward in the narrative the name of the guy and one or two significant Things that happened while he was Sachem so you'll notice early in the record the the red record itself claims that they began to write this history and Council just some more Snippets uh I wanna I'm gonna draw something out here this this will get us now closer to closing the gap between post contact and pre-contact it's not just the Lenny lenape's history it is their history that they wrote down but it doesn't just talk about them Alone they talk
about neighbors and enemies he could fight every foe the strong Stone he struck down wholehearted was the Satan fighting the snakes that would first pass this may just sound like figurative language you look in context it's clearly talking about specific types of peoples where this gets even more interesting is when you begin to look at the names and the origin of the names of some of These nations that we all take for granted when I say the term Sue many Caucasians will say yeah I know who you're talking about well what does the word Sue
mean the word Sue means adder or snake in the Ojibwe language why would the ojibwes be giving them a name because they were neighbors remember what I just told you about the lakotas The ojibwes were pushing on the decode as the Santi Sioux who then push in the lakota's and they went out to the plains the ojibwes are right here if we superimpose these two language maps in the grayish now color you can see the suun kataban language family here's the ojibwes they're Neighbors is cinnaboins right here means one who roasts using Stones there's a
group of suan speakers called The stonies hopefully this now begins to connect a few dots when this account talks about the strong Stone the snakes this isn't figurative language these are the names they've applied to their neighbors so yes this is the red record the londonape's record of their history but you're going to get some Clues to other nations as you read it this this has much larger implications than just one nation As you get further along in the narrative they eventually reach the Atlantic Ocean the sun's salt sea they say they talk about who
is this ancient then they talk about the arrival of the whites twice there's an initial sighting of them for at this time from the dawn see the whites appeared and then the red record ends with this Satan watching closely was this ancient looking c word for at that time from North and South the white people came friendly people And great ships who are they and this is likely the Dutch in 1620 and this is how the red record ends this has been speculated to be the arrival in 1524 of Verrazano I think he was an
Italian conquistador long story short if you walk through all the details of the red record and again I don't have time to walk you through verse by verse what it says you can map out where the Lana delope the Delaware came from where they went where they Crossed the Mississippi River where they eventually landed when the Dutch arrived and Europeans arrived in the 15 1600s 96 sachems traces this migration path again we can put a date right there there's two other dates we can estimate the fact there's two dates leads to an ambiguity that I'm
gonna get to here in a moment 1396 is a date that's been given for the arrival of the Lenape at the Atlantic Ocean based on one pump records this is like a secondary Tertiary source of it someone said they talked to so and so and then he communicated to so and so and that's how I found out about it written records from the colonial era I'm actually suspicious this might be talking about the ojibwes they might go and the nation's confused but anyway you have this date and then you have the date of the first
sighting of the whites which I think is Verrazano 1524. anyway the point being You have a date for the arrival of the sun salt C you know the Sachem you've got the closing of the red record 1620 you've got these two dates the number of years that have passed plus you can count the number of sachems between these two dates which gives you an estimate of the average satrum rule length and you can extrapolate backwards in time and say okay when do they arrive in the Americas you use the the one pump base date you
Get the 200s ID for the arrival if you use the Verrazano so again so and so is the Sachem from the dawn see the whites first appeared you put 1524 as a date then you can you can do the subtraction here to find how many years have transpired you know how many Satan's then from the red record exist between these two dates then you get an estimate for how long each Sachem rules the new extrapolate backwards in time it gives you a very different number both The 900s A.D now both of these numbers are compatible
with a genetic history but my point is there's an ambiguity of several centuries so if you try to assign dates to this intervening period what do you do if you want to so these are going to be pre-columbian dates if you want to assign locations and dates to try to connect the red record to archeology you've got the several Century ambiguity and now you're stuck Now I said I've talked about this elsewhere we did a 25 part video series in 2020 the new history of the human race if you go to the Answers in Genesis
YouTube channel so YouTube channel Answers in Genesis find this playlist episode 13 goes into much more detail on this red record I've also got technical papers on this in 2020 I published the first announcement of an agreement between the red record and the genetic Data and of course I've gone to even more detail in this book Trace team and DNA's big surprise so let me stop and summarize what I've told you so far is all attempts prior to today prior to April of 2022 to bridge the gap between pre-columbid archeology and post-columbian Nations I haven't
yet and we hadn't by March 2022 but we've made good progress in setting up a new framework I had good genetic data to show all sorts of dynamic movements from Eurasia into the Americas a very Dynamic history in the pre-killamine world radically new information that no one had been talking about before but I haven't yet been able to identify specific branches of the Y chromosome family tree with specific Nations and on the indigenous history side of things again I haven't had time to justify this In this time with you but I have talked about it
again in those other videos and and print resources how this red record implies there have been multiple settlings of the Americas the red record talks about there being people in the Americas before the Lenape arrived it talks about their movements you can map it out but this chronological ambiguity did they arrive in the 200s A.D or the 900s A.D made it difficult to press the record For more detail beyond what we were able to infer it made it difficult to close the gap so that was the second Point we've begun up to March 2022 we
began to close the gap between the archaeological record and the post-columbian history with these revolutionary discoveries returning to the Delaware Nation the history that was taken away from them it was it was told to them that this was a forgery I think we have good evidence that it was not But was actual indigenous history that was collected by a guy in Kentucky and has been transmitted to us fairly faithfully and just so happens to match very closely the history that we see in the Y chromosome record so this sets us up now to where we
were a year ago this raises the questions can we press this data further can we dig further into the Y chromosome tree And the native histories to connect them to one another and to the archaeological record can we close this Gap so what I'm going to show you now what I'm going to claim and you can watch and decide if I've Justified this claim what I'm going to claim now is that we've successfully begun to bridge one of the biggest gaps in the history of North America and in a revolutionary in a spectacular way This
is the beginning of the Lost history of North America what transpired that then disappeared and that we're now beginning to recover and here's how I'm going to do it right now I haven't been able to connect Y chromosome branches to specific Nations or to their indigenous histories but I'm going to and the way I'm going to do it is via an indirect route I'm going to connect Y chromosome branches to a particular Language family so now I am going to be able to connect a specific sub-branch to a specific Nation or group of Nations related
by language and then we're going to connect to Native history to that same language family and so the Y chromosome history is going to Via this path be able to inform and help anchor native history and that anchored native history is going to blow open this question of Archeology this is where I'm going these are the steps I'm about to take so let's now do it together I said about a year ago we had insufficient data to identify specific sub-branches the Y chromosome family tree with specific tribes since that time one of the biggest genetic
testing companies in the world family tree DNA has released their Y chromosome dna-based family tree and they say they Have 214 000 tested users so what this what happens if you work with this company if you take one of their tests is you pay the fee you have the option of giving your background your known paternal history they send you a test kit they take like a saliva sampler or cheek sample you send back they tested and then they give you results and you and I think you can agree or not agree To to be
part of their publicly available Y chromosome tree the data has some limitations unlike some of the academic data they don't tell you which nation in terms of Native American nation you come from or First Nation you come from it's based on current political entities so for North America this database tells you or you can report yes I'm from the United States yes I'm from Canada so When I say North America I'm referring heavily now to north of the Rio Grande because south of that Mexico and such is mesoamerica and and that's a whole other topic
for the day north of the Rio Grande North America you can say I'm from Canada from the United States or they also have the option of saying I'm from the United States and I've Native American history ancestry or you can say I'm from Canada and a First Nation ancestry paternal ancestry so there's really four options and what I want to focus on then is these two branches that we've already talked about hapla group or Branch C Capital group or Branch Q we already know from the academic literature these are the major Native American branches so
we can specifically look at the family tree DNA database we can look at the haplogroup C branch In that database we can look at the Q branch in that database and count the number of individuals in the United States in Canada I should say the United States Native Americans or Canadian First Nations or frankly any from these two countries in these branches because we know they're native and we know the specific sub-branches that are native fine how is that helpful to our purposes there's another set of data that's going To blow this wide open we
also have publicly available census data so when the US does a census and I'm using the 2010 numbers that's what I had access to the U.S asks questions about Native history are you native and are you only native so there's about four different categories you can answer you can say yes I'm native and I'm only native well let me let me break it down this Way you can say I'm native and only native or I'm native Plus German Italian something like that if you say you're only native they're going to ask you well are you
belonging to a single nation or does your ancestry include multiple Nations if you say I'm native Plus well is your native side only native or is it multiple Nations or one nation or multiple Nations that's how that data is broke down the Canadian Census data which I have access to from 2016. doesn't break it down quite as detailed you can say are you from First Nation or not and are you mixed or not and each of these data sets what I looked at carefully was the category that was the most restrictive so for the U.S
census data I said let me focus on the numbers of those people who said I am native and only one nation I'm Navajo and only Navajo I'm Cherokee and only Cherokee this is how the numbers break down and this is looking at percentages in terms of the total category in that column so native only native only one nation how do those numbers break down and I've broken it down by language family ayak at the Baskin which would include Navajo Apache and such iroquoin which would include Cherokee Al Jake which include Chippewa Delaware and such muskogan
which include The Choctaw Chickasaw Seminole and such soon Catawba which we talked about earlier Udo as Tekken which includes some of the Pueblo peoples the hobies and Eskimo loot and you can see here the the bigger point I'm trying to communicate with this graph is that within the United States there's a fairly diverse distribution of living Native Americans who say I'm native and only native and only one nation It's distributed among several different language families that's perhaps not a category in which you're used to thinking or that I'm used to thinking but I'm reporting it
this way because if you look at the Canadian data it's not this well distributed at all it is heavily skewed towards a single language family the algae language family which would include Ojibwa cree and so on the Eskimo loot is the next category Iroquoian and such but you can see here 80 percent belong to Algin whereas there's there's nothing that comes anywhere close to that percentage in the United States data so let me simplify this I've been talking about the Delaware they belong to the algae language family and if we break down these categories into
algae or some other group this is how the US versus Canada data break down in Canada almost 80 percent are algae Language family this is living natives in the United States the numbers are almost the reverse only 15 percent would say we're part of the algae language family and 85 percent of the U.S Native Americans belong to something else some other group okay I mentioned the family tree DNA data set I'm now going to bring those results in and compare to these Census Data because I think we can use these data to connect A branch
to a nation or group of Nations so what does the family tree DNA data set say about haploid groups or branches C and Q how does it break down in terms of Canada versus the United States did you know that of those haplogroup C and Q individuals in the family tree DNA data set s that are Canadian 94 percent belong to haplogroup Q That's a crazy amount of skewing but it's intriguing because it seems to roughly correlate with the Census Data the vast majority of Canadian First Nation individuals are algae language family members the vast
majority genetically of Canadian natives or half a group C this data alone would be strong evidence to say Branch C represents the algae language family and This would be the first time I've been able to connect a specific Branch with a specific Nation or group of Nations but it gets better what if we bring in the U.S data once again the data match quite intriguingly again the algaec language family members in the United States living natives only 15 of the total and appropriately if haplogroup C is alject a small minority of the U.S haplogroup cnq
individuals are in in C There's almost this this Mirror Image as it should be so together these results are strong evidence if you've not followed anything I've said so far this is the main conclusion first time I've been able to connect a sub-branch of the family tree to a specific Nation or group of Nations haplogroup C is a very strong candidate for being the branch of the aljic language family you want to know the alject you want to Know Delaware history look at haplogroup C okay how does this bridge the gap between pre-climate archeology and
post-columbian Nations well it's step one I've been able to connect a specific Branch to a specific language family haplogroup C to the algae language family still work with me here because now we're going to connect this to Native history I said the problem with connecting this native history the Delaware nation's history is this chronological ambiguity there's a couple different dates liked in the record and if you extrapolate back in time you get a several Century difference well one of those dates is the 900s that's one of the possibilities again this is uh the Delaware's are
part of this larger algae language family it Goes without saying so we've got a native history that belongs to the algae language family on one hand I've got Y chromosome branches a specific sub-branch that I can connect to the algae language family that was this data right here and if you'll think back a few minutes ago to what I told you what we already knew going back to March 2022 about haplogroup C this arrives in the Americas about the 900s A.D so I think we have good scientific justification for using the chronology based on DNA
which we can connect to here which connects to here we can we can use this chronology to help resolve the ambiguity in the native history this data right here So we can instead of displaying it this way with well it could be the 200s it could be the 900s I think we have good scientific evidence to say the Delaware red record begins in the 900s A.D and now you can change these question marks to Hard dates we're still not yet at archeology but I said if we can do this now we can begin to connect
native histories to the archaeological record can we I've claimed that can we I'm going to draw your attention to one specific set of events in this red record history around the Mississippi River in what's now dated to the to the mid to late 1200s A.D Century 2 before Columbus here's the relevant section of the Lenny lenape's red record I'm going to read it to you I want to focus on the details here because this is where it gets explosive East east looking was the Sachem Melancholy about the war there was I'm setting it up here
for you to the Rising Sun you now must go he said many were those who Eastward went so there's there before the Mississippi there's somewhere else West and they're saying you gotta go east they separated at the Mississippi the lazy ones remained behind so by the way this red record itself talks about migration events so you think about the larger not just the Suing neighbors but the other members of the algae language family this red record is probably Clues to this as well when did the cree originate the part of the algae language family it's
probably one of the separation events recorded in this document so I can put a date now on that around 12 43 A.D is when they separated the Mississippi I can put dates when there's a Satan the lodge man was the Satan the Talega Possessed the East we can put a date on that 1251 roughly strong Ally was the Satan Lance the East asked for 1258 for that Eastward some travel to Lego King massacred them now I've just read two names that might be unfamiliar to you the talegas who are they the red record doesn't necessarily
tell us but it gives us some Clues it says they possessed the east so just to stop and summarize for a moment before we go to the Archaeological record what the red record says this anchored narrative puts them at the Mississippi by about 80 1250 an in confrontation with the telegas whoever they are whoever they are they're possessing the East so they're a powerful group of people now you might recall from the beginning of this time together That I mentioned from the archaeological record the city of Cahokia the greatest city north of the Rio Grande
before the arrival of Europeans and I say that because I'll just quote the textbook for you now this ancient North America Brian Fagan fagin was professor at UC Santa Barbara archaeological record of North America he says Cahokia flourished with what was probably the highest population density north of Mexico So that's his statement interesting Cahokia is now modern St Louis so the anchor Delaware narrative puts him at the Mississippi by 80 1250 not necessarily Saint Louis but it's a powerful enemy ruling the East and if you're looking at the archaeological record for candidates of powerful enemies
ruling the East Cahokia kind of comes to mind is that a is that a fair equivalence to Say the Delaware's are confronting the rulers of Cahokia we'll read on what the archaeological record says again quoting from this book textbook sedentary Villages prospered at or near Cahokia after ad 600. not a big not a big town not a big city at that point then apparently within a few decades around 80 10 50 a great Center emerged at Cahokia itself The height of its power was between 1050 and 1250. cahokia's power declined after ad 1250 when other
large centers Rose to prominence Moundville by the black Warrior River in West Central Alabama flourished between 80 1250 and Circa 1500. Mountainville here's an image of it in Alabama you can see it's not nearly as imposing or as large as some of the Mounds in Cahokia and just so that we're all on the same Page in terms of geography what this archaeological record implies is that Cahokia was this great city until about 1250 and then it declines but around the same time that it declines other sets of mound building cultures arise to the South Southeast
so I said the red record talks about the Delaware's arriving of the Mississippi confronting some powerful enemy ruling the east I paused that and said if we look at the archaeological record we've got this massive City on the Mississippi who just so happens to decline after 12 50. and following that decline there's new Mounds to the South as if perhaps whoever was ruling Cahokia left and restarted in the south now let's unpause the red record go back to that and see what else it says about the interactions between the delawares and these to Lagos whoever
they were who Possessed the east United enraged they all declared to battle destroy them the Iroquois are Northern friends then arrived to join them the Iroquois are joining the delawares to help them in battle sharp one was the Sachem the path maker across the river so apparently they cross the Mississippi 1266 I can assign a date now they won many victories there driving away the telegas still 1266. stirring Was The Sage I'm extremely strong with the talaga so they hadn't wiped them out yet that's 1273. breaking open was the Sachem capturing all the great towns
so roughly 1280 the crusher was the Sachem Southward flood over to Lagos 1288. interesting isn't it so the red record puts the Delaware's at the Mississippi about 12 50. then they cross it and they have a series of battles with the telegas eventually Conquering them and sending them to the South the archaeological record says Cahokia is this great city north of the Rio Grande probably the best candidate if you're looking for one for someone ruling the east they just so happened archaeologically to decline right about the time that apparently the Delaware's arrived and archaeologically there's
new Mounds to the South Which is what the Delaware record says is the direction that they sent the rulers of whoever the telegas were so the red record is almost an exact match to what the archaeological record says now that we have the red record anchored to affirm chronology so this journey recorded in the red record is quite impressive and what I've just told you isn't the Entire story we know the names of the men who led this greatest Conquest in the pre-columbian North American era if you're Anglo Caucasian like I am you may have
missed them the first time because you're not used to thinking the names of this way but let me remind you that you probably subconsciously already are when I talked about the movements of the Sioux Of the lakota's in the 1600s from Minnesota I showed this image and this is an image of a picture of Red Cloud one of their greatest Chieftains maybe you don't know his name but you probably know the names of other great Sioux Chiefs like big bull sits down you say why I don't know that name Sitting Bull you might know that
name that's the shortened version of big bull sits down one of my favorite names though perhaps of the Sioux and Chiefs would be young Man afraid of his horses now there's some debate if it's actually young man afraid of his horses as if he was afraid of his horses or it's young man whose horse is to be feared regardless hopefully what you see here and perhaps what you're even reminded of was the creative and functional way I might say that native nations would adopt names for themselves or be given names by their parents That same
pattern holds true within the red record who what what are the names of these leaders who conquered Cahokia the greatest conquerors in North America it seems in the pre-columbian era sharp one was the Sachem the pathmaker across the river they won many victories there stirring was the Sachem extremely strong with salagos breaking open was the say chimp captured in the great towns the crusher aptly named was the Satan Southward fled all the talegas finished them off it seems these men are the great Heroes the conquerors of the pre-columbia North American era we can now recover
this lost history begin to recover this lost history and restore the pre-clement era back to its rightful place and and uncover this history similar to how we understand European history there's a big there's a big difference between how you learn European history in school With names and places and people and events and the vague archaeological record North America this begins to change it now we have names we have Nations we have events we have Heroes this is the beginning of this conquers and this let me add to this it's not just that we have names
of these people and events with dates think about the alject language grouping as a whole they have if you look at the the groups In North America algae speakers Sue and catawban speakers hey I got the Baskin speakers the alject language family has more languages than any of them one more than even the athabascans which includes the novels and the Apaches this is based on data was looking at in February of this year 2023. more languages than the sun catalans 48 here 19 among the sun catawbans look how much Land the algaec language family groups
eventually conquered at the time of contact so the delawares and their relatives in the algae language family are some of the greatest conquerors in the pre-clem in North Americas Conquering the greatest city north of the Rio Grande and also one of the most geographically and linguistically successful pre-columbian communities and I should add though it perhaps goes Without saying one of the most meticulous pre-columbian communities of historians if they hadn't written down what they did and where they went and what transpired I wouldn't be able to tell you this story this raises the question of course
how much more history is waiting to be uncovered how much more lost history is out there for the taking for the re-learning There's huge untapped potential in the field of genetics so I've been able to align one branch sub-branch of the tree with one particular group how many more other branches are waiting to be connected to other nations and groups the second huge untapped Potential from what I can tell is other native accounts now I've since March of 22 gone further south and looked at Central America and South America and there's there's Incredibly detailed histories
there from the natives that align with this Y chromosome history that's that's going to be exploded that the mainstream Community just like they did for the Delaware say ah we can't trust it's mythological it's fake it's whatever but that genetics says no it's real and you're all insulting the native communities by rejecting them as real since March of 2022 we formed a Native American study group I already have as Members of this group we've got cree and you pick and Navajo and Cherokee and we're hoping to expand it and this is where I want to
make it make a a special appeal to anyone who's part of the algae language family or the suun kataban language family in part hopefully you've seen because we already have a really great start connecting a branch to the alject Language family to the red record and the red record talks about most likely other sub-branches of the algae Community when the chip when the when the chip was likely broke off or the cree or the arapa and so on Cheyenne that history is likely there and in y'all's communities there may be even more history that's untapped
that can further expand this account and re reveal to us what transpired in the pre-claiming world I mentioned The suun kadabins because one the red record talks about their enemies their neighbors and others it's probably talking about I mentioned the Euros tekkens the Shoshone they are geographically up near the likely path of the Delaware migration there's just so much more history but any Nation in North America and really if you're watching this in your Latin America we're wanting to expand into this as Well there's a tremendous untapped potential if you'd like to join us join
this already existing Native American community and one of one of the things we're hoping to do is begin with perhaps a hundred males so just to clarify here and I thought I had a slide for this but I guess I failed to have it uh oh here what would be most helpful from the genetics perspective is native males First Nation males who have a known Native ancestry that's not because we have specific preferences or want to discriminate it's simply if we want to understand the native history we need to find the native Y chromosomes so
if you're a male and you say yep all I know is as far back as I can tell it's been it's been native father grandfather great grandfather and so on you'd be a tremendous candidate for this I mentioned any Native American Community but there's special interest here in in these in particular but again any of these communities would be fantastic there's so much history left to be uncovered now that we've finally been able to close one of the gaps between pre-columbian archeology and post-columbian history how much more can we connect so if you want to
get in touch with me you go to Our home page so just to clarify then I work for Answers in Genesis I'm the research biologist we don't get government money this is not a this is not a government project we're a Christian organization our primary goal is to defend the history in Scripture it just so happens that if you start with the scriptures history all these historical events pop out from DNA and they restore to natives the history that the mainstream Community has Rejected and treated as forgeries as mythological as is whatever so this excites
me I'm not native but I'm excited to be able to hopefully give back to people's the history that's been taken away from them and I would love to work with you to do this ultimately the goal is that every Community around the globe native or non-native is if it takes ownership of This research runs with it and is able to uncover their own history and in a Sense give the world a gift of this history recover the lost history and then for the entire community be able to reveal it and Advance all of our knowledge
answers in genesis.org is our home page if you go to that homepage type in slash go Geo slash traced traced is the name of the book it'll pull up a page that looks like this there should be a button at the top of the page history hidden history of every people project which you can click on or you Just scroll down to the bottom of the page and you'll find a place to enter name email phone number if you want to a message this goes directly to my inbox this is how we formed the beginnings
of this Native American study group already so the Navajo when you pick in Korean and Cherokee connected contacted with me that way let me spoke by phone and by virtually I've been able to meet with at least one In person again we're hoping to grow this group maybe eventually have about a hundred native male volunteers which again if you're not strictly male history you're a lady you're welcome as well we have men and women as part of the group the genetic is just one aspect of this the native history is another huge aspect of this
trying to recover as many Native accounts as we can because so Many of them have been rejected or just dismissed come join the group I think there's tremendous amount of exciting things left to be discovered much more lost history to be recovered this is the book I've referred to repeatedly where we began to set this new framework for Native American history where I talk about how the red record aligns with the genetics we've done this is now another video series that we began in March of 2022 called Trace demon DNA's big surprise again go to
the answers and Genesis YouTube channel look for a playlist by that name there's I think like the third or fourth video in this series talks about the the new Y chromosome discoveries and how it lines up with Native history this is the older 2020 series that goes into much more detail about the red record episode 13. other books that you might be interested in if this is a Topic that piques your interest replacing Darwin talks about the larger creation Evolution issue which in a sense is unavoidable once you start challenging the mainstream narrative it raises
a thousand questions and this seeks to answer them this is a very strong defense from genetics of the biblical view of the Origin of Species and of course the human species our own species is one subset of this larger question This is sort of the cliff notes version of that same book in a one hour video somewhere you can find here or if you go to our streamingservice answers dot TV you can find that as well along with thousands of other videos we are the organization with the Creation Museum and the Ark encounter in here
in Northern Kentucky so come visit us and especially for Native and you come visit we'd love to meet you in person If you want to contact me a different way I do have accounts set up on multiple social media channels in addition to Facebook and Twitter so you can you can do the answers in genesis.org Go slash Trace to go directly to my email or you can contact me this way as well I've talked to all sorts of folks that way thank you so much for joining us this has been the Lost history of North
America's spectacular new insights into the Pre-columbian world and my hope is this is just the beginning of the closure of the gap between pre-columbian archaeological records post-contact history one discovery of many more to come please join us again I hope to get in touch with you with many more of you thanks again for joining us
