Jesus is indeed a transvestite! I was born sexist. .

. but I am working on it. .

. A video spread on social media shows a 4-year old touching him. Often, all that is missing in our lives is Sex Education.

In November 2020, gender ideology was on the Supreme Court’s agenda. The most controversial item is related to gender ideology. Schools would be obliged to adopt principles, which states that people are not born men or women.

. . they choose their sex afterwards, while they are being educated.

In 2014, when Congress voted the national education plans, A movement against gender policies emerged in the country. Thanks to the pressure from society, members of Congress removed gender items from the plan. It is on the ADIn.

Anyone can find it on the Supreme Court website. This ADIn consists of 52 pages. The party affirms that this removal is unconstitutional because the Constitution states that we must not discriminate.

We agree. We do not want people to be discriminated. This is not the point.

People cannot see where the manipulation lies. Unsatisfied with the many losses gender ideology faced in Brazil, PSOL referred the matter to the Supreme Court. Another big demonstration was held.

Representatives, listening to people’s voices, requested a meeting with the Chief Justice, who accepted this request and to remove them from the agenda. They were successful, in time, to address the voting. There is a big difference between adismissal and the removal.

So, this is not a victory. We have only gained time. .

. Time to seek clarification. Time for people to understand what gender is, demonstrate their opinion to Congress.

Otherwise, on this and on many other matters, The Supreme Court doing the same thing to the people. The law proposed by PSOL follows a trend in the Western world. In the past few years, countries adopted laws to punish who don’t respect new nomenclature.

In Canada, the Supreme Court convicted of domestic violence a father who refused to refer to his daughter as a boy. In addition, the Court issued a protective order, which allowed him to be immediately imprisoned if he addressed her as a girl either in public or privately. In the U.

S. , the California state approved a law that imposes a fine, and one-year imprisonment, for people who deliberately and continuously misuse pronouns. In England, a 38-year-old mother was arrested at home, in front of her children, for addressing a transgender woman as a man on Twitter.

These one-off events are becoming regular in many countries and reflect an increasingly present culture. Do you know the difference between sex and gender? We are going to talk a little about gender and sexuality.

We are going to discuss gender and nature. What is sexual orientation? What is gender identity?

We will now address A very important matter. . .

gender and sexuality. Many people are not familiar with these words yet, the differences between gender and sexuality. What is the difference between sexuality and gender?

We have seen many youtubers, personalities and even artists, who should not have such intellectual authority, commenting on gender issues. Judicial and legislative activism, through proposals like the ADIn, bills that were proposed by Jean Wyllys, Erika Kokay, etc. , all of them are based on a concept Of "gender" been different to "sex".

One of the major feminists advocating for gender ideology. . .

is Judith Butler. She became famous in Brazil because she has recently been here. Her presence raised a storm of controversy.

No! No! No to this ideology!

She defines gender as this dichotomy, this differentiation between gender and sex. On page 25 of one of her most famous books. .

. "Gender Trouble", she says: "Originally conceived to question the formulation “biology is destiny”, the sex/gender distinction. .

. helps the thesis that, although sex may not seem to be disputable, in biological terms, gender is culturally construed. " And she goes on: "genders should not be restricted to two.

” And, on page 27, "even 'sex' may be as culturally built as gender. " If I was born a man, but I behave as a woman and dress as a woman, I have a different gender. In order to understand gender theory, gender policy, gender perspective, gender equality, or gender ideology, we have to understand the following.

. . There is a history, which started in the 1960s, with Dr Money, a sexologist who, by chance, finds the perfect situation to develop a theory that only lacked for a guinea pig.

He is known for studying transsexuals and transvestites. One of his first experiments involved the Reimer family. Dr John Money addresses this case On his book "Sexual Signatures".

On page 81, he describes this family. . .

"There was a family who lived in the countryside. The couple conceived twins, who were named Brian and Bruce. When they were around 6-month-old, They developed phimosis problems.

" Their parents looked for a hospital that would operate on the babies, who were only 6 months old. The first one to have surgery was Bruce. But medical malpractice caused the mutilation of Bruce’s penis.

The couple then had two baby twins, one of which mutilated. In a certain occasion, the parents, full of anguish, watched on the TV. .

. so that you can see Dr Money’s prominence back then, a show where Dr Money presented a transvestite, a person who had a sex change operation, and therefore was a successful experiment, demonstrating that a man could be a woman and vice-versa, easily and successfully. So parents started to look for this alternative, the alternative of reassuring sex to the child’s identity.

So Dr Money and other specialists convinced them to raise Bruce as a girl. So they changed his name to Brenda. They were also convinced that later, when the child was 12, they could do a plastic surgery so she could have a vagina made by plastic surgeons.

On Dr Money’s book, we see that he had great expectations with this experiment. He says: “Since the child had barely begun to speak when the parents decided to reform, there was an excellent likelihood that sexual identity was not yet very differentiated in the male direction. ” Dr Money was a researcher who believed that a child should start the transformation before reaching 2 years old and this would be successful.

Later, one of his intellectual opponents decided to go further in the case. Dr Diamond ended up finding the Reimer family. He found Brian, the old Bruce (now Brenda) and their parents.

He came across a devastated family. The father and the mother were alcoholic, schizophrenic, with psychological problems and depression. His brother, Brian, was already schizophrenic and with drug problems, and ended up even dying from an overdose.

When Dr Diamond finally found Brenda, he told her case had been sold as a success story. This made Bruce, now Brenda, disgusted and led him to tell his story. He started to remake his biography and find out what was said about him.

And he told the world that this experiment had failed. And everything Dr John Money wrote about that case was a lie. Since childhood, Bruce, now Brenda, didn’t feel comfortable wearing pink clothes, didn’t fit in school, had trouble socializing, didn’t feel like a girl, was more aggressive and liked boyish games.

Then Dr Diamond also discovered that these annual meetings that Dr Money had with the brothers were extremely violent and even criminal. They report having been subjected to staging sexual relationships between the brothers. The objective would be to fix on the children's heads who was the male and female.

All of these absurdities were only revealed later, when Bruce, or Brenda, decided to tell his story. So this first experiment by Dr John Money resulted the death of his brother Brian and the suicide of David Reimer. Bruce, who became Brenda then David, ended up committing suicide in adulthood.

Even after trying to build a family, he was unable to deal with the trauma of his story. And the parents, visibly shaken, in alcoholism and depression. .

. So, the Reimer family was destroyed by gender ideology. So we see that there was a phase in which this gender theory, this concept, although it still did not have that name, tried to establish itself through science.

It tried to be sold as a scientific proposal. We see that it failed as a science. Alfred Kinsey, Dr John Money.

. . All these personalities who tried to sell this gender fluidity, or this sexual differentiation through choice, decision and education, proved to be frauds.

All of these experiments have failed. If they failed as a science, why do they thrive as an ideology? This is important.

The feminist movement embraced this idea of sexual reframing. So we see in the 50s, at the same time that it failed scientifically in the hands of Dr John Money, it appeared ideologically in the hands of feminists. From feminist waves.

. . There is the first wave, which is the path that was being structured and people know it as “the vote”.

But there was still no gender theory. We are talking about the two waves, the second and third waves. In the 2nd wave, the feminist movement had two great thinkers.

Betty Friedan and Simone de Beauvoir. Betty Friedan, an American, spoke mainly to the bourgeois. Simone de Beauvoir, a French socialist, spoke to left-wing feminists.

But the two had something in common: contempt for femininity. We have the main work of the 20th century, which underlies all of this. Simone de Beauvoir's work: “The Second Sex”, where she says that the oppression of women is maintained by the existence of men and women, by binarism.

She opens this in 1949 and says: "Women have achieved civil and political rights, but women have not yet achieved freedom. " Why didn't you achieve that freedom? Because there is still an oppression of the role of women, who still have the option, in their imagination, of being a mother and being a woman in her own right.

Betty Friedan, for example, published a book called “Feminine Mystique”. That is, for her the feminine and femininity are a mystic. A myth and an invention.

She spreads this book among American women, saying that everything we know as motherhood as feminine, professional preferences like nursing, pedagogy, caring for children and the elderly, domesticity and any feminine characteristics are just propaganda and male invention to oppress women. Betty Friedan sells this idea that feminine does not exist. Simone de Beauvoir, at the same time in France, writes “One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman”, mainly related to the materialism and existentialism of Sartre, her husband, she defends that being feminine depends on a decision and social construction.

They are the first fruits of the idea of gender, despite not having that name yet. Both French and Americans are poisoned with this idea, that femininity and masculinity are constructions, so they are false. They are artificial and are not natural.

We also have Julia Kristeva, who said: "Strictly speaking, you can't say that there are women. " The feminism that claims to represent women since the 2nd wave of the feminist movement, begins to bring writers, thinkers, protagonists of the feminist movement, who challenge their own femininity and manage to use the gender ideology in favor of the feminist movement. That is why we say today that gender ideology is the 3rd wave of the feminist movement.

Simone de Beauvoir opens a path, which not only Frida will write about it, but other feminists are beginning to theorize about the existence of a woman. This theory will be developed later by other feminists, mainly by Butler. His main work, “Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity”, show in subtitle what you want.

It is to say that there is no identity, something determined. As we saw in Judith Butler's book, if the genre is fluid, then it cannot be reduced to 2. There are feminists who say there are from 5 to 7 genders.

And feminists who say that there are as many genders as there are people. There are bizarre records of adults who think they are children. Human beings who think they are cats, tigers.

. . These oddities already exist.

At this point, gender ideologues manage to create gender fluidity. In her work, Butler gives this idea that in order to achieve true freedom, without a society that continues to generate violence, we must modify, through language, all man's understanding of himself, that this was an imposition. Gender is, in fact, the liberation from this system.

When a man says “sex”, male or female, he is in a linguistic prison. Gender would be linguistic liberation. The ideological patrol elected its newest enemy, the Portuguese language.

There are growing social networks and outside the net who advocate the adoption of gender neutral. "She" and "he", become "they". "They are friendx".

The importance of using correct pronouns with trans people. Wow, you look gorgeoux! Wow, you look marvelloux!

"She" or "he" can be "they". Or "them". If you want to comment on my photo or praise me, then you write "pretty".

It's wrong. It is important to know that there are changes in language that can propose changes in reality. We must have a specific language for us.

And you should respect that. On November 12, 2020, the Franco-Brazilian high school sent a letter to the students' parents, saying they would adopt the gender nomenclature in their vocabulary. For “renewing their commitment to promoting respect for diversity”, the new language adopted by the school aims to combat machismo and sexism against children who do not identify themselves as male or female.

This idea of using these neutral pronouns and exchanging letters for X, Y, A and O, Z or @ is not a new idea. Even Monique Wittig is widely quoted by Judith Butler. It is one of the theorists that she mentions most in her book.

She advocated this change. When this started with the exclusion of father and mother, changing to parent 1 and 2, an idea by Monique Wittig was already applied. For Monique Wittig, feminist of the 3rd wave, language is one of the greatest oppressive forces.

In the West, language is sexist and phallocentric, in Monique Wittig's opinion. Hence the importance of changing it. Then we start talking about defending gender identity, and we start to deconstruct the language itself.

Of course, we have neutral pronoun in other countries. But in Portuguese it is different. And then you start wanting to put something that is not even in our imagination, our reality and the language itself.

In Rio de Janeiro, we have Pedro II School, which was publicly known because in its exam, a photo was taken and posted on the internet, in which the word “aluno” (student) is erased and replaced by “alunx”, changing the language and pleading the idea of changing customs, based on a new ethics. Gender is part of a new ethics to be applied via education, beginning at an early age to deconstruct sexuality and human identity through a child's way of understanding. The school is very important.

The school is the environment for the understanding of what they have in mind, to work. So you need to start at an early age. If you do that with gender theory, in 30 years we will have a very modified society.

A truly transformed society, as they write in their books. So we will see many quotes talking about social transformation, a new society, a new normal. This new normal, which goes through a gender issue, and a new understanding of relationships.

The LGBT lobby has also come to sports. During the Olympic Games in Rio, the International Olympic Committee decided to change the rules for the participation of transsexual athletes in official competitions. Since then, the Committee understands that sex-change surgery is no longer necessary, requiring athletes to only control the testosterone level below 10 nmol per liter of blood for at least 12 months before the competition.

It was a political maneuver, because it had no scientific basis or research or analysis of human biology. It was simply based on an article, and the IOC used that single article to change the whole policy, which was not only very harmful to women, but also called into question anti-doping policies. In 2017, the volleyball Superliga had its first transsexual athlete.

Tifanny Abreu, born Rodrigo, changed sex at age 28, after she’d played men’s volleyball in small European leagues. As a male athlete, Rodrigo never stood out, but his Superliga performance was very different. In Bauru’s 3x2 defeat against Praia Clube, by scoring 39 points, Tiffany broke a Superliga record.

The 37 points mark was established by Osasco’s Tandara, one of the major Brazilian players. This above-average performance has raised a storm of controversy. She has been fighting for her rights, but physical strength is an issue, as she’s much stronger than us.

She jumps higher. Her muscle fibers are stronger. Her body is different from women’s.

If there were no differences between man and woman, our net would 2. 43 m high, the same as men’s. ”It’s a fucking man!

”, Bernardinho says. This false inclusive policy, which excludes women in all areas, started affecting women’s university life. Many girls.

. . and boys, as well, with athletic abilities invest time, money and training to win athlete scholarships from good universities.

Now, here in the U. S. , these scholarships are being given to biological boys, 16 and 17-year old boys taking away girls’ opportunities.

If one girl missed an athlete scholarship for this, that would be enough for us to carry on this fight. But it’s not about one girl. .

. hundreds of them have been losing scholarships to biological boys. The worst part of this is that such proposals are sold as if they improved lives, as if homosexuals and gender dysphoric people would have their life improved or their problems eased, be it by using neutral pronouns, by these anti-bullying campaigns at schools.

. . which, in fact, is not true.

You are selling an illusion to them, and this is the most serious aspect. Pediatric associations all around the world and physicians have issued opinions on this. One of the most famous documents was issued by ACPeds, and discusses 8 topics on sex and gender.

When a child has difficulties in relation to its sex identity, the problem is probably in their mind, not the body. These initiatives involving child hormone treatment, or even surgeries, mutilating kids based on an inferred problem, is more of a hindrance than a help. As disclosed by the same association, 40% of transgender people commit suicide, that is, of all these people subjected to these treatments, sex change, surgeries, and hormones, 4 out of 10 commit suicide.

This is a huge number! The association has also notified that the suicide rate is 20 times higher among who resignify their sex, by hormone treatment or surgery. So, why immediately look for.

. . Why do they try first what brings more problems to kids and teens?

It seems like such actions lack love and empathy, and don’t protect as gay or feminist movements say they do. A lot of nonsense happens in the name of beliefs, and this is the case. .

. people wanting to forbid teachers to call students he and she, boy and girl. And inner confusion, such as the case of Dr Money and Brian.

Seeing what happens in his life, everyone saying that he is not what he sees he is. What happens? Increase in suicides.

Remember this documentary. If suicide rates increase, if depression increases, because the drugs that sell the most in the country are anxiolytics and antidepressants, from an age group of 19 to 29 years, that do not have enough trauma to receive this medication, imagine children with identity problem? The real perspective of such a society is that of a sick society.

A society that prevents you from being and speaking freely. This, in the name of a law. By law you impose and prevent people from being free.

They wanted to free people, but they are enslaving them. We don't have to go very far. We talk about the case of Dr John Money, who did a violent and criminal experiment with two children, but we have an example here in Brazil as well.

Recently a lesbian couple undertook a homemade gender experiment with a Brazilian child. This case became very famous because the boy Rhuan was only 9 years old. The lesbians cut Rhuan's penis with a rudimentary kitchen instrument, and the boy was left with pain, inflammation and infection for over 1 year, as he was mutilated by his own mother and ended up dying, a year after this rudimentary experiment.

Their explanation and motives of these feminist lesbians were simply gender transformation. For the first time in 6 decades of history, a trans woman will compete at the Miss Brazil pagent. At the age of 4, she asked her mother to wear boy clothes and change your name.

Which bathroom should be used by a transsexual person? The debate is stalled in the Federal Supreme Court. Mato Grosso court authorized the change in the birth certificate of a 9-year-old child who was born a boy, but behaves and sees himself as a girl.

The judge of Balneário Camboriú upheld 5 requests for changes in name and gender. It is an unprecedented decision in Santa Catarina. The process is the first step in the search for the rights of transsexuals.

This year's slogan was “Power for LGBTI+, our vote, our voice”. The intention is to affirm, in an election year, the importance of political engagement and the choice of candidates aligned with the thinking of these groups. 25 trans people were elected to the country's city councils in these elections, according to the National Association of Transvestites and Transsexuals.

GERAÇÃO SEM GÊNERO | AS GRANDES MINORIAS (EPISÓDIO 2)