Padre Hesse #04 - Os Problemas da Missa Nova [LEGENDADO]

And here we are already at today's topic the Holy Mass what happens to mass now first you have to know that the so-called trientine mass or the so-called Latin Mass those are both uh confusing terms because uh there is no such thing such thing as a Latin mass in the in the way it is used nowadays and there's no such thing as a trientine mass there is only uh the mass right of the Catholic Latin Church you see the Catholic Church consists of the Latin right the ambrosian right the right of Braga the uh right

of uh the most Arabic visigothic right the sarum right the penion right the Dominican right and the Eastern right and they all have different liturgies even though those liturgies uh have one thing in common they all express the idea of the real presence of the Lord on on the Altar and they all Express is the idea of the Propitiatory sacrifice that means a sacrifice not just for praise and thanksgiving but a sacrifice for the Redemption of sin and uh all of these rights go back to the Latin right which we use which was the original

right used by St Peter in Rome not in every detail as we know it but in many parts now the Roman Canon you have to understand the Canon is the part of mass between the s do holy holy holy until communion the Canon of mass Is something that goes back to the times of the Apostles so it's not not just 400 years old it doesn't just go back to the Council of Trent it goes back to the to the time of the Apostles and when St Gregory the Great my patron saint when he changed he

was Pope between 590 and 604 when he added the word the noos into a part theonas to the h Agy tour of the Canon the people in Rome were outraged and they threatened to kill him because he had Dared to touch lgy this we're talking about the year 600 already by then the concept of the unchangeability of the mass had been developed later on after Gregory the Great nobody dared to add anything to the Canon of MTH nobody dared to any to add to change anything in the proper or the order of math until pus

I 12 who was not the great conservative as some people like to see him in their romantic thoughts until P the 12 uh ignored this Tradition and had ano bonini those of you who have heard about the noas oras and his and their and and his creator have heard the name bonini and those of you who will read father trenchard's excellent book book on the topic we hear about the uh anib bonini anib bonini was discovered promoted and made by uh Pope pus the 12 and it is of no consequential interest to us if it

was in reality Secretary of State who did it or the pope himself the pope is Always responsible no matter how and uh that was the first change in liturgy the right of Palm Sunday Holy Thursday Good Friday and Holy Saturday was changed something that did not happen in the the 1500 years before because when p i with his uh uh Everlasting document qu primum in 1570 canonized that means set the rules forever canonized the mass that was nothing else but the mass used by the Roman CA and Rome on the dasis of Rome he outlawed

any further change any future change so uh I'll explain later why so what P 12 did was the beginning of the lurgical reform the lurgical reform did not start with Paul the 6 of most infelicitous memory but it started with pus the 12 now why is it that mass must not change that's very simple the oldest lurgical rule in the church is in Latin Lex orand Lei the law of what has to be believed results from the law of what has to be prayed now when our Lord and the sermon of the mount said I

want you to say the Our father and then he said the Our Father to make us known uh to make it known to us what he wanted us to say he established a rule of prayer now this rule of prayer made the faith and not the other way around we have to adjust our faith uh to what Our lord said in the Our father and not the other way around we cannot take the Our father and change it around to a New Faith or to a new adaptation of the faith to the 20th century uh

therefore the highest lurgical law says the Liturgy is the basis of the faith the Liturgy what the Liturgy says is what you believe so if the Liturgy changes the faith changes the faith never changes is we know that once the church establishes A dogma of Faith no future Pope can change it and before I go on talking about the Liturgy you have to understand the following the pope is not infallible unless he says so and unless he wants to be so if the pope prefers PE over New England clam child that has nothing got to

do with the face he's not infallible if the pope at the Angelos Domin says that his favorite sanctuary of our lady is is Loro I'm not interested that's a Personal message from a person unless the Pope says I with the auth authority bestowed upon me by Jesus Christ I as the bishop of Rome and the bishop of the entire Catholic Church define declare and statute I'm not interested in what he says unless he defines declares or statues he cannot be infallible he cannot do pronounce an infallible truth he does not have the necessary help of

the Holy Spirit the present Pope for Example never did so except maybe and that can be doubted maybe on the question about women's ordination which is obviously excluded and always will be excluded I don't need the president Pope to know that but that's the only time he used that formula so when the Pope says for example the present Pope the pro Protestants can be saved by the efforts of their own church he's nothing but a plain ordinary heretic and uh that has nothing got to do with his Infallible magisterium he has not the help of

the holy spirit for that and he does not and he did not say I define declare and statue that a Protestant can be saved by the efforts of his own church he just said it in one of his encyclical he said it in katees trender number 32 so uh the pope is not infallible on the contrary he is bound to what his predecessors decreed statute and Define and only in matters that have not Been settled by his predecessors he can claim infallibility that must be very clear to you the pope is bound to accept the

Liturgy that he receives from his predecessors as a matter of fact in the old uh uh uh oath of incarnation the indicum pontifices which was first solemnly signed and and mailed to the uh then princes and kings and the emperor in Europe and other way otherwi in other Places this oath of incarnation uh was the first time given by uh Pope St agat I 1 in 600 AD three I think it was so uh quite a long time ago and this also of for Incarnation has been signed by every single Pope until innocent the8 and

it has been spoken by the popes ever since and this o of incarnation among other things says should we or anybody else dare to change these things God will not be a Merciful judge to us so he's the the pope uh at the moment of incarnation swears an oath before God that he will not change what he has been handed over by his predecessors in the dogma of infallibility pronounced the 18th of July 1870 by pop the 9th the fourth chapter says the purpose of the papacy is to guide to con to uh to watch

over the doctrine and to explain it Faithfully to interpret it Faithfully the pope has not been given the Holy Spirit to proclaim a new doctrine and many theologians whom you can never quote against the pope but who can you you you can use as advisers many theologians have stated many theologians who have been endorsed by popes and endorsed in their particular statements by popes have said a pope who dares to change the entire liturgy puts himself outside the church does that mean the Pres Pope is Not Pope no it doesn't mean it because the president

Pope never said that he has the right to change the Liturgy he just celebrates another liturgy which is sad but we can't change it and we're not interested in what he does in that sense and in that case so you see the Liturgy is something that cannot be changed if the pope or any other of the pastors dares to change it he's wrong and the Council of Trent and the seventh session of in the 13th Canon says whoever says That the any of the pastors of the church now that includes the pope doesn't it any

of the pastors of the church the first pastor of the church is the pope whoever says that any of the pastors of the church May omit or add anything to the Liturgy or uh add change the Liturgy or write up a new liturgy he's outside the church whoever says so so if anybody says the pope has the right to change the Liturgy he's not a Catholic that's against the defined Dogma of the Council of train you can look it up seventh session Canon 13 anybody who doesn't believe me can have the footnotes so uh the

new liturgy is against Divine Law the new liturgy is something that is not it's not a work of the church it is not Opus eclesia it has been decreed by it has not been decreed by Paul the 6 it has been permitted by Paul the 6 it has been permitted by the present Pope it has Been used by Paul the 6 and the present Pope against the will of God against Divine Law and against what the Council of Trent and many other popes and councils before the present ones defined not recommended or suggested defined and

declared to be binding forever this is not the only reason however why we must reject the new liturgy the whole no Ordo and its structure this is just the the the reason scen from the Viewpoint of Divine Law and natural law and eternal law there is a reason in the new liturgy itself which will make any Catholic who sees through things refuse the new liturgy matter of fact the first reason why I decided never to celebrate the noas order again was because I found out that the Catholic priest cannot remain a Catholic celebrating this Mass

but why well first of all we have to see what is cathol Catholic teaching under Unholy MTH the Council of Trent Defines that mass is the unbloody repetition of the sacrifice of Calvary of our Lord Jesus Christ it is a propitiatory sacrifice and not just a sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving now here Dr Martin Luther said that mass was only Thanksgiving and praise and not propitiatory that means for the for the forgiving of sins now her Doctor Martin Luther is as we know a heretic and the Lutheran are Heretics and the lutherans Never Had MTH

the Council of Trent also defined that U the uh Holy Mass is uh offered first of all for the greater glory of the Blessed Trinity then for the forgiving of the sins and then among other things for Thanksgiving and praise and and uh and and for Thanksgiving the first purpose is the praise of Our Lord the Blessed Trinity the second purpose is the propitiatory aspect of mass the Sacrifice of Christ on the on on on Mount uh Cavalry to uh for for forgive for the Forgiveness of our sins and the third purpose of mass of

the the main purposes the third purpose of mass is Thanksgiving to God it's not the first it's not the second in the New Order of mass published not decreed by Paul the 6 of most infelicitous memory published by him I say published because the only decree ever on the new missile signed by The pope is a decree that says I like this book and talking about the constit do apostol Roman of uh uh I think it was November 1970 Pope Paul the 6 signed that and Pope Paul the6 said he likes the book and he

adds three Eucharistic prayers to the already existing Canon of mass so Paul the six never said that I have to use the new Missile it was the congregation who said so but the congregation cannot decide something behind the back of the popee even if the pope afterwards silently agrees this however is of no importance to me the point is here there was a mass an order of mass published that does not mention anymore the first purpose of mass the greater glory of the Trinity it does not mention anymore the propitiatory sacrifice it only mentions the

sacrifice It only mentions the sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving but generally speaking praise it doesn't mention in particular the Blessed Most Blessed Trinity and it nowhere mentions the real presence of Our Lord on the altar it nowhere mentions the fact that the moment the priest in the Name of Christ in the person of Christ pronounces the word of words of of consecration the the body the blood and intimately connected with that the soul And the Divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ are rendered present on the author now the lutherans believe that our Lord Jesus Christ

is present only subjectively that means uh as long as you believe it he is present for you in in in in in your appreciation in your faith and your personal interpretation of what happened the Council of Tren says from the moment of consecration until the particles are uh either invisible or gone our Lord Jesus Christ is present replacing the substance of the bread and the wine with his own substance even though the appearance is kept you understand that this is a very Elementary part of the Catholic faith otherwise we we would be cookie worshippers I

mean this is what you get to hear from the Protestants sometimes oh the Catholics the pist then their pist the cookie worshippers well today they Are with priest not celebrating Mass validly anymore you get a piece of spread in the altar you get a a uh sometimes a priest who's not even uh dressed for Mass behind a a sort of ironing board saying hello to the people saying a lot of blah blah doing some gestures that have become meaningless and then some people still kneel before that of course that's cookie worship but we're talking about

what the church says about mass and the church says the the Body the blood the the the the soul and the Divinity of Christ are present in the moment of consecration the new mass does not speak about that very cleverly when uh a group of theologians among them a majority of Protestants by the way you have to understand that the new right was written by a majority of Protestants and not Catholics I know that because I worked two years for Cardinal stickler who was Member of that group he was called the consilium the council and

uh I think of it was some nine members and seven of them were Protestants something like that I don't remember the exact number but you can look it up and uh they wrote up a new mass now I told you before that this is not possible that's against the will of the church and against the will of Christ so the mass is illegal but what They wrote up is even worse it beats anything you will see in an Anglican prayer book the Anglican uh what is the Anglican missile called the the the common prayer book

in the Anglican common prayer books many things of the Catholic mass are retained that you do not find in the no in the nov OR in Latin let alone in the English translation and you will read in Father fart's book that he believes and so do I That practically we can't say all we cannot say most of all we don't know but practically more or less all the masses celebrated in English language no order are invalid masses that means you do not con confect the sacrament you do not have the real presence of Our Lord

on the altar but it's just a meaningless Act of a new religion that's in English translation I think very very probable and I agree with father pinchard on this point in The Latin original it's different but uh that's of little concern to you because you will hardly ever find a new Mass celebrated in Latin now the reason for this is very clear when we study the infallible document Apostolic shur issued by Pope Leo the 13th over the question if Anglican ministers are validly ordained priests or not uh in the last century and the centuries before

many many uh uh clergymen of the Anglican uh right and Many Catholic Bishops and Priests discussed the question are uh Anglican ministers validly ordained priests in the Catholic sense of the word validly ordained means real priests forever who are able to celebrate mass or are they just appointed ministers without having received the holy sacrament of ERS and Leo the 13th said there's three things necessary for for for for a valid ordination or a valid Sacrament the matter the form and the intention or the Matter is easy we have to have a host on the altar

period you can't use a cookie you can't use a honey you can't use a bagel and we have to have wine on the altar it won't do with Coke that's the the matter of the mass the form is you have to say this is my body at least and this is my blood at least if the priest was to say this is Christ's blood forget it it's not valid now the intention the church cannot judge your intention and my intention The church does the church cannot judge what you think and what you really want but

the church can judge what you manifest to want say for example in the old days when a priest walked out 6:00 in the morning dead tired but dressed nicely for Mass walked out and said his MTH you had the impression he wanted to do what the church does otherwise why bother might have stayed in bed if on the other hand you have a priest coming out of the sacy dressed in Jeans and sweater and uh pay and then he does everything anything everything and anything but what you find in the Roman missile you will see

his intention is obviously not to do what the church does because the church does not do that the church uses her own lurgical books which was got rubrics in there which you have to follow and they have words in there which you have to read so that's the intention manifested sometimes a priest who has The intention to do what the church does cannot do it like if I find myself in the jungle and there's no missile around absolutely no no missile available and no bread available no wine I can't celebrate Mass period sometimes a priest

might have a missile but he cannot celebrate Mass with it because the missile is the wrong missile it might be written in Hebrew and he can't read it or it might be an Anglican Missile and about the Anglican common prayer books Leo the said you cannot use it for a Sacrament why because the Anglican Church officially says there is no sacrifice of mass there is no real presence of Our Lord in the Altar and there is no real priesthood so whatever they print in this book it can't be valid the book is determined not to

celebrate math it's determined to have a Nice uh entertaining evening prayer and uh with the new epist of Paul the 6 the thing is in a doubtful situation on one hand the Catholic church out there this counterfeit Catholic Church which I what I call it the Catholic Church of the modernists of the new Bishops and the new priests officially however says officially does not deny clearly and always the presence on of the Blessed Sacrament on the Altar and does not Always say there is no sacrif of mass in the sense of forgiving the sins the

pope at least still sticks to that however they make it manifest that they do not believe in the presence of the uh real in the real presence of Our Lord on the Altar and I will give you one example to show you how intentions become manifest in this case intentions of the American Bishop's conference and Rome it was a couple of Protestants and Catholics Protestant and Catholics who Some 10 or 12 years ago go signed an open letter to the pope complaining about the fact that you can see wine stains in the wall to--all carpet

in Catholic churches right there where communion is distributed under both kinds host and chalice and they could see the wine stains in the bright gray uh Walter wall carpet and they said the Catholics said we believe this is the blood of Our Lord how can you do this And the Protestant said you tell us this is the blood of Our Lord how can you do this you know what the what what the answer Rome was the sacred congregation for the Liturgy signed the letter to the American Bishop's conference given them plain faculty to decide to

distribute communion under both kinds whenever they want this is manifested intention not to confect the sacrament on the altar or to confect Much worse a sacrilege here Rome was officially endorsing the sacrilege or the symbol of communion where it doesn't matter if you spill a drop of wine or not because it's wine anyway it's symbolic wine so you can interpret Rome's answer either way and either way it does not correspond with the intention to do what the church does so you can see from these things that we at least have to have grave doubt about

The validity of the new Mass the church throughout 2,000 years has explicitly over and over again outlawed the participation in a doubtful Sacrament the church has always decreed and commanded the faithful to stay away from doubtful ceremonies and the church has never allowed anything but the safer course as a matter of fact when innocent III Pope Innocent theii was asked if you could celebrate a certain was a question About a certain lurgical local custom if you were allowed to use it even though it put a question mark on the validity of the sacrament but you

should use it for pastoral purposes to attract more faithful in sent the third answered no the safer course must always be adopted you can never use for something as sacred as the sacraments anything doubtful and if you do you engrave sin and Disobedience to the church and this is the reason why a Catholic who wants To remain a Catholic must not participate in a new order mass and I will explain this to you in detail because this concerns all of us in in in daily life life first of all we are not allowed to participate

in the new mass for the simple reason that the new mass is against the against Divine Law as I have shown to you how can you fulfill I mean this is absurd how can you fulfill Sunday obligation by participating in Something that is against Divine Law it's ridiculous second the church has always insisted on the safer course how can you participate in something which is evidently a doubtful ceremony third the church has always insisted that liturgy must correspond to the faith because the faith is based on liturgy how can you participate in a ceremony that

does not represent the Catholic faith read the new English Mistle and read the Baltimore cism read what is said about mass in the Baltimore catechism and read the uh the Eucharistic prayers in the new English missile in your Sunday missile of the new Mass you will see that the uh Baltimore catechism talks about our Lord Blessed Trinity talks about the sacrifice of Cavalry talks about the uh sacrifice of uh the propitiatory sacrifice he talks about The real presence of the of the body and the blood on the altar the new missile talks about the poor

people in prison talks about the PO the poor disadvantaged it talks about the people who are uh uh uh forgotten it talks about man man man and man oh excuse me man and woman man and woman man and woman man and woman we want to be politically correct it talks about uh persons the whole newy is concerned with persons let's pray for this person that This person may personalize personalize herself more personal it does not talk about the fact that we that the purpose of our existence is the praise of the of the Most Blessed

Trinity and it can because all the prayers that mentioned the old Doctrine have been left out in the new right and we will go through this at the end the reason why uh I gave you the reason why you cannot be present why you should not be and must not be a tend no Orass however there's one exception only if somebody in the family dies if somebody in the family uh marries and you would upset the whole family the whole uh as the Jews call it MH and uh the whole clan and the whole Dynasty

then you may attend but do not say Amen because Amen in Hebrew does not mean okay it's all right Amen in Hebrew means yes yes yes and you don't want to say yes through sacrilege why is it a Sacrilege now Mass first of all starts the the real Mass the Latin mass the trientine mass the mass of all times the mass that most of all Saints and popes ever celebrated mass starts with the the mentioning of the altar inar day a priest approaches the altar an altar is not a dining table an altar in the

concept of the English language and all other languages throughout history is the very place where you do a sacrif sacrifice you place a Sacrifice the uh the priest in ancient Greece when he was sacrificing different types of animals to uh the Greek gods Palace Athena and all the others he would not have dared to face the people instead of facing the the statue of palas a in the panon in Athens it was an altar on an altar a sacrifice is uh offered up and not a dinner so the the concept of the auar had to

go therefore the Psalm 42 was left out Already uh by Paul the 6 before the uh the new mask came up then you have the offeror uh there cannot be a sacrifice without an offeror you cannot you cannot uh in no religion ever throughout history there was an a sacrifice without an offeror without a priest first picking up the lamb and saying I offer this to you our Lord before he slaughtered the lamb or whatever the animal was that had to be sacrificed even in those horrible Pagan rights that Fortunately were massacred like the uh

the the uh like uh the what is it C cartago uh they sacrificed babies to the Malak they threw babies into the fire as an offering to God fortunately this religion was massacred by the Romans but uh or the atics the atics offered up to 40,000 a day to the gods cutting out the heart of the life prisoner now somehow those politically correct people today never mention these facts it's strange however even there The priest would first take up the uh the stone dagger say a prayer offering to one of the aster gods and before

he carved out the heart of the prisoner there was never a sacrifice in the history of religion without an offeror until politics came up with a new Mass this new mass does not speak anymore about the fact that the uh sacrifice is presented to the Most Blessed Trinity Su trinas is the prayer that you have to look up in your Missle Accept a Holy Trinity the sacrifice that I offer up the new offeror quote and quote offeror recites a Jewish dining a dinner prayer and uh I do not know it by heart I have never

celebrated the mass thank God in the vernacular and uh but it says blessed is the Lord uh uh from whom we receive the bread the fruit of uh Earth and human labor which will which will give to you so that may become our spiritual Bread this is what the uh the Jewish patriarch would say before would this is the way the Jewish patriarch would say grace at dinner so using this offeror quote and quote in the new Mass you communicate the idea of a dinner not a sacrifice later on in the in the Roman Canon

for those few priests who use the Roman Canon to celebrate Mass the words of consecration have been changed in the old days it was H in Corus May and nothing else the church had no intention of quoting St Paul literally the church was using uh word words that expressed the meaning of the sacrifice of mass because the words of consecration are efficient words it is the words of consecration in the right frame of course in the right intention with the right matter but it is the words of consecration that when the present our Lord the

words of consecration are not a Narration they are not a report on what happened 2,000 years ago but they are communicating what happens here right now and uh these have been changed to a literal quotation from the letter of St Paul to the Corinthians or is it the Romans I don't remember and uh the words of the consecration of the chalis used to contain what you do not find in the letters of St Paul or the gospel the Word mysterium Fay mystery of Faith so the priest would say I hate to translate it into English

because a vernacular translation is almost a sacrilege to a sacred text uh especially in English German and other rotten languages uh you the priest says this is the Chalice with my blood of the new and the uh Everlasting testament which is uh given up uh for you and for most not for all for most and in that moment he says mystery of Faith because now the priest at the very moment of consecration professes his own faith in the real presence professes his own faith in the fact that here a sacrifice takes place and he professes

his own faith in the fact that it is not he who is speaking when I celebrate Mass I say this is my body how is that possible I do not offer up my body visibly I'm still here it is not me it is not I who speaks but it is our Lord Who speaks I'm just lending him my voice and my priesthood that I share with him that I have received from him I'm sending him my voice basically he speaks through my mouth which is why priests are to be considered Sacred By the way so

at the very moment our Lord is present fully body and blood I have to do an act of reverence so I will immediately I will say mystery of Faith and very shortly after that will genuflect long before I show The Chalice or the host to the people I will genuflect because the moment he is present at the altar I have to do an act of reverence how can I make it how can I make it uh plausible to you that I believe that this could become the blood of Our Lord if at the moment it

it has become the blood of Our Lord I do not show any immediate reverence absurd absolutely absurd and Yet this is what the new mass does and I have mentioned the best of the best cases the old Roman canon in Latin now Paul the 6 added three so-called Eucharistic prayers whatever that means to uh the Roman Canon as an option now I give you one example of a of a real lurgical trash the third Eucharistic prayer significantly enough the one the present Pope prefers over all the others the third Eucharistic prayer starts with Saying uh

we have come together here to offer up the uh no it says Etc you do not uh seize to congregate the people so that the sacrifice may be offered up what does that mean that means the people have to come together so that mass can be offered up does that mean the people have to come together we so in order that we celebrate Mass the definition of mass given by the way in the Roman Miss of 1969 and 1970 Because you cannot add anything to a wrong definition uh you have to you have to take

away a wrong definition if you add other things to it it doesn't make a change so we have the definition still in there the definition of mass given in the Roman missile of 1969 signed by Paul I 6 is the following the mass or the uh uh what's the term in English the the mass or the uh it doesn't say sacrifice the mass or the supper the mass or the or the supper of Our Lord is when people come together and unite uh under Christ to give praise and thanksgiving to him now that's the definition

of the Roman missile where's the sacrifice for the forgiving of sins where's the propior sacrifice where's the real presence where's the uh where's the sacrifice of of of Our Lord on the on the cross and you know what this definition which you can read in the midle of Paul the 6 is almost to the Letter the same definition that Archbishop Thomas rmer of Canterbury under Henry VII gave to his mass and he called it the mass or the supper of the Lord so the new Mass to call the new Mass a Protestant right is an

insult of the Anglican uh uh uh Anglican Community because the new Mass goes far beyond that the Anglican mass at least still speaks about the fact that we have to have our sins forgiven the Anglican common prayer book speaks about the Sacrifice of praise and the sacrifice of Thanksgiving the Novus Oro Mass the Novis orass of Paul the 6 does not mention any type of sacrifice the word sacrifice hardly ever appears in the whole Missle it has been diligently scratched out of all the common prayers and all the the proper prayers in the M now

I've mentioned the best case the Roman Canon and the third Eucharistic prayer speaking about the uh kind of presuming the presence of the people for The necess as a necessity for celebrating mass is something that you could not call directly heretical but definitely leading towards heresy because if you read that and hear that over and over again you will come to the conclusion ah my presence is necessary for Mass well rest assured it isn't very often I celebrate Mass entirely alone behind closed doors and believe me it's a valid mass and it's exactly as valid

as a mass with 2,000 People and it is definitely more valid than a nov uto mass of the Cardinal Arch Bishop of New Orleans and his Cathedral and I don't care how many people are present it doesn't make a Time worth of a difference if there is two uh uh devote devout old ladies present at mass or 500,000 people when the pope celebrates Mass doesn't make the slightest difference we do not never has the has the presence of of the people been needed for a Sacrament only the one who receives the sacrament is needed for

a Sacrament if a recipient is needed and in math that isn't the case because the communion of the faith faithful strictly speaking is not even a part of mass only the communion of the priest is a necessary part of mass and in addition to that you have all the things that you will not find in the missile itself see this is something very often uh people very often forget To talk about the uh a liturgy does not just consist of the book that is used where is the book used by whom is the book used

what book when when how what's the circumstances the the new missile is used in churches that I do not have to illustrate or describe to you you have seen those hideous buildings when you uh drive through a beautiful old New England village with beautiful old uh useless Protestant churches the only Hideous and goly building around is the new Catholic church and uh this new Catholic church does not have an altar anymore a new law a a new law now uh for commands the Bishops to remove the high altar in the cathedral that's a law he

has to put up what is called the altar of the faith for the the altar of the faithful not just the word altar of the faithful Alar alar it's called alar but of the faithful versus the faithful the when which of course is a banquet table her do Martin Luther said we have to do away with the Altar and put up a table because on an altar you sacrifice on the table you eat those are the words of Martin Luther and that's the significance of a table and those are the words of Archbishop prom cranmer

the founder of the Anglican rights and when you listen to the Prayers of the faithful in the nois OR churches out there you will find out that we are much we I'm not belonging to them but that the the nois or church is much much worse than the Lutheran or the anglicans much worse you go to an Episcopalian Church in New York there is no out of fa facing the people there is no out of the faithful and there their uh their prayers of the faithful don't deis there is no such thing as a Procession

of ridiculously dressed people who line up to say some totally insignificant prayers for some poor prisoners in Nicaragua and uh when I want to say my my rosary in in in in peace I do not go into St Patrick's cathed Cathedral which is packed with tourists got loudspeakers on the columns and TV sets now for the poor people who sit behind the pillar and can't see what's going on up front uh this is ridiculous it's not a Church anymore it has become exactly what our lord said about the temple a market in St Thomas Church

of the episcopalians where our Lord was never present on the altar however and who used the common prayer book of Archbishop Thomas cranmer in this uh Church you have peace the people go in there to pray except for two jab tourists who have to click click click click away the whole church the rest is people who want to pray in St Patrick's I didn't even find the Blessed Sacrament I think I couldn't find it I was there two weeks ago I couldn't find it I have no idea maybe it was this kind of hideous box

that looked like a an an a flea market where you can have your palms red things like that I don't know maybe it was the tabernacle I couldn't any indication of the of of the presence of the Blessed Sacrament and so I say my rosary in St Thomas Church praying for the conversion Of the episcopalians of course and this is part of the Liturgy don't underestimate these facts the fact how the priest dresses the fact what the PRI what the priest says the the gestures the priest makes what the church looks like how you behave

with the faithful it's all part of liturgy and what is liturgy this is something I bet except father trinchard nobody of you knows how to answer what is Liturgy it comes from the Greek word late two again praise praise God but what is mass it's a Sacrament what is a Sacrament a Sacrament is a sign of sanctification and a sign signifies something a Sacrament is a sign it's a sign of sanctification it's a sign of the the sign itself gives you the grace and the sign is the sign of what of the grace it Gives

you that means the sacrament will give you sanctifying Grace and the different type of s of of Sacrament will show to you what the particular Grace is is needed for so when you kneel in a dark corner because you don't want to be seen because you're ashamed that is when you get the forgiven forgiveness of your sins when we hold uh the little child and wash its head we wash away its Sin not the sin the child committed but the sin that the child has inherited because the because of the original sin committed by Adam

and Eve which is like a birth defect if you understand like if I have cancer and I ain't got a wife thank God but if I have cancer my wife got cancer there's a chance my children will get cancer right and this is exactly what original sin is about so the sacrifice uh the the sacrament of baptism washes away the Original guilt at the sign at the confirmation the bishop slaps you that means like uh when the the the the English Queen Knights somebody and you become a knight and a soldier in the service of

Christ with come confirmation and at the last rights the extreme unction you will be uh you will be signed with the sign of cross with oil because this is what they used in The old days to cure a wound and believe me olive oil still works miracles and uh so each Sacrament has to show what type of Grace it will give you now what's the type of Grace quote unquote the Holy Mass Gives You well our Lord himself and how does it give you our Lord himself through the sacrifice of Cavalry Calvary I'm sorry I'm

a military man so I always think of Cavalry Um that means if mass does not show you the sacrifice it cannot give you the grace this is another reason why father trinchard and I believe that most masses today are invalid because you get the idea of a banquet and not of a sacrifice you do not have the idea of a religion which has a priest who sacrifices in the Name of Christ not of the people he represents the people but he does not sacrifice in the name of the people he Sacrifices in the name of

the Eternal high priest Christ to the father and in the way Son and Holy Spirit which is a mystery so uh mass does not consist of the book alone and when you go to the church into modern churches today you will find that every single church is different every single priest is different every single sermon is different and every single faith is different except there's one thing Common to all a tasteless banality to the Liturgy celebrated including the uh the uh Arch type cliche dining table with two ashtrays and candles in it and a bouquet

of flowers like on the dining table you have to have right here a bouquet of flowers you do not see what's going on you do not understand what's going on but you go home because you heard everything in English and say no finally I Understand I can't tell you how often I have met people who said to me I'm so glad m is celebrated in English now because now I understand and then I asked them some questions and I found out they understand much less much less than the people in the old day did who

had the Baltimore catechism the catechism of St P the 10th and heard the mass in Latin and did not have the Sunday Missle in those Days the Sunday missile is a new invention in the old days you had no idea what the priest was saying but the Baltimore catechism told you what Mass was all about and if I asked one of the faithful he would tell me what it is as a matter of fact I work very often for the Society of St P the 10th and when I asked the faithful what mass is about

I get very precise very clear and very understandable answers how come they never hear an English word in the Altar how come they understand when I go to the Nova order people I get some uh uh some real garbage about the social purpose of mass and help the poor it's fine to help the poor Salvation Army does that okay join the Salvation Army and leave the Catholic Church fine good for me but if you want to save your soul before you want to be able to save the poor then you will have to go along

with the doctrine of the church and the Doctrine of the church he cannot find the new Mass the new mass is very accommodating to Modern consciences because it doesn't speak about sacrifice it doesn't speak about Penance it doesn't speak about Sin and isn't that convenient how nice a life if I don't have to sacrifice if I don't have to give up anything if I don't have to live An Inconvenient life and this is exactly the reason why uh so many people just don't bother to go the church anymore Because if they want to hear whatever

is permitted to them they just have to switch on the TV and they will get the same garbage there and it's much more convenient why do you go to mass could anybody of you answer me the question why do you go to mass why do you bother to go to mass on Sunday why what for you can pray in the woods you can pray in the street you can pray in the bus you can pray in a car why do you go to MTH I can tell you why to go why You go to mass

because you are present at the most holy of all actions on Earth if it is the case if you have the mass of the Catholic Church the mass of the Latin right the mass that the popes Of All Times until pass the 12 and John the 23rd included commanded you to go to to fulfill your Sunday obligation the Sunday obligation does not just mean to fulfill the third commandment which cannot be dispensed of it also means to get the chance to Participate in a miracle and receive The Graces and especially the extraordinary and highest Graces

of all our Lord himself St Thomas aquinus said that all sacraments are directed towards the Eucharist he said the Eucharist is the only Everlasting Sacrament because it's our Lord himself offered up it's not a particular Grace for survival baptism salvation confirmation for getting you stronger uh confession for having your sins forgiven and receiving the grace Not to commit the sin anymore marriage to be able to live a life in in in battle for the rest of your life and the priesthood to be able to offer up uh the sacrifice of mass and the extreme unction

to be able to be saved in the last moment mass is all of that together mass is the highest of all sacraments and the sacraments toward which which all towards which all others are directed and it is impossible our lord said who Does not eat of My Flesh and does not drink of my blood cannot be saved it is impossible to be saved if you stay off Mass deliberately if you can't have mass our Lord will forgive you but uh he's not that much inclined to for to forgive if you stay off Mass deliberately and

uh all this together you have to remember what I said before do not participate in something which is against the Divine Law do not participate in something Which is about action in s in sakis as we say especially in sacred things you do not do you you you don't go the course of the the doubtful course like if you're not sure if your child was baptized you won't say oh I don't care you'll have it re-baptized conditionally in which case the priest will have to say if you are not yet baptized then I baptize thee

in the name of the father Holy Spirit if you don't know if you disc if you find a child Somewhere in the street and you're you you uh you you feel uh you feel Mercy for that poor child and you feel compassion and you adopt the child and you don't know if it's baptized you're certainly going to uh have it baptized conditionally right you won't go the cour you will go the safer course you will always make sure and this is why when a priest for some reason is distracted at mass and from one moment

to the other he doesn't Know has he said the words of consecration yet can happen things like that can happen he will definitely say them again conditionally you will always do this you will always follow the safer course the safer course cannot be to attend a new mass in which you don't even know if it's valid or not and rest assured the reason why father trinchard and I and many others doubt the validity of these Sacrament is not because we have too much time to Think about things like this but because Leo the 13th in

a dogmatic document was very clear about it and uh when you take when when when you uh when you take your time to think about what I said you will find out that it is impossible to attend new ma the new mass in good conscience except for social purposes I said before but that does not fulfill your Sunday obligation and I tell you in My Priestly Authority if you think that you can fulfill your Sunday obligation the new Mass you're wrong you cannot don't worry about the past you if you didn't know that you fulfilled

some suay obligation subjectively not objectively but subjectively and here's a distinction I gave to my uh uh to my audience yesterday already subjective and objective but you won't believe how many people don't know the distinction of Those two subjective means the person concerned objective means the thing concerned you might com you might for example you might commit a sin objectively and not commit it subjectively because you didn't know it was a sin you might commit a sin sin subjectively but not objectively because you think it's a sin and you do it anyway and in reality

it's not a sin you understand the distinction subjective objective so if in the past you went to Sunday mass at the regular local Parish don't worry you don't have to confess it you didn't know about it but now I tell you and I gave you reasons and you can hear them over and over again on tape and video I gave you reasons and uh believe me you can look up the sources of my information and I will indicate a few of those to you and you will see that what I said has a ground to

it it's good theology it's sound theology because I quote the Popes and not modern theolog not modern theologians I'm not interested in what the modernists have to say I'm interested in what the church said and I repeat the church doctrine cannot change ever the truth can't change impossible the Eternal truth cannot change and if the Council of Trent said that mass is a propitiatory sacrifice nobody can ever take that back so uh in the future if you have too much trouble to Go to the to to the old Mass because you would have to drive

2 hours stay home and say a rosary you fulfill your Sunday obligation why look what does the third commandment say the third commandment says sanctify Sabbath which means for us Sunday sanctify Sunday that means do not make business on Sunday if you can avoid it do not work on Sunday praise the Lord on Sunday the church says and the church has all the right to say that the church Says the best way and the way the church wants us to sanctify Sundays to attend Mass but to attend mass is not a Divine commandment but a

church commandment so it's human law human law can be dispensed of as it is said in Latin sub grav incomodo and the grave incomod and father schmidberger of the Society of sire the 10th once was asked what that means and he said Well you certainly don't have to drive two hours Over icy roads in Winter to attend Mass because you're risking your life just to attend Mass if you do it it's a nice uh thing and it's it's a great Merit but you do not have to do it but if you can find a mass

in the old right within an hour from here and you don't go and you do not fulfill Sunday obligation period I know that this sounds very harsh and hard to you and the Americans always have to be nice and I try to be nice but I'm not nice to you if I tell You something which is wrong and might put your soul in danger I don't think I would be a very nice and kind person if I do not inform you about the truth and unfortunately I do not have the necessary four hours to explain

everything in detail to you right now so I have to be straight and direct to the point do not go to the new Mass it's a sin and if you can go to the old mass or it's a sin again and if you complain About mentioning sin all the time please don't because you might complain in all eternity down down in hell if you don't not respect what I say now watch it we have to we have to walk the tight rope here on Earth believe me it is not easy to live a life of

Grace Temptations are everywhere and many people think Temptations are only existing in the in as far as smoking drinking eating and sex is concerned now rest assured there's 100 more Temptations a thousand More Temptations and we do not only have the six commandment the only commandment our present Pope preaches about we have another nine Commandments too starting with the first commandment only one God only one church only one Faith that's the most important commandment it's the first of all commandments and if you want sanctify someday can you logically generally speaking not about What we said

today but generally speaking I think you would all agree with me when I say Obviously you cannot sanctify the Sunday by doing something wrong and I tell you that attending the new mass is something wrong for the reasons I gave and I don't have to repeat now on the contrary I'm concluding this speech for the moment because I want to give you the chance to ask questions and ask the questions now because I won't be around Monday I'm Gone thank you well uh anal bonini the creator of the new right wanted to write a Protestant

Mass absolutely it's called ecumenical but that means giving in to the others giving up your own faith and giving in to the others uh in this regard uh it will interest you as an illustration what that means that the uh in in the in the war in Bosnia the Cardinal of uh belgrad complained to the pope and he Said how come the Serbian Orthodox take care of the Serbian Orthodox period the Muslims take care of the Muslims period the Catholics take care of everybody except the Catholics this is a cism now this was the Cardinal

of belgrad not not Archbishop Lea who said that the Cardinal of belgrad last year this is a cism and its effect and that's the reason why the new Mass was written by Protestants an bonini wanted a noas Or by the way not coincident not exactly coincidental the word no or with the word no Orum on the back side of your dollar bill bonini wanted for the church what uh uh President Bush wanted for the whole world the New World Order and bonini wanted the new world and the new Mass order why Paul the six permitted

that I don't know I can only uh assume and one of the The roles in combat is never assume anything Jean gon well they have a quotation from uh from Jean gon who said that Paul six wanted a sort of C Mass I don't know anything about that I only know that Paul six wanted a new order of mass he said and and but he I I wouldn't even say he wanted so because he he Paul the six was a very strange pracher he said uh in the same speech 1974 he said there is going

to be a major change in the Roman Catholic church and a couple Of he meant the new liturgy and a couple of minutes later he said and one might ask one ask oneself how this change came about and he never answered that question he was the pope who destroyed almost destroyed the church and at the same time complained about the autod destruction of the church he was the pope who had all the de all the prayers mentioning the devil scratched out of liturgy and then he said the fumes of Satan have entered the Church so

what do you make of a poke like this I leave the judgment to you I can't I can't judge him I don't know I've been I've been in Rome for 15 years but I can't judge the guy and it's not a pertinent question to our our problem today we I'm not interested why they destroyed liturgy I'm interested in proving to you that it has been destroyed and that the new litg is elicit and you cannot participate in it if you live right next around around The corner of the indult mass as long as you do

not receive Comm communion in the hand there because for example in Providence Rhode Island at the indult mass they give communion in the hand which is a sacrilege you are not allowed to touch our Lord I am allowed to touch him with those two fingers because they were uh they were what do you call it uh uh anointed at my ordination those two fingers have been anointed at my Ordination so that I have the right to touch our Lord with those four fingers I have never had our Lord I'm a priest now for 15 and

A2 years I've never had our Lord in my hand and God forbid that I ever will do it because the hand is the symbol of power of man this is how I became a priest this is how I celebrate Mass so don't ever dare to receive our Lord in your hand if you can avoid going to the Indult mass or the masses of the fraternity of St Peter go to the Mass of the Society of sire the tent however as I said before if there is no danger to your faith if the priests there at

the indult mass do not speak against the faith and do not tell you about the glories of Vatican 2 and if this Chapel was just around right around your corner and you would have to drive one and a half hours to the other one then go there but remember what I said and Remember my warning the devil is very efficient and he has a lot of useful idiots to serve him remember what lanan said about the useful idiots he said the W the West the West is going to buy the rope with which we will

hang them that's what Lenin said and he talked about the useful idiots meaning the Communists in the west he talked about the useful idiots in the west who will help communism to its Victory That's how the devil works and uh the devil works with three kinds of people they always nice and naive who say oh if it's the pope he can't be wrong and if the pope tomorrow dyes his hair green I will dye my hair green because it reminds me of St Patrick and uh the second sort of people are the ones who don't

give a damn anyway those are the useful idiots and then you have the people who want to Destroy those very often are satanists or plain bad people who want to make money keep their position and whatever and they are in that in that sense also part of the useful idiots and unfortunately I have to say uh I have had the doubtful honor of getting to know at least 45 Cardinals in Rome I mean talk to them meet them they do not know what is going on because they do not want to know I know a

cardinal who this is Recorded I will not name therefore I know a cardinal who uh is intelligent aidite nice Pious good willing but the moment you talk about uh the inacceptable ility of Vatican 2 his reason just blanks out he starts to lose his logic his arguments become confused and uh perfectly incoherent and otherwise he's a perfectly logical and intelligent person These people have been brainwashed you see it's the structure of of obedience the the enemies of the church in the 1930s and 1940s and 1950s had 30 years at their disposal to drill and tame

the Catholic clergy into perfect military stubborn military obedience now in the military we have a different type of obedience because we do not deal with eternal law usually most officers in the armed forces of the United States would never tell an Officer to shoot his wife or would never tell an officer to commit a sacrilege in Mass so you don't have to deal with that kind of issue you have to deal with a stupid bureaucracy and uh and and bad uh bad strategy and stuff like that but in the church you deal with a lot

more important things now in the church you cannot work on the basis of military blind obedience you have to work on a basis of responsible obedience and Instructed obedience because real obedience will always follow the highest command if the if the the the the uh the the supreme commander of the Armed Forces of the United States is the president at the present time unfortunate fact but usually a very good system and if the president says we will now wage war against Canada an officer cannot say I won't Unless this is a mean and vicious attack

against and people and the law of God is against it and the law of the church is against it in which case the officer will say no he might be get Court Marshal but then you have St Thomas Moore was Court Marshal by the by his Emperor or his King Henry VII because he didn't want to sign an oath against the church and matrimony so uh a priest who says yes it's against my conscience really but I'm bound to obedience has not understood his position has not understood theology has not understood the priesthood the priest's

obedience has to go first of all to our Lord Jesus Christ and tradition and if my Pope John Paul II says something against the tradition I will not obey Because I obey our Lord in the church and if my Bishop tells me Father H you will celebrate the mass in The no's order will say your Excellency I will not because God does not want that and if he says have you had a person Al Revelation I will say yes the tradition of the church and your predecessors and this is the answer does that mean does

that mean that all of my friends who go to the new Mass are in sin I said no you you got to try to convert them not doing this anymore but as long as they do it in good faith it's fine it's their priests Who will Who will suffer for the sin committed not not these people these people you you and you you have been instructed and other people present and I in the old days we were instructed by those Heretics they told us this is all perfectly right all good all fine and when you

trust those priests you get lost but believe me if you went to the to the new Mass long time ago or until yesterday or whatever uh the priest who talked you into doing it will Suffer for it not you priests have great responsibilities and I know exactly if I tell you something wrong here here at the last judgment I will get zapped and not you H so remember that