"Let us unite to stand against anti-racism and antisemitism." Do you know Renaud Camus? -"It's not acceptable to talk about the 'Great Replacement'." And yet he’s the guy who invented the concept... -"Great Replacement" -"Organized replacement of our population." "This so-called 'Great Replacement'." The "Great Replacement", there you go... So Renaud Camus is what we call in social sciences: a racist. "Race" x3 "Within their race" / "According to their race" / "The qualities of our race." "They tell you no, we can no longer talk about 'races' because of the death camps, the Shoah and all that." All that,
yeah yeah... Well, admittedly, it does sound a bit Nazi. But Renaud Camus, he’s not a Nazi guys, because besides fighting anti-racism, he has another fight in life: the fight against antisemitism. "Stop anti-racism and antisemitism! [...]" "Anti-racism and antisemitism, same fight." Yet the "Great Replacement" really looks like an antisemitic theory. A small elite conspiring to destroy nations and mass migratory submersion. That’s exactly what was said about Jews in 1942. "In 1808, there were in France 46,663 Jews and 29 million French people. The proportion of Jews was therefore 0.1%. In 1942, there are in France 1,200,000 Jews
and 42,000,000 French people. The Jewish population in France therefore increased over 134 years, by a proportion of 2,453%, while over the same period, the French population increased by only 44%. If no measures were taken to stop this invasion, in 2042 there would be ten to fifteen million Jews in France, for only twenty to twenty-five million French people!" This sounds like a classically antisemitic story. Except that this time, strangely enough, there are no Jews. It’s an antisemitic conspiracy without antisemitism, without Judeophobia. And you know, about fascism, Pasolini quoted this phrase: "Fascism can return to the scene
provided it calls itself anti-fascism." Since then, Italy has been governed by a woman: Giorgia Meloni who was fascist, or at least Mussolinian in her youth, but... -"I have never had sympathy or closeness toward anti-democratic regimes. Toward any regime, fascism included." In fact, in Europe, no movement descended from national fascism still claims to be fascist. Because, well, it’s embarrassing, that’s why... Some even accuse anti-fascists of being fascists. Which makes the sentence true — but for them. And maybe antisemitism is the same. It’s so stigmatized, that antisemitism could only return to the scene On the condition that
it calls itself the fight against antisemitism. And that’s how Renaud Camus would obtain an alibi. But no, he’s not a Nazi, because he’s not antisemitic. He’s against it, he’s pro-Jewish. So that makes him respectable. By condemning antisemitism, you can rewrite the same book by changing the names. Hop, one character changes: from the Jew to the Muslim. And "Jewified" France becomes "Islamized" France And "Judeo-Bolsheviks" become "Islamo-leftists" And the secret societies of the "Jewish conspiracy" become those of the "Muslim conspiracy". The old antisemitic grammar that permeated society is still there. But run through the wash, Cleansed of
its Judeophobia by calculation, a somewhat hypocritical calculation that allows the same software to return with one variable changed. So there you go. And we are living through the new antisemitism, a "neo-antisemitism" not Judeophobic, but against Arab Semites. That’s it. And so now, yeah, we can stop the video, right, those wokists. Look how sneaky those fascists are, they don’t even believe in their own stuff. And we’re not going to fall for it, you antisemite. Alright, shalom, subscribe you son of a b— Except that doesn’t work as a conclusion. At least, it’s a bit too easy. It
lacks… hmm… It lacks… It lacks Israel, there, I said it. It lacks truth, conspiracy… I don’t like that. We get funding from the CNC, we make videos for Blast? I don’t think so, therefore… Let’s go looking for trouble because, who? Who brought Renaud Camus’s ideas into the media stables? The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem? -"Absolutely not." -"You knew you would provoke a storm of protest by giving a platform to a rather controversial figure, convicted for racist remarks as Fabienne, a listener, points out, and an advocate of a white, Christian France closed in on itself, as Germain
reminds us. So what are you looking for in this provocation?" Well, it turns out it was a certain Alain Finkielkraut, who is Jewish, and who is going to come and defend himself. Where? On RCJ, the Radio of the Jewish Community, facing Elisabeth Lévy. -"In 2000, when Renaud Camus was accused of antisemitism for about twenty lines on France Culture published in his diary, you were, with Claude Durand, the only intellectual to defend him. Since then, the Camus affairs have followed one another more or less quietly, But you held firm, including in 2012 when he rallied to
Marine Le Pen, to quote: 'to say no to the change of people and civilization.'" -"As for 'global replacism', rightly denounced by Renaud Camus, it consists in wanting to compensate for the decline in fertility in European countries through immigration, he wrote: 'Elisabeth Badinter, on the basis of the striking and terrifying testimonies collected by Georges Bensoussan in A Subjugated France, a second society is trying to insidiously impose itself within our Republic by turning its back on it, explicitly aiming at separatism, even secession.'" Renaud Camus makes the same observation. Are Alain Finkielkraut, Elisabeth Lévy, Georges Bensoussan and Elisabeth
Badinter stupid? Were they fooled by this devious Mr. Camus? Did they not realize they were tokens, alibis? Well no, they just agree with him. It wasn’t that antisemitism was returning while being indifferent to Jews. No, it was that it seemed to be returning with them. Maybe it wasn’t hypocritical. -"Tried for the deaths of 77 people last summer, Anders Breivik continues to stand by his actions. The far-right activist says he wanted 'to protect native Norwegians against the threat of Islam or the sexual revolution.'" Breivik is a neo-Nazi, the largest neo-Nazi terrorist in Europe of the 21st
century. Except that Breivik happens to disagree with Adolf Hitler, that disagreement is: The Jews. -"Let us fight together with Israel, with our Zionist brothers, against all anti-Zionists, against all cultural Marxists and multiculturalists. Conservative Jews were loyal to Europe and should have been rewarded, instead, Hitler targeted them all." Breivik loves Israel, and in his manifesto he cites conservative Jewish intellectuals like Alain Finkielkraut or Frédéric Encel. -"We must consider loyal Jews as brothers." Does Breivik need an alibi to appear respectable? He doesn’t give a damn — he’s a TERRORIST. The truth is simply that this Nazi is
REALLY NOT antisemitic. Traditional… uh… vintage… old-school antisemites really seem to be an endangered species. And it even seems sincere! That’s the problem. Jews had been the main victims of the European Nazi-fascist project, that’s how things are remembered at least. So Jews could only once again play a central role in the RENAISSANCE… of this Nazi-fascism, in its rehabilitation, its renormalization in the political space. And the annoying thing, is that it appeared that many were going to be stakeholders in this phenomenon… And this time, on the other side. -"Stephen Miller is this very high-ranking official in the
Trump administration, who is Jewish, and who nevertheless holds positions such as: white supremacist positions, making subtle references to Nazism." -"In Germany there is a growing number of Jewish voters for the AfD, for the far right." You already know who introduced in France the concept of the "Great Replacement" into the political sphere. In 1942, the Vichy authorities carried out the Vel d’Hiv roundup. Jewish men, women and children, gathered by the police and then deported. In 2018, Éric Zemmour said: -"I had in my hands the roadmap of the Vel d’Hiv roundup, taken out by a friend from
the Paris police headquarters. Do you know what was written on it? It is exactly the same procedure as for the expulsion of undocumented foreigners. Exactly! With nationalities, etc. You have to put this back in the context of a very strong pre-war Jewish immigration that angered many French people. If there had been a poll in ’42, I’m not sure the French would have voted for the tradition of asylum, my dear Alain (Finkielkraut). Because there had been many problems in the 1930s, a lot of black markets, a lot of competition, and all that was blamed on Jews
from the East." -"It’s not exactly the same thing…" This man, Éric Zemmour, then became a politician and so… Guess his political line. -"In the context of very strong immigration that angered many French people, there are many problems and they are blamed on undocumented foreigners. Exactly, with nationalities, etc…" Interesting, right? So what’s the program then? -"The Vel d’Hiv roundup, is exactly the same procedure as the expulsion of foreigners." Michel Foucault defined archaeology as "the discipline of mute monuments, inert traces, objects without context and things left by the past," which are identified by: "discursive regularities." The statements
made about migrants by this man Éric Zemmour are exactly that… VERBATIM, literally the same sentences that applied to Jews in ’42. And he is the FIRST to say them. The discourse has not changed. What remains is an ARCHAEOLOGICAL antisemitism, let’s call it that — discursive, a FOSSIL antisemitism whose residues in political and media discourse are not hard to spot — overall, it’s very similar. Obviously, for a fossil, antisemitism still seemed pretty lively, if I may say so. Assaults, insults, murders, It still seemed very much alive. It’s moving. And we noticed that mentions of the word
"antisemitism" in the media skyrocketed starting from… 2023… From the war in Gaza. -"Since October 7 […] essentially from October 7, 2023." That’s what the Minister of the Interior said before the CRIF association (Representative Council of Jewish Institutions of France). The umbrella organization of the Jewish community in France. And have you noticed that antisemitism is a form of racism unlike the others? In the sense that it explicitly connects domestic politics with international politics. -"This powerful wave, everyone knows what triggered it. It was October 7. The weather was nice in Israel that day." What’s also funny, is
that it’s nothing new for a minister to come and defend Israel before the CRIF. -"It’s hard to listen to the moral lessons of certain people who, safe and warm, explain to Israeli society that they are overreacting." Really not new… -"What is certain is that regarding so-called 'pro-Palestinian' demonstrations, I’m putting that in quotation marks, I believe I drew a lot of fire from my opponents by banning them. Everyone remembers it, under conditions that others in the world did not adopt." Really nothing new. -"There is hatred of Israel, there is antisemitism, and there is anti-Zionism, which is
simply a synonym for antisemitism and hatred of Israel." In 2015, the president of the CRIF was invited by an American cousin organization, AIPAC. -"The president of the CRIF, the umbrella organization for the Jewish community of France." -"Manuel Valls said, and I that it reflects not only the Jewish attitude, but the Jewish thought of everybody who thinks objectively, anti-Zionism is antisemitism." Among its main missions, the CRIF states: to express its solidarity with and attachment to the State of Israel. It is stated EXPLICITLY. Among its main missions, therefore, is campaigning to make explicit its link with a
foreign state. In fact, as Serge Halimi and Pierre Rimbert say in Le Monde Diplomatique, the CRIF is a star in the galaxy of the pro-Israel lobby in France, and what’s funny is that… -"On interference, I believe there has been a theme about interference, obviously it has not escaped anyone that certain foreign powers have understood that there are issues that divide us. Count on me to be extremely aggressive on this subject, and that we will obviously continue to track them down, pursue them, and bring them to justice." How can a minister worry about interference by a
foreign country… while at the same time defending a foreign state? -"The State of Israel […] Israel […] anti-Zionism […] the France–Israel football match […] the Israeli cause." -"Thus the weekly magazine Le Point almost every week puts on its cover a new Islamo-leftist conspiracy, Nests of Russian spies, Algerian, Chinese or Qatari influencers. Let us bet that it will investigate the Nepalese, Peruvian or Monegasque lobby before looking into that of Israel. Last June 26, the magazine denounced on its front page "The networks of the mullahs in France: how they manipulate journalists, researchers and politicians." "The Islamic Republic
of Iran," it warned, "has infiltrated almost every layer of the French media, political and academic world." Iran, really? Alright, I know you — you’re sharp, so you’re going to tell me: uh, journalists. -"Good evening, Mr. Prime Minister!" (to Benjamin Netanyahu) -"Good evening." Benjamin Netanyahu -"Good evening, Mr. Prime Minister." (to Benjamin Netanyahu) -"Good evening, welcome to Israel." They are rather strangely the type to go on trips to Israel and to put out promotional front pages for the Mossad and for that to be called advocacy of war crimes under international law. And I would answer you, uh…:
"gngnaphology gni gnapology gni gternational." Stop being ambiguous like that… But since you’re acting in bad faith, you’ll keep going by saying: "uh, researchers at universities," which is funny because what mostly gets cancelled are conferences on Palestine, symposia on Palestine at the Collège de France. So in terms of pressure, maybe we should look elsewhere… And since you’re frankly indecent, you’ll conclude by saying: "uh, and politically speaking," if we look at trips paid for at the invitation of third parties taken by French MPs, which are public data that anyone can check, well, there are absolutely no trips
to Iran. And I would answer you: THAT’S NOT THE POINT… And besides, number one is probably still the Comoros or Gabon, I’m sure! Oh f*ck… And there you go… there you go… Qatar, top 4… Well there you go, AS IF BY CHANCE! Cilizikhwan, they’re everywhere… -"When it comes to looking for lobbies serving a foreign power, the (deliberate) blindness of Le Point indeed appears elsewhere. Le Figaro Magazine recently denounced two members of parliament, one an alleged agent of Algeria, the other of Hamas (July 11, 2025). Both from La France Insoumise, of course. Marianne is also worried
about 'A France Under Influence' (June 12, 2025). Rest assured here as well: it is still not Israel, but Qatar. Marianne is busy, okay. It investigates Algeria, or Algeria again, or uh… immigration, or immigration again… Or France being racist? Enough with the hysteria, seriously… Let’s talk instead about Islamists, and then again about left-wing Islamists! About this clueless left! While the right is in the process of uniting with the far right. Finally! The alliance is coming. It’s funny to see media outlets, ALWAYS obsessed with foreign interference, with plots AND minorities... But there’s one topic where, really, they
let nothing slide. And a conservative paper like Le Point, Which could have been BANALLY antisemitic, has instead become very, very attentive to Jews... AND... to Israel. Uh, I’m not saying: "uh, focus on the REAL conspiracy here, they’re the ones infiltrating!", no. It’s normal not to flag those things for Israel, because it’s a country classified as non-hostile to France, with governments that are partners, like the United States. It’s just that this constant use of conspiratorial, infiltration rhetoric while managing not to do it about Jews, at any point—almost no slip-ups. It can’t only be a conscious alibi
strategy to reintroduce a fossil antisemitism. It can only be a sincere conviction. And that’s what raises questions. They really seem to have fallen in love with Israel and not be faking it. Their insensitivity toward Palestinians shows it’s deep-rooted. So here comes the first question: Where did the bourgeois antisemites go? French media used to be kind of antisemitic by default, in a normalized way—not Nazi, sure, but widespread. In ’78, Le Monde was STILL publishing op-eds by Holocaust deniers. -"There were still antisemites, it was funny. It was unbearable." -"It was publishing pieces by Faurisson, is that it?"
-"No, no, not at all! It’s in conversations. In conversations—‘a little Jew’ here, ‘a little Jew’ there. It was unbearable. But hey, that’s over now." -"New forms of fixation on Jews are appearing, including an unleashing of philo-Semitism on the right, which, personally, being of Jewish origin, frightens me, because it reveals an upper layer of society still obsessed with Jews." Philo-Semitism: the love of Jews, as a replacement for antisemitism. Which could be good—we might tell ourselves it’s better, it’s progress... it can also be a bit problematic, because you fetishize... there... yeah... If antisemitism still exists in society,
once again... it’s becoming harder and harder to find it in the media... And maybe also in the political class. -"The image of Dominique Strauss-Kahn in handcuffs leaving after a night at the Harlem police station in New York left a mark. It was the image of the fall of one of the most powerful men on the planet. It all started yesterday, on May 14, a maid enters suite 2806 of this Sofitel, that of the IMF director, to clean it. Dominique Strauss-Kahn allegedly came out of the bathroom naked and sexually assaulted her after closing the door." -"In
France, the DSK affair, widely covered worldwide in 2011, is a revealing sign of the decline of antisemitism." It’s 2011, and this year is not like the others! Because on the occasion of the DSK affair, it appears as if the West had come out of its arc of antisemitism. Thank you all for taking part! End of the season! Shalom! "Here is one of the most powerful men in the world, head of the planet’s leading financial institution: the IMF, from a family in which one finds both rabbis and Freemasons. Married to a famous journalist, also Jewish, belonging
to a wealthy family of art dealers. A cosmopolitan statesman well known on the international stage, he was suddenly swept away by a sex scandal, Then implicated in prostitution rings. His sexual obsessions and his ties to pimps were exposed in broad daylight by media around the world. Arrested in New York, he moved into a wildly expensive house and hired Jewish lawyers, also defenders of the powerful and known for their exorbitant fees. The DSK affair brought together all the ingredients likely to awaken an old mythology, and there is no doubt that in another era it would have
unleashed the antisemitic press. Yet nothing of the sort happened. It is almost impossible to detect, in the rivers of ink poured out over this affair, the slightest antisemitic allusion. None of his political opponents, Neither left nor right, nor even within the ranks of the xenophobic far right, deemed it useful to exploit this scandal with arguments drawn from the old antisemitic arsenal." And you know, at the start of the affair, the historian Eric Alterman had said... -"It’s an anti-Semite’s dream and a nervous Jew’s nightmare." But in the end, everything went fine... Well, that was nearly 15
years ago—since then... There was another one...! -"It’s the Epstein affair, named after that financier." -"The Epstein affair." -"Jeffrey Epstein." -"That American billionaire indicted for sexual exploitation of minors." Astarfarosh ashana your mother’s— [insult] The nightmare of anti-conspiracy thinking! An extremely wealthy Jewish businessman from the world of finance, who made his fortune thanks to the Wexners, Jewish billionaires from New York, falls over a child trafficking network case linked to his partner Ghislaine Maxwell, whose father is a media tycoon of the, ahem, faith, and whose mother is a Holocaust historian of the, ahem, faith. And the man is
defended by attorney Alan Dershowitz—ALWAYS the same faith— who was the lawyer for other great millionaires of the same faith like Harvey Weinstein AND Jonathan Pollard, convicted of being a spy for Israel. While the name Ehud Barak, former prime minister of Israel, is cited by one of the victims: Virginia Giuffre. Pedophile elites, you motherf— the amount of “not all of them” we’re going to have to roll out... "Uh... but Jeffrey has the right to relax." Okay. Some people were... a bit antisemitic about this affair... and there are always crazies on the internet, but they were already
crazy before—those people. They’ll end up with NO political outlet, because that’s the point, right— POLITICALLY... it won’t lead to anything—well, at least not what was expected. In any case, the political and media class seemed deconstructed on that topic. Apparently. Alan Dershowitz would conclude by saying about Virginia Giuffre that... -"She’s a blatant antisemite!" And maybe that’s true—Alan Dershowitz is a man of great integrity, he wouldn’t throw accusations around at random! And anyway, let he who has never been accused of sexual abuse by Virginia Giuffre—found dead by suicide in mysterious circumstances— While declassified communications have supposedly established
that the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Ehud Barak led Israel to obtain contracts for the sale of sensitive security services in Mongolia and Côte d'Ivoire, according to initial revelations— cast the first stone!! Right... throwing stones, you folks like doing that in your countries over there... But that’s something else again. -"Will you declassify the Epstein files?" "Yeah, I will, I think. I think the less you know... we don’t want to affect people’s lives if there are false things, because there’s a lot of fake stuff in that whole case." And then some people will say to me:
where are you going with this ominous music? But it’s important to develop this, Because you know, alongside polished, bourgeois, media antisemitism, there was another antisemitism: DIRTY antisemitism, conspiracist antisemitism. And we need to understand why it malfunctioned, even though it was handed on a silver platter a SCENARIO it would have DREAMED of. -"The goal is to replace a failing and deeply corrupt political class with a new government controlled by you, the American people. The Washington establishment, as well as the big financial and media corporations that funds it, exists for only one reason: to protect itself and
enrich itself." Trump had ridden that conspiracism... with its antisemitic imaginary, he had played on... that hypnotic power to suggest to... the masses. He SHOULD HAVE BEEN HAPPY, but... -"But look at the Epstein affair, he’s down 39 points on this issue, his net approval is 39 points negative!" -"What did Jeffrey Epstein mean when he said you knew 'about the girls'?" -"If the Epstein case is a hoax, why are you calling for more investigations?" -"Are you concerned grow, you calling for Epstein case?" -"I don’t want to talk about it because, fake news." He’s not happy at all...
because he’s involved. -"How do you know this?" -"I was Donald’s closest friend for 10 years." -"Have you ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of female under the age of 18 ?" -"Though I’d like to answer that question, at least today, I’m going to have to assert my Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments Right (of the U.S. Constitution), sir." It was an antisemite’s dream and a Jew’s nervous nightmare. Result: both of them woke up. And it had two effects. -"These files implicate billionaires and friends of him, of his and political doners that he's trying to
protect. And Epstein also had close ties to our own intelligence agency and Israeli intelligence agencies." They want to destroy nations, borders, the white race, the Great Reset, white genocide, “deconstructing kids,” I don’t know what... That was the classic antisemitic conspiracy—neo-Nazi, far right—in the fantasy. So what is the reality of the facts? Because it wasn’t exactly what was expected. And yet it ticks boxes: look at Epstein’s victims, young women exclusively white, often blond—those are pages out of Mein Kampf. -"We shouldn’t kid ourselves, everyone sees it, around us, we all see that young European women, young white
women are attracted to— 'Jews'." And if you read the documents you see that Epstein explicitly asked for young girls, but not tanned ones, not Latinas, not Black girls. The far-right nationalist antisemitic-Nazi conspiracist explanation is: the trafficking of white women by the community—right... And the real explanation is: it’s racist. He’s really got everything going for him, this guy. Whereas my GOAT George Soros would never have done that... he would have accepted EVERYONE! Come on over here, Kids United— That brought us to the big question: do you know this man’s political opinions...? Because if there wasn’t the
expected political exploitation, it must be getting blocked somewhere... You know he lived partly in France? He had an apartment in Paris, hmm? -"The future is for the way women’s think." -"The way women thinks?" -"Thats correct." -"Is that on a sop because of all the depravity you've done against young women, And your new sop is that there is that women thinking is the future?" Alongside crimes against minors. -"Okay, he has flaws... but! He’s also a powerful individual with an agenda. What did he really believe? Well, there’s only one way to find out... let’s open the files...
Most of them aren’t about his criminal cases; they’re personal or professional communications. As for the professional ones, we can already note that this rich patron funds researchers. But you know, not “woke” Gender Studies researchers. No, it was other types of researchers. Like for example the German Joscha Bach, Linked to artificial intelligence, with whom he discusses racial hierarchy, genetics, the specificities of each race: the Chinese, the Jews. He talks about the brains of Black children, women’s brains, who can’t do mathematics, and seek attention instead, discussions that evoke reducing the world population... mass murder of disabled people
and the elderly by taking the opportunity of climate change. That’s what Joscha Bach says. Who’s going to get the Jeffy check. Just like the Swede Nick Bostrom. Whose white-supremacist statements are public, who’s more into eugenics and global AI surveillance... Just like Ben Goertzel. Turns out they weren’t plotting at all to destroy borders, nations, or do “white genocide,” whatever... No—actually, white supremacists... he gives them money... which shows the antisemitic conspiracy doesn’t work here. Because in fact Jeffrey Epstein’s origins have absolutely no impact. He compares himself to Hitler, to Goebbels—he finds it hilarious, by the way. And
it’s not to recode the conspiracy in reverse. The truth is that Jeffrey Epstein, like all the other guys from his milieu, From his social class, is undergoing an ideological transformation. It’s not a conspiracy, it’s his social class. Among elites—especially in the United States— Silicon Valley, the tech world, the big bourgeoisie, there’s a gradual shift from neoliberalism to racism, to an essentialist worldview. Bannon, Bannon, Bannon... That’s a name that keeps coming up in all the communications. Steve Bannon, Donald Trump’s first strategist and a big far-right racist fascist by trade. -"Salvini, Orbán and Le Pen don’t want
to destroy the EU, they want to reform it!" With Bannon, Jeffrey talks politics and also strategy. Jeffrey is excited about Tommy Robinson from the English far right—Islamophobic, racist, anti-immigration. Jeffrey receives Miroslav Lajčák, a Slovak nationalist aligned with the Slovak far right. And when Steve Bannon goes on his tour of Europe to unite Europe’s far rights, who does he report back to? To his buddy Jeffrey! -"People like the League, the RN, are far more sophisticated than American political parties; the best thing I can do for them is exactly what I did for Trump." -"Let them call
you racist. Let them call you xenophobic. Let them call you nativists. Wear it like a badge of honor." -"Recent revelations by our colleagues at France 2 Suggest he could also be a financial backer of Marine Le Pen’s party, the RN." -"What do you think of her?" -"I think she’s great. Marine Le Pen is one of the best political leaders in the world." -"Donald Trump’s former adviser reportedly stayed in Paris at Epstein’s place in October 2018. It was during this stay in France that he met Marine Le Pen, on October 11." According to the butler’s wife,
Steve Bannon came to Epstein’s place, “and not just once!” From what she remembers, “every time he came it was for Marine Le Pen meetings.” The far right, the nationalist right, couldn’t make political capital out of this affair, and that’s normal— because it turns out, well, Epstein is a fascist—there, I said it, he’s a pedo-fascist, a pedo-fascist! There are different kinds of PEDOS—he’s that kind. But yeah: it was an antisemite’s dream and a Jew’s nervous nightmare. Well, both of them woke up... The Jew can maybe relax: it’s fine... Hitler isn’t back... But the antisemite also woke
up, and then, well... it was ONLY a dream—your whole thing doesn’t hold up. Because billionaires, in real life, don’t plot for the end of nations and the destruction of the white race through the Great Replacement! No, they just defend their capitalist interests, basically, and the far right is a political outlet that, in times of crisis, has always been an attractive option for them. Okay, in truth, the reality of his opinions isn’t that clear-cut, He has more interests than ideas. He feeds at every trough, basically. The point here isn’t really his political ideas—they’re not important— it’s
that these networks seemed to include what was traditionally that antisemitic, conspiracist far right. So there is a conspiracy—decades old, well, it’s been exposed, we know it well, and links could be established with the Epstein networks. That conspiracy is the Iran–Contra conspiracy. -"Hearing on the Iran–Contra affair in May 1987" when the United States funded right-wing militias—the Contras—actually far-right, really... to fight communists in Nicaragua during the Cold War. That is a proven conspiracy, an established one. And during the Cold War, as we know, there were CIA coups, support for far-right dictatorships in Latin America, And also in
Africa, and also in Asia, and also support for far-right networks, including far-right terrorists in Europe, like the Gladio networks in Italy. Those are the real conspiracies—why are you talking to me about... “it’s Klaus Schwab who’s going to force me to eat grasshoppers.” Come on, a little seriousness in conspiracism, guys. -"The reason for this change is that they’re purging these files. There’s a facility in Winchester, Virginia, where they’re cleaning the files to remove Republican names. That’s what I’m being told by a very good source." Conspiracism, in itself, is the sigh of the creature excluded from the
system. And what this affair reveals is that, well, just like Trump, who declares war on the deep state and the establishment while he’s at the head of the state and the very essence of the establishment— these far-right conspiracists, nationalists, whatever you want to call them, Aren’t excluded from the system—they are the system, they’re a cog in it. Trump, Clinton—same thing, all of it. And these nationalists, this antisemitic far right, which historically wanted to be the alternative, the subversion, the dissidence, the outside of the system... is in fact clearly very integrated into it. So those conspiratorial
hallucinations can disappear. Would Epstein have helped Bannon if Bannon were antisemitic? Maybe LESS, but Bannon, like soon almost all the leaders of the European far right, no longer focuses on Jews. And even, well... "Marion Maréchal Le Pen—I met her in Washington—she’s going in another direction. She’s trying to launch a university. She’s trying to build something to train young people to understand management in politics, the philosophy of politics, linked to Judeo-Christian cultural foundations." They bring them over to their side. And you know what... it might well be mutual... -"Hungary will withdraw from the ICC, the International
Criminal Court. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán called the conviction of Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu for war crimes and crimes against humanity a “cynical and totally unacceptable decision,” end quote." -"Viktor Orbán went to the Western Wall in Jerusalem." -"His positions against the Jewish billionaire George Soros have earned him accusations of antisemitism. But for his Israeli counterpart, so what— Orbán and the countries of the Visegrád Group have become heavyweight allies." -"They may be antisemites but they’re on our side." Said an Israeli MP from Netanyahu’s right-wing party. Hungarian, Czech and Slovak nationalists had just been welcomed with great
pomp in Israel. Since then, Vox in Spain, the AfD in Germany, the RN in France... The European far right has fallen in love with the Israeli far right... Hungary has become an Eldorado for Israelis, and Tommy Robinson in England can proudly wear his Israeli army T-shirt, like Epstein... Israel has become a washing machine for people accused of antisemitism. which gives it a key role in the reactionary international—the fascist international. In exchange, it finds in these far-right parties supporters who don’t care much about human rights. And by defending Israel during its bloodiest years, they can make
the fight against antisemitism look like a RIGHT-WING cause. And then, left-wing Jews feel uneasy. -"I’ve lost many friends,” confides Arié Alimi as well. He notes that “his” left—Insoumise or anti-capitalist—poorly understands what Jewish identity is, of which attachment to Israel is fully a part. He spent childhood holidays there, student summers at the university library in Jerusalem, he has family there." And for all those who refuse to divorce from Israel, it shifts to the right... even the far right. -"You can’t keep rejecting a party that today has in mind supporting Israel and Jews." So believing there are
no more antisemites—conservative, nationalist, traditional— well, that would be rather cavalier, if you’ll allow me that humble expression! But if antisemitism continues in the streets, it’s because there are antisemites. And if they’re neither in the media nor among the far-right goons... Then where, exactly, were they hiding? The takeover of the fight against antisemitism by... conservative or reactionary... forces... didn’t start with... October 7 or whatever... It had been going on for at least more than 15 years... In 2009, in “The Philo-Semitic Reaction,” the Talmud scholar Ivan Segré noted: -"the integration of the fight against antisemitism into the
value system of an ideological current which, historically, was hostile to Jews." Thus was born: the Philo-Semitic Reaction. A reactionary current that justified its anti-progressive, anti-whatever opinions, anti-left... in quotes... “in the language of the fight against antisemitism.” Among its first victims: the student and worker uprisings of May ’68. -"We noted that the bourgeois and the Jew are more or less superimposable, in the criticism and hatred they are subjected to." So is May ’68... actually... maybe... antisemitic? -"The analytical hypothesis of an identity between Jewish and bourgeois discourses rests on the following analogy: The student challenge to bourgeois
discourse that characterizes May ’68 would prove its original expression in the evangelical challenge to Jewish discourse and would translate analytically as the challenge to the father as discourse of the law." Guys, have you noticed that if we replace “bourgeois” with “Jew,” Anti-bourgeois discourse becomes antisemitic discourse. At the end of the book, the author mentions this exchange: started by Jean-Claude Milner on France Culture, speaking about Pierre Bourdieu’s sociology book The Inheritors. -"I’m fine with it being by reference to Bourdieu. I have my thesis on what “inheritor” means in Bourdieu. The inheritors are the Jews." -"Oh, you
think so?" -"I think it’s an antisemitic book." -"Oh really? Oh wow!" -"Yes." -"Listen [laughs], as you put it very, very bluntly, perhaps we’ll have to devote another program to this question—this question." -"I’ll leave that point." Seventeen years later, Jean-Claude Milner is still on the lookout. -"'Tax the rich!' yes, sure... but immediately I tell myself: you can make it the major premise of a syllogism. Tax the rich—now, Jews are rich (??? ok bro ??) therefore: tax the Jews. Death to the slaughterers, yes but Jews are slaughterers, therefore death to the Jews." Well then, long live the
slaughterers... Tax the rich—horror, practically Nazism! So you might say: “he’s old, grandpa, time’s ticking!” but he’s been saying this for 20 years, okay—he’s dead serious. And it starts from a simple reality: every possible law against antisemitism has been passed, BUT the country keeps generating... generating insults, assaults... SINCE it CAN’T be expressed in the media or politically, this antisemitism, well, it can only be hidden, coded, encrypted, concealed, so you need decoders to find hidden meanings and metaphorical symbols. "Old antisemitism claimed itself. Modern antisemitism doesn’t own up to itself; it hides. Because it is unthinkable (how can
one be antisemitic after Hitler?), it is unthought." “Unthought”—wow, that’s strong. There was “thought crime,” that was already something, now here’s the crime of “unthought.” You hadn’t even thought it could be antisemitic—yet it is. Example: owls. Owls in the 12th century, and a bit in the 13th, were an antisemitic thing, OK? Because if you mistranslate the Bible there’s a verse that says Moses has horns, then owls bring disease, and in the Middle Ages people said Jews brought disease. And also owls live at night, and since Jews aren’t in the light of Christ, they’re kind of a
people of the night like owls, so owls are antisemitic. It’s documented—there are theses, articles, research work. I’m not making up some stupid thing! It’s established for specialists in the field. Obviously it’s a little-known example, but I’m telling you that in the end, you become either completely paranoid or completely out of touch. It starts from good intentions, or at least an IMPOTENCE to deal with the problem, because antisemitism continues and we don’t know what to do. But in the end we’re reduced to what’s called hermeneutics and semiotics. That is: the science of interpreting texts and the
study of SIGNS and meaning... to DETECT the structures of language and reasoning that could ONE DAY have been used for antisemitic ends. To detect the artifacts, the remnants of an archaeological antisemitism. Except in the end you end up with stuff like... May ’68: antisemitic Bourdieu’s The Inheritors: antisemitic And taxing the rich is kind of antisemitic—it’s ambiguous... it’s not clear—what do you mean, don’t tax the rich? You mean we should tax people who are rich, is that it? mmmh... It becomes kind of antisemitic to say it’s antisemitic because, who says all rich people are Jews, or
Jews are rich, except antisemites? You’re the antisemite for saying antisemitic, antisemitic...! And the anti-antisemitism activist ends up in a world of mystical metaphors where you need a master’s-plus-12 to run everything through the antisemitic-symbol detector. -"It’s an antisemitism that doesn’t know itself, an antisemitism filtered by the amount of good feelings Injected into its discourse, but no less real for that. Its danger is increased by the feeling that it doesn’t know itself." There you go... you don’t even know it, but it’s antisemitic, and it’s even worse because if you did know, fine, but here you don’t! Not
only are you a Nazi, you’re also dumb! Congrats! You could at least make the effort to educate yourself, but no! So here Raphaël Enthoven is talking about the antisemitism of someone in particular: -"When I fight Les Insoumis, I’m fighting people who are; who, in good faith, in good faith, think they are not antisemites." -"In any case this study is unequivocal: LFI supporters are less antisemitic or have fewer antisemitic prejudices than right-wing or far-right supporters." -"Listen, that’s what the study says. But the problem isn’t there, once again..." He’s talking about a part of the French left
that I’m discovering: La France Insoumise, labeled too pro-Palestine, pro-Islam and, precisely... -"From this ideological configuration, at once Islamophile, Palestinolatrous and “beur-phile,” there emerges an indirect, subtle, symbolic Judeophobia." Pierre-André Taguieff wrote in 2002 in his book The New Judeophobia. Since you can be antisemitic without being Judeophobic, you could be Judeophobic without necessarily drawing from the nationalist and conspiracist repertoire of historical antisemitism... Thus appears a new antisemitism, a new Judeophobia, different, and not from the same source as the first. Pierre-André Taguieff is credited with identifying this NEW... source... which would be what he calls the “Islamo-leftists.” The
basic observation is very simple: it’s after 9/11, and on 9/11, Bin Laden, well, is sort of the spiritual son of the communist Leon Trotsky and the revolutionary Che Guevara! There you go—if you didn’t know, well, it’s written in his book. And then, out of hatred for the West AND THEREFORE Israel, there would arise ON THE LEFT these new Judeophobes, “neo-leftists” of “Marxist revolutionarism,” “Marxo-Christian-Islamic,” and other “leftist feminist” types of “neo-communist, perverted Christianity” and its “xenophilia” -"To the aesthetic-leftist theme of the beauty of the mixed-race person, to the advertising celebration of mixing, there has been added
in the imagination of certain activist elites an a priori sympathy for those perceived indiscriminately as foreign or victimized immigrants, that is, “irregulars,” or more commonly, “illegals,” celebrated as undocumented people by the new do-gooders." A Jean-Marie Le Pen Facebook post? No. A CNRS researcher, president of the March 2 Foundation, from the “sovereigntist” “left,” with Élisabeth Lévy and other figures... A man who today does nothing but rant about anti-white racism, or goes to war against wokism and deconstruction... -"Philosophical texts have become a war machine against Western civilization." Yeah, yeah... we’re really going to listen to you with
that ow- ow— that ow- cut— That’s where the winding paths of the hermeneutic-semiotic analysis of indirect antisemitism ended up, subtle and symbolic… in full psychoanalysis: on the left… Linked, therefore, to the community you know very well. -"In Arab families, in France, and everyone knows it but nobody wants to say it, antisemitism is suckled with mother’s milk." -"It’s a disgrace that you can say such a thing…!" Georges Bensoussan! In 2002 again, a collective book edited by Georges Bensoussan is published, "The Lost Territories of the Republic", ouch ouch ouch, scary stuff! Don’t worry bro, it’s nothing, everything’s
fine… The book is a best-of of the worst anecdotes from teachers in suburban middle and high schools, and so guess what— what do you think happens? -"Antisemitic!" Antisemitism throughout the whole book, obviously, what’s funny is that they themselves admit they all make racist remarks among themselves because, well, middle school / high school, 2) the suburbs. But they’re still shocked when it’s about Jews… Because we know them, these little thugs, these “beurettes”, these young “beurs” who spit on French soil and thus, by extension, spit on France… Their attacks on secularism, their Fatma hands, scarves in the
colors of Algeria, Bin Laden tags… There are no religious symbols there, that’s just Arab stuff— My favorite part, the exceptional moment where the teacher rejoices that the US army crushes the enemy in Afghanistan and brings them to Guantánamo because it restores the authority of Western civilization AND THEREFORE the authority of the teacher in the classroom. No, it’s the Enlightenment, the Enlightenment, the civilization of Enlightenment, the light of Jules Ferry before the inferior races, well, the animals. So, uh, Georges Bensoussan’s thesis is basically this: -"We didn’t want to see the cultural and anthropological factors at the
source, at the very heart of traditional Maghrebi culture." There you go—so it’s anthropological with them, right, with aquiline noses, curly hair and aggressiveness, there are statistical regularities, that’s just how it is… That’s what Mr. Bensoussan notes, who writes books to remind us how terrible the situation of Jews was in Arab countries. That it was so much better on the side of the countries that carried out the Shoah, presumably… -"There is a very large number of studies that have continued to appear for about thirty years now and which all go in the same direction, yes: today
antisemitic prejudices are extremely heavy, massive, among people of Arab-Muslim immigration. And what is more serious is that it’s among young people of Arab-Muslim origin, who are French, under 35, Whereas among the older ones, over 60–65, prejudices are less persistent." And that’s true, it’s real—but then: if the chibanis born back home have fewer prejudices than the French-born youth who are further from the original culture, then the original culture isn’t the problem. After all, there is a historical, cultural, “anthropological” tradition, perhaps, he would say, of antisemitism among Westerners. The question is why it wouldn’t be activated, or
less activated, than others. But you’ll have understood anyway that these ANALYSES are there to serve a political agenda. -"The fight against antisemitism has become a propaganda tool, a means used by racist media and parties to discredit Black and Arab minorities, by claiming that antisemitism is a prerequisite of the Muslim religion." In fact, if the authors of the book had stepped outside France for two seconds to look at the United States, for example, they would see that prejudices against Jews are this time stronger among Blacks and Latinos, minorities in general, and even Asians, in the few
studies that mention them. And personally I don’t really see what Islam or Maghrebi anthropology would have to do with it, worth investigating though. But what seems to emerge is maybe something else—namely jealousy. -"If you can attack Blacks, Arabs, Muslims with near impunity—in short, the ‘subalterns’— it is almost impossible (…) to touch a single hair on a Jew’s head or criticize Israel without immediately being labeled antisemitic." -"The idea of ‘double standards’ is often found in the anti-racist field, according to which Jews are privileged and take up too much space." "Are they privileged (antisemitic prejudice)? Are they
less discriminated against or better listened to (competition of suffering)? The Jew remains a pebble in the shoe of anti-racists, the disruptive element." Meanwhile, antisemitism remains present and violent in society: insults, assaults… murders. Since it almost never expresses itself EXPLICITLY in public discourse, it requires an EVER-HIGHER level of vigilance. And while the fight against antisemitism continues in the realm of symbols and the unthought, other racisms remain fully in the open fields of the explicit. Which creates this feeling of double standards. This Judeophobia… born of jealousy. Especially since politically and in the media, other racisms are far
more tolerated. -"The very second Dieudonné made antisemitic remarks, he was banned from all media, and personally I think that’s good. When Éric Zemmour was convicted for racist remarks against Arabs, he was given TV shows. And I think I have objectively established a double standard." Is this double standard a feeling or a reality? -"Down with the veil, of course." We’re going to examine that with two examples, the first of which— an affair that concentrated all of this: semiotics, hermeneutics, Islamo-leftism and double standards. The release in March of a visual on Twitter featuring Cyril Hanouna’s face, and
very quickly, accusations: this poster resembles the poster of the film Jud Süß, by the German Veit Harlan released in 1940—and controversy ensues. -"They made an antisemitic poster." -"It’s an antisemitic poster. -You don’t need to know much history to know that this iconography is typically antisemitic." -"Racist, antisemitic illustration, reminding us of the darkest hours of our history…" -"Hooked nose, protruding ears, a combination of all antisemitic stereotypes, the profile looks traced from a caricature of the 1930s. For those who know how to read, it’s as clear as blue-white-red for France, or the swastika for the Nazis." -"There’s
a whole imaginary of antisemitic propaganda here, and Cyril Hanouna will file a complaint. How did you react when you saw it?" -"I was scandalized, like the entire French population, I think." Well, NO. I don’t think the average French person says: “Oh yeah, it looks like the Jud Süß poster by Veit Harlan from 1940! The codes are there!” I’m not sure—you need specialized cultural knowledge that NOT EVERYONE has. Let’s be lucid for two seconds. So let’s compare: do you know THIS painting? This painting is an OFFICIAL fresco of the Republic proudly displayed on the walls of
the NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, and honestly, I’ll admit it, the Hanouna poster didn’t personally jump out at me as antisemitic. Sorry, I’m dumb, but still, it seems pretty kindergarten-level… And don’t come out with: “uh, it’s the artist’s style.” That doesn’t work. We’re talking about codes! We’re on codes, right? Codes, your grandma queen of grasshoppers, codes, to me it looks like: -"As clear as blue-white-red for France or the swastika for the Nazis." There was a petition a few years ago, 4,000 signatures. Marianne headlined: “Pfff, they see racism everywhere.” This isn’t some random Twitter visual, it’s an official painting
in the National Assembly, MPs can walk past it every day if they want. It never triggered the slightest scandal, and maybe Black people on TV panels just get less attention. -"Double standards." But let’s move on to the second big scandal of the year. -"The Netanyahu costume works pretty well to scare people. See who it is? It’s like a Nazi but without a foreskin." A joke about Netanyahu’s foreskin, then complaint, summons, fired from the radio, show canceled. We don’t joke about these topics, okay? Making a joke about the foreskin of a Jewish head of state. I
mean, can you imagine if a comedian had made the same joke about the foreskin of a Muslim head of state on the same station?! -"Ayatollah Khomeini with his can’t-get-off face, his foreskin as a turban, his tiny dick-hole eyes And his ball-hair beard." She’s dumb, she’s dumb… Go on, decorate her! Legion of Honor, huh! -"Double standards." Compare? No, but that has nothing to do with it… The editor-in-chief of Charlie Hebdo, Riss, said: "This isn’t Charlie, that joke about Netanyahu. […] That’s the difference—the Charlie spirit isn’t that; the Charlie spirit is more subtle and harder to master
than it seems." He knows about subtlety and humor, Riss—for example: a little Syrian refugee child who dies crossing the sea, well, you can caricature him as a sexual predator like all his kind, Signed Riss. That’s Charlie. -"Double standards." Another example: "Angry Boko Haram sex slaves: don’t touch our welfare checks" -"Does that make you laugh?" -"I-it’s the faces—the faces of the characters, it’s totally absurd…" -"But there’s the faces, and then there’s what it’s saying." -"Huh, uhhhh" -"The veiled woman character saying ‘don’t touch our welfare’." -It’s not—it’s not a—" -"They’re Boko Haram sex slaves." Okay, wait, I’ll
explain: Boko Haram in Nigeria massacres villages, kidnaps sex slaves, sometimes minors—in fact it’s hah— It’s funny because, well, they’re Black… And they’re yelling, they keep yelling, pumping out kids for welfare, like here, right! Signed Riss. That’s the Charlie spirit: “more subtle and harder to master than it seems.” -"Double standards." Third drawing: Stromae. You know, son of a Rwandan refugee, his father was killed and cut to pieces during the Rwandan genocide. So there you go—you get it now, we’re in subtlety! Signed Riss. Riss was exhibited at the Shoah Memorial. Now you’re going to act all ambiguous
again and say that maybe that’s kind of the problem, but actually it’s just because you didn’t understand. There you go—genocides always make for good laughs, but when it’s about the uh… fufufufehein the… well, fufufufehein… I’m not going to say the word— -"The foreskin incident opens up abysses of reflection on the relativity of acceptable laughter, depending on targets, eras, and media." -"What image do left-wing, anti-racist thirty-somethings Have of Charlie Hebdo, which they discovered in the Val years?" -"A belligerent rag, about which the main debate is whether its Islamophobia is dumber than it is hateful, or the
reverse." -"From that point of view, nothing distinguishes a Riss drawing from one in Valeurs Actuelles. It’s hard to draw like racists." So what do we do then? Ban everyone from drawing anything? Since others are jealous, since Charlie Hebdo keeps having its little SLIP-UPS… Well, let’s hit the Jews—it’ll relieve the others! Come on Charlie, do us a little bit on the Shoah— Okay, that’s maybe a slightly dubious political line to defend… I’LL REFRAIN FROM DOING SO. Because we need to be clear on the facts: there can be all the media outrage in the world, antisemitic violence
exists in real life. And in reality, some people may well pretend to be EXTREMELY ATTENTIVE TO THE ISSUE, a newspaper like Raphaël Enthoven’s can allow itself to draw Éric Zemmour like this… or like this, or like this… And then suddenly—no but…! -"Threatening posture, hooked nose, protruding ear, he combines all antisemitic stereotypes. The visual looks traced from a 1930s caricature." The codes are there. And what worries me personally is that this is an antisemitism that doesn’t know itself, it’s an antisemitism… -"Whose danger is increased by the feeling that it does not know itself." Basically, these guys,
they’re not on point at all with this hyper-vigilance thing… I won’t say it’s theater just to silence political opponents, but in any case, this vigilance activates ONLY FOR OTHERS, never for themselves. Never would these good liberal or conservative bourgeois entertain the idea that THEY TOO could also be antisemitic in an indirect, subtle, symbolic—or non-symbolic—way… And since they themselves are prosecutors in the media tribunal, they will NEVER be suspects, which amounts to handing out licenses for antisemitism, which… is a rather surprising strategy in the fight against antisemitism. If it just amounts to setting up an authorized
antisemitism. The one and only conclusion of this whole affair was that… since all racisms are ultimately connected, you can’t make one disappear without making the others disappear, SO things had to be seen globally—hence an anti-racism… TOTAL. And the problem is that… the political situation… was not… going to allow it… In October 2023, a march “For the Republic and against antisemitism” is organized in Paris, AND French President Emmanuel Macron does not take part. Georges Bensoussan explains why. -"Emmanuel Macron didn’t come, and what’s interesting to know is why he didn’t come. He didn’t come because he takes
advice from the comedian we all know: Benalla. Who must no doubt be telling him that on the side of the suburbs, the Islamized suburbs, it would be very badly perceived." So I’ll skip over the idea that the suburbs are Islamized, 2) that Macron actually cares, and 3) that they wouldn’t vote for you if you go to that march, Seriously—they’re supposedly so antisemitic and have no other concerns in life… Let’s clarify anyway: Benalla isn’t the comedian, It’s BELLATAR, let’s not confuse Arabs, Mr. Finkielkraut— Sorry… I have trouble with… cisgender men… who have been… accused of incitement
to racial hatred. The point is mainly that, in fact, secretly, Macron is under the control of an Islamic communal influence network. That’s the problem. The Secretary General of the Élysée and main adviser to Emmanuel Macron at the time, happens to be a certain Alexis Kohler. And Alexis Kohler, well… he is… not a Muslim Brotherhood member… Although… although… You see the trick? Mr. Bensoussan’s communal conspiracism calls for… another one. Macron controlled by Arabs? But who’s going to stop saying the opposite? Saying it yourself? In the mirror of authorized conspiracism, antisemitic conspiracism. And bam—vicious cycle. And the
truth: Emmanuel Macron is a grown man, he makes his own decisions, and if he doesn’t go to a march, it’s to avoid getting booed… But there you go: by constantly invoking conspiratorial, nationalist, infiltrator imaginaries, media, politicians and intellectuals fuel a climate That can ONLY end up producing antisemitism. Because it’s the same reasoning. Because it’s THE SAME discourse. A discourse that drips EVERY DAY onto the population, from which antisemitism can spring at any moment, a growing antisemitism, which can only GROW in an environment where it is constantly OXYGENATED. an ambient conspiracism—authorized, normalized, broadcast to a mass
audience. It’s BOOMERANG antisemitism. You throw out Islamophobic conspiracism, nationalist “plots,” you get antisemitism straight back in the face. Global racism, total system. To break the vicious circle, you would have had to BURY all the fossils of archaeological antisemitic discourse— but in the end the problems hadn’t really changed since the 1930s; they were still the same… So the discourses stayed the same, and the effects would stay the same. We ended up trapped. -"All the Jewish French people who were murdered in the last 15 years were murdered by Muslim hands. I can’t help it. Manuel Valls said
it. […] I myself said it on France Culture, and it got me a trial that lasted 4 years." Can you imagine someone talking about “Jewish hands” to describe what Israel is doing in Gaza? Regardless of the stat, Yeah, I’m not convinced there are a lot of Buddhists in the Israeli army, but from there to generalize on that basis would be antisemitic number 1, and number 2 it would be a political choice. But that is indeed Mr. Bensoussan’s choice, whose ENTIRE THESIS and ENTIRE WORK consists in making the Muslim community a PROBLEM… an ANTHROPOLOGICAL problem. The
guy is a historian of antisemitism—well, he’s done his homework, haha! He applies… He’s an archaeologist. But let’s answer on the substance, because it might be true what he says. -"Of the dozens of attackers arrested in 2001 for antisemitic acts, Only two belonged to a far-right movement." Far-right parties have calmed down on the issue, apparently far-right groups too, They don’t target Jews as much as before. So has the “historical channel” disappeared? The German chancellor, in a speech a few months ago, said: "We have IMPORTED antisemitism through MIGRANTS these last 10 years." Oh really…? Saying antisemitism in
GERMANY is an imported product??? Seems like there’s still a little local supply chain! But you know, I love German statistics, so I went to look—maybe he’s right. In 2022, antisemitic violence was therefore committed by… The right at over 82%, foreigners 2.5%, religious 1.4% and the left, a miserable 0.3%… Well… always there to disappoint, huh… But in 2023, the turning-point year, that should have changed… Antisemitism in 2023 doubles… right: top 1, over 58%, foreigners 23%, religious 10, left 0.77… The following year, 2024: 44% for the right, foreigners 10%, left 8, religious 3.8%… There’s clearly a shift.
Except—observation number 1: The classic right / far-right hasn’t disappeared at all and remains the majority, so uh… Thinking the job is done—uh, no, there’s still work… that deserves attention, Mr. Chancellor himself—his father was in the Wehrmacht and his grandfather in the Nazi party, so… there may be some artifacts in the attic… And then you’d also have to look at what’s being counted as an antisemitic act, because well, Germany—uh—well, you know, couscous is already kind of antisemitic, one third of people fired, silenced or boycotted for antisemitism are themselves Jewish. Because a pro-Palestine slogan is enough to
get counted as antisemitic. So yes, interpretation of the numbers has limits. The goal of the discourse anyway isn’t to fight antisemitism, it’s to wash your hands by pointing at the migrant… That’s also what J.D. Vance will do, the Vice President of the United States… while ignoring the neo-Nazi and antisemitic white-supremacist terrorist demonstrations in his own camp. So in France, we don’t have German or US statistics to know exactly what proportion of blah blah… We don’t know. We can take the cases of antisemitic murders that were covered in the media and compare them with certain attacks—
which can be a debatable method, sure. But the truth is we don’t know whose “hands” or whatever confession they were, since we have no figures. The generalization made by Georges Bensoussan Mainly serves as a POLITICAL argument, his interpretation of the facts is POLITICAL, and it serves him to conclude that people should vote… Rassemblement National, by saying that even if that party was founded by Nazis, Waffen-SS, that’s not the point. -"We are not naïve, we know that in the RN there are many antisemitic prejudices but they are not the same antisemitic prejudices. And then communities—and it’s
not only a community, it’s also a Jewish society. It’s like states: they have interests, they don’t have friends." So there you go—that’s called communitarianism, fully owned, that one. -"So here, the question is: what are the common enemies?" Yeah… who is it? -"When The Lost Territories of the Republic came out in October 2002, it was met with a long media silence, but also political silence, coming from part of the left, from which all of us came. A few months later, a first paradox was to see a right-wing government receive us, and arrange, in November 2003, for
us to be heard (regarding) the question of whether or not to authorize the Islamic headscarf at school." -"As debates on secularism begin through hearings by two parliamentary commissions with the principle of adopting or not adopting a law banning the veil at school." -"Of an ostentatious nature, the veil." In 2004, the law banning the veil in schools is passed. Which was going to solve nothing. Because on the contrary, it would raise new questions, and more, and more… -"Draft implementing circular. It concerns bandanas in particular, but you’ll see, here too, nothing is simple." -"A circular could tighten
this law by banning veiled mothers from participating in school trips." -"Manuel Valls is also very firm regarding the veil. He says he favors banning it at university." 'We should do it, but there are constitutional rules that make this ban difficult.'" -"The president of UNEF for Paris 4 University, uh, she’s a young woman who wears a veil, she’s on the front page of Charlie Hebdo this week. Well as always with our colleagues, it’s great delicacy." -"So the veil is a controversial topic and a source of discord. Once again, the veil is back in the spotlight after
an RN elected official confronted a veiled woman accompanying a school trip." -"Please remove that veil." -"MPs stood up and left a commission at the National Assembly; the cause was the presence of a union activist, spokesperson for UNEF, the student union. Her name is Mariam Bouchtou, she wore the hijab and sparked controversy by coming veiled yesterday to the National Assembly." -"But no, there’s nothing to do with the burkini. Nothing to do with anything that could be Islamist." -"Who votes in favor?" -"It is adopted." -"At first it went unnoticed, the EU co-funded campaign even made its way
onto the benches of the French Senate." -"The tweets published by the Council of Europe have nothing to do with how secularism is applied in France." -"The Ministry of Education also considers the abaya a religious sign to be banned." -"Indeed, the priority is to give meaning, to calm things down." It won’t calm anything down at all. This veil law only sharpened a conflict that keeps deepening—because when you make a community A PROBLEM TO SOLVE… You can only sink further and further into racism… The question is: how far are we willing to go…? Our left-wing intellectuals were
soon going to get the beginning of an answer… In the latest legislative elections, the parties of the French left unite against the “far right” to create the “New Popular Front,” and then a column appears in Figaro Vox: "The New Popular Front constitutes the primary threat to Jewish French people." Among its many signatories, first in the header… Georges Bensoussan and Pierre-André Taguieff… “Enlightenment left,” sovereignist left; in fact supremacist left—Western supremacism— Understood just how far they were willing to go. So they bring up migration flows, Islamism, you know the drill—they’ve made their choice. Just like Richard Prasquier,
former president of CRIF, they will vote far right. If someone had said a few years ago to the Jewish community that this kind of “block the left by voting far right” column would end up being published… apparently… it would have SHOCKED people a lot… In the end, it wasn’t such a huge earthquake… Because it’s already been a few years that the Jewish community… has shifted right. Sociologists noted it regarding CRIF, yes—it’s an organization well on the right. Especially since the Second Intifada in Palestine and the disappearance of the left in Israel… It really is Palestine
Palestine, Israel Israel all the way through the Taguieff–Bensoussan op-ed. So to counterbalance the pro-Israel, right-wing Zionists of CRIF, there was an attempt to create a network of left-wing Zionists, called J-CALL, created in 2010… Among its signatories were: Georges Bensoussan or Alain Finkielkraut… And 15 years later you can start to notice that… left-wing Zionists were increasingly revealed to be… mostly right-wing men. Maybe the species mysteriously going extinct wasn’t so much right-wing antisemites… but rather… left-wing Jews. -"A new reactionary is someone who looks like an old reactionary But he is new because before, he wasn’t reactionary. He
was often even progressive, a man of utopia, of invention, and then suddenly he thinks it’s to the past and not the future that we must turn to find solutions. He doesn’t like immigration, especially—especially Muslim immigration. That’s really a bit of an obsession among the new reactionaries, who often were, on the contrary, friends of immigrants, supporters, like that…" -"And then anyway people say, well all those ones, all those who don’t think like us, all those who aren’t in our line, all those who don’t go in that direction, the respectable, politically correct direction—and there! They’re all reactionaries
becoming fascists, all of them!" In 2002, again. Daniel Lindenberg talks about the emergence of this intellectual current, neo-reactionary, built around left-wing intellectuals and activists suddenly shifting to the right. And at the heart of this phenomenon, you found in particular… Jews Jews who apparently seemed to be MUCH more concerned than others, for some mysterious reason. In the United States, for quite some time, another new current had also appeared: neo-conservatism, whose first writings had been published by the Jewish monthly Commentary of the American Jewish Committee. Now, there have always been right-wing Jews, That’s nothing new—and there’s diversity
in that community because there are individuals and… well, I hope this video has made that clear enough. BUT on a collective level, something had changed. -"If the first half of the 20th century was the age of Franz Kafka, Sigmund Freud, Walter Benjamin, Rosa Luxemburg and Leon Trotsky, the second was rather that of Raymond Aron, Leo Strauss, Henry Kissinger and Ariel Sharon. (...) Jews who vote left, for example, remain numerous, both in Europe and in the United States, but this choice—which often stems from a tradition, an inherited culture— is not overdetermined by the particular position they
occupy in the social and political context. By contrast, it is when they do not vote like simple American, French or Italian voters, but first of all, as Jews, That they tend to give their preference to right-wing political forces." It’s sometimes thought as if the most right-wing community in the country were Jews. And there, REALLY, it makes no sense— because Jews had for a long time been almost the MOST LEFT-WING community. What happened? In 2025, Guillaume Erner recounted in his book the story of his communist family who belonged to that category… common: the Judeo-Bolsheviks. -"In every
cell of the Communist Party, there was a minyan, in other words at least ten male Jews: the Party meeting was Yom Kippur without the fasting. The big names were Leon Trotsky, Rosa Luxemburg or Emma Goldman, accompanied by thousands of anonymous people." -"I gradually detached myself from Stalinism, But my grandparents didn’t detach themselves, they considered Gorbachev a traitor. My father voted Communist—these were very left-wing people for whom Jewish identity was associated with left-wing identity." He recalls this joke about the Revolutionary Communist League: why doesn’t the LCR hold its congresses in Yiddish? because Bensaïd is Sephardic…! The
joke is… they’re all Jewish… And Guillaume Erner notes something that annoys him: today, there are no more Jews in LFI’s leadership bodies, even though the era keeps counting the “racialized.” And you notice, it’s funny how the condition for summoning back the old antisemitic lexicon Is the supposed fight against antisemitism. The resurrection of the antisemitic fossil is conditioned by philo-Semitism. -"Hatred, the antisemitic plague, is much more present, much more active, on the side of the far left." -"It shifted toward the far left, toward the left." -"This antisemitism is no longer where we thought it was. In
France, it is fueled exclusively by the far left." Now, I don’t know feelings or impressions, only the numbers. The CNCDH has published long surveys; antisemitic stereotypes are more present on the right… The willingness to FIGHT antisemitism is MASSIVELY on the left—even the far left. No… The only point where the left / far left stands out… is “exclusively” its critical stance toward Israel. That’s the ONE AND ONLY reason for this DIVORCE, apparently. It’s Pierre Birnbaum who spoke of this “Israelization” of the Jewish community, which seems to be responsible for this phenomenon of radicalization to the right
that goes as far as shaking even the Chief Rabbi of France, who is far from being some big leftist. -"So it’s true that today—even seeing part of the left as the main vector of the spread of antisemitism is extraordinarily painful. It’s painful for France, and it’s painful for the left. Because it’s a rupture with its deepest identity." Are you sure… it’s not rather the opposite? So, once again, Guillaume, don’t worry: not all Jews are far right. Maybe they should invite onto TV panels Alain Gresh or Rony Brauman or Michaël Löwy, who, well—actually is in LFI
circles, on the scientific council of their think tank. An ecosocialism theorist with a line of thought that draws particularly from Jewish religion, there are others, if we’re going to COUNT LIKE THAT… They control ag—well they’re—well… I’m for it, me. But don’t generalize too much; still, Guillaume Erner is right to say the very first Jewish candidate in a French presidential election, Alain Krivine in ’69, was far left… It’s just that we also need to tell the rest of the story: the second—and latest to date—Éric Zemmour… is far right… Just an anecdote? Apparently not. It’s a community
phenomenon. And you know, if you look at Israel, it’s funny—it’s exactly the same drift. Israel is first led by the radical left, then the left, then alternation, then the right, then today… -"The Israeli far right…" -"It really is a tidal wave." -"This drift of Israeli politics toward the far right." How could Jews have gone from that… to that… -"Anti-Zionism is antisemitism." Roger Cukierman at the AIPAC meeting… had a line… -"I must say that this government, even if it is not popular in France, is extremely sympathetic toward our cause." He’s right—but he doesn’t give the reason.
And then, it was David Ben-Gurion, founder of the State of Israel, who said: "The first great victory of Zionism is to have transformed the Jewish question into an Arab problem." And it was Benjamin Netanyahu who said—and it was barely noticed: -"You have these terrorists in your home and you must imagine that if you build a terrorist state, not thousands of kilometers from Paris, but in the suburbs, next door to you, do you think that would create peace?" -"What would France do if, in the suburbs of Paris, there were 20,000 soldiers?" -"The possibility of having a
Palestinian state in the Paris suburbs—that’s what we’re talking about." -"It hasn’t escaped anyone that certain foreign powers have understood there are a certain number of themes that divide us." -"This headquarters focuses on Western Europe […] notably through the activation of Muslim minorities who become loud, violent there, and threaten states." You’re on Taoqan’s channel—it’s me! Thanks to the donors who fund the channel! See you very soon to talk about Israel and then: -"The fight against racism could have built bridges between you and us. We’ll see what came of it." To be continued.
![IA : CE QUE CACHE LA BULLE [ARGENT MAGIQUE]](https://img.youtube.com/vi/1CrjyQvV3nE/mqdefault.jpg)
