Hey guys and welcome to today's video. Today we have two sovereign citizens in court or non4th amendment citizens as they like to call themselves. Now the first one comes from Colorado and the second one is a followup to a video I recently covered out of Michigan.
So let's begin. Okay. And court calls people versus Robert Geese um 2016884.
And if you'll come on up to the podium, he appears in the courtroom and the district attorney, uh, Mr McGra appears for the people. Um, so, Mr Geese, are you going to be hiring a private attorney? Do you want a referral to the public defender or are you going to be representing yourself?
Your honor, do I stand in to speak? Yes. I appreciate that.
It's important to me that I stay respectful. I come in peace as a non-belligerant. I um would like to read this into the record if I may.
Sure. Go ahead. First, your honor, respectfully, for and on the record, I am Robert Eugene Geese, a man of the VUN, a natural person, as said, a non-belligerant or enemy of the state, and I occupy the office of executive and co-rustee for the Name Kolkari Express Trust.
I am here propri propria persona in that regard by special appearance only not generally. Further I am of the age of majority by both age and a verminant sui jurist on the record in Weld County. I deny that I am a US citizen nor do I claim to be a sovereign.
I deny that I'm a federal 14th amendment citizen, a corporation or a statutory person. I'm a natural freeborn national of the territory of Colorado known as a Colorado. If I may, I would like the uh court to take judicial notice that the written record thus far is incorrect.
As said, I am here appropriate persona. I am not here prosay, nor am I here proper. It's important that that be documented and on the record.
I have submitted a motion to of discovery and an affidavit of truth. Uh has the court received and reviewed those documents? Um if you want to uh request discovery, you need to do that through the district attorney's office.
I I've done that. Okay. And the documents are recorded.
Sir, did you I have received your request for discovery. It is being processed at this time, sir. Okay.
With that in mind, I don't know how this court can proceed without the affidavit being rebutted, answered, and discovery being taken care of. That's not how this works. Um, so the court is not the one that goes through the discovery.
Um, uh, if you want to talk to the DA regarding plea offers in the case, I'm happy to set over for you to do that. If you're going to hire a private attorney or if you want a referral to the public defender, I'm happy to set another date for you to get that done as well. Would you like to discuss the matter now, sir?
We can, sir. Uh, we would pass the case and then speak off. Yeah.
[clears throat] Okay, we'll pass the case for a few minutes. Thank you. Okay.
So, they step away to discuss a possible plea offer and to no one's surprise, the American non-citizen declines the offer and they come back a few minutes later to finish the hearing. You would like to recall Mr G when you have a chance. Okay, sure.
Uh, court will recall people versus Robert G 2016884. And if I may correct the court, the last name is pronounced geese. Geese.
Sorry about that. As in Canada Geese. Yep.
That's okay. Okay. U [clears throat] Mr McGra.
Uh yes. After speaking uh with Mr Geese, I advised him of the offer on the case. Uh it is his plan to uh plead not guilty and set for trial today, your honor.
Okay. If I may, I apologize. Respectfully, um I do not plea.
I don't know how I can plea uh and I object to and would not consent to a plea being made for me. Okay. So, how do you want to proceed?
Well, we'll go ahead with setting up a trial. So, if you want a trial, that means that I will be entering a not guilty plea. I understand that.
I respect that. I will object to it and I don't consent to it. But let's proceed.
All right. So, I need to go through an advisement with you regarding your right to counsel. Uh, do you understand that you have the right to be represented by counsel in your case?
Yes. Um, do you understand that if you cannot afford an attorney, what would be provided to you free of charge if you qualify financially for the public defender? I am here appropriate persona.
Do you understand that um the charges against you in this case are driving under revoke license and careless driving? They're both class two um I'm sorry uh the careless driving is a class 2 misdemeanor traffic offense that carries up to uh 10 days to 90 days in the county jail. Uh the driving under revoke license um is as a class A traffic infraction and carries a possible fine.
Um are you under the influence of any medication, drugs, or alcohol that would affect your ability to think clearly? No. Um, do you wish to consult with the public defender before you make a decision to wave your right to an attorney and represent yourself?
No, I do not. And I do not wave my right to trial by jury. Um, have you ever studied law?
I don't know how that is relevant to the case, your honor. I'm trying to make sure that you're knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waving your right to counsel. I am.
Have you ever represented yourself in a criminal action? I have. Uh, do you understand that you have the right to remain silent?
Anything that you say can be used against you in court, and I choose the fifth, I won't answer any more questions. The judge isn't asking you questions about your innocence or guilt. She is trying to make sure that there are enough functioning brain cells in your skull to ensure that despite your request to represent yourself, your sixth amendment rights are not being violated.
So pleading the fifth during your Ferretta hearing could result in you being forced to have a lawyer. Do you understand that you have the right to confront the witnesses against you and cross-examine them? Absolutely.
Do you understand that you have the right to have witnesses that you choose be compelled to appear and testify on your behalf? Yes. Uh do you know how to request the witnesses be uh compelled to appear on your behalf to subpoena them?
If you're asking whether I know administrative procedure um I wonder your honor is this a court of equity or is this a administrative court? So do you understand uh that if you represent yourself you're on your own? I can't tell you or even advise you how you should try your case.
I am here appropriate persona. You know uh that you have the right to represent yourself but by doing so you could take a great risk of not properly presenting your case. Um do you understand that uh you will be required to abide by the Colorado rules of evidence and the Colorado rules of criminal procedure?
And do you understand uh the defenses um to the offenses by which you're charged? Uh do you understand that an attorney would be familiar with defenses and requirements to raise such defenses on your behalf? Uh, do you understand that you must proceed by calling witnesses and asking them questions, not arguing or making speeches, but asking appropriate questions, and that you will not per be permitted to tell the jur jury uh matters that you wish for them to consider as evidence during the examination of other witnesses?
Do you understand that it would be much easier for an attorney to contact potential witnesses, gather information, and question witnesses, and to present your case than it would be for you? All right. Um, at this point, I'm going to um find that you are aware of the rights that you have and that you're giving up by waving your right to counsel.
You are not u choosing to cooperate with the process. Um, but uh at this point the court's going to find that you've knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waved your right to counsel. Uh, we'll go ahead and enter not guilty plea and get the case set for trial.
I object, your honor. You're the one that asked me to set it for a trial. If you don't want it set for trial, I'm happy to set it for something else.
Do you still want it set for a jury trap? Yes. Okay.
That includes a not guilty plea. Well, let the record show that I have not entered a plea, that the plea was made for me. While you're at it, let the record show that the defendant is a dumbass.
You're asking for me to set up for a jury trial. That requires the entry of a not-uilty plea. So, the court will receive a not-uilty plea today.
I'll find that speedy trial runs on October uh 3. I'll order that motions be filed on or before uh May 4th. That'll also be the deadline for endorsement of witnesses and defenses.
We'll set a half hour motions hearing, trial readiness, and jury trial dates. And let's see what dates we have. Motions at 3:30.
Okay. June 15th at 3:30 for motions. How long will be July 29th?
July 29th at 8 o'clock for jury trial. Okay. July 14th at 11 o'clock for trial readiness.
Trial readiness will be the last day the court will accept any plea agreements in the case. Uh the court will issue a written pre-trial order and uh we'll print an extra copy for you today so you have those. Um, be sure to look because there are some additional deadlines and information in there about uh doing uh jury instructions and things like that.
All right, thank you very much. Thank you, Yan. All right, so that's the end of the first video.
It looks like he is going to be representing himself against the infinite wisdom of the universe, and I'll definitely be bringing this trial to you. Now we head to our next soft tartian genius, which is a follow-up to a video I recently covered. In this video, the brings his wife with him to court, and she's just as stupid as he is.
Uh, next is the people versus Philip Andrew Leers. This is case number 26819 FY. [clears throat] Ms.
Do appears on behalf of the people. Mr Leers appears in the courtroom but refuses to enter the well. Um I do remember this uh from the last time we were here last week.
The court uh had removed the attorney of record and indicated that it would have a new attorney appointed. Mr Leers, that has not happened yet. Uh we're still waiting for an attorney to be appointed for you.
Just so you're aware of that. All right, your honor. Is the court going to prov next week?
We will, but it looks like Mr Leers is digging through some stuff here. What do you have, Mr Leers? I should go through that.
[clears throat] Mr Lefers, before you start, I gave you a lot of time last week, so I'm not going to give you very much time this week. So, if if you're if you're planning on giving the court a history lesson in maritime law or self-governance or any of that, I'm not going to have that today. Okay?
So, I have to stand up for my rights. Otherwise, my rights are forfeited by my subjection, and I will not do that. Your honor, are we on the public record?
We are. Is this a court of common law or Admiral T law? Mr Lefers, I am not doing this today.
I've already told you that. We're not going to go through this. I move the court to take judicial notice of your oath of office to the Michigan Constitution as ratified without amendments in the United States Constitution.
What say you, sir? I addressed you last week about my constit about the oath I took. I confirmed that you had a copy of my oath.
I confirm that. Thank you, your honor. Moving forward, article three, [clears throat] section 2, clause two of the United States Constitution says that when a state is a party in a case involving a citizen, that state, the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction.
The state has a conflict of interest. You cannot unbiasedly represent yourself in the state. The state cannot be a victim.
Also, we have been made aware that there is some judicial bonds that may have a monetary value which clearly gives the state an interest in the outcome of the case which once again is why article 3 section two clause two of the constitution exists. The state cannot prosecute this because it always going to rule in favor of itself. If this were even remotely true, then we would literally never have anyone found not guilty of the charges they're being accused of.
law said also discovery hasn't been met because I was never given a full accounting [clears throat] about the bond relationship any accounting on the bid bonds performance bonds bonds and I am not a 14th amendment citizen I am a Michigian state national I have corrected my status I have spent a year doing it. What do you mean by that? No, you tell me what you mean by that.
I don't need you to look at paperwork. You You said you corrected your status. So, what do you mean by that?
on finding out about jurisdictions. 14th amendment citizen is bound by your jurisdiction, sir. I am not a 14th amendment citizen.
What are you? I'm an American state national. And what is that?
That is a man or woman born to the state in the territories of the Confederation of the Republic. that made up this wonderful place and all the rights and freedoms that we all have that have been aggregated through policy and procedures. So, are you claiming you're a citizen of the the Confederacy from after the American re and when I say the Confederacy, I mean before after the American Revolution and before the US Constitution?
No, sir. This predates even that. Okay.
I am a living man that follows the creator's law, the supreme law, the law of the land, which no policy or procedure can abregate my rights or immunities. So then how are you relying on the constitution to say that I don't have jurisdiction if you don't believe that you're subject to that? Yes.
Supports it. And the first amendment, we are one. This is my wife, Gilane.
She's been with me for 24 wonderful years. She has had my back. She has helped me grow and understand and overstand so many wonderful things.
Constitution is set up to protect rights. and I have the right to use everything at my disposal. The constitution is at my disposal in addition to the supreme law of the land.
So is the bill of rights. You cannot pick and choose which parts of the US Constitution that you would like to apply to you. It either all applies and you have rights that are granted to you in the Bill of Rights and other amendments or none of it applies and you have no rights at all and you can go straight to jail for the charges you're being accused of.
How does the Michigan Constitution play against the US Constitution? Michigan Constitution, as wonderful as it may be, is not constitution. The corruptness that went into it, destroy it.
Though it moment may hold some lingering truth, if you change 10% of 100% of the story, you have deceived everyone that you tell that story to. [clears throat] thereafter. They will never be able to defend themselves properly.
They will never know how to manage themselves properly. If the truth was to be told, then the decision, the rightful will choice would fall on the people. and I am one of the people [clears throat] which is why there's also another conflict of interest.
The state cannot prosecute me because I am the people. [clears throat] So is my wife and so are our children. So it's your belief that the state cannot prosecute criminal laws against its citizens.
But if you were a citizen of Texas and violated [clears throat] a Michigan law, would the court then be able or would the state of Michigan then be able to prosecute that person? State of Michigan the text. No, no, hold on.
Hold on. It's Mr Lefers is the one who has Well, as I stated, we are one first amendment, right? Okay.
Okay. Mr Leers is the one who's before the court. Mr Lefers is the one who gets to speak on the record.
That would be against my First Amendment right. He really needs to shut his living donkey up because she's in a court of law. So there's no such thing as her first amendment right to freedom of speech.
And if she doesn't stop interjecting herself into these matters, then the judge can very easily send her to jail for direct contempt of court. Okay, I can I can see how this is going to go. So, uh, Mr Lefers, you are not releasing any rights that you have.
Um, but we're going to reset this then for another probable cause conference next week. And um hopefully by then we will have council appointed for you and you can discuss your issues with your appointed attorney. I do not accept.
Also I am here on special. All right Mr Lefers in the case Mr Lefers you need to stop. All right.
I need you to go out to the front window where you checked in and get a copy of your next court date because I'm not going to allow you to interrupt the business of the court. And [snorts] as you can see, you're getting pretty close to that. I'm not saying that you're wrong.
I'm not saying that you're right. I'm just saying again, this is not the forum. We're not that's not what we're here for today.
there's a procedure to go through for uh motions to be filed and to be heard and um as I said I've appointed counsel even though that hasn't happened yet to make sure that you are fully apprised of all the options the way the court works the way the laws interact with each other and I highly encourage you to listen to that council, that attorney once they're appointed. You're not the first one to have this situation before the court. You're not the first one to assert these rights.
But there's a way that things work and your your grasp of it right now. I [clears throat] believe that you are mistaken in how the laws interact with each other and how the constitutions interact with each other, how jurisdiction works. So, um, once again, I'm going to ask you to go out to the front window where you checked in.
I understand you're not waving any of your rights, but I going to ask you to the front window where you checked in and get your next court date and then we will have again we will continue working on getting council appointed for you. Judge ask yourself thank you sir. Thank you.
Have a nice day. You too. All right.
So that's the end of the video. I'd suggest next time he comes to court that he leaves the oxygen thief he's married to at the crayon buffet where he met her. Now, both of these videos will have follow-ups.
So, stay tuned for those shows. And if you like the video, hit the like button. If you disliked it, hit the dislike.
But don't forget to leave a comment below and subscribe with notifications on so you don't miss any of my content. I'm team Skeptic and I'm out.
