I raised my glass of wine which is the substance that christ chose to become himself which is the substance that he drank and that god before he created the world chose as the best drink ever and the very liquid to become his own son let me raise this glass to our lady who is now ridiculed by the vatican this is not a prepared conference In the sense that i do not have notes and my dear friends who are going to watch this video are uh advised to order as soon as possible best yesterday the uh
copies of the volume of crusader especially the falima crusader issue number 64. summer 2000 that will fill them in on both the so-called published secret and rat singers excuse me his eminence Colonel ratzinger's beautiful interpretation do not have the text memorized neither of the so-called published secret no of the comment by ratzinger but you will find my own articles in issue 63 and 65 on the subject this is here what i'm going to say here is in addition to these articles in the falima crusader Without which i couldn't possibly answer your questions because it was
my source of information as the vatican published his document and it was translated into several languages and as far as i'm aware of it it seems that the english translations the precises that has been as usual has been done so everything i know i know out of the english translation Of the vatican publication except a few single rather important words in the portuguese text supposedly written down by sister lucia and what has been done here is a continuation of a plot to silence our lady nothing else you said you mentioned the so-called done consecration now
there is no need for me here to repeat everything that has been said about the consecration Of 1984 1991 or whatever the dates are sister lucia herself has made it clear in 1982 i think it was 1984 that the requests of our lady have not been heeded i advise you to get past the issues of valima crusader on this topic because father paul kramer and father gruner both have proven sufficiently sufficiently for me and sufficiently for most people who Study the question of fatima that the consecration has not been done and it's very easily understood
why it hasn't been done because sister lucia accounts also in her own writings in times when there were no computer software to imitate handwriting she said that our lady had asked that fadima be fulfilled by consecrating russia mind you she did not say the Soviet union she said it at a time when the soviet union was in full bloom but she said russia she wanted russia consecrated to the immaculate heart and when sister lucia asked how she said the pope has to do it together with the bishops and sister lucia explains herself when she was
asked on how she had understood the conditions She said the pope together on the same day at the same time she said but at the same time i gather would be the same day because of the time differences in the whole world you can't expect the bishop of anchorage to do it at one o'clock in the morning when the pope does it at 10 in saint peter's what sister luchi is the consecration has to be done By the pope and at the same time by each bishop in his own cathedral i'm not going to waste
your time by uh giving all the proof that that has not been done we know that that hasn't been done the pope as a matter of fact so far has not even mentioned russia he said he consecrates the world to the immaculate heart and all those countries that you want consecrated that's not what our lady Said she didn't say consecrate the world and all the countries that i want consecrated i mean can you order out of the catalog in this country by saying uh i want i want i want i really want your products and
i want all the products that i really desire please ship them to me the company is not going to react except they will think probably that you Are not exactly in your right mind to put it mildly our lady said russia if our lady said russia it will be russia or bust that's what we say monte carlo or bust our lady is not some average day person not to be taken seriously in her wishes our lady doesn't choose the word russia because she really meant the world and the countries that she wanted this was an
explicit request it's like Filling out an order form i want this item numbered so and so description so and so single price total price she said russia it hasn't been done of course in the recent publication uh archbishop bertone who is the the secretary of the so-called congregation for the doctrine of the faith said that the consecration had been done and he quotes a letter Supposedly written by sister lucia that wasn't even signed maybe they didn't have the software back then to imitate sister lucia's signature i guess where guesswork um the father my crusader has
proven sufficiently that this letter cannot be authentic and there's no need to repeat this we're talking about the so-called message the so-called vision that has been published by the vatican Recently and as the the ones who like my tapes know i'm not a person who likes to waste my readers or uh listeners time by uh mincing words and so i may be allowed to say the whole publication is a hoax and i say it's a hoax for the following reasons first of all we have to consider the text of the actual vision published And we
have to consider the comments made by archbishop bertolne in the introduction to his publication and then we have to consider the comment by cardinal ratzinger in that vision sister lucia whose quoting quote handwriting is reproduced photographically speaks about the angel with the flaming sword Thus shouts penance penance penance i would like to see who would be able to explain to me while why an angel with a flaming sword shouting and screaming penance penance penance would be a secret there has never been an approved marian operation in which our lady didn't say you have to do
penance of course she says it because our lord said it The entire tradition the holy scripture the old testament the new testament the entire testament is about penance the entire history of salvation is about penance you think our lord enjoyed himself on the cross no i was penance the ultimate penance for our sins i would do respect to our lord and our lady i do not need i do not need our lady to make a secret that will be better Understood after 1960 of an angel with a flaming sword the shouts and screams penance penance
penance that doesn't make sense why was this part of the secret even if the other things she says for some reason might have been considered too early to publish but the angel with the flaming sword like you read it in book of genesis saying penance pendants Penance i'm sorry but i can't see a reason why this would be a secret to be kept a secret and why in the vatican's publications uh um in the vatican publication supposedly sister lucia decided on when it should be published which i don't believe for a minute sister lucia is
not the kind of sister that would decide on her own when a secret has to be published i'm sure she Asked our lady and our lady said not before it should be published in 1960 because then it will be better understood that's another reason why would sister lucia i'm referring to the part of the published document that is a supposed supposed account of archbishop bertone's talk to sister lucia in which supposedly sister lucia says oh it was just my feeling my intuition That told me that it shouldn't be published before 1960. i don't believe that
because sister lucia never decided anything on her own she's a carmelite nun and a carmelite tradition is you do not decide anything except to go to heaven and serve our lord why would the angel of the old testament of the book of genesis the one who chased adam and eve from the paradise Who turned adam and eve's life into a life of penance be a secret in a time when penance is the only way to save your soul that's one thing the next thing and i think a conclusive proof for the fact that this uh
supposed secret is a hoax is the is one word that sister lucia uses now sister lucia describes the pope approaching a hill with a cross on top And then he's shot by soldiers but before he reaches this he passes the dead and he's praying for them the problem is that sister lucia in the portuguese original doesn't say that that she uses the very explicit very clear and unmistakable portuguese word cadavers cadavers corpses in the entire history of salvation the Word corpses cadavers cadavers has never been used for the dead only in the old testament i
think it's prophet jeremiah but as a kaya but i don't remember right now will you find the word cadaverous cadaveri in latin and it's only used for apostates and lost souls saying their souls are lost therefore what's left is not a temple a former temple of the holy spirit as we Would say in the new testament or in the old testament say the body that god gave to this man but it's a cadaver like animals that's the term you use it for in the entire tradition of antiquity you use the word cadaveri for animals in
the history of salvation you do not use it for a dead human body in the creed it says the resurrection of The dead in resurrection it doesn't say we believe in the resurrection of the cadavers we don't believe we don't believe in the resurrection of the corpses we believe in the resurrection of the dead when i apply a mass to somebody who died i do not apply the mass to his cadaver to his corpse i apply the mass for the dead the Requiem is officially called the mass for the dead or defunct the funkti in
latin means the ones who have been buried the bodies that have been buried not the corpses that have been buried i find that you find a corpse with the uh what do you call it the uh uh obituary hall about the police you know that's what he called corpse that has to be uh examined for a crime and whatever The history of salvation doesn't know the term except for apostates and lost souls why would a carmelite none that has read many pious books as cardinal ratzinger calls them claiming that she might have seen pictures of
that vision in pious books sister lucia how does she spend her time in the monastery it's a long time ago that she was young Enough to clean the floors she probably spends her time not just in prayer but also in religious reading probably spent her time she's probably one of the few people in the whole world who has read the entire scripture several holy scriptures several times why would she use the term cadavers in a vision mind you so you couldn't say that's what our lady said no she is choosing the according to the vatican
publication She is choosing that term for something that she saw so she's giving a description of that vision she does not quote our lady having used the term cadavers she is making up that term of course uh it's a futile attempt to speculate on sister lucia's to talk just to use a modern word on sister lucia's iq But you can rest assured that somebody who has spent his entire life on the study of holy scripture and so-called devotional books pious books religious books is one who might after several decades in the monastery which in 1945
she was several decades in the monastery you might assume or presume that she would know religious language and exactly as in english in portuguese You do not use the word cadaveris for the dead you do not say uh tomorrow i will say una misa por los calabres you will say tomorrow i will say a mess for the dead not for the corpses to me this in itself is conclusive proof sister lucia has proven to be very precise in her accounts when she was asked with years in between asked several times about what our Ladies said
in 1917 and after that she is usually very precise why would she of course she's an old woman now but why would she now use a word like cadavers and the so-called published text was not written now that was laid down in writing many many many years ago when she was anything but old why would she back then Have used the word cadaverism to me this is conclusive proof and in addition there is another circumstantial proof for this being a hoax now the first secret is very precise the vision of hell and the second secret
the ending of the first world war the beginning of the second world war under and he's named pope pius Xi he's not a man dressed in white who might have a papal name no he's named he's called the pope with the name pius the 11th russia is named as a country because the soviet union of course was a forced political entity the soviet union was not a natural entity the soviet union was not the uh area or the nation in which people commonly speak russian but the Soviet union on paper was a conglomerate of 22
socialist soviet republics not a regular national entity but a forced dominion over 21 republics and it's understandable that when our lady wants a certain consecration that she would not want the consecration of a political entity that's hardly understood but that she want she would want the the Consecration of an individual nation and she said so and she said so precisely let's think uh when we talk about precision the requests of our lady for the five saturdays of reparation again she's very precise as a matter of fact i consider the message of fatima one of the
precisest ever why i'm asking is the third secret vague why she talks about a man a bishop Dressed in white you know that the abbott of brixton and south tyrol is dressed in white and he's a bishop ask any missionary bishop in africa or local diocesan bishop in africa he's a bishop and he's dressed in white why would our lady say a bishop dressed in white now the city of account this will right now interfere with father hess and say of course because he's not the pope But he dresses in white and he might be
a bishop i don't think that the third secret of fatima would be an exception to the exceptional precision in the first and second secret secret a third and again to me conclusive proof for the publication being a hoax is the fact that the publication the published text makes no logical connection let alone A direct reference to the unexplained line port in portugal the dogma of the faith will be preserved comma etc sister lucia said that our lady's own words where in portugal the dogma of the faith is going to be preserved etc the etc is
of course sister lucia's edition indicating that there was more in portugal the dogma of the faith will Be preserved calmer and more words are lady following another proof why does cardinal ratzinger in 1984 say that the third secret of fatima is about the end of times and a religious prophecy when now he says the third secret of fatima is basically nothing else but the 1981 failed attempt on the pope's life now don't get me wrong i i take the Attempt on the pope's life very seriously i have witnessed it in rome may 13 1981 it's
the time when i still lived in rome and it was shortly before my ordination the priesthood which happened the same year and i'm not the person who takes the assassination attempt on the pope anything but very seriously however our lady predicted the first world war The end of the first world war she predicted the second world war she predicted the chastisement coming from russia to be the instrument for the chastisement she predicted russia spreading her errors in all of the world why would the third secret be better understood after 1960 when we deal about the
failed attempt on the pope's life and it's quite interesting to see that Both archbishop bertone and cardinal ratzinger not to forget cardinal sudano the secretary of the state hastened to affirm confirm that the third secret must be essentially dealing with the poor present pope's fate in 1981. i'm asking myself uh i happen to be one who is pretty well aware of the history of the 19th century especially in the united states Of america and we have lived in this country here we have lived through the civil war we have we have seen in the united
states of america uh lincoln's assassination in 1965 and of course the americans in this century have witnessed the assassination of president kennedy in 1963 why would be why would an attempt on the pope's life be better understood after 1960. How come that people in the 19th century wouldn't understand that also the supposed vision that supposedly sister lucia put in writing speaks about the pope being killed john paul ii wasn't killed he came close to it but he wasn't killed and there are many other very very strange circumstances about that uh attack of may 13 1981
That i cannot go into here because it doesn't deal with fatima for the very simple reason that i believe firmly believe that the pope the assassination attempt on the pope on the page on the pope's life has nothing to do with the third secret it's the reason why i do not go into the details that are rather strange about what happened in 1981 To me it is conclusive proof that cardinal ratzinger said in 1984 that the third secret deals with the end of times and this religious prophecy and that now he says uh it's all
events of the past and we are mainly dealing with the prophecy showing that john paul ii the swedish christ on earth as he quotes some religious quotation about the pope that the third secret basically deals with Hardly anything else but the attempt on the pope's life to me this is conclusive proof and i cannot see why if cardinal ratzinger was an error about the actual third secret in 1984 why he would be right now mind you i didn't use the word lie not yet another conclusive proof just looking at the actual text of the message
that has been Published is the fact that we are faced with the description of a vision the first secret our lady spoke in the second secret our lady spoke several times after 1917 our lady spoke in actual words so sister lucia was able to quote our lady directly how come now we are faced with a vision and not one single word by our lady andrew cezanne in the number 64 issue of The fallible crusader has rightly pointed out that this is holy in wholly incredible it is impossible that the third secret would consist only of
a vision he has also proven the fact which i highly recommend you to read this article because he delivers conclusive proof with details all the details needed that even if this published vision was authentic it would Only be one of the two parts of the secret there's conclusive proof that uh the actual secret is contained in two different envelopes one with supposedly four or five pages of sister lucia's own handwriting and another one with one page of sister lucia's handwriting i've talked about proof against the vatican's publication resulting from the published text Of the so-called
vision there's another one which i consider the most important proof now usually when we deal this is one thing which is uh a principal issue in dealing with theology it has a lot to do with with the the secret of fatima but it is something that you have to apply to all theology what i'm saying now Now first of all the method of theology usually a science has its own methods you use the brush and the shovel and the lens and microscopes and analyzing gadgets in archaeology you use instruments the scalpel and pincers and whatever
in medicine a science has its own instruments saint thomas aquinas proved all through his life in all of his publications that the instrument that we use in theology Is twofold theology is not just dealing with uh things that have been made made up by the human mind theology is dealing with revelation the basis of what we discuss is coming from revelation that's one thing and the method that is used is what saint thomas aquinas calls the census communis in an analogous way not in an identical But an analogous way uh gilbert keith chesterton and the
english language call that the common sense and my dear friend chesterton who was never tired to define this wonderful substance wine chesterton said in his book on saint thomas aquinas but the method of saint thomas aquinas was common sense and common sense he says is the sins of the probable Whenever we are faced with revelation that is not instantly clear and understandable and there are such things in revelation you will even find apparent contradictions it is sufficient to remember the different versions that we find in matthew mark luke and john about the actual words that
our lord used at the last supper for consecrating britain went so we will find Apparent contradictions but we will not that is a dogma of the church find actual real contradictions in holy scripture we are faced sometimes with quotations in holy scripture that we do not understand there are several ways to understand them now in that case tradition will help and the sense of the probable if an interpretation is highly Improbable it will never become a sentencia probabilis which is one of the theological category categories for theological statements and judgments sentencia probabilis means nothing else
but probably right judgment so we say well when our lord said that what he really meant was if uh theologians popes in their private pronunciations And doctors of the church for a certain amount of time found that this is the most probable the most feasible interpretation of this otherwise enigmatic pronouncement and we talk about the sentencia probabilities so the method of theology is not the microscope or the scalpel the method of theology is reason and common sense a common sense is something that every Sane healthy human being has received with his intelligence it's in proportion
to his own intelligence it's also in in vertical proportion to his education because usually the more specialized your education is the less you will maintain your common sense that's why we have the so-called specialists who know more and more and more about less and Less and less until they know everything about nothing which is the definition of a specialist now he has lost his common sense he will be able to rattle on on one single detailed topic for hours and hours and when you ask him how does a simple uh alarm clock work he will
say oops excuse me a what and theology doesn't know that problem not if it is dealt with properly In theology we do have the unchangeable truth contained in the sacred scripture the tradition and infallible magisterium but we also have whenever it's not infallibly decided we have the sins for the probable the sense for the probable has a very high authority in the church it's not something to be taken lightly now apply your common sense on the Following reasoning and you will understand why the vatican publication cannot be possibly authentic when god god only knows the
future saint thomas aquinas says very clearly that even the saints in heaven and even the angels do not know the future they are what he calls they are not absolutely in eternity they are in what he calls The iom i have no english translation for that it's something between eternity and time and space the angels obviously being spiritual creatures cannot have time and space impossible however they are not that much within eternity that like god is that they would know the future nobody knows the future except god Now when god decides to communicate the future
to somebody which is called the gift of prophecy mind you cardinal ratzinger says in his commentary on uh the so-called third secret that prophecy is not about revealing the future but explaining to past and the present that is a very interesting definition but certainly in direct contradiction to what the church fathers And the teachers of the church said the doctors of the church said about prophecy we also know just consider what saint john at the cross said about the grazia gratistate the special given graces to somebody uh prophecy is the highest of all of those
graces why would he be the highest of all of those graces if it only interpreted the past and the present that's nonsense prophecy essentially Deals with the future god does not often reveal the future to people even our lady the queen of heaven the mediatrix of our graces does not know when the last judgment will take place i don't think she knows according to what we know according to what we can conclude from holy scripture she doesn't know because christ said only father in heaven knows when it will Take place now uh please explain to
me i know john you will not be able to explain it to me but please explain to me why would our lord god father son and holy spirit tell our lady inform our lady in 1917 about the end of the first world war about the beginning of the second world war under pope Pius xi about the chastisement for which russia is going to be the instrument possible that a priest through some illegal channels had access to the actual secret now the actual secret is kept as far as we know of course the actual secret is
kept in the paint in in the personal uh safe that the pope got in his apartment Now after 15 years in the vatican i know that some people can get into everything they want to get into and the american intelligence communities be it the cia the dia the nsa nsa is no such agency uh they are very capable agencies now i'm not saying they did that they could sue me for that and i don't believe they did it but of course they would be able to get into a paper apartment if they wanted to That's
not a bunch of amateurs so somebody might have had a way to get into the papal safe which is made of wood by the way and read that secret write it down or memorize it and now threaten the vatican that he would publish it if the vatican didn't do this and this and this and this and this they also could say this would be something that father gruner would have A smile about uh dear holy father either you consecrate russia right now are we gonna publish that secret anyway it's another way whatever it is end
of guesswork here whatever it is the vatican must have a very serious reason for publishing a document that cannot hold no way pretending that this would be the third secret and did you notice something else Now john you know the mass media better than i do you know the newspapers how come the newspapers were in an uproar about the beatification of pope pius ix but the newspapers didn't say anything about the published secret of fatima i mean they just mentioned it there was no objection they didn't say hey wait a second another one of those
vatican lies no you couldn't read about that the Newspaper said yesterday cardinal secretary of state has announced etc blah blah secret was revealed that's it the world press that has never failed to be incredibly efficient in ridiculing slandering the sacred now there's nothing maybe they had a hint maybe somebody told them hey listen ignore that whole thing why would they do that Why wouldn't they say here's another one of those typically uh inquisition-like medieval lies coming from the vatican soldiers shooting the pope why maybe because what was published is entirely politically correct maybe that's guesswork
again it's no guesswork that the fact that there was no enemy reaction as we call that Means something the fact that there was no enemy reaction means a lot it also means a lot that this publication takes place at a time when maybe part of that secret will come true the pope is very old it's not up to me to decide when uh john paul ii is going to die but i don't think it's going to be in 10 years maybe maybe Some people have an educated guess on who is going to be the next
pope maybe some people know a lot more about these things than i do and uh consider the possibility that the next pope might not be a pope at all saint francis of assisi predicted a long say this vacancy he did that that's a fact and whatever it means that's it's a fact it's a printed fact saint francis of assisi predicted That there will be an extended time of sadist vacancy when the church will be in great disaster and when uh wrong false doctrines will be preached by that man who was not canonically elected i'm not
saying this is john paul ii because i do not have any proof in this direction but i'm at the same time i'm not saying That this is not possible i'm not saying that divine providence will interfere with this and will not make it happen i cannot tell divine providence what divine providence knows uh before the world was started but what i'm saying is that with all the knowledge that i might have after 15 years in the vatican there are millions of things that i do not know Apart from my memory not being what some of
my friends might think there are many things that obviously if you're not at the core of things at the heart of things you cannot know there is a lot of possibilities that would explain such a ridiculous publication to us here the thing that is interesting is that we are faced with a ridiculous publication in my article in the fatima crusader Which is in print and as everything that is in print is literally codable and cannot be excused or explained with the moment of action like we have it now obviously i'm not reading anything when i
answer your questions and i have not had much time to prepare this but when i print things i usually try to be on the safe side and that's the reason Why my article in the fatima crusader i'm not as adamant on the whole publication being a hoax as i'm now my firm conviction is that not the basically not one word of the whole publication is true theologically speaking it doesn't matter if we're dealing with the introduction by uh bishop archbishop bertone it doesn't matter if we're talking about the introduction to the Publication by cardinal sudano
or the commentary by cardinal ratzinger the whole thing is at least pretty close to heresy and blasphemy i'll quote that with examples because i have to justify my judgment right now i generally speaking do not consider anything in this whole publication to be true now first of all You know better than i i'm not very well uh versed with this modern gadget which i call a beeping pile of plastic most people call it a computer i'm not very familiar with computers my computer is from 1986 and i'm happy with it it's 286 laugh laugh laugh
but i know that the software nowadays will cost you less than one hundred dollars and you will be able to print original handwriting All we have seen is photocopies of the so-called handwriting by sister lucia some graphologists have said that can't be her handwriting anyway but i don't even need that kind of proof because software wouldn't make that mistake anyway so that might even be approved for the authenticity of the whole thing because my own handwriting has changed over the years so sister lucia's handwriting might have Changed but we know that politicians send beautiful electoral
campaign letters written in their own handwriting from dear mr so and so signed by and the whole thing is a fabrication of the computer software that came out 15 years ago already it wasn't affordable back then but it came out 15 years ago that i know i've talked to experts about that i'm Not the expert the fact that we see a photocopy of of a handwriting doesn't mean it's just the lugia's handwriting if and i've i remember well it was in 1991 if they admittedly were capable of presenting an old lady in a badly put
on habit as sister lucia in 1991 then they might as well invent the whole so-called conversation With uh between sister lucia and archbishop bertone how would i know that an archbishop a secretary of the congregation who makes a statement that uh this whole publication the third secret has ended that period of you know i quoted it tragic human lust for power and evil such an idiotic statement then why would i believe that his conversation with sister lucia Is authentically reported why how do i know uh we're all human beings we are capable of sins how
do i know that he's not capable of lying i i have absolutely no no guarantee for that on the contrary a ridiculous publication like the one we are facing is rather indicating a lie or think of the fact what cardinal ratzinger said in 1984 and what he's Saying now that's absolutely contradictory at the same time colonel ratzinger in one of his books i wish i'll remember the title but uh in one of his books he literally says that uh the council document guardium at space is nothing but an anti-syllabus so the cardinal prefect of the
congregation for the doctrine of the Faith obviously is not very shocked or very bothered by the fact which i believe and it is true what he says that the last document among the documents of the so-called ecumenical council vatican ii is an anti-document to popeyes the ninth syllabus why would i presume that such a man is always saying the truth The cardinal ratzinger cannot sue me for have for having called him a liar i didn't call him a lie i just say why would i presume that he is not what guarantee do i have that
he is not do i have any proof whatsoever that this publication is not an entire entirely a fabrication no but i do have proofs that at least parts of it are fabricated so i have to conclude that we are dealing not only with the hoax But we are dealing with a strategically intended hoax a hoax is not something see these people they are not just some old bishops cardinals prolets monsignori who have nothing else to do all day long but to come up with ridiculous fabrications you cannot deny their common sense that easily why would
they waste time a document like this Is something you do not write in one afternoon why would they waste their time with a ridiculous publication like that if it wasn't for a definite purpose i said it before and i say it again i do not know why that publication was done now i do not know what is the strategic purpose of this strategic diversion of this deception Of this perception management but i know it is such it is perception management it is deception diversion and i say it again it has to be and it cannot
be anything else it has to be the diversion from what i believe to be the actual secret of fatima announcing vatican ii the apostasies the heresies after vatican ii and in vatican ii i said blasphemy and heresy Cardinal ratzinger says that prophecy does not predict the future he says that a prophet who predicts the future would only satisfy the curiosity of the mind and ratzinger this way does not reproduce faithfully and authentically as he should do as the prefect of congregation with the doctrine of faith what is church teaching number one number two with his
uh almost equation of the Immaculate heart and the blessed are the pure of heart for they shall see god he's uttering blasphemy our lady's heart is not immaculate because she was pure in her heart and saw god because she saw god god was her son she saw god for many years but uh she has the immaculate heart because she was immaculately conceived as the only one ever After adam and eve there was one new adam and a new eve as they are called our lady was conceived without original sin and so was our lord the
immaculate heart is only one and it's our ladies and the vatican which is something that i've dealt with elsewhere in vatican 2 we are facing similar and other heresies therefore i cannot see any other Sins in that quoted publication but to hide the disastrous effects and disastrous contents of a council that i do not believe for one minute was a council that i do not believe for one minute was magisterium of the church in the entire history of the church never has it happened that the council was convoked by a pope with the a priori
exclusion of definition of truth and condemnation of Errors john the 23rd said exactly that and at the same time i refuse to believe that something can be ordinary magisterium which is what the documents of vatican 2 claim to be that would not have received the permission for print in the 19th century obviously with this short exposition on the recent publication i have not answered All the questions that may arise about what is actually printed there and what might be the real secret however there is one thing which i offer for speculation and you will find
the exact text of that in if they managed to print it there in the issue number 65 that's going to come out in winter 2000 of falmouth crusader i'm doing guesswork again For the simple reason that there was a french priest they say who claimed that while he was listening to a cd with a religious oratory compact disc music that he supposedly i'm expressing myself carefully because those who know father has know that father has generally is very skeptical about messages visions apparitions and miracles I'm a skeptic because i've learned with sixty thousand or seventy
thousand visionaries among the traditionalists alone today you have to be careful because i don't believe a minute that there are 60 000 visionaries uh so i've been very careful with that however i'm talking about something that again has to be judged in probability that priest supposedly heard a supernatural voice while he was Listening to this music supposedly that voice told him what the real secret was and it's uh along the lines that there will be an iniquious council organized and convoked that will uh spread errors and confuse the faithful there will be confusion everywhere and
the sheep will look in vain for their pastors and so on on that line again I say uh i i'm rather inclined not to believe that this priest really had that message however whatever he put in print and you can read this and the following crusade whatever he put in print that supposedly would have been the third secret the actual message of fatima makes a lot more sense than what than anything that cardinal rat said or published because the third secret Must be something cardinal ratzinger said that in 1984 it must be something that is
entirely coherent with the messages of our lady in la salette and other approved messages there is one common thing to la salette uh 16th century quito in peru it was echoed ecuador i'm sorry then you had a lady of good success in 1635 Or something like that approved marion visions they all talk about that chastisement to come they all talk about the errors that are going to be spread in the church they all talk about the crisis of the faith and in 1984 colonel ratzinger said the third secret is entirely coherent with these marian apparitions
and now he says it's In the past and only dealing with the uh assassination attempt which i'm still wondering about if it was an assassination attempt i don't know so many inconsistencies about the whole thing but it's not up to me to do to go into a criminal investigation here let me conclude this with a rather sarcastic line which is not out of character with Father hess i think probably with the so-called publication of the third secret which it was mainly in colonel ratzinger's hands we are faced with something that you can find on the
trademark of old musical records the company was called his master's voice father i i have a question should no you can't wait to get the answer It's pretty obvious that this is not the third secret effect yeah yet i do not hear an outcry from priest religious they're all allowing the vatican to go on with this so-called third secret how can a catholic keep on following the vatican that's two questions could it could it be that they've taken a place from bill Clinton and they're trying to make the pope out to be a saint because
there is a a a a bishop in a white robe if he is if the martyr yes if the if the pope is this bishop in white then he is the blessed mother is certainly speaking of him and once again this is mary's pope he Can't be wrong i mentioned that in my article that will be published in the fallen crusader now that was several questions i'm sorry but now the first thing is uh why is there no reaction from the priests well that's the same question as why is vatican too that easily accepted by
most of the priests and the bishops needless to say i do not know the Percentage of priests that will correspond to the groups that i have to classify as an answer human beings are individuals the more one is a human being the more one is an individual because of course the soul of a human being is entirely individual while the body has certain similarities which is why we talk about the species we usually have one nose two eyes one Mouth and two hands with five fingers each so we have similarities but each single human soul
is a complete individual just like saint thomas aquinas defines the angels as absolutely individual as a matter of fact saint thomas aquino says that each angel is his own species that's something to elaborate on another occasion but you just look up the term species and individual And so it is not easy to generalize today we are living in a time when fantasy is substituted by video images hi and tv and whatever and movies and in the old days when people still had fantasy and imagination they were very careful about generalizing groups however for the sake
of argument allow me to generalize the clergy into several groups there is Those who will who will do nothing but what the superiors tell them to do the catholic church when my patron saint gregory the great was pope did not believe in anything like slave obedience matter of fact i can quote my favorite church father gregory the great my favorite pope 590-604 saying that priests should not Always be obedient because they will assume the vices of their superiors too now that's the wisdom of a saint however we are faced with priests who grew up in
a certain organization you know that to obey very often is more comfortable than uncomfortable and sometimes eccentric individuals like me is not the person for whom obedience is The most evident and obvious thing in the world but many people find comfort in obedience because they blame everything on the superior and just do what he wants that's one category there's another category who have genuinely been brainwashed especially young priests and this is why i must warn people and i do this from the pulpit all the time do not judge them if you see their Heretics avoid
them but do not judge them you do not know why they are heretics many of them never saw the catholic church they never experienced the faith they have never seen it and traditionalists are not all saints so sometimes when they meet a traditionalist one is enough for them they turn back to the concealed church which is more comfortable Then there's a group of priests who are just plain stupid they scratch their head and say well cardinal perfect of congregation for the doctrine of the faith publishers that i wouldn't know any better they're just stupid i
don't understand what the whole thing is about they couldn't kill us anyway then you have the group of priests who are Not believing it for one minute but not going to risk their salary apartment position retirement and medicare medicaid and all these clintonian securities quote unquote today uh these people just go for security i gotta survive would you like a few people know better than i that we have to survive but some people are willing to sacrifice the Truth for their own physical comfortable survival i'm not saying now this is true for all priests i'm
also not categorizing by numbers just saying there's several explanations and now there is one thing which has very little to do with any kind of dishonesty and which i have personally experienced and i'm going to name the name and may he see that video and think of It i was the secretary not the secretary officially by the vatican but a personal secretary to his eminence cardinal alphonse maria stickler he was the librarian the cardinal librarian of the vatican and he was the cardinal archivist of the vatican because the prefect of each is really the number
two and usually a simple priest So uh i was i'm quite honored to say that cardinal stickler and i are friends since 1975. that's a quarter century of friendship and my personal appreciation of all the things that i've learned from him would fill another one of your digital video cassettes cardinal stickler is one of the most intelligent Priests cardinals and bishops that i've ever met he even more than intelligent is incredibly aerodyne he was a librarian and a teacher all of his life he knows a lot he is probably he belongs probably belongs to the
10 percent of the most erudite catholics in the world now get this cardinal stickler is a Salesian means don bosco he belongs to the priest of don bosco in 1991 when i left rome there was an issue which i do not want to quote here uh on which cardinal stickland i disagreed now being old friends i don't have to say yes your eminency as human ncsu eminence we're all friends we're not talking on familiar terms i don't say hi L but uh i don't have to call him eminency as eminence us eminence all the time
we talk in familiar terms and i we disagreed mccartney stigle looked at me and said something that you have to think about in a negative way garner stickler said my dear friend you will have to learn to let others do the thinking for you you can't believe how shocked i was here i'm talking to somebody who has Studied the doctors of the church better than i ever will one who has an erudition that's incredible and who tells me that i have to let other things other others other people do the thinking for me now mind
you the issue we had a controversy about was he was he he held the position of vatican ii and paul vi and i held the position of tradition I was so surprised by this statement that usually not being uh the tumor in too much of a problem in finding an answer for things i was speechless chronostickler is one of a few people who probably managed to see me speechless i just stood there again three months later we met again and i said by the way do you remember when uh in december you told me That
i really should start to let other people do the thinking for me yeah yeah he said i said when you said that i was so completely taken by surprise that i didn't find the real answer and i'm going to give it to you see i do let others do my thinking you let 40 years of church history think for you i 1900 years his reaction was nothing else And that will explain a lot if an educated personally very holy priest archbishop cardinal retired who could basically strategically speaking allow himself to do anything because he has
nothing to lose he can't become pope he cannot advance anymore he couldn't possibly have a personal uh dishonest or honest motive not to do This and he could do anything he wanted basically tells me to let others do the thinking for him for me that will explain the cardinal prefect of the sacred congregation for the doctrine of the faith has commented on this authentic real secret of fatima that's it period roma finita the papal informability has been defined In 1870 it has never been described well so far it has only been overrated i think that
answers one of your questions and the other one i've forgotten by now you're talking you're asking me how come so many priests agree with it well no i asked another question it seems to be the selling if this is the pope mentioned in the third secret or this the bishop mentioned in the third secret And he wears a white robe of course you're right are they trying to sell this pope as mary's pope after 15 years in the vatican i i know that see the vatican is a government obviously and rightly so but still it
is a government in in 1900 the germans were shouting and screaming hail kaiser wilhelm in 1933 following they shouted and Screamed hitler in italy they shouted aviva mussolini in russia they were praising stalin we have had periods in this country when presidents were not really praised or but we've also had periods when presidents were praised and it's in the essence of bureaucracy and career making and being an official in the government that you will have People who are um sort of willing to perform all kinds of things just to advance in their career there are
several vulgar terms for them which i do not want to quote but these people are certainly willing to do a lot just to advance don't ever think that this has never happened in the vatican flattery will get you anywhere it's an old saying that's not something that came up Recently uh you may rest assured that you will not get anyone's true opinion on hillary i'm sorry on bill clinton as long as bill in washington as long as bill clinton is president and is the master of the fate of all the bureaucracy in washington it doesn't
matter if now the next president name will be gore or bush it doesn't matter whoever will make it Will have automatically the majority of officials in washington officially on his side either they will claim i voted for you anyway or they will say what a terrible mistake i didn't vote for you i wish i had known better or whatever it's in the human character and you can rest assured that in the vatican you will find the same thing Sometimes even a much higher level i'm talking about people who genuinely believe generally believe that whoever is
pope is to be revered not only as the vicor of christ not only as the bishop of rome not only as the archbishop of latium the primate of italy the patriarch of the west but who is also to be revealed as a person Which is a terrible mistake when we consider that pope alexander vi uh already was pope when he still had children and nobody revealed him back then they were a little bit more honest about that they didn't pretend but alexander vi didn't pretend he said i'm a miserable person but it goes with the
essence of bureaucracy and the circumstances of government that You will find people who will try idolatry and to consider 1981 as an event important enough to be the third secret is certainly one of the many forms of idolatry i'm not accusing cardinal ratzing of this no certainly not because sources told me this is uh i cannot confirm this that on more than one issue cardinal ratzinger Was not in agreement with the pope and offered his retirement offered his relief but he but the pope kept him so um i i do not for one moment even
intend or think intend to say or think that cardinal ratzinger did that out of the motive of idolatry i don't think so however it's an ingrained habit his master's voice i called him there is today in the church and it's Not come up recently i'm sorry but that's something that dates back to the early 19th century at least if not further back i could quote here uh saint ignatius of loyola and saint alphonsus of ligori whose concepts of obedience are somewhat i'm i'm not i'm not i'm not taking it lightly to call a doctor of
the church wrong in any point but at the same time When i compare [Music] the church father saint pope gregory the great concept of obedience with the concept of obedience that say no francis ligori had had and i will have to say that one of the two was wrong and i believe that sin of francis was wrong not basically on obedience but on the extent of him obedience on the extension of obedience On the limit of obedience saint thomas aquinos was very clear on it he said if you find the present wrong you have to
correct him if he doesn't accept it you have to uh you have to refer to a higher authority and it's in the gospel mind you fraternal correction something that you will find with saint paul so uh obedience in a church is something bound by tradition obedience is not just dependent on the superior But what can you do in with the ingrained habits of an established bureaucracy that we i said it before we have to consider generally speaking an efficient derivative you cannot expect them just to put up resistance also unfortunately they couldn't kill us you
