What's up, man? Hey, nice to meet you, Myin. I had a couple things I wanted to mention.
First of all, I think you contradict yourself a decent amount. Sure. You had mentioned that you wanted to repeal the 19th Amendment, and then your reasoning for that was that women don't have skin in the game.
Yep. However, when someone had mentioned if your thoughts would change if women did have skin in the game, for example, that they would be accepted into the draft, you said that you wouldn't want women in the military. Uh, you weren't listening.
I said that if they had some type of government service or whatever, then obviously, you know, I think at that point then, yeah, them being able to vote would make sense cuz they have skin in the game. Okay. But in general, most women don't have skin in the game.
So that's why I don't think most of them should be able to vote. I think for men, it's given. For women, they have to earn it to vote.
Don't you think instead of repealing the 19th amendment, it would make more sense to let women get this skin in the game, these government services? Well, the problem is that a lot of the times they don't. Women overwhelmingly choose career fields that you know are social in nature, right?
They don't they don't necessarily deal with um certain job fields that the government might require. But you don't promote them either. Like I'm sorry, you don't promote this.
Like why isn't this part of your platform? Why why why do women choose these careers? Why don't you promote women not choosing these careers and instead choosing government services?
I I do. Well, here's the thing. I do, but the reality is that women just are interested in different things than men a lot of the times.
So what ends up happening is like they they just choose certain career fields because that's what they want to do because we're inherently and biologically different. Okay. Then my the other contradiction I wanted to point out was that you complain a lot about women not being smart.
You say they're dumb and then you say that they should limit their education because their primary role should be in a family. You're you're totally mischaracterizing every single position I've given. I don't think you've been listening.
Um could you elaborate then? Yeah. Uh, what I said was I don't think women should be prioritizing education over the pursuit of a man and a family.
That's what I said. So, they should still be educated. I'm sorry.
They should still be educated. Look, I don't have, like I said before, I don't have a problem with them, you know, attending school and having some kind of backup, but the problem is that that becomes the primary focus. That's my problem with it.
Okay. And then the last thing I wanted to mention was how I'm not trying to mischaracterize your argument. So, yeah, it's okay.
It'll only be the third. Correct me if I'm wrong. You had said that women who are promiscuous, that's the reason that they deserve less because they're [ __ ] and they around never wife of [ __ ] So would you agree that people who don't do that don't deserve less?
Women that aren't promiscuous? Yeah. Uh so regular girls much as men.
Yeah. Yeah. They still deserve less, too.
They still Yeah. Yeah. They still deserve less, too.
And and the reason why I say this is because I don't want guys to fall into the trap and be a s. Look, this is going to sound [ __ ] up, but I'm going to say it. Women are terrible [ __ ] people when they have leverage over you in a romantic relationship.
I'm going to I'm going to say that again. Women are terrible [ __ ] people when they have leverage over you in a relationship. I'll give you an example.
Let's say you move in with a girl, right? You're staying at her spot. You're crashing there, whatever.
Um you're not paying any of the rent. She's trying to help you out, whatever. As the days progress, she's going to become more annoyed, more [ __ ] and agitated with you.
Rightfully so, because women don't respond favorably to lazy men. Okay? Because their attraction circuitry is based around a guy that could provide security.
you sleeping on her couch every day is inherently going to turn her off. Now, let's flip the roles. Let's say you have an apartment and she crashes at your spot, right?
Are you going to get as annoyed with her as quickly? Probably not, because men have far more tolerance for creating resources for women and children than women do, right? Like men are designed to create excess resources, not just for themselves, but for their family.
Women aren't built that way. So, and this is something that a lot of guys like don't understand and they buy into this egalitarian mindset that men and women are the same. They're not, dude, at all.
And like where are you getting this information from? Like the biological reality. You think women are just naturally less tolerant to putting up with people's stuff?
Yes. Women are far less tolerant of um incompetent men that can't produce and protect and provide. Yes.
