Hey guys and welcome to today's video. Today I have two very different sovereign citizens to expose. The first is an idiot who is charged with stabbing a police officer and claims that he's an actual king.
Truly putting the sovereign in sovereign [ __ ] And then the second one is an idiot I referenced in a previous video, the bruncle to Jared Sullivan, William Sullivan. Now I don't know for sure that they're related. However, I find it highly suspicious that they share the same name, general appearance, and dumbass arguments to not be related by blood and/or marriage.
I'll put the other video in the description box for you to decide. So, let's begin. Mr Alpin, thanks, Judge.
This is Mr Montes, number 36, 22CR70002, people versus Montes, entries, Daniel Con people, and Robert Halpern. back Mr Montes who is present uh in custody in the courtroom today. All right, we're set for sentencing today.
That's correct. Ready to proceed? Yes.
Yes, your honor. Prosecution. Uh thank you, honor.
Um I will just initially note um well, as the court is aware, this is a case that it's a fairly small range of sentencing between 20 and 25 years. I am going to be asking for the 25 years. Um I believe I thought it was Did I typo?
I thought it was 24. Sorry. 20 I think 20 24.
Pardon me. That was the older the previous one was 20 to 24. I'm asking for that 24 years.
Um I know I think we're all aware of the Mr Montes's situation. Uh but at the end of the day, this was a uh very violent assault against peace officers when they were trying to uh enforce the law and and protect the peace and sanctity of the Denver uh Union Station bus station. As someone who has regularly used that bus station, um I know how harrowing it can be at times and I know the amount of work that RTD has put into that to try and make the public transportation system safer in this city.
Uh it's necessary for so many people and for some of of us it's we want this RTD to be safe and enjoyable for everyone and Mr Montes uh through his actions severely disrupted that and uh I believe that based on the nature of his offense he has earned those 24 years. Um I will say that in preparing for this trial in speaking to some of the witness officer witnesses um one witness what stood out in my mind is when I asked him what did you think when you saw what happened? He told me my first thought was I just lost a a colleague because the stabbing was just that violent and aggressive.
And thankfully there the officer who was stabbed repeatedly in this case. His vest did exactly what we hoped it would do. It prevented him from receiving any further serious injuries.
It prevented him from being killed. Um but there were lasting effects in this case. The officer whose hand got cut suffered a fairly severe infection as a result of that and is I believe still on desk duty as a result of that.
cannot his hand has never really gotten back to full functioning. Um, this has affected a lot of people in a lot of different ways. Um, I I there's a very large restitution amount.
Um, and I don't know if I I haven't had a chance to talk to Mr Halpern about this, so I will state that it's in excess of $20,000. So, if I could have an opportunity to file a written motion to because it's it's divided between multiple different officers and uh expenses. So, uh if I could have permission to file a written uh restitution request after conferring with Mr Halpern about it um and I can get that done in the next uh week to week and a half to be heard before sends.
So, he's looking at 24 years in prison for assaulting an officer at a bus stop. Now, his lawyer is going to do the best he can to mitigate the punishment, but then the self-described diplomatically protected king is going to open his mouth and remove all hope. Alper, thanks, Judge.
Um, been a difficult case. It's obviously quite old and and I've gotten to know Mr Montes throughout the the the pendency of the case um fairly well. And I know he would disagree with some of my characterizations and my raising competency, but I've seen kind of the highs and lows, if you will.
And and when he is um what I what I think uh functioning on a competent level level, he's very smart, asks really intelligent questions about the case, um about his options, about what happened that day, and he's taken responsibility for it. And it was you watch the video and and that part of it can is hard to watch when he has the scissors. But there is a long standoff and what he was that's in front of an elevator.
I watched the video. Okay. And what Mr Montes is talking about and and you hear it on the video is at some point they do say that he can go once he puts the scissors away.
They wanted him to get to to get rid of the scissors and then the doors open and he did think he was free to go and he got rushed. I think it's pretty clear that they weren't going to let him go given the circumstances, but he believed that and and stepped back onto the elevator and then they rushed him and he reacted. And again, it's scary watching that reaction.
And I'm glad they were wearing the vests. And I'm also glad that Mr Montes before the trial um opted for this option. While it's still a hefty sentence, he's looking at um I would be concerned about um post-trial and what he'd be looking at potentially the rest of his life.
Um, again, I'm not sure that Mr Montes to this day agrees with uh the idea of of of mental illness and mental health, but again, I think when I've seen him on his medications and doing well, he is um smart and thoughtful and I would encourage him to ex to wrap his head around that and understand that diagnosis. um obviously that's the decision he's going to make, but um uh when I've seen him at his best, he has a lot to offer. And um I really wish him luck moving forward um uh on uh through the prison and then when he's released and and how he handles handles that in the future.
But uh I know he wants to speak and and I do wish him wish him the best throughout this process. All right, sir. You have the right to tell me anything you'd like me to know uh about this about this case and uh what your sentence could be.
I really have no interest in anything else. The only issue for this court is what should the sentence be? All right.
This is very important about the case and about the sentencing. very important that um my diplomatic community highest degree was automatically uploaded and in effect February 2023. It will be against my rights as a king and diplomatic community to prosecute me protocol.
I I am a king. We've passed all that, sir. You agreed to plead guilty.
The the only question right now is do I give you 20 years or 24 years? That's what you agreed to. So what is it?
What is it you want? 20 21 24 um with diplomatic immunity highest degree is what I'm trying to understand is that I'm not supposed to be prosecuted. So how is it I've already we're not having this discussion anymore, sir.
You need to talk to me about the sentence. At least at least your record has been made. You have no diplomatic immunity.
I'm sentencing you to 24 years in the Department of Corrections. There's a three-year period of mandatory parole and I will give you what [clears throat] what's his presentence confinement credit? 1,043 days.
1,043 days of free sentence confinement credit and we will determine restitution within 63 days. Good luck, sir. This video should be called when the court king turns out to be the jail house jester.
And shout out to the officers and public servants that serve our communities. I truly hope the officer who was stabbed ends up making a speedy recovery. Now we head to Bronl's court appearance.
Next, I'll call case number 2025M534, people of the state of Colorado versus William Sullivan. Good morning, Mr Sullivan. Okay.
I'd like the record show, your honor, that uh my name is William Sullivan. I'm the living man. I'm not the entity known as William Joseph Sullivan.
So, and I'd like to know uh the nature and cause of the charges that are here for today. I'm under you're under threat caress and uh threat to arrest and corrosion. Um so yes, sir.
Okay. Well, uh Mr Sullivan, you're charged with a violation of Colorado Revised Statute section 42-4-1409 subsection 1. This is no insurance by an owner.
In order to be found guilty of this offense, the state would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you owned a motor vehicle or low power scooter that was required to be registered in the state of Colorado and you operated the vehicle or permitted it to be operated on a public highway in Colorado without a complian policy or certificate of self insurance in full force in effect as required by law. This is a class one misdemeanor traffic offense. It carries a mandatory fine of $500.
Half of that fine could be suspended upon a showing that insurance has been obtained. It's your second or subsequent conviction within a period of 5 years. It could result in a fine of not less than $1,000.
You're also charged with a violation of Colorado Revised Statute section 42-4-1402 subsection 1 and subsection 2A. This is careless driving. In order to be found guilty of this offense, a state would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you drove a motor vehicle, bicycle, electrical assisted bicycle, electric scooter, or low power scooter in a careless and imprudent manner without due regard for the width, grade, curves, corners, traffic, and use of streets and highways in all other tenants circumstances.
This is a class 2 misdemeanor traffic offense. If found guilty, it carries a penalty of a fine between 10 and 90 days in jail or a jail sentence of between 10 and 90 days in jail, a fine of between $150 to $300, and four points could be assessed against your driving privileges. You're also charged with a violation of Colorado Revised Statute section 42-4-6005.
Uh, this is leaving the scene of an accident um involving a highway fixture. In order to be found guilty of this offense, the state would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you were driving a vehicle that was involved in an accident that resulted in only damage to a highway fixture or traffic control device and you failed to notify the road authority in charge of such property of the accident and your name, address, and registration number of your vehicle. This is a class 2 misdemeanor traffic offense.
If found guilty, you could be sentenced 10 to 90 days in jail. You could be fined in amount of $150 to $300. You're also charged with a violation of Colorado Revised Statute Section 42-4-6006 subsection 1.
This is failing to report an accident and call police. In order to be found guilty of this offense, the state would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you drove a vehicle that it was involved in a traffic accident that resulted in injury to serious bodily injury to or death of any person or resulted in any property damage and you failed to give immediate notice of the location of the accident to the nearest office of the duly authorized police authority or you failed to immediately return to and remain at the scene of the accident until police arrived and completed their investigation. This is a class 2 misdemeanor traffic offense.
It carries a penalty of 10 to 90 days in jail, a fine of $150 to $300. 12 points could be assessed against your driving privileges, and your license could be suspended. You're also charged with a violation of Colorado Revised Statute section 18-9-107 subsection 1A.
This is obstructing a highway or other passageway. In order to be found guilty of this offense, the state would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that without legal privilege, uh, you knowingly or recklessly obstructed a highway, street, sidewalk, railway, waterway, building entrance, elevator, aisle, stairway, or hallway to which the public or a substantial group of the public had access or you obstructed any other place used for the passage of persons, vehicles, or conveyances. uh and it's it doesn't matter whether the obstruction arose from uh you acting alone or um from your acts in conglomeration with the acts of others.
This is a um this is a petty offense. If found guilty, you could be sentenced to up to 10 days in jail and find an amount of up to $300. You're also charged with a violation of Colorado Revised Statute section 42-2-206 subsection 1A.
This is driving after revoca. Um, this is driving under revocation. In order to be found guilty of this offense, the state would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you operated a motor vehicle in the state of Colorado at a time at which your driving privileges were revoked.
This is a class 2 tra misdemeanor traffic offense. It carries a fine of between $150 to $300 and 10 to 90 days in jail. So, he's being charged with the standard travelers trifecta along with hitting some sort of highway equipment and not reporting it immediately to the police.
Sounds like he might have been sipping a little too hard on that 80 proof highlighter juice. So, those are the charges against you, Mr Sullivan. Um, at this point, um, at this point, are you wishing to apply for a public defender?
Are you going to represent yourself? No, sir. Again, your honor, uh, like I said, uh, I'm the living man.
I'm not the corporate entity, the fictional entity. William Joseph Sullivan. Um, I need to know, is it this a civil procedure or a criminal procedure against me?
This is a criminal proceeding, Mr Criminal procedure against me. Let the record show this a criminal procedure against me. Could you give this to your honor?
This is a judicial demand rule. Uh, if you want to bring that up and take a look at it, your honor, please. Stating that I be recognized as a living man as stated in the Bible.
You're either a man, a woman, or a citizen. I'm not a second rate citizen. I'm not a corporate fiction unless the DA or the court can prove to me I'm a corporate fiction.
But I stand here as a living, breathing man. [snorts] Also have a motion for dismissal. If this is a criminal case against me, then I have the right to face my accuser.
I need to know who that is. I need to see a written affidavit from that person, and I have the right to face them. If this is a criminal case, do you have a copy of that motion, Mr Sullivan?
I do. Right here. Okay.
Why don't you bring that up as well? Apologize. I did not get that filed this morning.
Okay. And I take it that this probably hasn't been provided to the district attorney at this point, correct? No, sir.
It has not. Okay. I tried to get here early, but I was not able to facilitate that.
Okay. So, Mr Svin. Um, you know, at this point, um, I I just received these today and so, um, you know, I'm happy to we'll put them in the court file.
We'll get a copy to the district attorney. They'll have an opportunity to respond if they wish and then I'll issue a ruling on these. Um, we're going to get this set over for a pre-trial readiness or pre-trial conference um, in about a month uh, maybe a little bit longer and um, you'll you'll be back at that point in time and and by that point, I'll certainly have I'll have rulings on both these things in advance of that.
Yes, sir. Um, I guess the only other thing, Mr Sullivan, that that we need to address, uh, you know, certainly you have a right to represent yourself. Um, and so if that's what you want to do, uh, you certainly are entitled to do that.
Um, your other option is if you want to apply for a public defender, we can get you an application for public defenders. Okay, fair enough. Um, and then, uh, the only other thing that we need at this point, um, we do have a fingerprint order for you.
Um, and I'm going to, um, Oh, no, I won't I won't be doing that. So, so M. So, Mr Sullivan, there's not Mr Mr Mr Sullivan, unless there is a written Mr Sullivan, this is my time to talk, please.
Okay. Um, there's a fingerprint order right there. I'm going to order that you complete that by the end of next week and get your fingerprint submitted.
Okay? If you fail to comply with the fingerprint order, you could be held in contempt of court. Okay?
And so, my expectation is that you'll comply with that court order. That that fingerprint order, your honor, is assuming that I have committed a crime and a criminal offense. Mr Mr Sullivan, why would I go give fingerprints if there is no accuser that has come and said I have done anything wrong to any other human being?
Yeah. So So Mr Sullivan, that's that's the order by the Constitution of the United States. Mr Sullivan, that's the order of the court.
And so um it's up to you whether you That's fine. I'll send a writ up to the higher court and we'll squash that order. The term you're looking for is quash.
In a court of law, we quash orders and we squash sovereign citizens. Furthermore, high courts don't squash orders sent up the ladder. They vacate, reverse, or remand them through the appeals process.
Using the wrong terminology doesn't just make your argument hard to follow. It proves that you're a bonafide idiot. Okay.
So, um, so that's the that's the order of the court at this point in time. Um, Miss Davenport, any need for any sort of protection orders in this case? I don't see.
There's no damage party, so there's no protection order. I will issue the standard Title 18 protection order that prohibits you from harassing, intimidating, or interfering with any named witness or victim of the crime you're alleged to have committed. Okay.
Um, and uh, we'll just get you a copy of that to sign. Um, and I'm going to order that you sign that before you leave the building today. I don't understand what the protection order is there for if there's been no one harassed.
There's no there's no person there's no living person that's bringing the claim. So, what am I getting a protection order for? So, Mr Sullivan, I just I just told you the terms of the protection order.
But but who is it against? Who? Any witness or victim of the act you're alleged to have committed?
There is no witness or victim. Okay. Look in the paperwork.
There's no witness or victim. Well, if that's the case, then you don't need to worry about it. Okay.
Then why would one be issued? I don't understand. So, um, and then we're going to get this set over.
Um, your honor, I don't think you'd be violating your oath of office by doing your duty by the Constitution if there is no damaged party. There's no written affidavit with a competent fat witness. There is no charges here, sir.
Yep. Yep. There.
Yes, there are there are charges, Mr But how you cannot the state cannot bring charges against me. You're artificial person. You're creation of the mind only, the government.
I'm a living man based on the Constitution of America. You know this is true. I'm asking for a dismissal.
Unless you can give me a a damaged party or a competent fattent witness with them with a written affidavit of what I have done to them, this case is dismissed. So, Mr Sullivan, I I accepted your motion to dismiss and I'll issue a ruling on that. Okay?
And we're going to set you for a pre-trial pre-trial conference at 10:00 a. m. on November 25th.
Okay? So, um, sign the protection order, fingerprints done by the end of next week, and I'll see you back on November 25th. So, I need to know before I leave, I need that that, um, my, uh, uh, Ni Prius.
I need that file. Did you put that on record? That is in the file.
That's correct. Did you put it on record? It's in the file on record.
We We've got it filed. Yep. It's in the court file.
Are you Are you abiding by that, Mr Sullivan? I told you I would rule on the documents that you submitted. Um, I just had them.
I just received them two minutes before the hearing and so um I will issue rulings on those documents. There's this. Okay, I'll see you back on the 25th.
Um and have a good rest of your day, Mr Sullivan. That's the end of the first hearing, but I want you to pay attention to the way he hobbles out of the courtroom. This is what happens when you ingest too many crayons from the wrong end of your torso.
Now, we head to his next appearance. Next, I'll call case number 2025 M534. This is people of the state of Colorado versus William Sullivan.
Okay. Good morning, Mr Sullivan. [laughter] You feeling any better?
No, I live with it every day. Yeah. I get this ankle fusion.
So, sure. Sure. Okay.
Well, Mr Sullivan's here. Um, and then we have uh who's here on behalf of the people? That's Mr Roman.
And Mr Roman's here on behalf of the people. Um, [snorts] so we were uh here in court last on the 15th of October. Um, Mr Sullivan, at that point in time, um, you uh, you indicated that you wanted to move forward representing yourself.
Um, correct. And, uh, I ordered the fingerprint order and I appreciate you getting that done. Thank you.
I got that for you. Thank you. So, um, so I do see that there that discoveries been made available through the district attorney's office.
Have you had an opportunity to get that yet? I had not had an opportunity to get that and I just recently because of some clerical things with Colorado. It took me a while to get a lot of my documents in place notorized and then I got to get a couple things authenticated from the state so they can have their commercial weight and value.
So if I could get a continuence that would be really great would appreciate it. Okay. Um have you had an opportunity to talk to the district attorney about possible resolution?
I don't have contact information from Mr Sullivan. No I haven't. I haven't.
That's um I possibly will in the future when I go to pick up my discovery. Sure. Sure.
I guess I could just call the office and Yeah, I have. Sure. We can discuss contact.
Well, Mr Sland, I think here's kind of the here's kind of the way I envision this going. Um I'm I'm willing to set this out one more time for a plea hearing. Um [clears throat] and then at that hearing, um I'll expect entry of a plea either way.
If you plead not guilty, we'll get a trial set. Um, and if you plead, if you reach some kind of a disposition, then we can go down that road. But, um, obviously we got to keep these things moving.
And I want to handle it properly on how I'm handling things. Make sure all my ducks are in a row. So, equity and everything.
Absolutely. Your honor, I believe Mr Sullivan also has a revocation of probation pending. 2413.
Oh [ __ ] So, not only did he pick up these new criminal charges, but he's also revoked on a previous probation that he was on, which means more potential jail time. I'm sure the highway light polls don't have a problem with that. Yeah, that court date's on the 23rd.
We set that on the 23rd. We can set this at the same time. Um, I understand that's going to kind of crunch you for time in terms of being able to enter a plea.
I mean it makes some generally some filings I have to make and it to the secretary of the state and then get some documents authenticated from them. So that may take a couple more weeks. Okay.
So it would be nice if I Why don't I give you a little bit more time? I would appreciate that. Uh I mean understanding that well we can set them off for like a longer period of time.
I just want them to be set together. That would actually be really beneficial. Okay.
That way I can handle it both at the same time. Sure. You know what I mean?
Let's do that. So, what's the what's the revocation case, Mr M? Uh 24 T13 is what I have in my notes.
Okay. So, what we're going to do, I'm going to call case number 2024 T13 at this T13. At this point, let's get these both set out.
Um we'll set for hearing on probation January 20th. Does that give you enough time, Mr Sullivan? Yes, sir.
I think I can accommodate that. Absolutely. January 20th at 9:00 a.
m. we'll set both these cases. So, we'll set 24 T13 for a hearing on probation and 25m 534 we will set for a pre-trial conference or for a plea hearing.
I'm sorry. Okay. Set at 9:00 a.
m. 9:00 a. m.
Thank you. Sounds good. Thank you.
Yep. Yeah. You too.
All right. So, that's the end of that hearing. leaving off with a future hearing date in late January, which to no one's surprise, he didn't show up to.
Next, I'll call case numbers 2025 M534 and 2024 T113, people of the state of Colorado versus William Sullivan. Mr Sullivan here. Give me just a second here.
Okay, so I've got a a minute order that indicates that Mr Sullivan apparently called and said that he didn't have a ride to court and that he also had a sickness. Um this point I'm going to issue bench warrants in these cases. In case number 24 T113 we were set for a hearing on probation.
Bench warrant will issue. Bond will be set at $1,500 cash. And then in 24T113 I'm sorry.
I'm sorry. 25 M534. Uh that case bond will be set at $500 personal recgnissance.
Okay. Anything else in these matters? Nothing.
Okay. Thanks. So, we didn't show up and he earned himself a spot on the if you see him, arrest him list for Monizuma County.
Now, this is a unique situation since even though he does have a bond, it really won't matter since the arrest will almost certainly trigger a no bond hold due to his probation violations. All right, guys, that's the end of the video. I'm actively looking out for this [ __ ] So, the moment he appears in court, I'll be there to bring it directly to you.
So, if you like the video, leave a like. If you dislike the video, leave a dislike. But don't forget to leave a comment below and subscribe with notifications on so you don't miss any of my content.
I'm Team Skeptic and I'm out.
