[music] Hey guys, welcome to the liberal hive mind, a channel solely focused on exposing the abundant hypocrisy of the left. And here's the meme of the day brought to you by fivemind. com.
Well, we've got another doozy here, another clip from Asmin Gold that's going absolutely mega viral online and causing all kinds of controversy. But once again, you know, it's the same pattern. The more controversy generated by a take is usually less because the take itself is so horribly unacceptable and controversial and more so because well the take is actually hitting an uncomfortable truth for the left.
And frankly I think it's a topic that we should probably switch on them. We should flip the script because when you really dig down into it when you dig down into what the left is actually up to into the results of their policy efforts they're the ones who are enabling mass suffering. And that I believe is the core component of what Asmin Gold was saying.
Let me show you guys what's going on here. Let's try to cut through the emotional gatekeeping and stick to the core concept, shall we? We got some stuff to get into.
So, let's roll the tape. All right, folks. So, just take a look at this clip.
I would much rather pay for rockets to go to the moon than pay to keep a bunch of Africans alive from starving instantly. And it's not even close. Like, I I would instantly would rather do that.
And why is that? Because it's not my obligation to keep every African alive. I don't care about that.
I mean, ultimately, if they can't keep themselves alive, maybe they're at a population rate that isn't sustainable based off of their environment, right? I mean, that's it. I would much rather spend money on space exploration than keeping Africans alive or or anybody else, South Americans or some othering group of people.
It's not my problem and I don't why would I care? So, anyway, no, it's about America first and as far as I know, Africa is not in America and we should stop sending money to Africa. I think that we should stop sending money to Africa too.
I think that it's actually hurting them. I think that what's happening is that when we send money to Africa, the money ends up being stolen by people who are uh you know the warlords there, right? Or like whatever the military ruling class is and they steal all the money and then they effectively use that to widen the gap and the power disparity between them and the rest of the African people.
Like the reality is that Africa's been a for thousands of years, right? And if they're ever going to not be ashole, it's not going to be because we send them, bro. All it's going to take is $3 billion more dollars.
All we need to do is five more years and then they're going to get theirit together. This is a permanent babysitting operation that is being undertaken by the Western world to keep Africans alive. I don't agree with this.
I don't. If they're going to die, this is their own this is their own fate. This is the way that they have to they have the right of self-determinism for better and for worse.
Ultimately, I think trying to like micromanage and run the lives of Africans is honestly it's very clear that you know the massive population boom in Africa is due to I think probably a massive amount of aid and uh better uh you know medical stuff that we've provided them that has created a population that's unsustainable by anything other than our continual support of Africa. We were basically like we spawned a bunch of Africans and then now it's like well what are you gonna do? Like they don't have the agriculture system to take care of themselves so do we just have to feed them forever too?
Like how when does this ever end? Yeah. So, you know, it's another one of those clips from Asmin Gold that supposedly is heartless and inhumane and horrible.
How dare he say that? But if you really think about it, he's right. And this is exactly what I've been saying forever.
And especially just recently, we've been talking about this in relation to all these US aid programs. You've got all this money being spent in Africa that's supposedly saving lives. We're subsidizing medical programs and intervention, which sure on the surface seems like the right humanitarian thing to do.
But then you start to think a little and you realize, wait a second, we've been doing this for decades upon decades. You know, the entire world is modernizing. And when we're talking about simple medical procedures, this particular part of the world for some reason after multiple decades is still reliant on these programs, you start to ask the question, are we helping or are we enabling?
And you know, maybe there's like a biological truth to all of this, a sort of Darwinism effect that's necessary for human evolution and human progression. We think we're doing the right thing, but in reality, we're getting in the way. It's the typical teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.
Give a man a fish and he eats a single meal or eats for a single day. We've been basically giving Africa a fish every single day for the past however many decades. And it's clearly created a sort of reliance and dependency and especially a leadership dynamic where they don't have to.
They don't need to do the right thing, get their act together, build the systems that are required to be self- sustaining and do for themselves. Instead, the same corrupt actors can stay in power and simply just rely on all the American aid. How is that progress?
It seems counterintuitive. But the left tells you, well, we're saving lives. And this is where the conversation becomes maybe a little bit morbid or cryptic, a little bit utilitarian.
Maybe that's true in the short term, but is it the right thing to do in the long term? Are we doing the right thing? You know, you look at Western history and it's filled with tragedy.
It's filled with events of near mass extinction, plagues and wars and famine. Millions upon millions of people died on the European continent throughout just the last 3 4 500 years. Look at European population numbers just through the last two world wars.
A quick Google search tells us that World War I and World War II caused an estimated 90 to 105 million deaths combined. And then what followed, the greatest era of prosperity and progress ever known to mankind. It feels almost as if, you know, looking at the developing and third world, we're almost depriving these places of even having an opportunity to follow suit.
I think we could kind of chalk it up to white savior complex. This white savior complex, we're going to save the world from its problems. But in reality, foreign nations need to work through their own problems.
And I think that's probably one of my biggest critiques of mass migration and the refugee system of the West. You know, you have these places that are completely embattled, these places that are in the midst of civil war, places with political and economic instability. And our solution to those problems is to open up the door for all of the good people and all of the people who are required to stay in those home nations and to fight for a better and more free and prosperous future.
Our solution is to take those people out and bring them into our country, leaving the host nation with nothing but the bad guys and the oppressed masses. How does that make sense? Oh, immigration is very important.
We need to take all the most talented people from all of these developing and third world nations and bring them here. All the doctors and lawyers and engineers, all the people who are supposed to be in their home countries working to develop and progress their home nations, let's take them all in and soak them here. And sure, you know, to an extent there's an economic argument as to why that would be beneficial to us.
But is it beneficial for the globe? Is it beneficial for global stability and global markets? Is it beneficial again for the host nation?
Are we doing what's humanitarian or are we doing what's self- serving? What makes us feel good and warm and fuzzy inside? What makes us more globally competitive?
You know, we don't stop to ask these questions. Instead, we just think with our emotions. And it's also counterintuitive as well because we claim that mass H1Bs and mass migration is necessary for the country's advancement.
But then like Asminold said, instead of spending resources building rockets and advancing future technology, we spend money on foreign aid and we spend money on entitlement programs. We spend endless amounts of money on the unproductive masses instead of actually progressing, instead of spearheading the nation forward. We spend money on destabilizing foreign countries.
It all just seems misguided and backwards. most of it completely illogical. We're not helping, we're perpetuating, we're subsidizing broken systems and authoritarian governments.
And so, yeah, to the point that I was making in the intro, I'm less offended by the fact that Asmin Gold has the courage to say the truth and more offended by the harm that we continue to perpetuate across the globe under the guise of foreign and humanitarian aid. Anyways, that's what I got.
