Hey guys and welcome to today's video. Today we have three sovereign citizens in court with the last one being a follow-up to the Indian sovereign citizen who brought his own personal tribal council to his last hearing. So let's begin.
This is Mr Traml, right? Oh, I was just going to I was just going to call Mr Traml. Ready?
26 CR 921 Traml appearances. Daniel Conan on behalf of the people. Mr Treml is present onbond prosay.
Looks like last time we were in court uh he was asking for extra time to potentially hire counsel. We I had um on April 6 um I um indicated to you that um you should apply for the public defender's office. Did you do that?
Yes, ma'am. No, I did not. Um qualified in that time um a lot transpired.
Okay. Did you get the notice that I submitted into the case? the the letter.
Yes. Did you get it, Mr Cohen? Let me check real quick.
Uh, yes, I do see that. Um, so your um did you have an op first? First and foremost, I'll um indicate to you that I am not an administrative law judge.
All right. Um, but it looks like based on what you were asking in here is that you're asking for restitution. um that is not something that can be done out of this case.
Okay. Right. Okay.
Um and you you're invoking a number of other um Yes. I mean given given the nature that there's no injured party or no uh damage to property. I have a concern with an administrative court hearing a I'm not administrative court.
You're not this is not an administrative No. This is part of the judicial branch. This is not part of Excuse me.
This is an article three. We're in article three court. Th this is not an administrative court.
Are we in an article three court? I mean I mean that's just a simple question. I'm not trying to be difficult.
I want to know what I'm walking into before I Your honor. Um I'm not trying to be difficult at all. I would just ask that given the nature of what's going on here, I need to know exactly what I'm So, last time we were in court, this court uh agreed to continue, but said the court would expect to move forward on this date.
Um, at this point, the people would just ask that the court enter a not-uilty plea on behalf of Mr Traml uh and set it for a disposition date. Um, it sounds like Mr Treml has some philosophical beliefs about the system that don't exactly match with the facts of the of his situation, but that's neither here nor there. You're citing the United States Constitution and we're governed here.
Um, I'm I'm appointed by the state. So, this is not a federal court. This is a state court.
So, no, this is not an article 3 court. This is a state court. All right?
This is not under the United States um constitution. I am not appointed. I I'm I'm not I wasn't nominated or confirmed by any federal body.
This is a state court. So I know this is take an oath to the constitution. And are these state rules repugnant to that oath?
That's the only question I ask. Yes. Yes, there are state rules.
And you are charged in this case with having a dangerous weapon, possessing a dangerous weapon, and having a large capacity magazine, which is prohibited. That's what you're charged with under the state law. So, how do you want to move forward?
You don't have an attorney. We're currently set for a um appearance of counsel. So, let's go ahead and set this for arraignment.
Z or Z set for arraignment. Yes. So, at that point or you can do that today if you'd like.
Plead guilty. You can either reach an agreement or you can enter a not guilty plea. Do you want to enter a not guilty plea?
No, I do not. What do you want to do today? He said what he's saying is said this for another arraignment.
I need more time to figure out what it is. So, why don't we come back next Friday at 8:30 and at that time it'll be set for arraignment. All right.
Friday. Friday the 29th. All right.
So, that's the end of the first video. It looks like he has a future court date coming up and has a lot on his plate. So, he's probably going to need to remove some of the lunch crayons before he can truly help himself out of this situation, especially since he's chosen to represent himself.
Now we head to our next hearing which comes from Khaled County in Washington. In this appearance, the defendant repeats some of the bad information that he got from the internet. And when the judge questions him about what he actually means, he freezes up because he has no idea what he's actually talking about.
Alan Wedell, thank you for being patient for the last people who were in the docket. Thank you. center.
All right. So, we have you here on a no valid operator's license. Um, it looks like um I'm still showing that you it is expired.
So, what would you like to tell me today about the infraction? Well, I'd like your honor, if the court pleases, to certify the bond of subrogation if you please. ify the bond.
Yes, your honor. Can you one moment? Yes.
So, what would you like me to have certified? The bond of subrogation. What is the bond of subregation?
I don't know. Why don't you inform me? Is there a document that you have?
I can have the Justice Department send you one for what? The bond of subregation. So, a subregation agreement.
Subregation is a bond. Correct. That's that's a bond that you place on on my name.
I don't I have not placed any bond on your name. Well, this municipality most likely has. Um, you are Alan Lee Wadell, correct?
Okay. Um and so I I there's see when this court is if you hammer me all that money in that bond goes to the IMF. I there is no bond.
There's an infraction with a fine amount. So if that's what you want to tell me today, we're here for a contested hearing. I I haven't heard anything that and cursed.
Are you familiar with the uh constitution? Latches and cursing, right? Motion to dismiss.
Okay. Motion to dismiss on what grounds? On grounds that you do not know what you're doing.
This is definitely a pot calling the kettle black moment because I'm sure the judge knows what subregation means and I'm also sure that he does not. I'm sorry, your honor. You're supposed to know the law.
Okay. Latches and curves. All right.
You What legal authority do you have for your motion to dismiss beyond you don't think I know what I'm doing? Yeah. We'll come from the Justice Department, your honor.
All right. Do you um you were stopped on February 25th, 2026, according to Eric the Council Cop. Okay.
Is he present? Did you present? Did you Did you subpoena him?
I did. And did you file proof of service of the subpoena? Excuse me.
Did you file proof of service of the subpoena? I did. I filed a notice of liability.
That's not a service proof of service. It's a certified sign. It's a signed affidavit.
What signed affidavit do you supposed to be in your possession? I I have it. Okay.
Have you read it? Yes, I It's notorized. Okay.
Indiana Bill of Rights. None of this is binding on this court. Those are case law.
Supreme Court case law. Standing. Indiana article one bill of rights is not case law.
Well, we're we're applying it to we are not applying Indiana Bill of Rights to Washington. Your name will appear here. All right, Mr Wadell.
Um, I have in front of me the officer's narrative indicating that he stopped you on February 25th, 2026 driving a maroon Chrysler PT cruiser on the northbound of 1400 block of South Pacific Avenue with left and center brake light not functioning. Initiated the Traverse stop, identified himself verbally as Alan Wadell. Um he stated he left his insurance back at his house and was unable to write proof of insurance.
The check of his do well showed that it expired September 22nd, 2022. The photograph on what else do well record matched a driver confirming his identity and he issued the infraction and you were warned about not having an insurance and not having brakes active. All right.
I informed the officer, your honor, at the time that there is no contract. The the contract the license which is a contract has expired almost 5 years ago. Yet you were driving there is no contract.
You were driving on a public road. Okay. I'm going to find the infraction committed at the full amount of $564.
You will have 60 days to either pay in full or set up a payment plan. I will sub and what was that? I will have to uh recommend it.
I I must recuse you. Your honor, you can file that with the you can make a motion, but I've made my ruling um at this point. I'm motioning for a mistrial.
I'm going to recuse. Okay. I'm denying those motions as they are not timely nor relevant at this point.
So, your action has been committed. If you would like to file motions to direct violation rights, your honor. All right.
Wel, that'll be all for today. All right, so that's the end of that appearance. This is what happens when you have no idea how a parachute works, but you still choose to jump out of a plane at 30,000 ft.
So, now we head to our final hearing of the day. This one is a followup to a sovereign citizen I've covered previously where he was getting really bad advice from someone who claimed to be a licensed federal attorney. All right.
And we are here for a pre-trial readiness conference. I'll just make a record that Mr Schmidt did file some uh further legal filings. I have issued a written order denying those and so I won't take additional argument u regarding the arguments that Mr Schmidt already made.
I just found that they were not based in law and so I have denied those. Today we're just going to find out if people are ready for their trial. So for the prosecution, we are set for trial next week.
Will you be ready to proceed? your honor. And I wanted to provide the court notice um that when I took over this case, I reviewed it um and I will not be proceeding on count five, the obstruction of government operations charge.
Um I did some case law research. I don't think it fits um under several cases. So um at trial, my plan is to only proceed on counts one through four.
Okay. So you're formally moving to dismiss Yes. count five.
Okay. Mr Then that leads only traffic offenses and I guess he's charged with failure to provide proof of insurance. So he'd still be entitled to a jury trial as there's potential jail on that offense up to a year.
Mr Schmidt, did you want to speak with the prosecution to see if you could come to some sort of resolution in the case based on that they've dismissed that misdemeanor case? Wait, we're taking a record, so I do need you to answer out loud. It's not a misdemeanor, a felony.
Okay. Well, the obstructing is a misdemeanor under Colorado law. So, that's been dismissed.
Now what you have faced with you is two counts of unregistered vehicle or account of fictitious plates, a seat belt not used, and failure to display proof of insurance. So the question for you is is it sounds like you would still like to proceed to trial or do you want to talk with the prosecution to come to some sort of resolution? No, ma'am.
Uh, but while I am sitting here trying to contemplate whether or not I'm going to file judicial criminal complaint against you and sue you personally who said that I was a sovereign citizen. You did. I never mentioned sovereign.
Okay, Mr I'm going to give you five minutes to make your record and then I'll go ahead. charge you four counts of defamation, liable, and slander. Ready to do that?
I want everything from the last hearing vacated. I want this stricken from the record. To say I'm a sovereign citizen is an oxymoron.
Number one. Number two, you're automatically falsely labeling me a domestic terrorist, and I object to that. Well, number one, if you don't like being called a sovereign citizen, then stop acting like a sovereign citizen.
And number two, if you don't like being called a domestic terrorist, then refer to number one. Okay, you have about three more minutes to make any other additional record that you'd like to make. And it's I got your motion or your order three days ago.
It says motions only filed one motion. The others are notices and I would like to see the statutory authority that allows you as a county court clerk or court judge to make a ruling on an appeal from another judge's court. Do you have that available?
Any other record? I'm going to give you this isn't a back and forth, Mr Schmidt. I'm done.
So I it's not a dialogue. I'm allowing you to make the record. I rule and then we go forward.
So you have additional probably about two and a half more minutes if you'd like to make any additional record. Did you rule on your appeal yet? If not, then it's on hold under an appeal.
and a lockatory appeal. It's an automatic stay. Any other record?
You still have time to make any additional record that you'd like to make? Are you okay? Based on the record, I've already filed and made an extensive record at the last hearing regarding the interlocatory appeal issue.
I have found the court has jurisdiction. I'm not going to revisit those. What we have done now, Mr Schmidt, is you've created a record.
Uh if you find that I've made mistakes, you can always appeal me, but ultimately we are set for trial next week. And so for the prosecution, you will be ready to proceed. Yes, your honor.
Mr Schmidt, will you be ready to proceed? No. And what is the grounds?
That you're incompetent. Sir, I will not sit for you insulting the court. You could be held Let's just Sir, I'm just going to give you a quick warning.
Uh you could be held in contempt of court if you are violating the court's orders or the court's decorum. You're facing up to six months in jail. So, we are talking about the legal issues.
You cannot insult the court or else I'll just have it hold you in contempt. Or you could just hold him in contempt and stop all this nonsense moving forward. But that's just a suggestion.
So the question for you is, will you be ready to proceed for trial? No. Okay.
Are you moving to continue? I do request to continue. What is the grounds?
that I have filed an appeal already and auditory appeal. For the prosecution, what's your position on the defense's motion to continue? I'd object to that motion.
Okay. Based on the record before me, I've already denied that request or made a record regarding interlocatory appeal. I find that the defense has not raised good cause to continue the trial.
Any other record Mr Schmite will allow you to make uh for two minutes? Okay. Your trial is the only case set on Thursday, so you should be ready to proceed.
Has the prosecution have any notice that he's picked up discovery. I can check on that, your honor. Should have a letter if he did.
I'm not seeing that he has picked up discovery. We normally have a letter that he has, but it's not in our file. Mr If you want to know the evidence that's against you, you need to stop by the district attorney's office and pick up discovery.
You ultimately need to be prepared for your trial. So, it's your choice if you decide not to pick up the discovery. Discovery is the evidence that the prosecution will present at your trial.
I will just tell you uh that we have certain very strict procedures for trial. I would suggest that you watch a trial before next Thursday so you have an understanding of what's going to happen. You have made arguments that you that I have ruled are not based under the law.
And I will tell you that I will not allow you to make those arguments before a jury because the jury is going to make a determination as to the facts of the case and whether you are guilty or not guilty of the offenses charge. So, I I just want to set your expectation that you will have to proceed to trial uh with an understanding that the court will not let you raise those arguments. You've already raised them.
I've denied them in a lengthy hearing. I've also denied them in writing. So, on the day of trial, I'll explain quickly the procedures of trial, but ultimately you'll have to make a a decision of how you are going to proceed.
You've had a gentleman here with you previously. I made it clear that he cannot represent you. He is not a licensed attorney who has entered on the case.
He cannot help you during trial. You cannot whisper to him. I allowed for you to talk with him during the motions hearing, but this is different for jury trial.
So ultimately, if you would like to be represented by an attorney for the public defender's office, this is Colorado does not have a procedure where I force an attorney upon you. You must apply for the public defender and show that you qualify. At this point, you've made choices not to be represented.
If you qualify for the the public defender, then you can have an attorney enter on your case. You can hire an attorney. Ultimately, trial is next week.
You've raised these legal arguments. I've denied them. We're proceeding to trial and so you should be ready with the evidence that picking up the evidence and understanding what evidence is against you.
Any record, Mr that you'd like to make? I'll give you two minutes. He is a licensed attorney.
Federal licensed attorney 746 if you'd like to look it up. You have about one more minute if you'd like to make any other argument. And he is my tribal counsel.
Let me guess. You come from the tribe of rock for brain and she doesn't need to look it up because even if what you said was true, having a license to practice law in a federal court means nothing to the state courts. He has to be licensed in Colorado to practice law.
He's not filed a formal entry of appearance and so he cannot represent you. You'll be representing yourself unless you take steps to hire a licensed Colorado attorney or you apply for the public defender. trial is set at 8 am on June 4th and so everyone should be prepared to proceed on that date for the prosecution.
Do you have that information on how we can pick up discovery? I do, your honor. I have a piece of paper right here.
Okay. All right. And for the record then, um, Miss Hanine is handing that to Mr Schmidt.
Mr Schmidt, you can take steps to pick up the discovery in the case. And ultimately, for the prosecution, did you want to lay out for the record what the plea offer is in the case? Sure, your honor.
Um, and just for the record, under the law, the court is going to have the prosecution make what's called a Laughler record, which is a record regarding the plea in the case. So, Mr Schmidt understands what plea offer he's rejecting. Um, so your honor, I haven't been able to convey this, Mr Schmidt yet.
Um, he refused to talk to me without his friend present. I didn't feel comfortable doing that. I don't think his friend understands that he is not his attorney.
Um, but I would dismiss the case if he uh obtained Colorado insurance. Mr Schmidt, did you understand that that if you get Colorado insurance, the prosecution would dismiss the case, we can proceed to to to trial? Um, ultimately, I think I've talked to you already about the possible penalties that you're facing, but it's your choice.
If you decide not to get insurance, but if you'd like to to take the prosecution up on that plea offer, you can contact them. Any other record, Mr Smith? I'll give you two minutes.
I do not understand. I do comprehend Okay, you have two minutes. I Okay, good luck.
We'll see you back here on June 4th at 8 a. m. Don't be late.
If you're even 15 minutes late, you can have a warrant for your arrest. Thank you, sir. All right, so that's the end of the video.
Two of these idiots have upcoming court dates, and the third has already lost his case, but all three of them are losers. So, if you like the video, hit the like button. If you disliked it, hit the dislike.
But don't forget to leave a comment below and subscribe with notifications on so you don't miss any of my content. I'm Team Skeptic and I'm out.
